Educational Horizons Charter School in West Melbourne, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 26.

1281 S WICKHAM RD
West Melbourne, FL 32904

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Wabasso School (18.3 miles):

96
New School (17.7 miles):

90
Royal Palm Charter School (8.7 miles):

84
Explorer Elementary/Middle Charter School (1.9 miles):

52
Educational Horizons Charter School:

26
South Area Alternative Learning Center School (3.9 miles):

17
Osprey Elementary School (15.3 miles):

4
Einstein Montessori School (19.4 miles):

1
Educational Horizons Charter School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Brevard County:

49
West Melbourne:

39
Educational Horizons Charter:

26

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:



Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (321) 729-0786 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 5
School number: 6511
School type: Elementary
District Name: BREVARD
Grade range: KINDERGARTEN TO GRADE 6
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (321) 729-8403
Principal: Aileen Tapp
Regular charter school.
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 15
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 31
Senate District: 24
School Web Address: http://www.educationalhorizons.net

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

100%
State average from 24 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

92%
State average from 24 schools:

77%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

86%
State average from 24 schools:

84%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

71%
State average from 24 schools:

54%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

85%
State average from 24 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
Here:

71%
State average from 24 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

85%
State average from 24 schools:

58%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

71%
State average from 24 schools:

68%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

661
State average from 24 schools:

548
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 24 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

22%
State average from 24 schools:

53%
Minority Rate
Here:

27%
State average from 24 schools:

40%
Region: 3

Title I: NO


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 24 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
EDUCATIONAL HORIZONS CHARTER:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16
Number of Students Tested in Math: 16
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

82%
State average from 24 schools:

72%
Meeting High Standards in Math
EDUCATIONAL HORIZONS CHARTER:

74%
State average from 23 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

90%
State average from 23 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

70%
State average from 23 schools:

55%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

63%
State average from 23 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

53%
State average from 23 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
EDUCATIONAL HORIZONS CHARTER:

63%
State average from 24 schools:

65%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

53%
State average from 23 schools:

66%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

548
State average from 23 schools:

557
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 23 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

33%
State average from 23 schools:

52%
Minority Rate
Here:

33%
State average from 23 schools:

40%
Region: 3


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 32 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 32 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

79%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

72%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 27
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 27 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19 (83%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

79%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

75%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 40 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 40 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

63%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

54%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 27
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 45 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 45 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

100%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 11
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

75%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 40
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

63%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 40
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 37 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 37 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 9

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

79%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 33
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

70%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 33
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1666
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
EDUCATIONAL HORIZONS CHARTER:

334
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

10%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

60%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

20%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

10%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
EDUCATIONAL HORIZONS CHARTER:

90%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

20
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
EDUCATIONAL HORIZONS CHARTER:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1563
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

325
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

30%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

40%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

20%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

10%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

70%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1381
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

313
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1345
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

310
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 9

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
EDUCATIONAL HORIZONS CHARTER:

1439
State average:

1396
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

323
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1384
State average:

1461
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

318
State average:

335
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 64%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

11
State average:

103
Mean Scale Score
EDUCATIONAL HORIZONS CHARTER:

640
State average from 3241 schools:

633
Median NPR
Here:

67
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
EDUCATIONAL HORIZONS CHARTER:

14
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
EDUCATIONAL HORIZONS CHARTER:

9
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
EDUCATIONAL HORIZONS CHARTER:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

5
State average:

97

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

8
State average:

101

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
EDUCATIONAL HORIZONS CHARTER:

3
State average:

190

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 5

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1247
State average:

1342
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

291
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1558
State average from 1875 schools:

1542
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

316
State average:

313
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 67%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1501
State average:

1546
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1317
State average:

1397
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 184

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1221
State average:

1413
Mean Scale Score 100-500
EDUCATIONAL HORIZONS CHARTER:

283
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1457
State average from 1874 schools:

1525
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

300
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 54%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1473
State average:

1528
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1385
State average:

1414
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 87

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 13
Mean Scale Score
Here:

620
State average from 1891 schools:

633
Median NPR: 50
Literary (max 18): 11
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 13
Mean Scale Score
Here:

650
State average from 1874 schools:

642
Median NPR: 68
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 13
Mean Scale Score
Here:

608
State average from 1891 schools:

632
Median NPR: 49
Number Sense (max 14): 10
Operations (max 11): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 3
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 13
Mean Scale Score
Here:

633
State average from 1874 schools:

652
Median NPR: 62
Number Sense (max 12): 9
Operations (max 12): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 13
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

231
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 54%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 15%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 15%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 13
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

2
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 38%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 8%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 15%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 8%


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2020 Advameg, Inc.