City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 34.
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Show street view
No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
| Sago Palm Academy School (1.7 miles): | 45 |
| Clewiston Middle School (18.2 miles): | 39 |
| Pahokee Middle-Senior High School (0.0 miles): | 37 |
| Pahokee Elementary School (0.2 miles): | 36 |
| 03-Mm School: | 34 |
| K Cunningham/Canal Point Elementary School (2.9 miles): | 26 |
| Lake Shore Middle School (9.4 miles): | 17 |
| Lakeside Academy School (10.3 miles): | 12 |
| Lake Shore Annex School (9.8 miles): | 0 |
03-Mm School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
| Florida: | 45 |
| Palm Beach County: | 45 |
| Pahokee: | 24 |
| 03-Mm School: | 34 |
1
Yvette Petrose
Sep 28, 2017 @ 4:04 am
Do you have private school in east orange county???
2
stapa
Jun 24, 2019 @ 6:06 am
very useful information. Easy to go through including the street view
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
School number: 3921
School type: Middle/Jr. High
District Name: PALM BEACH
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 8
2009-2010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 58% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 71% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 84% |
| State average from 612 schools: | 73% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| 03-MM: | 90% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 88% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 50% |
| State average from 612 schools: | 51% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 56% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 64% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 76% |
| State average from 612 schools: | 70% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| 03-MM: | 50% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 62% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 10| Here: | 61% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 68% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 535 |
| State average from 613 schools: | 545 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: NO| Here: | 98% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES
Grade in 2010: Pending
Grade in 2009: C
Grade in 2008: B
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: B
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 119999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 22% |
| State average from 614 schools: | 56% |
Minority Rate
Region: 4| Here: | 11% |
| State average from 614 schools: | 49% |
Title I: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1082 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1083 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 474
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| 03-MM: | 55% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 966
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 79% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 965
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 969 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 970 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 426
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 57% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 871
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 81% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 869
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 27
Number of Students Tested in Math: 27
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 36 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 36 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 269 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 267 (97%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 92% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 38% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 224
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 66% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 224
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 100 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 100 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 82% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 92
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 85
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 92
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 87
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2008-2009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 52% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 70% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 84% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 71% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 85% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 92% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 53% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 49% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 46% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 66% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 75% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 69% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 38% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 10| Here: | 60% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 67% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| 03-MM: | 503 |
| State average from 613 schools: | 553 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: NO| Here: | 97% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: NO
Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Reading: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
Grade in 2009: C
Grade in 2008: B
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: B
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 17% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 52% |
Minority Rate
Region: 4| 03-MM: | 11% |
| State average from 613 schools: | 48% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1048 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1044 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 93% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 49% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 951
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 80% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 949
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 930 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 926 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 94% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| 03-MM: | 50% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 843
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 82% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 840
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 41 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 41 (95%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 37
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 38
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 36 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 35 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 32
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 31
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 192 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 190 (94%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 87% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 35% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 173
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 66% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 175
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 120 (92%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 120 (90%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 75% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| 03-MM: | 20% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 98
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| 03-MM: | 47% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 102
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2007-2008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 58% |
| State average from 603 schools: | 69% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 83% |
| State average from 603 schools: | 70% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| 03-MM: | 87% |
| State average from 603 schools: | 88% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 55% |
| State average from 602 schools: | 46% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 57% |
| State average from 602 schools: | 65% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 72% |
| State average from 602 schools: | 71% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 41% |
| State average from 602 schools: | 64% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 0| Here: | 57% |
| State average from 602 schools: | 69% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 510 |
| State average from 602 schools: | 543 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES| Here: | 98% |
| State average from 604 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
Grade in 2008: B
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: B
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 14% |
| State average from 605 schools: | 49% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 11% |
| State average from 605 schools: | 48% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1108 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1105 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 93% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 54% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1037
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 78% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1031
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 966 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 963 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 93% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 57% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 902
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 81% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 897
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 57 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 56 (96%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 29
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 56
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 53
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 53
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 50
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 37 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 38 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 37
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 38
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 186 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 184 (95%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 84% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 38% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 166
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 58% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 163
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 137 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 130 (92%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| 03-MM: | 71% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| 03-MM: | 29% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 115
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 42% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 110
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1394 |
| State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 316 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 17% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 17% |
| State average: | 11% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 31% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| 03-MM: | 24% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| 03-MM: | 10% |
| State average: | 8% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 66% |
| State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 17 |
| State average: | 17 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1642 |
| State average: | 1604 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 330 |
| State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 9% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 17% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 33% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 28% |
| State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 13% |
| State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 73% |
| State average: | 72% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 20 |
| State average: | 19 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 2 |
| State average: | 2 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1616 |
| State average: | 1659 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 304 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 16% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 13% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 38% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 30% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| 03-MM: | 3% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 71% |
| State average: | 70% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 3 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 16 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 11 |
| State average: | 10 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 2 |
| State average: | 2 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 2011 |
| State average: | 1922 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| 03-MM: | 328 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 13% |
| State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| 03-MM: | 27% |
| State average: | 30% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 34% |
| State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 18% |
| State average: | 12% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 8% |
| State average: | 7% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 60% |
| State average: | 45% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 12 |
| State average: | 11 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 2052 |
| State average: | 1938 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 323 |
| State average: | 302 |
Percent Passing
| 03-MM: | 72% |
| State average: | 56% |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| 03-MM: | 18% |
| State average: | 35% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 34% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 24% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 8% |
| State average: | 8% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 15% |
| State average: | 12% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 48% |
| State average: | 37% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| 03-MM: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 16 |
| State average: | 15 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 306 |
| State average: | 321 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 21% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 42% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| 03-MM: | 31% |
| State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 6% |
| State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 37% |
| State average: | 51% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
| 03-MM: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 320 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 16% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 38% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 39% |
| State average: | 30% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 6% |
| State average: | 5% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 1% |
| State average: | 1% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 46% |
| State average: | 36% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
| 03-MM: | 9 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
| 03-MM: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1442 |
| State average: | 1481 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 331 |
| State average: | 339 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 12% |
| State average: | 8% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 17% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 28% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| 03-MM: | 31% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 12% |
| State average: | 16% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 71% |
| State average: | 79% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| 03-MM: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1666 |
| State average: | 1585 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| 03-MM: | 348 |
| State average: | 330 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 13% |
| State average: | 10% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 13% |
| State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 22% |
| State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| 03-MM: | 30% |
| State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 23% |
| State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 75% |
| State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1661 |
| State average: | 1674 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 331 |
| State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 13% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 22% |
| State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 25% |
| State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 33% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| 03-MM: | 6% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 65% |
| State average: | 63% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| 03-MM: | 8 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| 03-MM: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1992 |
| State average: | 1925 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 322 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| 03-MM: | 8% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 17% |
| State average: | 22% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 32% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| 03-MM: | 31% |
| State average: | 21% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 13% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 75% |
| State average: | 61% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 2061 |
| State average: | 1995 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 342 |
| State average: | 326 |
Percent Passing
| Here: | 90% |
| State average: | 80% |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 5% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 11% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 26% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 44% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 14% |
| State average: | 8% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 83% |
| State average: | 69% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1405 |
| State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%| Here: | 317 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1579 |
| State average: | 1605 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%| Here: | 319 |
| State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 06%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 05
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1647 |
| State average: | 1656 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%| 03-MM: | 310 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 2001 |
| State average: | 1907 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%| 03-MM: | 326 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1996 |
| State average: | 1921 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Percent Passing: 65%| Here: | 313 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%| Here: | 304 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%| Here: | 319 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1426 |
| State average: | 1476 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%| Here: | 327 |
| State average: | 338 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1546 |
| State average: | 1578 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%| Here: | 321 |
| State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1672 |
| State average: | 1675 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%| 03-MM: | 334 |
| State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 2007 |
| State average: | 1925 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%| Here: | 327 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 2030 |
| State average: | 1972 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Percent Passing: 86%| Here: | 335 |
| State average: | 321 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 65
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 8%| Here: | 4 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 46%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 92%
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 518
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%| Here: | 4 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 31%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 80%
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1432 |
| State average: | 1396 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%| Here: | 322 |
| State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1499 |
| State average: | 1582 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%| Here: | 306 |
| State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1573 |
| State average: | 1627 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%| Here: | 296 |
| State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1992 |
| State average: | 1894 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%| Here: | 325 |
| State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 2052 |
| State average: | 1935 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Percent Passing: 70%| Here: | 323 |
| State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 9
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%| Here: | 294 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 35%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%| Here: | 321 |
| State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1436 |
| State average: | 1461 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%| Here: | 329 |
| State average: | 335 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1518 |
| State average: | 1563 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%| Here: | 314 |
| State average: | 325 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| 03-MM: | 1690 |
| State average: | 1668 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%| 03-MM: | 337 |
| State average: | 333 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1983 |
| State average: | 1915 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%| Here: | 319 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 2037 |
| State average: | 1984 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Percent Passing: 87%| Here: | 336 |
| State average: | 323 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 65 |
| State average: | 103 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 635 |
| State average from 3241 schools: | 633 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 63 |
| State average: | 61 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
| 03-MM: | 57 |
| State average: | 97 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 640 |
| State average from 3233 schools: | 653 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 59 |
| State average: | 69 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 14 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 11 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)
| 03-MM: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 10 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 15 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 8 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
| 03-MM: | 55 |
| State average: | 101 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 654 |
| State average from 3309 schools: | 667 |
Median NPR
| 03-MM: | 61 |
| State average: | 71 |
Literary (max 18)
| 03-MM: | 12 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 11 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)
| 03-MM: | 12 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 533 |
| State average: | 273 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 708 |
| State average from 2275 schools: | 694 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 74 |
| State average: | 61 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 12 |
| State average: | 11 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 11 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| 03-MM: | 15 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 544 |
| State average: | 237 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 725 |
| State average from 2096 schools: | 709 |
Median NPR
| 03-MM: | 80 |
| State average: | 65 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 14 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 14 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 8 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 16 |
| State average: | 15 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 11 |
| State average: | 10 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 8 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 58
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 22%| Here: | 277 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 41%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 34%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 34%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 12%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 62%
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 554
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 12%| Here: | 322 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 11%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 66%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%| 03-MM: | 4 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 32%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 7%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 5%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 82%
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.