City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 47.
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Show street view
No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
| Hospital/Homebound School (18.5 miles): | 90 |
| Tampa Bay Tech High School (5.0 miles): | 63 |
| Hospital/Homebound School (18.5 miles): | 55 |
| Hillsborough High School: | 47 |
| Wiregrass Ranch High School (15.4 miles): | 43 |
| Jefferson High School (4.7 miles): | 30 |
| Pinellas Park High School (18.1 miles): | 14 |
| Ewes-Eckerd Youth Conservation School (18.1 miles): | 1 |
Hillsborough High School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
| Florida: | 45 |
| Hillsborough County: | 42 |
| Tampa: | 41 |
| Hillsborough High School: | 47 |
1
Raymond C. Wournell
May 22, 2011 @ 8:20 pm
How can I obtain a copy of my diploma? I finished my high school education at Hillsborough High back in 1976 or 1977. Thank-you, Ray Wournell
2
Elsie v. Roche
Oct 25, 2012 @ 10:22 pm
how can I get a copy of my high school diploma? I finish my high school at Leto High School in 1995
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
District Number: 29
School number: 1881
School type: Senior High
District Name: HILLSBOROUGH
Grade range: GRADES 9 TO 12
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (813) 276-5629
Magnet Program.
Principal: William Orr
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 11
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 58
Senate District: 18
2009-2010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 78% |
| State average from 451 schools: | 62% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 83% |
| State average from 451 schools: | 77% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 76% |
| State average from 452 schools: | 86% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 57% |
| State average from 451 schools: | 48% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 58% |
| State average from 452 schools: | 58% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 68% |
| State average from 449 schools: | 72% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 54% |
| State average from 452 schools: | 52% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| HILLSBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL: | 64% |
| State average from 452 schools: | 67% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 538 |
| State average from 452 schools: | 522 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES| HILLSBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL: | 100% |
| State average from 450 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES
Grade in 2010: A
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 119999: B
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 52% |
| State average from 454 schools: | 50% |
Minority Rate
Region: 4| Here: | 36% |
| State average from 454 schools: | 47% |
Title I: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 456 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 455 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 91% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 71% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 422
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| HILLSBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL: | 77% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 420
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 295 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 294 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 85
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 79% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 280
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 85% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 278
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 86 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 86 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 34
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| HILLSBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL: | 49% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 78
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 53% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 78
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 56 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 56 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 46
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 46
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 236 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 236 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 86% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 59% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 210
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| HILLSBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL: | 66% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 210
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 20
Number of Students Tested in Math: 20
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 64 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 63 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 26
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 61
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 61
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 60
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 60
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2008-2009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 85% |
| State average from 443 schools: | 60% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 85% |
| State average from 440 schools: | 75% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 77% |
| State average from 443 schools: | 85% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| HILLSBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL: | 68% |
| State average from 443 schools: | 46% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 75% |
| State average from 441 schools: | 59% |
Making Math Gains
| HILLSBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL: | 75% |
| State average from 442 schools: | 72% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| HILLSBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL: | 71% |
| State average from 442 schools: | 56% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 76% |
| State average from 441 schools: | 66% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 612 |
| State average from 441 schools: | 522 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 448 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 1999: B
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 45% |
| State average from 446 schools: | 46% |
Minority Rate
Region: 4| Here: | 34% |
| State average from 451 schools: | 45% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 438 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 438 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 93% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 78% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 403
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 79% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 403
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 287 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 287 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| HILLSBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL: | 94% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 82% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 269
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| HILLSBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL: | 84% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 269
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 80 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 80 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 61% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 69
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| HILLSBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL: | 56% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 69
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 44 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 44 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 40
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 40
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 190 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 190 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| HILLSBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL: | 90% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 65% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 173
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 65% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 173
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 67 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 67 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 23
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 61
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 61
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 61
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 61
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2007-2008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 83% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 61% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 79% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 75% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| HILLSBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL: | 74% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 82% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| HILLSBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL: | 49% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 45% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 68% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 61% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 65% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 74% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 63% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 55% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 64% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 71% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 545 |
| State average from 425 schools: | 526 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 1999: B
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 44% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 42% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 33% |
| State average from 425 schools: | 44% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 428 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 428 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 82% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 75% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 388
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 72% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 388
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 288 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 288 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| HILLSBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL: | 82% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 81% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 271
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 76% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 271
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 69 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 69 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 61
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 56
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 61
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 56
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 45 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 45 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 42
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 40
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 42
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 40
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 180 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 180 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 78% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| HILLSBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL: | 59% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 159
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 57% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 159
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 29
Number of Students Tested in Math: 29
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 66 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 66 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| HILLSBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL: | 33% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 60
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 35% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 60
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2006-2007 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 45% |
| State average from 370 schools: | 45% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| HILLSBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL: | 66% |
| State average from 370 schools: | 69% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| HILLSBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL: | 91% |
| State average from 370 schools: | 84% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 55% |
| State average from 370 schools: | 41% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 55% |
| State average from 370 schools: | 52% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 72% |
| State average from 370 schools: | 71% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 46% |
| State average from 370 schools: | 49% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 0| Here: | 67% |
| State average from 370 schools: | 67% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
| HILLSBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL: | 497 |
| State average from 370 schools: | 482 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: NO| HILLSBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL: | 97% |
| State average from 370 schools: | 97% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
Grade in 2007: C
Grade in 2006: D
Grade in 2005: D
Grade in 2004: D
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 54% |
| State average from 372 schools: | 38% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 72% |
| State average from 372 schools: | 48% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1071 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1064 (97%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 94% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 40% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 60% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 269 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 269 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| HILLSBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL: | 100% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| HILLSBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL: | 72% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| HILLSBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL: | 84% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 379 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 376 (96%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| HILLSBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL: | 90% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 20% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 42% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 313 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 309 (96%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 92% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 23% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 48% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 68 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 68 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 67
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 67
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 628 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 624 (96%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 92% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 21% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 45% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 125 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 125 (97%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 77% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 107
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 22% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 122 (92%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 121 (92%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 81% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 10% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 94
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2005-2006 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 45% |
| State average from 360 schools: | 45% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| HILLSBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL: | 66% |
| State average from 361 schools: | 68% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 90% |
| State average from 361 schools: | 83% |
Making Reading Gains
| HILLSBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL: | 52% |
| State average from 361 schools: | 53% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 72% |
| State average from 361 schools: | 72% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 44% |
| State average from 361 schools: | 53% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
| Here: | 369 |
| State average from 361 schools: | 374 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: NO| Here: | 98% |
| State average from 361 schools: | 98% |
Grade in 2006: D
Grade in 2005: D
Grade in 2004: D
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 50% |
| State average from 362 schools: | 38% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 71% |
| State average from 362 schools: | 47% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1065 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1065 (98%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| HILLSBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL: | 90% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 39% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| HILLSBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL: | 60% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 285 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 284 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 96% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 69% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 84% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 351 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 352 (97%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 86% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 16% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 37% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 323 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 322 (98%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 87% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 23% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 50% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 72 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 72 (100%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 85% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 72
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 579 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 578 (97%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 84% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 18% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 45% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 125 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 124 (97%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 72% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 111
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 28% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 117 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 116 (94%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 57% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 9% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| HILLSBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL: | 15% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2004-2005 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 47% |
| State average from 348 schools: | 42% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 70% |
| State average from 348 schools: | 67% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 91% |
| State average from 348 schools: | 84% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 55% |
| State average from 348 schools: | 51% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 68% |
| State average from 348 schools: | 73% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 45% |
| State average from 348 schools: | 53% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
| Here: | 376 |
| State average from 348 schools: | 371 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: No%| Here: | 99% |
| State average from 348 schools: | 98% |
Grade in 2005: D
Grade in 2004: D
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| HILLSBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL: | 51% |
| State average from 347 schools: | 38% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 68% |
| State average from 348 schools: | 45% |
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1430 |
| State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 321 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 12% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 10% |
| State average: | 11% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 35% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 35% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 8% |
| State average: | 8% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 78% |
| State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| HILLSBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 18 |
| State average: | 17 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| HILLSBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1529 |
| State average: | 1604 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 311 |
| State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 18% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 17% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 33% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 28% |
| State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 4% |
| State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 64% |
| State average: | 72% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 18 |
| State average: | 19 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| HILLSBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL: | 8 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 2 |
| State average: | 2 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1649 |
| State average: | 1659 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 310 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 12% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 19% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 31% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 28% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 10% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| HILLSBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL: | 68% |
| State average: | 70% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 3 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 16 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 10 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| HILLSBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL: | 2 |
| State average: | 2 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| HILLSBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL: | 1741 |
| State average: | 1716 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 317 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 17% |
| State average: | 19% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 18% |
| State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 31% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 24% |
| State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| HILLSBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL: | 11% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 66% |
| State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 14 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1833 |
| State average: | 1810 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 322 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 10% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| HILLSBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL: | 22% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 38% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 23% |
| State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 8% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 69% |
| State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 17 |
| State average: | 16 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1892 |
| State average: | 1876 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 311 |
| State average: | 308 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| HILLSBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL: | 13% |
| State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 34% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 35% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 15% |
| State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 2% |
| State average: | 3% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| HILLSBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL: | 52% |
| State average: | 52% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 17 |
| State average: | 16 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1959 |
| State average: | 1922 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| HILLSBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL: | 319 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 27% |
| State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 27% |
| State average: | 30% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 17% |
| State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 14% |
| State average: | 12% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 16% |
| State average: | 7% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| HILLSBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL: | 46% |
| State average: | 45% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 11 |
| State average: | 11 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| HILLSBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1968 |
| State average: | 1938 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 308 |
| State average: | 302 |
Percent Passing
| HILLSBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL: | 54% |
| State average: | 56% |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 38% |
| State average: | 35% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 22% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 12% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 7% |
| State average: | 8% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 21% |
| State average: | 12% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 40% |
| State average: | 37% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 15 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 323 |
| State average: | 321 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| HILLSBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL: | 15% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 38% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 32% |
| State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 12% |
| State average: | 11% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 3% |
| State average: | 4% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| HILLSBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL: | 47% |
| State average: | 51% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
| HILLSBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 300 |
| State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 29% |
| State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 37% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 28% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 4% |
| State average: | 8% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 2% |
| State average: | 2% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 34% |
| State average: | 41% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 320 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 24% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 29% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| HILLSBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL: | 34% |
| State average: | 30% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 11% |
| State average: | 5% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 2% |
| State average: | 1% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| HILLSBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL: | 47% |
| State average: | 36% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
| HILLSBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1549 |
| State average: | 1481 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 354 |
| State average: | 339 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 3% |
| State average: | 8% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 8% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 38% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| HILLSBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL: | 32% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 19% |
| State average: | 16% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 89% |
| State average: | 79% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1515 |
| State average: | 1585 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 314 |
| State average: | 330 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 11% |
| State average: | 10% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 19% |
| State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 46% |
| State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 19% |
| State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 5% |
| State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| HILLSBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL: | 69% |
| State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1719 |
| State average: | 1674 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 344 |
| State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 8% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 23% |
| State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 32% |
| State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 26% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 10% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 69% |
| State average: | 63% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1742 |
| State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 326 |
| State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 22% |
| State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 21% |
| State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| HILLSBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL: | 25% |
| State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 20% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 12% |
| State average: | 8% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 57% |
| State average: | 55% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1821 |
| State average: | 1786 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 314 |
| State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| HILLSBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL: | 18% |
| State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 22% |
| State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 35% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 19% |
| State average: | 19% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 7% |
| State average: | 7% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 61% |
| State average: | 57% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| HILLSBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1892 |
| State average: | 1892 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 320 |
| State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 11% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 24% |
| State average: | 21% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 44% |
| State average: | 38% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 15% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| HILLSBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL: | 6% |
| State average: | 10% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 65% |
| State average: | 64% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| HILLSBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| HILLSBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1944 |
| State average: | 1925 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 308 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 22% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 23% |
| State average: | 22% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 20% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 19% |
| State average: | 21% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 16% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 55% |
| State average: | 61% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1996 |
| State average: | 1995 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 326 |
| State average: | 326 |
Percent Passing
| Here: | 75% |
| State average: | 80% |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 19% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 17% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 25% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 21% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 18% |
| State average: | 8% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 64% |
| State average: | 69% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1409 |
| State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%| Here: | 318 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| HILLSBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL: | 1639 |
| State average: | 1605 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%| Here: | 329 |
| State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 09%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1721 |
| State average: | 1656 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%| Here: | 323 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1728 |
| State average: | 1707 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%| Here: | 314 |
| State average: | 310 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1812 |
| State average: | 1800 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%| Here: | 318 |
| State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1903 |
| State average: | 1864 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%| Here: | 314 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1915 |
| State average: | 1907 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 34%| Here: | 311 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 41%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1998 |
| State average: | 1921 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Percent Passing: 55%| Here: | 313 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 40%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%| Here: | 332 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%| Here: | 301 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 37%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%| Here: | 317 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1472 |
| State average: | 1476 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%| Here: | 337 |
| State average: | 338 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1584 |
| State average: | 1578 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%| HILLSBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL: | 329 |
| State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1730 |
| State average: | 1675 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%| Here: | 346 |
| State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 9
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1725 |
| State average: | 1679 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%| HILLSBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL: | 322 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1816 |
| State average: | 1799 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%| Here: | 313 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1914 |
| State average: | 1876 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%| Here: | 325 |
| State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1943 |
| State average: | 1925 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%| HILLSBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL: | 308 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 2008 |
| State average: | 1972 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Percent Passing: 74%| HILLSBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL: | 329 |
| State average: | 321 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 148
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Unscore - Combined: 1| Here: | 4 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 42%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 76%
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 474
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%| Here: | 4 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 36%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 7%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 94%
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 442
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%| Here: | 4 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 11%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 7%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 81%
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| HILLSBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL: | 1406 |
| State average: | 1396 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%| Here: | 317 |
| State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1632 |
| State average: | 1582 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%| Here: | 328 |
| State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 20
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1614 |
| State average: | 1627 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%| Here: | 304 |
| State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1683 |
| State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%| Here: | 306 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1822 |
| State average: | 1775 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%| Here: | 320 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| HILLSBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL: | 1897 |
| State average: | 1857 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%| Here: | 312 |
| State average: | 304 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1924 |
| State average: | 1894 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%| Here: | 312 |
| State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1988 |
| State average: | 1935 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Percent Passing: 55%| HILLSBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL: | 311 |
| State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 23%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 8
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%| Here: | 310 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%| Here: | 295 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 31%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%| Here: | 319 |
| State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1468 |
| State average: | 1461 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%| Here: | 336 |
| State average: | 335 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1577 |
| State average: | 1563 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%| Here: | 328 |
| State average: | 325 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1651 |
| State average: | 1668 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%| Here: | 329 |
| State average: | 333 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1682 |
| State average: | 1670 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%| Here: | 312 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1829 |
| State average: | 1801 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%| Here: | 316 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1916 |
| State average: | 1882 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%| Here: | 326 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1947 |
| State average: | 1915 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%| Here: | 309 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 2003 |
| State average: | 1984 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Percent Passing: 75%| Here: | 328 |
| State average: | 323 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
| HILLSBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL: | 153 |
| State average: | 103 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 636 |
| State average from 3241 schools: | 633 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 64 |
| State average: | 61 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 139 |
| State average: | 97 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 657 |
| State average from 3233 schools: | 653 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 73 |
| State average: | 69 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 14 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 10 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| HILLSBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL: | 15 |
| State average: | 15 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 8 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 130 |
| State average: | 101 |
Mean Scale Score
| HILLSBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL: | 669 |
| State average from 3309 schools: | 667 |
Median NPR
| HILLSBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL: | 74 |
| State average: | 71 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| HILLSBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL: | 10 |
| State average: | 9 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 460 |
| State average: | 190 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 673 |
| State average from 2604 schools: | 671 |
Median NPR
| HILLSBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL: | 65 |
| State average: | 63 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 12 |
Functional (max 18)
| HILLSBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 8 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| HILLSBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL: | 14 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 477 |
| State average: | 201 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 687 |
| State average from 2487 schools: | 682 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 71 |
| State average: | 66 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 14 |
Informational (max 18)
| HILLSBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL: | 13 |
| State average: | 12 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 12 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 9 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| HILLSBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 453 |
| State average: | 192 |
Mean Scale Score
| HILLSBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL: | 692 |
| State average from 2497 schools: | 687 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 68 |
| State average: | 63 |
Literary (max 18)
| HILLSBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL: | 13 |
| State average: | 12 |
Informational (max 18)
| HILLSBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL: | 13 |
| State average: | 12 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 10 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
| HILLSBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL: | 492 |
| State average: | 273 |
Mean Scale Score
| HILLSBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL: | 704 |
| State average from 2275 schools: | 694 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 70 |
| State average: | 61 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 12 |
| State average: | 11 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 12 |
| State average: | 11 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
| HILLSBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL: | 459 |
| State average: | 237 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 724 |
| State average from 2096 schools: | 709 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 78 |
| State average: | 65 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 14 |
Informational (max 18)
| HILLSBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL: | 14 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 14 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 8 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| HILLSBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL: | 16 |
| State average: | 15 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 11 |
| State average: | 10 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 8 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 143
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 27%| Here: | 301 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 57%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 12
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 4%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 68%
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 458
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 14%| Here: | 307 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 52%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 5%| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 38%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 10%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 93%
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 463
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 20%| Here: | 311 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 14%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 52%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 7%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 5%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 82%
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1884 |
| State average from 612 schools: | 1849 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 34%| Here: | 305 |
| State average: | 298 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 37%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 9: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 86%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1892 |
| State average: | 1837 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 74| Here: | 1818 |
| State average: | 1779 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1973 |
| State average from 573 schools: | 1879 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Percent Passing: 51%| Here: | 309 |
| State average: | 291 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 23%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 40%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 18: 12
Percent Matched to 2006: 90%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 2012 |
| State average: | 1873 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 50| Here: | 1962 |
| State average: | 1876 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%| Here: | 319 |
| State average: | 295 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 14: 8
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1928 |
| State average from 613 schools: | 1884 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%| HILLSBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL: | 303 |
| State average: | 290 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 10: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 8: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 86%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| HILLSBOROUGH HIGH SCHOOL: | 1935 |
| State average: | 1869 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 42| Here: | 1893 |
| State average: | 1821 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1997 |
| State average from 581 schools: | 1950 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Percent Passing: 75%| Here: | 326 |
| State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 20%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 10: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 11: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 88%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 2026 |
| State average: | 1939 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 46| Here: | 1981 |
| State average: | 1901 |
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 559
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 72| Here: | 708 |
| State average from 597 schools: | 696 |
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 10): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 14): 10
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 475
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 69| Here: | 712 |
| State average from 575 schools: | 695 |
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 10): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 14): 10
Strategies (max 10): 6
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 559
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 76| Here: | 719 |
| State average from 597 schools: | 708 |
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 9
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 7
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 8
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 475
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 74| Here: | 728 |
| State average from 575 schools: | 710 |
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 8
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 7
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 475
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 21%| Here: | 315 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 21%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 50%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 9 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 12
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 1%| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 30%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 11%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 85%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 72%
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.