Mildred Helms Elementary School in Largo, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 55.

561 S CLEARWATER/LARGO RO
Largo, FL 33770

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Ptec - St Petersburg School (12.6 miles):

98
Oakhurst Elementary School (3.5 miles):

78
Citrus Park Elementary School (17.8 miles):

65
Southern Oak Elementary School (2.9 miles):

56
Mildred Helms Elementary School:

55
Curlew Creek Elementary School (10.9 miles):

45
Bear Creek Elementary School (11.1 miles):

35
James B. Sanderlin Elementary School (13.9 miles):

26
Dixie Hollins Adult Education Center School (8.0 miles):

0
Mildred Helms Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Pinellas County:

51
Largo:

46
Mildred Helms Elementary School:

55

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:



Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (727) 588-3569 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 52
School number: 2431
School type: Elementary
District Name: PINELLAS
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (727) 588-3603
Principal: Sandra R Cowley
School in Need of Improvement (SINI) Status: Year 1 in Need of Improvement
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 10
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 54
Senate District: 13
School Web Address: http://www.mildred-es.pinellas.k12.fl.us

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
MILDRED HELMS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

77%
State average from 963 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

68%
State average from 963 schools:

77%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

79%
State average from 963 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
MILDRED HELMS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

49%
State average from 962 schools:

53%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

64%
State average from 963 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
MILDRED HELMS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

56%
State average from 963 schools:

66%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

72%
State average from 963 schools:

58%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

60%
State average from 963 schools:

66%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

525
State average from 963 schools:

543
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 963 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 119999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

71%
State average from 963 schools:

58%
Minority Rate
Here:

32%
State average from 963 schools:

47%
Region: 4

Title I: YES


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 377 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 377 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 123
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

72%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 359
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 351

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 359
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 350
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 266 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 266 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 91
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

76%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 254
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 248

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

68%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 254
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 248
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 37 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 37 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 40 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 40 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 37
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 37
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 246 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 246 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 78
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

67%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 230
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 224

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

58%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 230
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 224
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 30 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 30 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 48 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 48 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 46
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 45
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 46
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 45
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

80%
State average from 959 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

76%
State average from 959 schools:

77%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

86%
State average from 959 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

45%
State average from 959 schools:

52%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

68%
State average from 959 schools:

67%
Making Math Gains
Here:

68%
State average from 959 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

66%
State average from 959 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

62%
State average from 959 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

551
State average from 959 schools:

560
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 959 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

60%
State average from 959 schools:

54%
Minority Rate
Here:

28%
State average from 959 schools:

46%
Region: 4


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 334 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 334 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 113
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 318
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 311

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

72%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 318
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 313
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 259 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 259 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 87
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

76%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 248
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 243

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 248
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 244
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 27
Number of Students Tested in Math: 27
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 180 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 180 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 56
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

69%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 169
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 165

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 169
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 166
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 59 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 59 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

40%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 50

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 51
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

79%
State average from 954 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

74%
State average from 954 schools:

76%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

82%
State average from 954 schools:

82%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

41%
State average from 954 schools:

48%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

71%
State average from 954 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
Here:

60%
State average from 954 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

69%
State average from 954 schools:

62%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

67%
State average from 954 schools:

68%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

543
State average from 954 schools:

544
Percent Tested
MILDRED HELMS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

100%
State average from 954 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

58%
State average from 954 schools:

51%
Minority Rate
Here:

27%
State average from 954 schools:

45%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 295 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 297 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 90
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
MILDRED HELMS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 279
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 277

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

72%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 281
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 278
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 228 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 229 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 65
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 215
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 214

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 216
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 216
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 22
Number of Students Tested in Math: 22
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 168 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 170 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 56
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

68%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 158
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 156

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

69%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 160
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 157
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 48 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 49 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 46
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 45

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

55%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 45
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

73%
State average from 862 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Math
MILDRED HELMS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

73%
State average from 862 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

90%
State average from 862 schools:

82%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

28%
State average from 862 schools:

43%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

70%
State average from 862 schools:

70%
Making Reading Gains - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Included
Making Math Gains
Here:

81%
State average from 862 schools:

66%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
MILDRED HELMS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

77%
State average from 862 schools:

66%
% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Included
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

93%
State average from 862 schools:

68%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
Here:

585
State average from 862 schools:

539
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 862 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
MILDRED HELMS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

63%
State average from 865 schools:

58%
Minority Rate
Here:

62%
State average from 865 schools:

56%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 322 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 322 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

99%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 102
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

70%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 293
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 293
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 116 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 115 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

98%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 40
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 106
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

81%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 105
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 146 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 147 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

100%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 43
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 131
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 132
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 31 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 31 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 194 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 194 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

98%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 57
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 170
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

67%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 170
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 61 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 61 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

63%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 54
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 54
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

71%
State average from 848 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

58%
State average from 848 schools:

69%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

79%
State average from 848 schools:

79%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

65%
State average from 848 schools:

62%
Making Math Gains
Here:

64%
State average from 848 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

65%
State average from 848 schools:

61%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

402
State average from 848 schools:

413
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 848 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

67%
State average from 848 schools:

58%
Minority Rate
Here:

57%
State average from 848 schools:

55%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 353 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 353 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 94
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 311
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 312
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 148 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 148 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 35

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

69%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 127
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

63%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 128
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 143 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 143 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 40

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

65%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 129
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 129
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 24
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 239 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 239 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 64

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 209
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 209
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 71 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 71 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 23

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 62
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

51%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 63
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

70%
State average from 834 schools:

72%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

62%
State average from 834 schools:

67%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

83%
State average from 834 schools:

79%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

70%
State average from 834 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

71%
State average from 834 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

64%
State average from 834 schools:

60%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

420
State average from 834 schools:

412
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 834 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

100%
State average from 834 schools:

60%
Minority Rate
Here:

54%
State average from 832 schools:

54%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1371
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

312
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
MILDRED HELMS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

16%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

10%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
MILDRED HELMS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

35%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

34%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

4%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
MILDRED HELMS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

74%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

17
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1597
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

322
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
MILDRED HELMS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

13%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

16%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

38%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

24%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

10%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

71%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

19
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
MILDRED HELMS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

1612
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

303
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

13%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

20%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

39%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
MILDRED HELMS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

26%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

68%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

15
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

10
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

311
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

21%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

37%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

37%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

4%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

42%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

9
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
MILDRED HELMS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

8
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1390
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

319
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

8%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

24%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

35%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

25%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

8%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

68%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
MILDRED HELMS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
MILDRED HELMS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1551
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

322
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

6%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

24%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

43%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

23%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

5%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

71%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
MILDRED HELMS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1620
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

323
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

15%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

32%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

29%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

19%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

4%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

52%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
MILDRED HELMS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1334
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

306
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1578
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

319
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 05%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 05
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1655
State average:

1656
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

311
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

311
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1431
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MILDRED HELMS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

328
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1552
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

322
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1660
State average:

1675
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

331
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 120
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Unscore - Combined: 1
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 39%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 8%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 83%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1350
State average:

1396
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

308
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1613
State average:

1582
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

325
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1616
State average:

1627
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

304
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

308
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 37%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1426
State average:

1461
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

327
State average:

335
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1534
State average:

1563
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

318
State average:

325
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1664
State average:

1668
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

332
State average:

333
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

113
State average:

103
Mean Scale Score
MILDRED HELMS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

630
State average from 3241 schools:

633
Median NPR
MILDRED HELMS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

58
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
MILDRED HELMS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

13
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
MILDRED HELMS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

94
State average:

97
Mean Scale Score
Here:

656
State average from 3233 schools:

653
Median NPR
Here:

72
State average:

69
Literary (max 18)
MILDRED HELMS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

14
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

10
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

8
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

90
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
Here:

666
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
Here:

72
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
MILDRED HELMS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

13
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
MILDRED HELMS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

14
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
MILDRED HELMS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 92
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

302
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 63%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 48%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 82%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1364
State average:

1342
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

311
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
MILDRED HELMS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

1597
State average from 1875 schools:

1542
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

322
State average:

313
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 82%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1600
State average:

1546
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
MILDRED HELMS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

1344
State average:

1397
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 256

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1609
State average from 1873 schools:

1629
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MILDRED HELMS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

303
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1606
State average:

1632
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1525
State average:

1532
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 81

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MILDRED HELMS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

300
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 27%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1443
State average:

1413
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

331
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1582
State average from 1874 schools:

1525
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

329
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 82%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1582
State average:

1528
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1396
State average:

1414
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 187

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1666
State average from 1872 schools:

1647
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

332
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1670
State average:

1649
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1498
State average:

1519
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 173

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 113
Mean Scale Score
MILDRED HELMS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

630
State average from 1891 schools:

633
Median NPR: 58
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 112
Mean Scale Score
Here:

648
State average from 1874 schools:

642
Median NPR: 66
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 99
Mean Scale Score
Here:

663
State average from 1870 schools:

667
Median NPR: 69
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 113
Mean Scale Score
Here:

625
State average from 1891 schools:

632
Median NPR: 64
Number Sense (max 14): 10
Operations (max 11): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 114
Mean Scale Score
Here:

651
State average from 1874 schools:

652
Median NPR: 76
Number Sense (max 12): 9
Operations (max 12): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 98
Mean Scale Score
Here:

655
State average from 1870 schools:

663
Median NPR: 68
Number Sense (max 12): 8
Operations (max 12): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 114
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

308
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 59%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 13
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 28%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 35%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 90%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 62%


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2021 Advameg, Inc.