Just Elementary School in Tampa, Florida (FL) - Test Results, Rating, Ranking, Grades, Scores, Classes, Enrollment, Teachers, Students, and Report Card

City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 21.

1315 SPRUCE ST
Tampa, FL 33607

Show street view No street view available for this location

Other nearby schools ratings:

Disston Gifted Center School (19.6 miles):	98
Bay Vista Fundamental Elementary School (19.9 miles):	73
Claywell Elementary School (10.1 miles):	61
Macfarlane Park Elementary Magnet School (1.2 miles):	50
Yates Elementary School (12.1 miles):	41
Dickenson Elementary School (6.0 miles):	30
Just Elementary School:	21
Melrose Elementary School (17.9 miles):	18
Dixie Hollins Adult Education Center School (18.2 miles):	0

Just Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:

Florida:	45
Hillsborough County:	42
Tampa:	41
Just Elementary School:	21

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:

Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum

Phone: (813) 276-5708 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 29
School number: 282
School type: Elementary
District Name: HILLSBOROUGH
Grade range: KINDERGARTEN TO GRADE 5
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (813) 272-2379
Principal: Tricia Mcmanus
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 11
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 59
Senate District: 18

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	64%
State average from 734 schools:	73%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	62%
State average from 734 schools:	77%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	90%
State average from 734 schools:	85%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	39%
State average from 733 schools:	53%

Making Reading Gains

JUST ELEMENTARY:	65%
State average from 734 schools:	64%

Making Math Gains

JUST ELEMENTARY:	72%
State average from 733 schools:	67%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	64%
State average from 734 schools:	58%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	72%
State average from 734 schools:	66%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	528
State average from 734 schools:	543

Percent Tested

JUST ELEMENTARY:	99%
State average from 733 schools:	100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: B

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 119999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	64%
State average from 734 schools:	57%

Minority Rate

Here:	65%
State average from 735 schools:	46%

Region: 3

Title I: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1001 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1001 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 350
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

JUST ELEMENTARY:	60%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 956
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 929

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	58%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 957
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 930
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 356 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 357 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 126
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	76%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 341
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 329

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	70%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 340
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 328
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 313 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 313 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 115
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	51%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 300
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 288

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	51%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 303
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 291
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 289 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 288 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 90
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	46%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 273
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 270

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	48%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 272
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 269
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16
Number of Students Tested in Math: 16
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 636 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 635 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 213
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	49%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 600
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 587

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	48%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 602
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 589
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 194 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 193 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 58
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	32%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 181
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 181

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	35%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 180
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 180
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 122 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 123 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 42
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	35%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 116
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 112

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

JUST ELEMENTARY:	30%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 116
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 112
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	62%
State average from 735 schools:	74%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	63%
State average from 734 schools:	76%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	95%
State average from 734 schools:	88%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	36%
State average from 734 schools:	51%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	62%
State average from 734 schools:	67%

Making Math Gains

Here:	66%
State average from 735 schools:	68%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	64%
State average from 735 schools:	65%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	65%
State average from 734 schools:	67%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	513
State average from 734 schools:	557

Percent Tested

JUST ELEMENTARY:	99%
State average from 734 schools:	100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: B

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

JUST ELEMENTARY:	59%
State average from 734 schools:	53%

Minority Rate

Here:	64%
State average from 734 schools:	45%

Region: 3

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 942 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 942 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 263
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	59%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 883
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 863

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	59%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 882
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 863
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 345 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 345 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 88
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	73%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 337
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 327

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	68%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 337
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 327
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 265 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 265 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 69
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	50%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 246
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 241

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	51%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 245
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 240
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 286 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 286 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

JUST ELEMENTARY:	93%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 95
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	47%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 257
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 254

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	53%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 257
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 255
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 22
Number of Students Tested in Math: 22
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 552 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 552 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 158
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	47%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 502
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 491

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	50%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 501
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 491
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 197 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 197 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

JUST ELEMENTARY:	89%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 62
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

JUST ELEMENTARY:	34%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 172
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 171

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

JUST ELEMENTARY:	42%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 172
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 172
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 123 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 123 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	88%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 34
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	37%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 113
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 109

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	34%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 113
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 110
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	66%
State average from 711 schools:	73%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	63%
State average from 711 schools:	75%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	82%
State average from 711 schools:	82%

Meeting High Standards in Science

JUST ELEMENTARY:	34%
State average from 711 schools:	47%

Making Reading Gains

JUST ELEMENTARY:	67%
State average from 711 schools:	65%

Making Math Gains

Here:	72%
State average from 711 schools:	70%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	71%
State average from 711 schools:	62%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	70%
State average from 711 schools:	69%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	525
State average from 711 schools:	544

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 711 schools:	100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	57%
State average from 711 schools:	50%

Minority Rate

Here:	66%
State average from 711 schools:	44%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 958 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 958 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	91%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 263
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	60%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 901
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 866

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	57%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 903
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 868
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 327 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 327 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 88
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	72%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 314
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 308

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	70%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 314
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 308
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 269 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 269 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

JUST ELEMENTARY:	93%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 60
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	58%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 252
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 242

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

JUST ELEMENTARY:	47%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 252
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 242
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 315 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 315 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	83%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 104
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	46%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 292
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 275

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	47%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 293
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 276
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 22
Number of Students Tested in Math: 22
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 550 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 550 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	88%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 144
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	48%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 506
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 484

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	47%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 508
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 486
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 211 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 211 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	75%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 60
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

JUST ELEMENTARY:	32%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 193
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 181

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	36%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 194
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 182
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 135 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 135 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	88%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 34
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	34%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 125
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 121

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	33%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 126
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 122
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	31%
State average from 652 schools:	75%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	27%
State average from 652 schools:	73%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	60%
State average from 652 schools:	83%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	17%
State average from 650 schools:	46%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	54%
State average from 652 schools:	72%

Making Reading Gains - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded

Making Math Gains

Here:	51%
State average from 652 schools:	68%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	73%
State average from 652 schools:	67%

% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

JUST ELEMENTARY:	64%
State average from 652 schools:	69%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns

Here:	377
State average from 652 schools:	553

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 652 schools:	100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: F

Grade in 2006: D

Grade in 2005: F

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	96%
State average from 655 schools:	53%

Minority Rate

JUST ELEMENTARY:	98%
State average from 655 schools:	55%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 241 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 241 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	80%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 60
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	26%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 223
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	26%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 223
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 208 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 208 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

JUST ELEMENTARY:	83%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 52
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	24%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 195
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	23%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 195
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 26
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 236 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 236 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	80%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 60
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	27%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 221
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	26%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 221
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 34 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 34 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 56 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 56 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	11%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 55
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

JUST ELEMENTARY:	20%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 55
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	35%
State average from 643 schools:	75%

Meeting High Standards in Math

JUST ELEMENTARY:	33%
State average from 643 schools:	71%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	57%
State average from 643 schools:	81%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	48%
State average from 643 schools:	63%

Making Math Gains

Here:	66%
State average from 643 schools:	69%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	58%
State average from 643 schools:	61%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns

Here:	297
State average from 643 schools:	420

Percent Tested

Here:	99%
State average from 643 schools:	100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: D

Grade in 2005: F

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	95%
State average from 644 schools:	54%

Minority Rate

Here:	99%
State average from 644 schools:	54%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 227 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 224 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	81%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 48
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	27%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 195
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	24%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 195
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 189 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 186 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	82%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 45

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	24%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 165
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	24%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 165
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 26
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 20
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 222 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 219 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	80%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 45

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	26%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 191
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	24%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 191
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 31 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 31 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 27
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 27
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 62 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 62 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 12

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	11%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 56
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	7%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 56
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	24%
State average from 631 schools:	74%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	15%
State average from 631 schools:	69%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	61%
State average from 631 schools:	80%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	39%
State average from 631 schools:	66%

Making Math Gains

Here:	44%
State average from 631 schools:	69%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	33%
State average from 631 schools:	60%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns

Here:	216
State average from 631 schools:	417

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 631 schools:	100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: No%

Grade in 2005: F

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	95%
State average from 631 schools:	54%

Minority Rate

Here:	99%
State average from 631 schools:	52%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1035
State average:	1402

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	256
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1

JUST ELEMENTARY:	39%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	28%
State average:	11%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	26%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	7%
State average:	32%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	33%
State average:	74%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	12
State average:	17

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	3
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	2
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1288
State average:	1604

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	269
State average:	324

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	49%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	17%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	25%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	7%
State average:	29%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	1%
State average:	11%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	33%
State average:	72%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	15
State average:	19

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	6
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	2
State average:	2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1358
State average:	1659

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	258
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	37%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	34%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	21%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	6%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	1%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	28%
State average:	70%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

JUST ELEMENTARY:	2
State average:	3

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	11
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	8
State average:	10

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

JUST ELEMENTARY:	1
State average:	2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1905
State average:	1876

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	314
State average:	308

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	16%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	28%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	36%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	16%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	4%
State average:	3%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	56%
State average:	52%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	4
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	17
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	7
State average:	6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	270
State average:	321

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	44%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 2

JUST ELEMENTARY:	44%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	9%
State average:	36%

% in each Achievement Level 4

JUST ELEMENTARY:	3%
State average:	11%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

JUST ELEMENTARY:	12%
State average:	51%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

Here:	7
State average:	9

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	6
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

Here:	6
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

Here:	6
State average:	9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	303
State average:	307

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	31%
State average:	27%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	33%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	26%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

JUST ELEMENTARY:	8%
State average:	8%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	2%
State average:	2%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	36%
State average:	41%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

Here:	8
State average:	9

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	7
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

Here:	8
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

Here:	7
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1183
State average:	1481

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	275
State average:	339

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	33%
State average:	8%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	23%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	29%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	13%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	1%
State average:	16%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

JUST ELEMENTARY:	44%
State average:	79%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

JUST ELEMENTARY:	6
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	3
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

JUST ELEMENTARY:	4
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1403
State average:	1585

Mean Scale Score 100-500

JUST ELEMENTARY:	288
State average:	330

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	26%
State average:	10%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	24%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	36%
State average:	36%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	11%
State average:	26%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	3%
State average:	11%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	50%
State average:	74%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	5
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	3
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1452
State average:	1674

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	287
State average:	334

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	43%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	34%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	9%
State average:	27%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	10%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	3%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	22%
State average:	63%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	5
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	4
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	4
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	4
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	5
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1924
State average:	1892

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	328
State average:	320

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	9%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	21%
State average:	21%

% in each Achievement Level 3

JUST ELEMENTARY:	38%
State average:	38%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	22%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	10%
State average:	10%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	70%
State average:	64%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	5
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

JUST ELEMENTARY:	1107
State average:	1402

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	268
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 34%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1384
State average:	1605

Mean Scale Score 100-500

JUST ELEMENTARY:	286
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 09%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 01%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 04
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 08
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 02

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1404
State average:	1656

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	266
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 41%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

JUST ELEMENTARY:	1639
State average:	1707

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	298
State average:	310

% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1815
State average:	1800

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	318
State average:	315

% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1870
State average:	1864

Mean Scale Score 100-500

JUST ELEMENTARY:	307
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1903
State average:	1907

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	308
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1849
State average:	1921

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	286
State average:	299

Percent Passing: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 15%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

JUST ELEMENTARY:	270
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 18%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	299
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 34%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	296
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 32%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1234
State average:	1476

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	286
State average:	338

% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1376
State average:	1578

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	282
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1484
State average:	1675

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	294
State average:	334

% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 34%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1632
State average:	1679

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	300
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 41%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1842
State average:	1799

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	319
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1906
State average:	1876

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	323
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1950
State average:	1925

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	310
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1948
State average:	1972

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	314
State average:	321

Percent Passing: 76%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 76

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	4
State average from 27 schools:	59

Unscore - Combined: 1
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 36%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 71%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 278

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	4
State average from 27 schools:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 32%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 90%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 131

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	4
State average from 27 schools:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 64%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1032
State average:	1396

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	256
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

JUST ELEMENTARY:	1338
State average:	1582

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	278
State average:	320

% in each Achievement Level 1: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 40%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1328
State average:	1627

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	253
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 23%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

JUST ELEMENTARY:	1730
State average:	1696

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	315
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1780
State average:	1775

Mean Scale Score 100-500

JUST ELEMENTARY:	312
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1841
State average:	1857

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	301
State average:	304

% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1813
State average:	1894

Mean Scale Score 100-500

JUST ELEMENTARY:	292
State average:	307

% in each Achievement Level 1: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 30%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1944
State average:	1935

Mean Scale Score 100-500

JUST ELEMENTARY:	303
State average:	302

Percent Passing: 57%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	273
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 23%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	289
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 28%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1184
State average:	1461

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	275
State average:	335

% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 37%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1377
State average:	1563

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	282
State average:	325

% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1508
State average:	1668

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	299
State average:	333

% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 32%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1673
State average:	1670

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	310
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1835
State average:	1801

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	317
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

JUST ELEMENTARY:	1903
State average:	1882

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	322
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1901
State average:	1915

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	295
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2011
State average:	1984

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	330
State average:	323

Percent Passing: 85%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	90
State average:	103

Mean Scale Score

Here:	598
State average from 3241 schools:	633

Median NPR

Here:	30
State average:	61

Literary (max 18)

Here:	9
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	10
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	9
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

JUST ELEMENTARY:	7
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	11
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	6
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	5
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	81
State average:	97

Mean Scale Score

Here:	624
State average from 3233 schools:	653

Median NPR

Here:	45
State average:	69

Literary (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

Here:	10
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

JUST ELEMENTARY:	11
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	10

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	12
State average:	15

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	7
State average:	8

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	6
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Number of Students

JUST ELEMENTARY:	55
State average:	101

Mean Scale Score

Here:	642
State average from 3309 schools:	667

Median NPR

Here:	50
State average:	71

Literary (max 18)

Here:	11
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	11
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	11
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

JUST ELEMENTARY:	11
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	5
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	372
State average:	190

Mean Scale Score

Here:	671
State average from 2604 schools:	671

Median NPR

Here:	64
State average:	63

Literary (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

JUST ELEMENTARY:	13
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	8

Interpretation (max 20)

JUST ELEMENTARY:	15
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	298
State average:	201

Mean Scale Score

Here:	683
State average from 2487 schools:	682

Median NPR

Here:	68
State average:	66

Literary (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	12

Initial Understanding (max 12)

JUST ELEMENTARY:	9
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	14
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	6
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Number of Students

JUST ELEMENTARY:	285
State average:	192

Mean Scale Score

Here:	683
State average from 2497 schools:	687

Median NPR

Here:	60
State average:	63

Literary (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	12

Informational (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

JUST ELEMENTARY:	13
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	7
State average:	7

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	13
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	10

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	135
State average:	273

Mean Scale Score

Here:	691
State average from 2275 schools:	694

Median NPR

Here:	59
State average:	61

Literary (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

JUST ELEMENTARY:	11
State average:	11

Functional (max 18)

JUST ELEMENTARY:	12
State average:	11

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	7
State average:	7

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	14
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	5
State average:	5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Number of Students

JUST ELEMENTARY:	124
State average:	237

Mean Scale Score

JUST ELEMENTARY:	716
State average from 2096 schools:	709

Median NPR

Here:	74
State average:	65

Literary (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

JUST ELEMENTARY:	14
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	14

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	8

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	16
State average:	15

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	11
State average:	10

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	8
State average:	8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 77

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	259
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 35%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 8

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 43%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 69%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 284

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	268
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 31%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 39%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 77%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 122

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	292
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 43%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

JUST ELEMENTARY:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 5%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 71%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	948
State average:	1342

Mean Scale Score 100-500

JUST ELEMENTARY:	242
State average:	307

% in each Achievement Level 1: 55%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 30%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1194
State average from 1875 schools:	1542

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	253
State average:	313

% in each Achievement Level 1: 63%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 23%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 94%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

JUST ELEMENTARY:	1193
State average:	1546

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1126
State average:	1397

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 66

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1416
State average from 1873 schools:	1629

Mean Scale Score 100-500

JUST ELEMENTARY:	268
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 35%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1413
State average:	1632

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1266
State average:	1532

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 148

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	272
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 17%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1151
State average:	1413

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	268
State average:	324

% in each Achievement Level 1: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1267
State average from 1874 schools:	1525

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	257
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 51%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 20%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 92%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1277
State average:	1528

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1234
State average:	1414

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 43

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1432
State average from 1872 schools:	1647

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	283
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 15%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 92%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1438
State average:	1649

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1294
State average:	1519

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 143

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 107

Mean Scale Score

Here:	589
State average from 1891 schools:	633

Median NPR: 24
Literary (max 18): 9
Informational (max 18): 8
Functional (max 18): 9
Initial Understanding (max 12): 6
Interpretation (max 20): 10
Critical Analysis (max 12): 6
Strategies (max 10): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 63

Mean Scale Score

Here:	603
State average from 1874 schools:	642

Median NPR: 27
Literary (max 18): 8
Informational (max 18): 9
Functional (max 18): 8
Initial Understanding (max 12): 6
Interpretation (max 20): 10
Critical Analysis (max 12): 5
Strategies (max 10): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 71

Mean Scale Score

Here:	641
State average from 1870 schools:	667

Median NPR: 47
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 12): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 12): 6
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 107

Mean Scale Score

Here:	593
State average from 1891 schools:	632

Median NPR: 35
Number Sense (max 14): 8
Operations (max 11): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 3
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 3
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 61

Mean Scale Score

Here:	616
State average from 1874 schools:	652

Median NPR: 46
Number Sense (max 12): 7
Operations (max 12): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 71

Mean Scale Score

Here:	630
State average from 1870 schools:	663

Median NPR: 44
Number Sense (max 12): 7
Operations (max 12): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 3
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 59

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	235
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 17%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	3
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 56%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 31%

City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DC	DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID
IL	IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	MD
ME	MI	MN	MO	MS	MT	NC
ND	NE	NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY
OH	OK	OR	PA	RI	SC	SD
TN	TX	UT	VA	VT	WA	WI
WV	WY

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID	IL
IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	ME	MI
MN	MO	MS	MT	NC	ND	NE
NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	SD	TN	TX
VA	VT	WA	WI	WV	WY

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID	IL
IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	ME	MI
MN	MO	MS	MT	NC	ND	NE
NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	SD	TN	TX
VA	VT	WA	WI	WV	WY

AL	AZ	CA	CO	CT	DE	FL
GA	HI	IA	ID	IL	IN	KS
LA	MA	MD	MI	MN	MO	NC
NE	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	TN	TX	UT
VA	WA	WI	WV

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DC	DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID
IL	IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	MD
ME	MI	MN	MO	MS	MT	NC
ND	NE	NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY
OH	OK	OR	PA	RI	SC	SD
TN	TX	UT	VA	VT	WA	WI
WV	WY