Middleton High School in Tampa, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 10.

4801 N 22ND ST
Tampa, FL 33610

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Hospital/Homebound School (19.7 miles):

90
Tampa Bay Tech High School (3.8 miles):

63
Brandon High School (8.9 miles):

53
Wharton High School (12.8 miles):

40
Lennard High School (18.6 miles):

22
Sunshine Youth Services School (13.8 miles):

13
Middleton High School:

10
Tampa Bay Academy School (12.5 miles):

1
Middleton High School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Hillsborough County:

42
Tampa:

41
Middleton High School:

10

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (813) 233-3360 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 29
School number: 3004
School type: Senior High
District Name: HILLSBOROUGH
Grade range: GRADES 9 TO 12
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (813) 233-3364
Magnet Program.
Principal: Owen Young
School in Need of Improvement (SINI) Status:
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 11
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 59
Senate District: 18

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

22%
State average from 451 schools:

62%
Meeting High Standards in Math
MIDDLETON HIGH SCHOOL:

55%
State average from 451 schools:

77%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

78%
State average from 452 schools:

86%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

32%
State average from 451 schools:

48%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

36%
State average from 452 schools:

58%
Making Math Gains
Here:

68%
State average from 449 schools:

72%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

33%
State average from 452 schools:

52%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

67%
State average from 452 schools:

67%
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 10

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

401
State average from 452 schools:

522
Percent Tested
Here:

98%
State average from 450 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: Pending

Grade in 2009: D

Grade in 2008: D

Grade in 2007: D

Grade in 2006: D

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: D

Grade in 2003: N

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

80%
State average from 454 schools:

50%
Minority Rate
Here:

90%
State average from 454 schools:

47%
Region: 4

Title I: YES


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 580 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 575 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
MIDDLETON HIGH SCHOOL:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 278
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

25%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 526
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 489

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 519
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 479
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 47 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 47 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 31
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 46
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 41
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 46
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 42
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 434 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 429 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 193
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

18%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 392
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 367

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 385
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 356
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 87 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 87 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 44
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 77
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 70
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 77
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 70
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 493 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 488 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 217
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

21%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 443
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 410

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

48%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 436
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 400
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 43 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 44 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 36
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 37
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 113 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 111 (96%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

76%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 37
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 104
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 90

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

43%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 100
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 87
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
MIDDLETON HIGH SCHOOL:

26%
State average from 443 schools:

60%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

51%
State average from 440 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

73%
State average from 443 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

36%
State average from 443 schools:

46%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

44%
State average from 441 schools:

59%
Making Math Gains
Here:

72%
State average from 442 schools:

72%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

53%
State average from 442 schools:

56%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
MIDDLETON HIGH SCHOOL:

69%
State average from 441 schools:

66%
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 0

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

424
State average from 441 schools:

522
Percent Tested
MIDDLETON HIGH SCHOOL:

96%
State average from 448 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: D

Grade in 2008: D

Grade in 2007: D

Grade in 2006: D

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: D

Grade in 2003: N

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

71%
State average from 446 schools:

46%
Minority Rate
Here:

87%
State average from 451 schools:

45%
Region: 4


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 603 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 602 (96%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

82%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 276
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

26%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 541
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 520

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 540
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 516
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 63 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 63 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 35
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 59
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 58
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 59
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 58
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 422 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 421 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

78%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 194
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

15%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 382
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 366

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

38%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 380
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 361
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 78 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 78 (94%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

81%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 31
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 68
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 65
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 69
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 66
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 443 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 441 (96%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

77%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 192
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

18%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 393
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 375

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

42%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 393
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 374
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 44 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 44 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 23
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 33
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 113 (89%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 111 (88%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

67%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 63
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

25%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 106
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 92

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

41%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 100
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 87
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

27%
State average from 425 schools:

61%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

52%
State average from 425 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

75%
State average from 425 schools:

82%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

40%
State average from 425 schools:

45%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

42%
State average from 425 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
Here:

69%
State average from 425 schools:

74%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

43%
State average from 425 schools:

55%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

71%
State average from 425 schools:

71%
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 0

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

419
State average from 425 schools:

526
Percent Tested
Here:

94%
State average from 425 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: NO

Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Reading: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: D

Grade in 2007: D

Grade in 2006: D

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

66%
State average from 425 schools:

42%
Minority Rate
Here:

86%
State average from 425 schools:

44%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 741 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 737 (96%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

86%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 339
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

25%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 679
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 649

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

48%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 668
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 638
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 89 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 90 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 48
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 87
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 82
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 88
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 83
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 534 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 529 (95%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 241
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
MIDDLETON HIGH SCHOOL:

15%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 490
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 471

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

36%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 477
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 458
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 87 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 86 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

82%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 38
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 75
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 71
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 75
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 71
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 525 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 520 (95%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

83%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 226
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
MIDDLETON HIGH SCHOOL:

18%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 474
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 455

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 464
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 447
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 49 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 49 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 37
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 37
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 160 (92%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 158 (91%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 61
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

23%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 146
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 138

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

37%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 141
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 133
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

27%
State average from 370 schools:

45%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

50%
State average from 370 schools:

69%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

83%
State average from 370 schools:

84%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

35%
State average from 370 schools:

41%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

41%
State average from 370 schools:

52%
Making Math Gains
Here:

59%
State average from 370 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

41%
State average from 370 schools:

49%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

62%
State average from 370 schools:

67%
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 0

Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
Here:

398
State average from 370 schools:

482
Percent Tested
Here:

97%
State average from 370 schools:

97%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: D

Grade in 2006: D

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

63%
State average from 372 schools:

38%
Minority Rate
Here:

84%
State average from 372 schools:

48%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 905 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 908 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 397
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

25%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 811
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
MIDDLETON HIGH SCHOOL:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 813
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 122 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 121 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

95%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 62
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
MIDDLETON HIGH SCHOOL:

72%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 120
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 119
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 641 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 644 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 269
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

12%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 560
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

30%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 563
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 104 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 105 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 47
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 94
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 94
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 617 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 618 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 241
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

14%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 538
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

34%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 539
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 40 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 40 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 172 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 173 (95%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 70
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

19%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 148
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

26%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 148
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

34%
State average from 360 schools:

45%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

57%
State average from 361 schools:

68%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

87%
State average from 361 schools:

83%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

48%
State average from 361 schools:

53%
Making Math Gains
Here:

65%
State average from 361 schools:

72%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

43%
State average from 361 schools:

53%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

334
State average from 361 schools:

374
Percent Tested
Here:

98%
State average from 361 schools:

98%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: NO

Grade in 2006: D

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: D

Grade in 2003: N

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

61%
State average from 362 schools:

38%
Minority Rate
MIDDLETON HIGH SCHOOL:

83%
State average from 362 schools:

47%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 967 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 971 (98%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 447
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

30%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 891
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 887
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 165 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 164 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 80

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 155
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 155
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 671 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 673 (97%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

82%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 303

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

14%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 611
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
MIDDLETON HIGH SCHOOL:

34%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 608
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 90 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 93 (98%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

82%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 44

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 87

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

65%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 86
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 20
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 620 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 624 (97%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

79%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 271

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

16%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 555
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

36%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 554
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 37 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 37 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 18

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

22%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 36

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

41%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 34
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 161 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 160 (94%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

42%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 62

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

9%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 141
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

16%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 136
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

38%
State average from 348 schools:

42%
Meeting High Standards in Math
MIDDLETON HIGH SCHOOL:

61%
State average from 348 schools:

67%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

88%
State average from 348 schools:

84%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

52%
State average from 348 schools:

51%
Making Math Gains
Here:

68%
State average from 348 schools:

73%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

46%
State average from 348 schools:

53%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

353
State average from 348 schools:

371
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 348 schools:

98%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: No%

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: D

Grade in 2003: N

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

59%
State average from 347 schools:

38%
Minority Rate
Here:

83%
State average from 348 schools:

45%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1757
State average:

1922
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

281
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

47%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

36%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

12%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

4%
State average:

12%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

16%
State average:

45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

9
State average:

11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
MIDDLETON HIGH SCHOOL:

5
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1837
State average:

1938
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

284
State average:

302
Percent Passing
Here:

37%
State average:

56%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

55%
State average:

35%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

23%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

8%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

6%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

9%
State average:

12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
MIDDLETON HIGH SCHOOL:

22%
State average:

37%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

13
State average:

15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

6
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

300
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

31%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

40%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

23%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

5%
State average:

5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

29%
State average:

36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
MIDDLETON HIGH SCHOOL:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
MIDDLETON HIGH SCHOOL:

1854
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

281
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

28%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

29%
State average:

22%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

33%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

9%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

43%
State average:

61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
MIDDLETON HIGH SCHOOL:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
MIDDLETON HIGH SCHOOL:

1979
State average:

1995
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

322
State average:

326
Percent Passing
Here:

76%
State average:

80%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

11%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

31%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
MIDDLETON HIGH SCHOOL:

29%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

18%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

10%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

57%
State average:

69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
MIDDLETON HIGH SCHOOL:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1816
State average:

1907
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

292
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 25%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1818
State average:

1921
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

280
State average:

299
Percent Passing: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 56%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 18%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MIDDLETON HIGH SCHOOL:

293
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 30%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1887
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

291
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1946
State average:

1972
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MIDDLETON HIGH SCHOOL:

314
State average:

321
Percent Passing: 68%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 291
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 6%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 66%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1774
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

285
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 51%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 22%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1791
State average:

1935
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

275
State average:

302
Percent Passing: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 55%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 21%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MIDDLETON HIGH SCHOOL:

299
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 34%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1859
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

283
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1937
State average:

1984
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

312
State average:

323
Percent Passing: 68%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

345
State average:

273
Mean Scale Score
Here:

686
State average from 2275 schools:

694
Median NPR
Here:

54
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

11
Functional (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

11
Initial Understanding (max 12)
MIDDLETON HIGH SCHOOL:

7
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

5
State average:

5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

326
State average:

237
Mean Scale Score
Here:

704
State average from 2096 schools:

709
Median NPR
Here:

62
State average:

65
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

8
State average:

8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 352
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

272
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 36%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 8
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 68%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1780
State average from 612 schools:

1849
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MIDDLETON HIGH SCHOOL:

286
State average:

298
% in each Achievement Level 1: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 22%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 9: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 90%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1784
State average:

1837
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1750
State average:

1779
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 34

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1798
State average from 573 schools:

1879
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

276
State average:

291
Percent Passing: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 57%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 23%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 18: 10
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1830
State average:

1873
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1839
State average:

1876
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: -9

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

295
State average:

295
% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 32%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 14: 7

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1860
State average from 613 schools:

1884
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

283
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 10: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 8: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 89%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1867
State average:

1869
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1824
State average:

1821
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 43

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1907
State average from 581 schools:

1950
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

305
State average:

315
Percent Passing: 58%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 10: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 11: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1923
State average:

1939
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1912
State average:

1901
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 11

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 411
Mean Scale Score
Here:

696
State average from 597 schools:

696
Median NPR: 63
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 14): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 410
Mean Scale Score
Here:

696
State average from 575 schools:

695
Median NPR: 54
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 10): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 14): 10
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 409
Mean Scale Score
MIDDLETON HIGH SCHOOL:

708
State average from 597 schools:

708
Median NPR: 68
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 8
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 409
Mean Scale Score
Here:

712
State average from 575 schools:

710
Median NPR: 61
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 7
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 416
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

276
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 38%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 9 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 74%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 53%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Tampa, FL
  5. Middleton High School in Tampa, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.