James Madison Middle School in Titusville, Florida (FL) - Test Results, Rating, Ranking, Grades, Scores, Classes, Enrollment, Teachers, Students, and Report Card

City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 39.

3375 DAIRY RD
Titusville, FL 32796

Show street view No street view available for this location

Other nearby schools ratings:

Chiles Middle School (18.5 miles):	83
Chiles Middle School (18.5 miles):	75
Sculptor Charter School (8.3 miles):	63
Andrew Jackson Middle School (4.9 miles):	53
James Madison Middle School:	39
Corner Lake Middle School (17.7 miles):	24

James Madison Middle School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:

Florida:	45
Brevard County:	49
Titusville:	54
James Madison Middle School:	39

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:

Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum

Phone: (321) 264-3120 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 5
School number: 52
School type: Middle/Jr. High
District Name: BREVARD
Grade range: GRADES 7 TO 8
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (321) 264-3124
Principal: Joan E Sparks
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 24
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 29
Senate District: 24
School Web Address: http://www.madison.brevard.k12.fl.us

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	64%
State average from 8 schools:	71%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	58%
State average from 8 schools:	78%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	85%
State average from 8 schools:	87%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	37%
State average from 8 schools:	52%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	56%
State average from 8 schools:	59%

Making Math Gains

Here:	59%
State average from 8 schools:	70%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	52%
State average from 8 schools:	57%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	61%
State average from 8 schools:	66%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	472
State average from 8 schools:	541

Percent Tested

Here:	99%
State average from 8 schools:	100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: C

Grade in 2009: B

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 119999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	75%
State average from 8 schools:	43%

Minority Rate

Here:	26%
State average from 8 schools:	26%

Region: 1

Title I: YES

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 451 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 450 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 96
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	57%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 423
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 409

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	52%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 423
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 409
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 336 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 335 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 73
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	64%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 311
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 299

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	61%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 311
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 300
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 85 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 85 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	29%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 82
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 82

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	26%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 82
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 82
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 338 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 337 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	94%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 72
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	55%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 311
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 299

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	48%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 311
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 298
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 72 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 72 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	22%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 69
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 68

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	23%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 69
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 67
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	62%
State average from 8 schools:	69%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	61%
State average from 8 schools:	74%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	98%
State average from 8 schools:	92%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	39%
State average from 8 schools:	54%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	66%
State average from 8 schools:	65%

Making Math Gains

Here:	65%
State average from 8 schools:	72%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	66%
State average from 8 schools:	66%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	61%
State average from 8 schools:	68%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	518
State average from 8 schools:	559

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 8 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: B

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	70%
State average from 8 schools:	45%

Minority Rate

Here:	21%
State average from 8 schools:	28%

Region: 1

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 443 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 441 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 111
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	56%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 419
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 405

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	54%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 419
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 404
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 348 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 347 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 90
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	62%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 329
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 319

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	60%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 330
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 319
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 75 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 75 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	25%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 72
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 70

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

JAMES MADISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:	29%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 72
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 70
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 310 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 309 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 77
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	50%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 292
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 280

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	51%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 291
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 279
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 72 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 71 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	20%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 66
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 61

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

JAMES MADISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:	14%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 65
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 60
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	56%
State average from 8 schools:	68%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	51%
State average from 8 schools:	73%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	83%
State average from 8 schools:	92%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	31%
State average from 8 schools:	51%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	57%
State average from 8 schools:	66%

Making Math Gains

Here:	57%
State average from 8 schools:	76%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	58%
State average from 8 schools:	68%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	61%
State average from 8 schools:	73%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	454
State average from 8 schools:	567

Percent Tested

Here:	99%
State average from 8 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	65%
State average from 8 schools:	42%

Minority Rate

Here:	23%
State average from 8 schools:	29%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 427 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 426 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 98
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	50%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 404
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 385

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	47%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 403
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 382
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 328 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 327 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 75
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	56%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 308
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 292

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	51%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 307
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 291
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 81 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 81 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	28%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 79
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 78

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	30%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 79
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 76
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 275 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 275 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 55
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	44%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 259
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 251

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	41%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 259
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 250
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 69 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 69 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	16%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 63
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 61

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	27%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 63
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 60
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

JAMES MADISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:	65%
State average from 8 schools:	68%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	78%
State average from 8 schools:	73%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	83%
State average from 8 schools:	90%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	54%
State average from 8 schools:	51%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	55%
State average from 8 schools:	57%

Making Math Gains

Here:	74%
State average from 8 schools:	76%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	63%
State average from 8 schools:	62%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	79%
State average from 8 schools:	78%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns

JAMES MADISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:	551
State average from 8 schools:	555

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 8 schools:	100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	34%
State average from 8 schools:	32%

Minority Rate

Here:	23%
State average from 8 schools:	22%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 632 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 631 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	92%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 291
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	58%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 611
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	72%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 610
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 486 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 485 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	92%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 222
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	64%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 469
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	77%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 468
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 102 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 102 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	92%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 48
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	34%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 99
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	52%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 99
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 219 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 219 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	90%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 87
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	48%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 207
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	59%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 207
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 101 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 101 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	65%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 43
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	25%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 97
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

JAMES MADISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:	37%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 97
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	66%
State average from 8 schools:	70%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	73%
State average from 8 schools:	72%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	90%
State average from 8 schools:	87%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	58%
State average from 8 schools:	65%

Making Math Gains

Here:	72%
State average from 8 schools:	76%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

JAMES MADISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:	72%
State average from 8 schools:	72%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns

Here:	431
State average from 8 schools:	441

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 8 schools:	100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

JAMES MADISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:	32%
State average from 8 schools:	32%

Minority Rate

Here:	20%
State average from 8 schools:	21%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 659 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 661 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

JAMES MADISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:	95%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 335
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	60%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 634
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	68%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 634
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 528 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 529 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	96%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 273

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	65%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 510
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

JAMES MADISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:	73%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 509
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 96 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 97 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	84%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 49
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	40%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 91

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	38%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 92
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 18
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 18
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 207 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 208 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

JAMES MADISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:	89%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 95

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	44%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 190
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	50%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 190
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 87 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 87 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	69%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 35
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	22%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 81

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	27%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 79
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	63%
State average from 7 schools:	63%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	76%
State average from 7 schools:	72%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	79%
State average from 7 schools:	80%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	55%
State average from 7 schools:	54%

Making Math Gains

Here:	77%
State average from 7 schools:	79%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	58%
State average from 7 schools:	62%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns

Here:	408
State average from 7 schools:	411

Percent Tested

Here:	99%
State average from 7 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	31%
State average from 7 schools:	31%

Minority Rate

Here:	18%
State average from 7 schools:	18%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1381
State average:	1402

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	313
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	13%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	17%
State average:	11%

% in each Achievement Level 3

JAMES MADISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:	33%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	34%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	4%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	70%
State average:	74%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	17
State average:	17

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1576
State average:	1604

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	319
State average:	324

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	15%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	19%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	32%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	27%
State average:	29%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	6%
State average:	11%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	65%
State average:	72%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

JAMES MADISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

JAMES MADISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:	19
State average:	19

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	8
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	2
State average:	2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1484
State average:	1659

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	280
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	33%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	12%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	35%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	15%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	4%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	55%
State average:	70%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	3
State average:	3

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	13
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	9
State average:	10

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	2
State average:	2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1654
State average:	1716

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	301
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	20%
State average:	19%

% in each Achievement Level 2

JAMES MADISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:	15%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	44%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	16%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	5%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

JAMES MADISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:	65%
State average:	65%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	13
State average:	14

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

JAMES MADISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:	7
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	3
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1749
State average:	1810

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	306
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	20%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	19%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	37%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	18%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	5%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	60%
State average:	65%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	15
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	3
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1855
State average:	1876

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	303
State average:	308

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	25%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 2

JAMES MADISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:	27%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	33%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	12%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	3%
State average:	3%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	48%
State average:	52%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	4
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	15
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	6
State average:	6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	290
State average:	321

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	32%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	38%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	25%
State average:	36%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	3%
State average:	11%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	2%
State average:	4%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	30%
State average:	51%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

JAMES MADISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:	8
State average:	9

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	6
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

Here:	7
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

Here:	7
State average:	9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	304
State average:	307

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	24%
State average:	27%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	40%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	32%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	2%
State average:	8%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	2%
State average:	2%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	36%
State average:	41%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

Here:	8
State average:	9

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	7
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

JAMES MADISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:	8
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

Here:	7
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1462
State average:	1481

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	335
State average:	339

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	6%
State average:	8%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	20%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	33%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	26%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	14%
State average:	16%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	74%
State average:	79%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	8
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	4
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	5
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1581
State average:	1585

Mean Scale Score 100-500

JAMES MADISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:	329
State average:	330

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	9%
State average:	10%

% in each Achievement Level 2

JAMES MADISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:	19%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	36%
State average:	36%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	25%
State average:	26%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	10%
State average:	11%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	72%
State average:	74%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	7
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

JAMES MADISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1556
State average:	1674

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	309
State average:	334

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	27%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	28%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 3

JAMES MADISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:	28%
State average:	27%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	16%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	2%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	46%
State average:	63%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	6
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	6
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	5
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1643
State average:	1696

Mean Scale Score 100-500

JAMES MADISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:	303
State average:	315

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	35%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	14%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	32%
State average:	29%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	17%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	2%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	51%
State average:	55%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	4
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

JAMES MADISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	6
State average:	6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1757
State average:	1786

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	298
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	24%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	31%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	27%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	15%
State average:	19%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	3%
State average:	7%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	45%
State average:	57%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

JAMES MADISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	4
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	5
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1883
State average:	1892

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	317
State average:	320

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	14%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	24%
State average:	21%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	46%
State average:	38%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	10%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	6%
State average:	10%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	62%
State average:	64%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	7
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	5
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1384
State average:	1402

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	314
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1588
State average:	1605

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	321
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 08%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 03%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1517
State average:	1656

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	286
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

JAMES MADISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:	1623
State average:	1707

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	295
State average:	310

% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1793
State average:	1800

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	314
State average:	315

% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1871
State average:	1864

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	307
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

JAMES MADISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:	296
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 34%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	290
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 32%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1481
State average:	1476

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	339
State average:	338

% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1559
State average:	1578

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	324
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

JAMES MADISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:	1577
State average:	1675

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	314
State average:	334

% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

JAMES MADISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:	1619
State average:	1679

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	297
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1787
State average:	1799

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	306
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1854
State average:	1876

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	310
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 126

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	4
State average from 27 schools:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 46%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 72%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 119

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	5
State average from 27 schools:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 9%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 7%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 97%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1442
State average:	1396

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	323
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1618
State average:	1582

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	326
State average:	320

% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

JAMES MADISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:	1415
State average:	1627

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	268
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1643
State average:	1696

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	299
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1688
State average:	1775

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	294
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1873
State average:	1857

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	307
State average:	304

% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

JAMES MADISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:	1508
State average:	1894

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	236
State average:	307

% in each Achievement Level 1: 92%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 8%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	273
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 22%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	299
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 35%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

JAMES MADISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:	1451
State average:	1461

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	333
State average:	335

% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1560
State average:	1563

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	324
State average:	325

% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1484
State average:	1668

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	294
State average:	333

% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 37%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1647
State average:	1670

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	304
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1731
State average:	1801

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	292
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 40%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1877
State average:	1882

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	316
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1626
State average:	1915

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	214
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 83%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 8%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 1
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	139
State average:	103

Mean Scale Score

Here:	636
State average from 3241 schools:	633

Median NPR

Here:	64
State average:	61

Literary (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	15
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

JAMES MADISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:	9
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

JAMES MADISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:	7
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Number of Students

JAMES MADISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:	103
State average:	97

Mean Scale Score

Here:	651
State average from 3233 schools:	653

Median NPR

Here:	68
State average:	69

Literary (max 18)

JAMES MADISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:	14
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	10

Interpretation (max 20)

JAMES MADISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:	14
State average:	15

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	8

Strategies (max 10)

JAMES MADISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:	7
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	102
State average:	101

Mean Scale Score

Here:	645
State average from 3309 schools:	667

Median NPR

Here:	52
State average:	71

Literary (max 18)

Here:	11
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

JAMES MADISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:	11
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

JAMES MADISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:	8
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	12
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

JAMES MADISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:	8
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	5
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	98
State average:	190

Mean Scale Score

Here:	660
State average from 2604 schools:	671

Median NPR

JAMES MADISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:	53
State average:	63

Literary (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	7
State average:	8

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	13
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	129
State average:	201

Mean Scale Score

JAMES MADISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:	668
State average from 2487 schools:	682

Median NPR

Here:	54
State average:	66

Literary (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

Here:	11
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	11
State average:	12

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

JAMES MADISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:	13
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	6
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	106
State average:	192

Mean Scale Score

Here:	683
State average from 2497 schools:	687

Median NPR

Here:	60
State average:	63

Literary (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	12

Informational (max 18)

JAMES MADISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:	12
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

JAMES MADISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:	7
State average:	7

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	13
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	10

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	11
State average:	273

Mean Scale Score

Here:	636
State average from 2275 schools:	694

Median NPR

Here:	13
State average:	61

Literary (max 18)

Here:	6
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

JAMES MADISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:	6
State average:	11

Functional (max 18)

Here:	7
State average:	11

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	3
State average:	7

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	7
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	5
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	3
State average:	5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Number of Students

JAMES MADISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:	4
State average:	237

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 103

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	297
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 52%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 12

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

JAMES MADISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 36%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 77%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 106

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	280
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 38%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 4%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 78%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 8

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1775
State average from 808 schools:	1746

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	311
State average:	305

% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 94%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1778
State average:	1743

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1767
State average:	1668

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 10

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1881
State average from 819 schools:	1810

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	309
State average:	294

% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 7
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1891
State average:	1807

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1809
State average:	1738

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 82

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

JAMES MADISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:	314
State average:	290

% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1834
State average from 804 schools:	1777

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	317
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 94%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1838
State average:	1774

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

JAMES MADISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:	1775
State average:	1645

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 63

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1915
State average from 815 schools:	1851

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	325
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1923
State average:	1845

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1824
State average:	1755

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 99

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 331

Mean Scale Score

Here:	679
State average from 796 schools:	675

Median NPR: 65
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 297

Mean Scale Score

Here:	694
State average from 810 schools:	685

Median NPR: 70
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 10): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 14): 10
Strategies (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 330

Mean Scale Score

JAMES MADISON MIDDLE SCHOOL:	692
State average from 796 schools:	685

Median NPR: 75
Number Sense (max 9): 5
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 6
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 297

Mean Scale Score

Here:	711
State average from 810 schools:	698

Median NPR: 79
Number Sense (max 9): 7
Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 299

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	277
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 40%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 10
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	3
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 38%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 76%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 65%

City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DC	DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID
IL	IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	MD
ME	MI	MN	MO	MS	MT	NC
ND	NE	NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY
OH	OK	OR	PA	RI	SC	SD
TN	TX	UT	VA	VT	WA	WI
WV	WY

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID	IL
IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	ME	MI
MN	MO	MS	MT	NC	ND	NE
NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	SD	TN	TX
VA	VT	WA	WI	WV	WY

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID	IL
IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	ME	MI
MN	MO	MS	MT	NC	ND	NE
NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	SD	TN	TX
VA	VT	WA	WI	WV	WY

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DC	DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID
IL	IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	MD
ME	MI	MN	MO	MS	MT	NC
ND	NE	NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY
OH	OK	OR	PA	RI	SC	SD
TN	TX	UT	VA	VT	WA	WI
WV	WY

AB	BC	MB	NB	NL	NS	NT
NU	ON	PE	QC	SK	YT