City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 19.
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Show street view
No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
| Bay Haven Charter Academy School (4.6 miles): | 88 |
| Mowat Middle School (4.3 miles): | 66 |
| Haney Technical High School (3.6 miles): | 56 |
| Merritt Brown Middle School (8.9 miles): | 54 |
| Surfside Middle School (9.8 miles): | 42 |
| New Horizons Learning Center School (3.7 miles): | 31 |
| Margaret K. Lewis Exceptional School: | 19 |
| Hope School (2.5 miles): | 3 |
Margaret K. Lewis Exceptional School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
| Florida: | 45 |
| Bay County: | 42 |
| Panama City: | 39 |
| Margaret K. Lewis Exceptional: | 19 |
1
Lula Vickers
Aug 19, 2011 @ 4:16 pm
My sister wnt to Margaret K Lewis school and we want to find out what years it was open
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
District Number: 3
School number: 281
School type: Combination Elementary and Secondary
District Name: BAY
Grade range: PREKINDERGARTEN TO GRADE 12
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (850) 872-7628
Principal: Barbara Hardy
The main educational program offered at the school: Special Education
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 2
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 6
Senate District: 4
2009-2010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 74% |
| State average from 59 schools: | 76% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 76% |
| State average from 59 schools: | 78% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 71% |
| State average from 59 schools: | 85% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 56% |
| State average from 59 schools: | 54% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 65% |
| State average from 59 schools: | 66% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 55% |
| State average from 59 schools: | 69% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 53% |
| State average from 59 schools: | 62% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| MARGARET K. LEWIS EXCEPTIONAL SCHOOL: | 47% |
| State average from 59 schools: | 69% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 497 |
| State average from 59 schools: | 560 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES| MARGARET K. LEWIS EXCEPTIONAL SCHOOL: | 100% |
| State average from 59 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: NO
Grade in 2010: B
Grade in 2009: B
Grade in 2008: B
Grade in 2007: B
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 119999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 81% |
| State average from 59 schools: | 54% |
Minority Rate
Region: 1| Here: | 31% |
| State average from 59 schools: | 46% |
Title I: YES
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 323 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 323 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 90% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 69% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 303
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 73% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 303
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 230 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 230 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 92% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 73% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 214
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 78% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 214
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 64 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 64 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 30
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 54% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 61
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 56% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 61
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 251 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 251 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 90% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 66% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 233
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 70% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 233
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 36 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 36 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 31
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 31
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2008-2009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 74% |
| State average from 58 schools: | 76% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 75% |
| State average from 58 schools: | 77% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 92% |
| State average from 58 schools: | 88% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 39% |
| State average from 58 schools: | 50% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 54% |
| State average from 58 schools: | 69% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 57% |
| State average from 58 schools: | 69% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 57% |
| State average from 58 schools: | 66% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 60% |
| State average from 58 schools: | 68% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 508 |
| State average from 58 schools: | 564 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 59 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
Grade in 2009: B
Grade in 2008: B
Grade in 2007: B
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| MARGARET K. LEWIS EXCEPTIONAL SCHOOL: | 78% |
| State average from 59 schools: | 51% |
Minority Rate
Region: 1| Here: | 30% |
| State average from 59 schools: | 46% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 308 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 308 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 92
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 69% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 288
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 71% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 288
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 217 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 218 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 67
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 74% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 204
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 74% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 204
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 64 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 64 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 54% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 61
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 62% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 61
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 232 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 232 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 63
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 63% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 213
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| MARGARET K. LEWIS EXCEPTIONAL SCHOOL: | 67% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 213
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 42 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 41 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 37
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 37
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2007-2008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 72% |
| State average from 59 schools: | 73% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 75% |
| State average from 59 schools: | 75% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 77% |
| State average from 59 schools: | 83% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 42% |
| State average from 59 schools: | 47% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 61% |
| State average from 59 schools: | 65% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 65% |
| State average from 59 schools: | 70% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 55% |
| State average from 59 schools: | 60% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 57% |
| State average from 59 schools: | 68% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 504 |
| State average from 59 schools: | 541 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 59 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
Grade in 2008: B
Grade in 2007: B
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 71% |
| State average from 59 schools: | 47% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 25% |
| State average from 59 schools: | 46% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 323 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 323 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 88% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 68% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 292
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| MARGARET K. LEWIS EXCEPTIONAL SCHOOL: | 71% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 290
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 244 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 244 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 89% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 74% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 219
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 76% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 217
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 54 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 54 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| MARGARET K. LEWIS EXCEPTIONAL SCHOOL: | 47% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 51
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 53% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 51
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 223 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 223 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| MARGARET K. LEWIS EXCEPTIONAL SCHOOL: | 84% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 62% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 199
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 67% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 197
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 40 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 40 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 37
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 37
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 51 (76%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 50 (76%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| MARGARET K. LEWIS EXCEPTIONAL SCHOOL: | 81% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 56% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| MARGARET K. LEWIS EXCEPTIONAL SCHOOL: | 31% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 36 (75%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 35 (74%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| MARGARET K. LEWIS EXCEPTIONAL SCHOOL: | 64% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 34% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 31 (74%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 31 (74%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 50% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 23% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 51 (76%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 50 (76%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 26
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 56% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| MARGARET K. LEWIS EXCEPTIONAL SCHOOL: | 31% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 72 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 72 (97%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 58% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 68% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 54% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 53 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 53 (97%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 20
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 71% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 57% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 43 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 43 (96%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 70% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| MARGARET K. LEWIS EXCEPTIONAL SCHOOL: | 65% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 72 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 72 (97%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 24
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| MARGARET K. LEWIS EXCEPTIONAL SCHOOL: | 68% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 54% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1382 |
| State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 314 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 15% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 17% |
| State average: | 11% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 31% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 31% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| MARGARET K. LEWIS EXCEPTIONAL SCHOOL: | 6% |
| State average: | 8% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 68% |
| State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 17 |
| State average: | 17 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| MARGARET K. LEWIS EXCEPTIONAL SCHOOL: | 1551 |
| State average: | 1604 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 314 |
| State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 18% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 17% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 29% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 31% |
| State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 5% |
| State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 65% |
| State average: | 72% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| MARGARET K. LEWIS EXCEPTIONAL SCHOOL: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 19 |
| State average: | 19 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 2 |
| State average: | 2 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| MARGARET K. LEWIS EXCEPTIONAL SCHOOL: | 1665 |
| State average: | 1659 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 313 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 12% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 16% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| MARGARET K. LEWIS EXCEPTIONAL SCHOOL: | 35% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 30% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 6% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| MARGARET K. LEWIS EXCEPTIONAL SCHOOL: | 72% |
| State average: | 70% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 3 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 16 |
| State average: | 16 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 10 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 2 |
| State average: | 2 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| MARGARET K. LEWIS EXCEPTIONAL SCHOOL: | 1410 |
| State average: | 1716 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 257 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 40% |
| State average: | 19% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| MARGARET K. LEWIS EXCEPTIONAL SCHOOL: | 30% |
| State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 10% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 20% |
| State average: | 25% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 30% |
| State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 14 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1621 |
| State average: | 1810 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 281 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 36% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| MARGARET K. LEWIS EXCEPTIONAL SCHOOL: | 18% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 36% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 9% |
| State average: | 23% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 45% |
| State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 16 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1857 |
| State average: | 1876 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 304 |
| State average: | 308 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 18% |
| State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 35% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 37% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 10% |
| State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 1% |
| State average: | 3% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 48% |
| State average: | 52% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| MARGARET K. LEWIS EXCEPTIONAL SCHOOL: | 15 |
| State average: | 16 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1891 |
| State average: | 1922 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 306 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 30% |
| State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| MARGARET K. LEWIS EXCEPTIONAL SCHOOL: | 32% |
| State average: | 30% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 21% |
| State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 10% |
| State average: | 12% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| MARGARET K. LEWIS EXCEPTIONAL SCHOOL: | 7% |
| State average: | 7% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 38% |
| State average: | 45% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 11 |
| State average: | 11 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1919 |
| State average: | 1938 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 299 |
| State average: | 302 |
Percent Passing
| Here: | 50% |
| State average: | 56% |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| MARGARET K. LEWIS EXCEPTIONAL SCHOOL: | 42% |
| State average: | 35% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 25% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 15% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 9% |
| State average: | 8% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 10% |
| State average: | 12% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 34% |
| State average: | 37% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 15 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 317 |
| State average: | 321 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 19% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 33% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 33% |
| State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 12% |
| State average: | 11% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 2% |
| State average: | 4% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 47% |
| State average: | 51% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 9 |
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 9 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 303 |
| State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 25% |
| State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 39% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 30% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 5% |
| State average: | 8% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 1% |
| State average: | 2% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 36% |
| State average: | 41% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 9 |
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 304 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 31% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 31% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 33% |
| State average: | 30% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 5% |
| State average: | 5% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 1% |
| State average: | 1% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| MARGARET K. LEWIS EXCEPTIONAL SCHOOL: | 38% |
| State average: | 36% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1500 |
| State average: | 1481 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 343 |
| State average: | 339 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 6% |
| State average: | 8% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 10% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 35% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 30% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 19% |
| State average: | 16% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 84% |
| State average: | 79% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1543 |
| State average: | 1585 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 320 |
| State average: | 330 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| MARGARET K. LEWIS EXCEPTIONAL SCHOOL: | 10% |
| State average: | 10% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 19% |
| State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 44% |
| State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 21% |
| State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 6% |
| State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 71% |
| State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| MARGARET K. LEWIS EXCEPTIONAL SCHOOL: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1662 |
| State average: | 1674 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 332 |
| State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 16% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 26% |
| State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 17% |
| State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 29% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 12% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 58% |
| State average: | 63% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| MARGARET K. LEWIS EXCEPTIONAL SCHOOL: | 1549 |
| State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 281 |
| State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| MARGARET K. LEWIS EXCEPTIONAL SCHOOL: | 40% |
| State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 40% |
| State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 10% |
| State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 10% |
| State average: | 18% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 20% |
| State average: | 55% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| MARGARET K. LEWIS EXCEPTIONAL SCHOOL: | 3 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 6 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1601 |
| State average: | 1786 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 259 |
| State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 73% |
| State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| MARGARET K. LEWIS EXCEPTIONAL SCHOOL: | 18% |
| State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 9% |
| State average: | 31% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 9% |
| State average: | 57% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| MARGARET K. LEWIS EXCEPTIONAL SCHOOL: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 5 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1891 |
| State average: | 1892 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| MARGARET K. LEWIS EXCEPTIONAL SCHOOL: | 319 |
| State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 14% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 21% |
| State average: | 21% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 44% |
| State average: | 38% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 17% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 5% |
| State average: | 10% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 66% |
| State average: | 64% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1898 |
| State average: | 1925 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 294 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 19% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 30% |
| State average: | 22% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 29% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| MARGARET K. LEWIS EXCEPTIONAL SCHOOL: | 18% |
| State average: | 21% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 4% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| MARGARET K. LEWIS EXCEPTIONAL SCHOOL: | 52% |
| State average: | 61% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| MARGARET K. LEWIS EXCEPTIONAL SCHOOL: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| MARGARET K. LEWIS EXCEPTIONAL SCHOOL: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1973 |
| State average: | 1995 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 320 |
| State average: | 326 |
Percent Passing
| MARGARET K. LEWIS EXCEPTIONAL SCHOOL: | 78% |
| State average: | 80% |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 14% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 26% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 30% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| MARGARET K. LEWIS EXCEPTIONAL SCHOOL: | 27% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 2% |
| State average: | 8% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 60% |
| State average: | 69% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1404 |
| State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%| Here: | 317 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1599 |
| State average: | 1605 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%| Here: | 323 |
| State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 09%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 05
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1549 |
| State average: | 1656 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%| Here: | 292 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1688 |
| State average: | 1800 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%| Here: | 294 |
| State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1862 |
| State average: | 1864 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%| Here: | 305 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1869 |
| State average: | 1907 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%| Here: | 302 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 32%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1933 |
| State average: | 1921 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Percent Passing: 52%| Here: | 301 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%| Here: | 298 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%| Here: | 297 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%| Here: | 305 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1436 |
| State average: | 1476 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%| Here: | 329 |
| State average: | 338 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| MARGARET K. LEWIS EXCEPTIONAL SCHOOL: | 1586 |
| State average: | 1578 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%| Here: | 330 |
| State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1595 |
| State average: | 1675 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%| Here: | 318 |
| State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1650 |
| State average: | 1799 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 58%| Here: | 272 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 26%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1891 |
| State average: | 1876 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%| MARGARET K. LEWIS EXCEPTIONAL SCHOOL: | 319 |
| State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1911 |
| State average: | 1925 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%| Here: | 298 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1993 |
| State average: | 1972 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Percent Passing: 82%| Here: | 325 |
| State average: | 321 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 96
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Unscore - Combined: 1| Here: | 4 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 51%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 89%
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 443
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%| Here: | 4 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 32%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 85%
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 343
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%| Here: | 4 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 34%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 80%
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1365 |
| State average: | 1396 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%| Here: | 311 |
| State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1566 |
| State average: | 1582 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%| Here: | 317 |
| State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1583 |
| State average: | 1627 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%| Here: | 298 |
| State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1369 |
| State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 50%| Here: | 250 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1494 |
| State average: | 1775 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 58%| Here: | 257 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 25%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| MARGARET K. LEWIS EXCEPTIONAL SCHOOL: | 1863 |
| State average: | 1857 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%| Here: | 305 |
| State average: | 304 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| MARGARET K. LEWIS EXCEPTIONAL SCHOOL: | 1869 |
| State average: | 1894 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 34%| Here: | 302 |
| State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 37%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1906 |
| State average: | 1935 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Percent Passing: 47%| Here: | 296 |
| State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%| Here: | 309 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%| Here: | 297 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 32%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%| Here: | 301 |
| State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1468 |
| State average: | 1461 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%| Here: | 336 |
| State average: | 335 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1573 |
| State average: | 1563 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%| Here: | 327 |
| State average: | 325 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1668 |
| State average: | 1668 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%| Here: | 333 |
| State average: | 333 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1342 |
| State average: | 1670 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 75%| Here: | 233 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 17%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1517 |
| State average: | 1801 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 64%| Here: | 239 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 27%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1904 |
| State average: | 1882 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%| Here: | 322 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1903 |
| State average: | 1915 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%| Here: | 296 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1964 |
| State average: | 1984 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Percent Passing: 73%| Here: | 318 |
| State average: | 323 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
| MARGARET K. LEWIS EXCEPTIONAL SCHOOL: | 118 |
| State average: | 103 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 626 |
| State average from 3241 schools: | 633 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 55 |
| State average: | 61 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 12 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 12 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 103 |
| State average: | 97 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 645 |
| State average from 3233 schools: | 653 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 63 |
| State average: | 69 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 14 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 12 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 10 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 15 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 8 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 107 |
| State average: | 101 |
Mean Scale Score
| MARGARET K. LEWIS EXCEPTIONAL SCHOOL: | 664 |
| State average from 3309 schools: | 667 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 69 |
| State average: | 71 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 12 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| MARGARET K. LEWIS EXCEPTIONAL SCHOOL: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| MARGARET K. LEWIS EXCEPTIONAL SCHOOL: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 12 |
| State average: | 190 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 617 |
| State average from 2604 schools: | 671 |
Median NPR
| MARGARET K. LEWIS EXCEPTIONAL SCHOOL: | 17 |
| State average: | 63 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| MARGARET K. LEWIS EXCEPTIONAL SCHOOL: | 7 |
| State average: | 12 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 8 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
| MARGARET K. LEWIS EXCEPTIONAL SCHOOL: | 12 |
| State average: | 201 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 643 |
| State average from 2487 schools: | 682 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 33 |
| State average: | 66 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 14 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 12 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 12 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| MARGARET K. LEWIS EXCEPTIONAL SCHOOL: | 8 |
| State average: | 9 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| MARGARET K. LEWIS EXCEPTIONAL SCHOOL: | 4 |
| State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 410 |
| State average: | 192 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 688 |
| State average from 2497 schools: | 687 |
Median NPR
| MARGARET K. LEWIS EXCEPTIONAL SCHOOL: | 65 |
| State average: | 63 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 12 |
Informational (max 18)
| MARGARET K. LEWIS EXCEPTIONAL SCHOOL: | 12 |
| State average: | 12 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| MARGARET K. LEWIS EXCEPTIONAL SCHOOL: | 14 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| MARGARET K. LEWIS EXCEPTIONAL SCHOOL: | 10 |
| State average: | 10 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 387 |
| State average: | 273 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 696 |
| State average from 2275 schools: | 694 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 64 |
| State average: | 61 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| MARGARET K. LEWIS EXCEPTIONAL SCHOOL: | 11 |
| State average: | 11 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 12 |
| State average: | 11 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 353 |
| State average: | 237 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 716 |
| State average from 2096 schools: | 709 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 74 |
| State average: | 65 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 14 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 14 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 8 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 16 |
| State average: | 15 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 11 |
| State average: | 10 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 8 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 100
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 23%| Here: | 298 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 57%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 5%| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 32%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 73%
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 410
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 27%| Here: | 281 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 34%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 36%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 86%
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 375
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 18%| MARGARET K. LEWIS EXCEPTIONAL SCHOOL: | 298 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 47%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 33%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 6%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 81%
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.