Lake City Middle School in Lake City, Florida (FL) - Test Results, Rating, Ranking, Grades, Scores, Classes, Enrollment, Teachers, Students, and Report Card

City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 31.

843 SW ARLINGTON BLVD
Lake City, FL 32025

Show street view No street view available for this location

Other nearby schools ratings:

Crescent City Junior/Senior High School (2.7 miles):	36
Damascus Road Project School (1.7 miles):	31
Lake City Middle School:	31
Challenge Learning Center School (1.1 miles):	27
Richardson Middle School (1.4 miles):	23
South Hamilton Elementary School (12.0 miles):	21

Lake City Middle School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:

Florida:	45
Columbia County:	42
Lake City:	41
Lake City Middle School:	31

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:

Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum

Phone: (386) 758-4800 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 12
School number: 241
School type: Middle/Jr. High
District Name: COLUMBIA
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 8
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (386) 758-4839
Principal: Tom Dorsett
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 4
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 11
Senate District: 14

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	71%
State average from 613 schools:	71%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	66%
State average from 612 schools:	73%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	77%
State average from 613 schools:	88%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	48%
State average from 612 schools:	51%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	62%
State average from 613 schools:	64%

Making Math Gains

Here:	72%
State average from 612 schools:	70%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	48%
State average from 613 schools:	62%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	69%
State average from 613 schools:	68%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	513
State average from 613 schools:	545

Percent Tested

LAKE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	100%
State average from 613 schools:	100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: B

Grade in 2009: B

Grade in 2008: B

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 119999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	67%
State average from 614 schools:	56%

Minority Rate

Here:	48%
State average from 614 schools:	49%

Region: 3

Title I: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 329 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 329 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	90%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 110
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	66%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 304
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 297

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	63%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 304
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 297
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 170 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 170 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	89%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 57
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	73%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 156
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 153

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	70%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 156
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 153
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 65 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 65 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	47%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 60
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 58

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	47%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 60
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 58
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 62 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 62 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

LAKE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	61%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 57
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 55

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	54%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 57
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 55
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 216 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 216 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	93%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 72
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	64%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 200
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 193

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	60%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 200
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 193
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 29
Number of Students Tested in Math: 29
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 42 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 42 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	75%
State average from 613 schools:	70%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	66%
State average from 613 schools:	71%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

LAKE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	90%
State average from 613 schools:	92%

Meeting High Standards in Science

LAKE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	40%
State average from 613 schools:	49%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	67%
State average from 613 schools:	66%

Making Math Gains

Here:	67%
State average from 613 schools:	69%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	56%
State average from 613 schools:	68%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	59%
State average from 613 schools:	67%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	520
State average from 613 schools:	553

Percent Tested

LAKE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	99%
State average from 613 schools:	100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: B

Grade in 2008: B

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	62%
State average from 613 schools:	52%

Minority Rate

Here:	51%
State average from 613 schools:	48%

Region: 3

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 337 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 337 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 95
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	72%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 313
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 304

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

LAKE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	63%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 313
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 304
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 184 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 184 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 60
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	77%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 171
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 168

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

LAKE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	68%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 171
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 168
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 66 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 66 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	56%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 64
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 60

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	52%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 64
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 60
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 50 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 50 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 42
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 42
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 201 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 201 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

LAKE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	94%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 54
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	66%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 183
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 178

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	60%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 183
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 178
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 37 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 37 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 33
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 32
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 33
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 32
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

LAKE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	74%
State average from 603 schools:	69%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	66%
State average from 603 schools:	70%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	83%
State average from 603 schools:	88%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	40%
State average from 602 schools:	46%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	58%
State average from 602 schools:	65%

Making Math Gains

Here:	64%
State average from 602 schools:	71%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	55%
State average from 602 schools:	64%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	64%
State average from 602 schools:	69%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	504
State average from 602 schools:	543

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 604 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: B

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	58%
State average from 605 schools:	49%

Minority Rate

Here:	49%
State average from 605 schools:	48%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 352 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 352 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	92%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 106
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	70%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 336
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 328

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	63%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 336
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 328
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 194 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 194 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	94%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 54
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	80%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 187
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 185

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	68%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 187
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 185
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 65 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 65 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	53%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 58
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 54

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	52%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 58
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 54
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 60 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 60 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	63%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 59
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 58

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	53%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 59
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 58
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 198 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 198 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 60
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	63%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 189
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 185

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	56%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 189
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 185
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 27
Number of Students Tested in Math: 27
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	66%
State average from 539 schools:	64%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	60%
State average from 539 schools:	64%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

LAKE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	81%
State average from 539 schools:	91%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	43%
State average from 538 schools:	44%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	61%
State average from 539 schools:	61%

Making Math Gains

Here:	69%
State average from 539 schools:	69%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	60%
State average from 539 schools:	64%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

LAKE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	65%
State average from 539 schools:	67%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns

Here:	505
State average from 539 schools:	523

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 539 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	48%
State average from 541 schools:	49%

Minority Rate

Here:	28%
State average from 542 schools:	53%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1014 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1014 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	91%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 281
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	60%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 942
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	54%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 943
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 720 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 720 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	92%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 199
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	66%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 670
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	60%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 670
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 202 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 202 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	88%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 58
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	37%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 186
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	25%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 187
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 44 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 44 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 40
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 40
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 490 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 490 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	86%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 133
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	46%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 437
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	40%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 437
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16
Number of Students Tested in Math: 16
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 146 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 146 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	54%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 37
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	23%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 133
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	14%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 135
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	64%
State average from 526 schools:	64%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	57%
State average from 526 schools:	63%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	81%
State average from 526 schools:	89%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	63%
State average from 526 schools:	66%

Making Math Gains

Here:	68%
State average from 526 schools:	71%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	68%
State average from 526 schools:	72%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns

Here:	401
State average from 526 schools:	425

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 526 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	49%
State average from 525 schools:	50%

Minority Rate

Here:	29%
State average from 526 schools:	52%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1038 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1036 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	93%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 330
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	57%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 980
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	50%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 979
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 735 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 733 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	94%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 248

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

LAKE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	63%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 697
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

LAKE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	58%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 696
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 201 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 201 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	90%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 51
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	33%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 189
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

LAKE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	22%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 189
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 49 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 49 (99%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 11

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	67%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 43

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	56%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 43
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 20
Number of Students Tested in Math: 20
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 20
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 506 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 504 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	91%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 140
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	44%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 465
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	33%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 464
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 164 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 164 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	65%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 49
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	21%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 149
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	17%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 150
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	60%
State average from 505 schools:	59%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	54%
State average from 505 schools:	60%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	77%
State average from 506 schools:	83%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	60%
State average from 505 schools:	61%

Making Math Gains

Here:	66%
State average from 505 schools:	69%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	65%
State average from 505 schools:	66%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns

LAKE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	382
State average from 506 schools:	397

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 506 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	51%
State average from 506 schools:	51%

Minority Rate

Here:	27%
State average from 506 schools:	50%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1292
State average:	1402

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	299
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	23%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

LAKE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	14%
State average:	11%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	38%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	23%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	3%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	63%
State average:	74%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	16
State average:	17

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1470
State average:	1604

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	301
State average:	324

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	29%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	17%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	27%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	24%
State average:	29%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	4%
State average:	11%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	54%
State average:	72%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	17
State average:	19

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	7
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	2
State average:	2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

LAKE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	1693
State average:	1659

Mean Scale Score 100-500

LAKE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	318
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	16%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

LAKE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	13%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	34%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	28%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	9%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	72%
State average:	70%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	4
State average:	3

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	16
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	10
State average:	10

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

LAKE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	2
State average:	2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1653
State average:	1716

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	301
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	24%
State average:	19%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	15%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	35%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	20%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	5%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	60%
State average:	65%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	13
State average:	14

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	7
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	3
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1794
State average:	1810

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	314
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	18%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	17%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 3

LAKE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	32%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	26%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	6%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	65%
State average:	65%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	16
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	3
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1875
State average:	1876

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	308
State average:	308

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	17%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	33%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 3

LAKE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	36%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	12%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	2%
State average:	3%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	50%
State average:	52%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	4
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	16
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	6
State average:	6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2029
State average:	1922

Mean Scale Score 100-500

LAKE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	332
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

LAKE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	13%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	28%
State average:	30%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	32%
State average:	26%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	15%
State average:	12%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	13%
State average:	7%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	60%
State average:	45%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	12
State average:	11

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

LAKE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	7
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2073
State average:	1938

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	327
State average:	302

Percent Passing

Here:	70%
State average:	56%

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	24%
State average:	35%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	23%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	19%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	12%
State average:	8%

% in each Achievement Level 5

LAKE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	21%
State average:	12%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	53%
State average:	37%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	16
State average:	15

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	7
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	8
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	320
State average:	321

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	17%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 2

LAKE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	35%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	38%
State average:	36%

% in each Achievement Level 4

LAKE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	9%
State average:	11%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	1%
State average:	4%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	48%
State average:	51%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

Here:	10
State average:	9

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

Here:	8
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

LAKE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	8
State average:	9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	305
State average:	307

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	27%
State average:	27%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	34%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	33%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	4%
State average:	8%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	2%
State average:	2%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	38%
State average:	41%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

Here:	9
State average:	9

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	7
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

Here:	8
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

Here:	7
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	324
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	16%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	33%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	38%
State average:	30%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	10%
State average:	5%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	3%
State average:	1%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	51%
State average:	36%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

Here:	9
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

Here:	8
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

Here:	7
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

LAKE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	1317
State average:	1481

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	304
State average:	339

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	20%
State average:	8%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	21%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	33%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	23%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	3%
State average:	16%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	59%
State average:	79%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	7
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	4
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	4
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1491
State average:	1585

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	308
State average:	330

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	13%
State average:	10%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	25%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	40%
State average:	36%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	18%
State average:	26%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	4%
State average:	11%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

LAKE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	62%
State average:	74%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	6
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

LAKE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1657
State average:	1674

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	331
State average:	334

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	17%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 2

LAKE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	25%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	32%
State average:	27%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	24%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	2%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	58%
State average:	63%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	7
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

LAKE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	6
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	6
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1632
State average:	1696

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	300
State average:	315

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	35%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	21%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	25%
State average:	29%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	15%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 5

LAKE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	4%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	44%
State average:	55%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	4
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	6
State average:	6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1826
State average:	1786

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	315
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	14%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	24%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	35%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

LAKE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	23%
State average:	19%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	5%
State average:	7%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	62%
State average:	57%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

LAKE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	4
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

LAKE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

LAKE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	6
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

LAKE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	1888
State average:	1892

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	319
State average:	320

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	14%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	23%
State average:	21%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	44%
State average:	38%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	15%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 5

LAKE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	5%
State average:	10%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	63%
State average:	64%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	7
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	5
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2000
State average:	1925

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	324
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	5%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 2

LAKE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	17%
State average:	22%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	35%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	29%
State average:	21%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	14%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	78%
State average:	61%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	5
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	5
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2054
State average:	1995

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	340
State average:	326

Percent Passing

Here:	91%
State average:	80%

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	5%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	12%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	26%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	43%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	14%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	83%
State average:	69%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	9
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	6
State average:	5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1344
State average:	1402

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	307
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1598
State average:	1605

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	322
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 08%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 06%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1603
State average:	1656

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	302
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1644
State average:	1707

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	299
State average:	310

% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1746
State average:	1800

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	305
State average:	315

% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1852
State average:	1864

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	303
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1988
State average:	1907

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	324
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2034
State average:	1921

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	320
State average:	299

Percent Passing: 69%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	304
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 35%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	298
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	320
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1343
State average:	1476

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	309
State average:	338

% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1541
State average:	1578

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	319
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1612
State average:	1675

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	321
State average:	334

% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

LAKE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	1634
State average:	1679

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	301
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1792
State average:	1799

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	307
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1860
State average:	1876

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	311
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1994
State average:	1925

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	323
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2052
State average:	1972

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	340
State average:	321

Percent Passing: 89%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 9
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 97

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	4
State average from 27 schools:	59

Unscore - Combined: 1
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 41%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 89%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 273

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	4
State average from 27 schools:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 34%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 30%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 7%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 95%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 485

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	4
State average from 27 schools:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 7%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 5%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 82%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1415
State average:	1396

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	319
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

LAKE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	1563
State average:	1582

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	316
State average:	320

% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1537
State average:	1627

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	290
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1633
State average:	1696

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	297
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1750
State average:	1775

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	306
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1859
State average:	1857

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	304
State average:	304

% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2009
State average:	1894

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	328
State average:	307

% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2043
State average:	1935

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	322
State average:	302

Percent Passing: 67%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	301
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 37%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	305
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	322
State average:	302

% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1401
State average:	1461

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	322
State average:	335

% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1496
State average:	1563

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	309
State average:	325

% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

LAKE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	1606
State average:	1668

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	320
State average:	333

% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1645
State average:	1670

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	303
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1763
State average:	1801

Mean Scale Score 100-500

LAKE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	300
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1890
State average:	1882

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	319
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2003
State average:	1915

Mean Scale Score 100-500

LAKE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	325
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2048
State average:	1984

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	339
State average:	323

Percent Passing: 86%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	116
State average:	103

Mean Scale Score

Here:	640
State average from 3241 schools:	633

Median NPR

Here:	67
State average:	61

Literary (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

LAKE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	13
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

LAKE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	9
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	15
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	113
State average:	97

Mean Scale Score

Here:	649
State average from 3233 schools:	653

Median NPR

Here:	67
State average:	69

Literary (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	10

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	15
State average:	15

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	8

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	129
State average:	101

Mean Scale Score

LAKE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	661
State average from 3309 schools:	667

Median NPR

LAKE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	68
State average:	71

Literary (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	14
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	6
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	276
State average:	190

Mean Scale Score

Here:	664
State average from 2604 schools:	671

Median NPR

Here:	57
State average:	63

Literary (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

LAKE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	7
State average:	8

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	14
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

LAKE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	9
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

LAKE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	7
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Number of Students

LAKE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	229
State average:	201

Mean Scale Score

Here:	676
State average from 2487 schools:	682

Median NPR

LAKE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	62
State average:	66

Literary (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

LAKE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	12
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	11
State average:	12

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	14
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

LAKE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	8
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	6
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	248
State average:	192

Mean Scale Score

Here:	685
State average from 2497 schools:	687

Median NPR

Here:	61
State average:	63

Literary (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	12

Informational (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	7
State average:	7

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	13
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

LAKE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	10
State average:	10

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	500
State average:	273

Mean Scale Score

LAKE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	712
State average from 2275 schools:	694

Median NPR

LAKE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	77
State average:	61

Literary (max 18)

LAKE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	14
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	11

Functional (max 18)

LAKE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	13
State average:	11

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	7

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	16
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

LAKE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	11
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	6
State average:	5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	471
State average:	237

Mean Scale Score

Here:	722
State average from 2096 schools:	709

Median NPR

Here:	78
State average:	65

Literary (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

LAKE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	14
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	14

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	8

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	16
State average:	15

Critical Analysis (max 12)

LAKE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	11
State average:	10

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	8
State average:	8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 111

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	307
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 62%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 32%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 80%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 263

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	298
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 49%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 34%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 93%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 491

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	308
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 54%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 30%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 78%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

LAKE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	1688
State average from 878 schools:	1661

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	307
State average:	302

% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

LAKE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	1765
State average from 808 schools:	1746

Mean Scale Score 100-500

LAKE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	309
State average:	305

% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1875
State average from 819 schools:	1810

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	308
State average:	294

% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 7

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	304
State average:	290

% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1664
State average from 873 schools:	1641

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	308
State average:	302

% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 5

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1742
State average from 804 schools:	1777

Mean Scale Score 100-500

LAKE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	294
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 5

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

LAKE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	1872
State average from 815 schools:	1851

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	314
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 364

Mean Scale Score

Here:	676
State average from 874 schools:	671

Median NPR: 68
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 335

Mean Scale Score

LAKE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	677
State average from 796 schools:	675

Median NPR: 63
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 283

Mean Scale Score

Here:	695
State average from 810 schools:	685

Median NPR: 71
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 10): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 14): 10
Strategies (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 363

Mean Scale Score

Here:	671
State average from 874 schools:	669

Median NPR: 66
Number Sense (max 10): 6
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 333

Mean Scale Score

Here:	680
State average from 796 schools:	685

Median NPR: 66
Number Sense (max 9): 4
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 284

Mean Scale Score

Here:	702
State average from 810 schools:	698

Median NPR: 73
Number Sense (max 9): 6
Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 298

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	273
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 35%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 10
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

LAKE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL:	3
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 37%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 76%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 58%

City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DC	DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID
IL	IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	MD
ME	MI	MN	MO	MS	MT	NC
ND	NE	NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY
OH	OK	OR	PA	RI	SC	SD
TN	TX	UT	VA	VT	WA	WI
WV	WY

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID	IL
IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	ME	MI
MN	MO	MS	MT	NC	ND	NE
NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	SD	TN	TX
VA	VT	WA	WI	WV	WY

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID	IL
IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	ME	MI
MN	MO	MS	MT	NC	ND	NE
NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	SD	TN	TX
VA	VT	WA	WI	WV	WY

AL	AZ	CA	CO	CT	DE	FL
GA	HI	IA	ID	IL	IN	KS
LA	MA	MD	MI	MN	MO	NC
NE	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	TN	TX	UT
VA	WA	WI	WV

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DC	DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID
IL	IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	MD
ME	MI	MN	MO	MS	MT	NC
ND	NE	NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY
OH	OK	OR	PA	RI	SC	SD
TN	TX	UT	VA	VT	WA	WI
WV	WY