Dan Mccarty Middle School in Fort Pierce, Florida (FL) - Test Results, Rating, Ranking, Grades, Scores, Classes, Enrollment, Teachers, Students, and Report Card

City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 16.

1201 MISSISSIPPI AVE
Fort Pierce, FL 34950

Show street view No street view available for this location

Other nearby schools ratings:

Data House School (4.0 miles):	89
Lincoln Park Academy School (1.7 miles):	64
Allapattah Flats K-8 School (2.1 miles):	50
Fau/Slcsd Palm Pointe Research School (12.4 miles):	46
Northport K-8 School (7.6 miles):	34
Oak Hammock K-8 School (11.3 miles):	25
Dan Mccarty Middle School:	16
Homebound Program School (2.1 miles):	13
Indian Hills School (0.3 miles):	0

Dan Mccarty Middle School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:

Florida:	45
St. Lucie County:	39
Fort Pierce:	40
Dan Mccarty Middle School:	16

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:

Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum

Phone: (772) 468-5700 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 56
School number: 72
School type: Middle/Jr. High
District Name: ST. LUCIE
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 8
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (772) 595-1124
Principal: Catherine Smith
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 23
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 78
Senate District: 26

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	48%
State average from 613 schools:	71%

Meeting High Standards in Math

DAN MCCARTY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	44%
State average from 612 schools:	73%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	81%
State average from 613 schools:	88%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	27%
State average from 612 schools:	51%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	60%
State average from 613 schools:	64%

Making Math Gains

Here:	66%
State average from 612 schools:	70%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	67%
State average from 613 schools:	62%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	74%
State average from 613 schools:	68%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	467
State average from 613 schools:	545

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 613 schools:	100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: C

Grade in 2009: C

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: D

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 119999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	90%
State average from 614 schools:	56%

Minority Rate

Here:	84%
State average from 614 schools:	49%

Region: 3

Title I: YES

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 781 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 780 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 217
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	44%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 729
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 710

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	40%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 728
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 709
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 124 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 124 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 41
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	64%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 108
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 101

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	55%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 108
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 100
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 465 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 465 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	93%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 120
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	36%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 441
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 434

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	32%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 441
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 434
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 170 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 169 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	94%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 47
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

DAN MCCARTY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	53%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 159
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 155

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	52%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 158
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 155
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 706 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 705 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 198
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	43%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 665
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 648

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	39%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 664
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 647
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 80 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 80 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 75
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 74
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 75
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 74
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 141 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 141 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	86%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 42
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	23%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 133
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 128

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	23%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 133
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 128
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	44%
State average from 613 schools:	70%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	39%
State average from 613 schools:	71%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	84%
State average from 613 schools:	92%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	20%
State average from 613 schools:	49%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	62%
State average from 613 schools:	66%

Making Math Gains

Here:	62%
State average from 613 schools:	69%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	72%
State average from 613 schools:	68%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	67%
State average from 613 schools:	67%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	450
State average from 613 schools:	553

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 613 schools:	100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: C

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: D

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	89%
State average from 613 schools:	52%

Minority Rate

Here:	83%
State average from 613 schools:	48%

Region: 3

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 867 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 867 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 330
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	40%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 820
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 787

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	36%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 820
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 788
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 146 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 146 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 50
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	53%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 134
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 127

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	48%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 134
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 127
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 506 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 506 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	94%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 200
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	33%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 480
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 458

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	29%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 480
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 459
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 188 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 188 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 73
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	47%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 181
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 177

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	44%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 181
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 177
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 768 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 768 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	94%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 285
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	38%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 725
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 698

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	34%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 725
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 699
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 95 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 95 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 35
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 87
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 73
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 87
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 73
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 141 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 141 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 50

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	24%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 134
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 126

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	21%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 134
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 126
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	49%
State average from 603 schools:	69%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	45%
State average from 603 schools:	70%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	85%
State average from 603 schools:	88%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	26%
State average from 602 schools:	46%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	65%
State average from 602 schools:	65%

Making Math Gains

Here:	73%
State average from 602 schools:	71%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	71%
State average from 602 schools:	64%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	80%
State average from 602 schools:	69%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

DAN MCCARTY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	494
State average from 602 schools:	543

Percent Tested

Here:	97%
State average from 604 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: D

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	82%
State average from 605 schools:	49%

Minority Rate

Here:	78%
State average from 605 schools:	48%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 811 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 811 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	94%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 263
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	45%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 766
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 732

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	40%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 765
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 733
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 185 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 184 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 82
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	64%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 177
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 166

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	63%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 176
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 166
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 431 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 431 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	92%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 125
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	34%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 401
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 384

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	28%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 400
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 383
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 172 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 173 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 47
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	52%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 166
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 161

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

DAN MCCARTY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	46%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 167
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 163
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 667 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 668 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	93%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 193
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	41%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 632
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 606

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	36%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 632
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 607
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 65 (88%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 66 (88%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 64
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 62
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 65
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 63
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 134 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 135 (96%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 28

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	23%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 129
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 118

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	18%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 130
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 120
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	45%
State average from 539 schools:	64%

Meeting High Standards in Math

DAN MCCARTY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	41%
State average from 539 schools:	64%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	81%
State average from 539 schools:	91%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	29%
State average from 538 schools:	44%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	50%
State average from 539 schools:	61%

Making Math Gains

Here:	54%
State average from 539 schools:	69%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	60%
State average from 539 schools:	64%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	60%
State average from 539 schools:	67%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns

Here:	420
State average from 539 schools:	523

Percent Tested

Here:	99%
State average from 539 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: D

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	73%
State average from 541 schools:	49%

Minority Rate

Here:	69%
State average from 542 schools:	53%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1062 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1063 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	90%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 394
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	39%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1005
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	36%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1005
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 331 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 330 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	95%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 152
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	54%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 316
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	55%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 315
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 513 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 514 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	86%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 169
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	25%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 484
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	22%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 485
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 184 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 185 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	87%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 60
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	43%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 171
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	34%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 171
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 776 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 776 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	88%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 266
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

DAN MCCARTY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	32%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 728
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	28%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 727
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 85 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 85 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 24
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 81
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 80
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 173 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 174 (96%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	74%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 61
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	6%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 162
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	9%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 162
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	56%
State average from 526 schools:	64%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	51%
State average from 526 schools:	63%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	81%
State average from 526 schools:	89%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	67%
State average from 526 schools:	66%

Making Math Gains

Here:	63%
State average from 526 schools:	71%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	75%
State average from 526 schools:	72%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns

Here:	393
State average from 526 schools:	425

Percent Tested

Here:	99%
State average from 526 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

DAN MCCARTY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	58%
State average from 525 schools:	50%

Minority Rate

Here:	52%
State average from 526 schools:	52%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1072 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1069 (98%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

DAN MCCARTY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	90%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 364
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	51%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1017
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	46%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1017
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 519 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 517 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	97%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 178

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	64%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 498
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	62%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 497
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 375 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 375 (98%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	80%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 123

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	31%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 356
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	24%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 357
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 136 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 135 (96%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	89%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 44

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	47%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 125
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	42%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 125
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 627 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 626 (98%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	85%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 186

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

DAN MCCARTY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	40%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 586
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	33%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 587
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 58 (86%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 57 (85%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 18

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	30%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 54

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	37%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 54
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 150 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 150 (98%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	64%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 50

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	20%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 140
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

DAN MCCARTY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	18%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 141
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	51%
State average from 505 schools:	59%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	52%
State average from 505 schools:	60%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	79%
State average from 506 schools:	83%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	61%
State average from 505 schools:	61%

Making Math Gains

Here:	70%
State average from 505 schools:	69%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

DAN MCCARTY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	74%
State average from 505 schools:	66%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns

Here:	387
State average from 506 schools:	397

Percent Tested

Here:	98%
State average from 506 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	59%
State average from 506 schools:	51%

Minority Rate

Here:	50%
State average from 506 schools:	50%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1049
State average:	1402

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	259
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	41%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	26%
State average:	11%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	25%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	8%
State average:	32%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	33%
State average:	74%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	3
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	13
State average:	17

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	3
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	2
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1298
State average:	1604

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	271
State average:	324

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	51%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	17%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 3

DAN MCCARTY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	23%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	9%
State average:	29%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	32%
State average:	72%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	15
State average:	19

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	6
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	2
State average:	2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1394
State average:	1659

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	264
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	45%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	15%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	28%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	12%
State average:	28%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	40%
State average:	70%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	2
State average:	3

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	12
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	8
State average:	10

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	1
State average:	2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1532
State average:	1716

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	279
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	36%
State average:	19%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	26%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	22%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	13%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 5

DAN MCCARTY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	3%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	38%
State average:	65%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	11
State average:	14

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	6
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	3
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1715
State average:	1810

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	299
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	25%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	22%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	39%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	10%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	4%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	53%
State average:	65%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	15
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	3
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1820
State average:	1876

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	296
State average:	308

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	25%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 2

DAN MCCARTY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	32%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	30%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	10%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	2%
State average:	3%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	43%
State average:	52%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	4
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	15
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	6
State average:	6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1901
State average:	1922

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	308
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	23%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	38%
State average:	30%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	28%
State average:	26%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	8%
State average:	12%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	3%
State average:	7%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

DAN MCCARTY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	40%
State average:	45%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

DAN MCCARTY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	11
State average:	11

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	7
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1939
State average:	1938

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	302
State average:	302

Percent Passing

Here:	56%
State average:	56%

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	32%
State average:	35%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	39%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	17%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	7%
State average:	8%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	6%
State average:	12%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	29%
State average:	37%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	14
State average:	15

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

DAN MCCARTY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	7
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	7
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	268
State average:	321

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	45%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	40%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	14%
State average:	36%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	2%
State average:	11%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	16%
State average:	51%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

Here:	7
State average:	9

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	6
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

Here:	6
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

Here:	6
State average:	9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	286
State average:	307

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	40%
State average:	27%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	34%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	21%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	4%
State average:	8%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	1%
State average:	2%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	26%
State average:	41%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

DAN MCCARTY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	8
State average:	9

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	6
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

Here:	7
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

Here:	6
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

DAN MCCARTY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	298
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	33%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	35%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	29%
State average:	30%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	3%
State average:	5%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	32%
State average:	36%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

Here:	8
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	7
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

Here:	7
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1205
State average:	1481

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	280
State average:	339

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	26%
State average:	8%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	31%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	25%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 4

DAN MCCARTY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	18%
State average:	31%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	43%
State average:	79%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	6
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	3
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	3
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	3
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	4
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1408
State average:	1585

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	289
State average:	330

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	32%
State average:	10%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	21%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 3

DAN MCCARTY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	26%
State average:	36%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	17%
State average:	26%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	4%
State average:	11%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	47%
State average:	74%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	6
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

DAN MCCARTY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	3
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1442
State average:	1674

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	285
State average:	334

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	43%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	33%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	15%
State average:	27%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	8%
State average:	28%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	23%
State average:	63%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	5
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	4
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	5
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	4
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	4
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1548
State average:	1696

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	281
State average:	315

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	48%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	25%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	22%
State average:	29%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	4%
State average:	18%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	27%
State average:	55%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

DAN MCCARTY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	3
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

DAN MCCARTY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	5
State average:	6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1701
State average:	1786

Mean Scale Score 100-500

DAN MCCARTY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	284
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	38%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	19%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	32%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	9%
State average:	19%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	1%
State average:	7%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	42%
State average:	57%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	3
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

DAN MCCARTY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	4
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1833
State average:	1892

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	305
State average:	320

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	20%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	31%
State average:	21%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	37%
State average:	38%

% in each Achievement Level 4

DAN MCCARTY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	10%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	2%
State average:	10%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	48%
State average:	64%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	4
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

DAN MCCARTY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	6
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	4
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1916
State average:	1925

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	300
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	16%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	25%
State average:	22%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	39%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	16%
State average:	21%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	5%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	59%
State average:	61%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	4
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2010
State average:	1995

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	330
State average:	326

Percent Passing

Here:	85%
State average:	80%

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	10%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	19%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	29%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	38%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	4%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	71%
State average:	69%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	7
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	8
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	6
State average:	5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1067
State average:	1402

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	262
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 53%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 31%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1301
State average:	1605

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	272
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 06%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 40%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 04
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 08
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 02

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1325
State average:	1656

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	252
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 55%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 27%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1561
State average:	1707

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	284
State average:	310

% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1677
State average:	1800

Mean Scale Score 100-500

DAN MCCARTY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	292
State average:	315

% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

DAN MCCARTY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	1788
State average:	1864

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	289
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 31%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1882
State average:	1907

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	305
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1895
State average:	1921

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	294
State average:	299

Percent Passing: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 31%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	252
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 67%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 6%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	267
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 51%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 18%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	293
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 25%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1095
State average:	1476

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	256
State average:	338

% in each Achievement Level 1: 51%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 32%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1327
State average:	1578

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	271
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1457
State average:	1675

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	288
State average:	334

% in each Achievement Level 1: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 22%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1532
State average:	1679

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	277
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 32%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1680
State average:	1799

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	279
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 31%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

DAN MCCARTY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	1796
State average:	1876

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	295
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 41%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1940
State average:	1925

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	307
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

DAN MCCARTY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	1974
State average:	1972

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	321
State average:	321

Percent Passing: 78%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 55

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	4
State average from 27 schools:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 40%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 80%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 289

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	4
State average from 27 schools:	59

Unscore - Combined: 1
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 40%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 79%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 391

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	4
State average from 27 schools:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 68%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1575
State average:	1696

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	287
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1658
State average:	1775

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	288
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

DAN MCCARTY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	1815
State average:	1857

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	295
State average:	304

% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 41%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1860
State average:	1894

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	300
State average:	307

% in each Achievement Level 1: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 37%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1867
State average:	1935

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	289
State average:	302

Percent Passing: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 27%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

DAN MCCARTY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	282
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 24%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	301
State average:	302

% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 32%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1523
State average:	1670

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	275
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 24%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1712
State average:	1801

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	287
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 37%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1831
State average:	1882

Mean Scale Score 100-500

DAN MCCARTY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	304
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

DAN MCCARTY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	1918
State average:	1915

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	300
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1973
State average:	1984

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	321
State average:	323

Percent Passing: 79%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	7
State average:	103

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	1
State average:	97

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Number of Students

DAN MCCARTY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	2
State average:	101

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Number of Students

DAN MCCARTY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	210
State average:	190

Mean Scale Score

Here:	659
State average from 2604 schools:	671

Median NPR

Here:	53
State average:	63

Literary (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	11
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	7
State average:	8

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	13
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

DAN MCCARTY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	9
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Number of Students

DAN MCCARTY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	314
State average:	201

Mean Scale Score

Here:	667
State average from 2487 schools:	682

Median NPR

Here:	54
State average:	66

Literary (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

Here:	11
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	11
State average:	12

Initial Understanding (max 12)

DAN MCCARTY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	9
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	13
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	6
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	276
State average:	192

Mean Scale Score

Here:	680
State average from 2497 schools:	687

Median NPR

DAN MCCARTY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	57
State average:	63

Literary (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	12

Informational (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	7
State average:	7

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	13
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	10

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	441
State average:	273

Mean Scale Score

Here:	691
State average from 2275 schools:	694

Median NPR

Here:	58
State average:	61

Literary (max 18)

DAN MCCARTY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	12
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	11
State average:	11

Functional (max 18)

Here:	11
State average:	11

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	7
State average:	7

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	14
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	5
State average:	5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	354
State average:	237

Mean Scale Score

Here:	704
State average from 2096 schools:	709

Median NPR

DAN MCCARTY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	62
State average:	65

Literary (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	14

Initial Understanding (max 12)

DAN MCCARTY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	8
State average:	8

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	15
State average:	15

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	10

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 1

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 274

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	269
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 30%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

DAN MCCARTY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 37%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 80%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 391

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	278
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 40%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

DAN MCCARTY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 32%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 70%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1498
State average from 878 schools:	1661

Mean Scale Score 100-500

DAN MCCARTY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	273
State average:	302

% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 90%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1509
State average:	1663

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1494
State average:	1592

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 15

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1700
State average from 808 schools:	1746

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	296
State average:	305

% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 89%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1724
State average:	1743

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1670
State average:	1668

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 54

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1754
State average from 819 schools:	1810

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	282
State average:	294

% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 87%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1762
State average:	1807

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1699
State average:	1738

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 63

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	274
State average:	290

% in each Achievement Level 1: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 25%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1449
State average from 873 schools:	1641

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	258
State average:	302

% in each Achievement Level 1: 61%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 19%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 90%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1463
State average:	1645

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1516
State average:	1620

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: -54

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1738
State average from 804 schools:	1777

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	293
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 89%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1758
State average:	1774

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1646
State average:	1645

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 113

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1774
State average from 815 schools:	1851

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	290
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 40%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 86%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1783
State average:	1845

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1701
State average:	1755

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 82

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 338

Mean Scale Score

DAN MCCARTY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	653
State average from 874 schools:	671

Median NPR: 47
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 281

Mean Scale Score

Here:	670
State average from 796 schools:	675

Median NPR: 57
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 407

Mean Scale Score

Here:	674
State average from 810 schools:	685

Median NPR: 51
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 14): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 338

Mean Scale Score

Here:	649
State average from 874 schools:	669

Median NPR: 44
Number Sense (max 10): 5
Operations (max 12): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 3
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 281

Mean Scale Score

Here:	678
State average from 796 schools:	685

Median NPR: 64
Number Sense (max 9): 5
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 406

Mean Scale Score

Here:	684
State average from 810 schools:	698

Median NPR: 56
Number Sense (max 9): 5
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 405

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	253
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 21%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 9
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	3
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 35%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 75%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 52%

City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DC	DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID
IL	IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	MD
ME	MI	MN	MO	MS	MT	NC
ND	NE	NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY
OH	OK	OR	PA	RI	SC	SD
TN	TX	UT	VA	VT	WA	WI
WV	WY

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID	IL
IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	ME	MI
MN	MO	MS	MT	NC	ND	NE
NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	SD	TN	TX
VA	VT	WA	WI	WV	WY

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID	IL
IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	ME	MI
MN	MO	MS	MT	NC	ND	NE
NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	SD	TN	TX
VA	VT	WA	WI	WV	WY

AL	AZ	CA	CO	CT	DE	FL
GA	HI	IA	ID	IL	IN	KS
LA	MA	MD	MI	MN	MO	NC
NE	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	TN	TX	UT
VA	WA	WI	WV

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DC	DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID
IL	IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	MD
ME	MI	MN	MO	MS	MT	NC
ND	NE	NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY
OH	OK	OR	PA	RI	SC	SD
TN	TX	UT	VA	VT	WA	WI
WV	WY