Noble Avenue Elementary School in Los Angeles, CA
(KG-05 • Public • Regular School)
City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in California) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 32
- Address
- 8329 Noble Ave.
Los Angeles, CA 91343
- Telephone
- (818) 892-1151
(make sure to verify first before calling)
- City-data.com school rating
- 32
- Students
- 891
- Classroom Teachers (FTE)
- 39.0
- National School Lunch
Program (NSLP) Status - Yes, under Provision 2
- Free lunch eligible students
- 744
- Reduced-price lunch
eligible students - 67
- School district
- Los Angeles Unified
- Charter school
- No
- Title I status
- Title I schoolwide school
- Magnet School Indicator
- No
- Shared Time Indicator
- Missing
- Adult education offered
- No
No street view available for this location
Ratings
This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
Noble Avenue Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:California: | 46 |
Los Angeles County: | 44 |
Los Angeles: | 36 |
Noble Avenue Elementary School: | 32 |
Students & Teachers
Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 891
Enrollment in 2015: 859
Enrollment in 2014: 872
Enrollment in 2013: 887
Enrollment in 2012: 1,130
Enrollment in 2011: 1,135
Enrollment in 2010: 1,170
Enrollment in 2009: 1,253
Enrollment in 2008: 1,226
Enrollment in 2007: 1,284
Enrollment in 2006: 1,350
Enrollment in 2005: 1,847
Enrollment in 2004: 1,841
Enrollment in 2003: 1,805
Enrollment in 2002: 1,759
Enrollment in 2001: 1,792
Enrollment in 2000: 1,752
Enrollment in 1999: 1,719
Noble Avenue Elementary School - Historical enrollment
Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)
Grade | KG | G01 | G02 | G03 | G04 | G05 | Total |
---|
All students | 183 | 133 | 142 | 152 | 132 | 149 | 891 |
Female students | 89 | 63 | 69 | 69 | 67 | 64 | 421 |
Male students | 94 | 70 | 73 | 83 | 65 | 85 | 470 |
Asian students | 8 | 5 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 29 |
Hispanic students | 169 | 119 | 124 | 136 | 125 | 139 | 812 |
Black students | 1 | - | 1 | 2 | 2 | - | 6 |
White students | 3 | 2 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 20 |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander students | 1 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 18 |
Two or More Races students | 1 | 3 | - | - | 1 | 1 | 6 |
Enrollment by grade:
Kindergarten enrollment: 183
1st grade enrollment: 133
2nd grade enrollment: 142
3rd grade enrollment: 152
4th grade enrollment: 132
5th grade enrollment: 149
Noble Avenue Elementary School - Historical enrollment by grade
Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 12,430 schools)
Female enrollment: 421 (47.3%)Noble Avenue Elementary School: | 47.3% |
State: | 49.4% |
Male enrollment: 470 (52.7%)School: | 52.7% |
California: | 49.6% |
Noble Avenue Elementary School - Historical enrollment by gender
Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 12,430 schools)
Asian enrollment: 29 (3.3%)
Hispanic enrollment: 812 (91.1%)Noble Avenue Elementary School: | 91.1% |
California: | 46.0% |
Black enrollment: 6 (0.7%)Noble Avenue Elementary School: | 0.7% |
State: | 6.1% |
White enrollment: 20 (2.2%)Noble Avenue Elementary School: | 2.2% |
State: | 28.3% |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander enrollment: 18 (2.0%)School: | 2.0% |
California: | 0.6% |
Two or More Races enrollment: 6 (0.7%)
Noble Avenue Elementary School - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity
Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 10,111 schools)
Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 811 (91.0%)
Free lunch eligible students: 744 (83.5%)Noble Avenue Elementary School: | 83.5% |
California: | 52.8% |
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 67 (7.5%)
Noble Avenue Elementary School - Lunch Program Eligibility
Teachers and support:
(State average from 12,394 schools)
Classroom Teachers (FTE): 39
Number of FTE teachers in their second year of teaching: 3
Number of FTE school counselors: 1.2
Number of FTE nurses: 2
Number of FTE psychologists: 4
Number of FTE social workers: 1
Student/Teacher RatioNoble Avenue Elementary School: | 22.8 |
California: | 22.8 |
Noble Avenue Elementary School - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio
School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds:
$3,461,680- Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 34.2 (Salary Expenditures: $2,841,754)
- Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 6 (Salary Expenditures: $130,661)
- Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 0.9 (Salary Expenditures: $145,105)
- Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 5 (Salary Expenditures: $344,161)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds:
$179,027Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,:
$4,822,083- Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $3,391,486
- Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 20 (Salary Expenditures: $509,332)
- Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 2.6 (Salary Expenditures: $514,193)
- Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 5 (Salary Expenditures: $407,073)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds:
$246,450 Limited English Proficiency:
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs
- Hispanic406
- Asian13
- Native Hawaiian5
- White10
- IDEA70
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 434 (male: 228, female: 206)
- Hispanic: 406 (male: 218, female: 188)
- Asian: 13 (male: 5, female: 8)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 5 (all female)
- White: 10 (male: 5, female: 5)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 70 (male: 50, female: 20)
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs
- Hispanic484
- Asian10
- Native Hawaiian10
- White7
- IDEA70
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 511 (male: 281, female: 230)
- Hispanic: 484 (male: 266, female: 218)
- Asian: 10 (male: 5, female: 5)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 10 (male: 5, female: 5)
- White: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 70 (male: 56, female: 14)
Students with disabilities:
Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.
Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and services solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The "Section 504 only" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive related aids and services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under IDEA.
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 95 (male: 70, female: 25)
- Hispanic: 95 (male: 70, female: 25)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 71 (male: 52, female: 19)
Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 7 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 86 (male: 67, female: 19)
- Hispanic: 86 (male: 67, female: 19)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 68 (male: 55, female: 13)
Retention:
(State average from 2,205 schools)
A student is retained if he or she is not promoted to the next grade prior to the beginning of the following school year. Students are not considered retained if they can proceed to the next grade because they successfully completed a summer school program or for a similar reason. At the high school level, a student who has not accumulated enough credits to be classified as being in the next grade is considered retained
Total number of students retained in Kindergarten: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all male)
Percent of Kindergarten students retainedNoble Avenue Elementary School: | 2.2% |
California: | 5.3% |
Total number of students retained in 1st grade: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
- Hispanic: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
Percent of 1st grade students retained
Gifted and Talented:
(State average from 5,551 schools)
This school has students enrolled in one or more gifted/talented programs
Gifted/talented programs are programs during regular school hours that provide special educational opportunities including accelerated promotion through grades and classes and an enriched curriculum for students who are endowed with a high degree of mental ability or who demonstrate unusual physical coordination, creativity, interest, or talent.
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment
- Hispanic28
- Asian4
- Native Hawaiian2
- White2
- LEP2
- IDEA2
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment: 36 (male: 24, female: 12)
- Hispanic: 28 (male: 20, female: 8)
- Asian: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 2 (all female)
- White: 2 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all male)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all male)
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 studentsNoble Avenue Elementary School: | 40.4 |
State: | 84.3 |
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment
- Hispanic34
- Asian7
- Multirace2
- LEP2
- IDEA2
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment: 43 (male: 21, female: 22)
- Hispanic: 34 (male: 17, female: 17)
- Asian: 7 (male: 2, female: 5)
- Two or More Races: 2 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all male)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all male)
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 studentsNoble Avenue Elementary School: | 48.3 |
State: | 93.6 |
Statewide Student Assessments
Smarter Balanced Summative Assessments:
(State average from 10,463 schools)
Smarter Balanced Summative Assessments (SB) is one of the online summative assessments - part of California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) System.
The summative assessments are comprehensive, end-of-year assessments of grade-level learning that measure progress toward college and career readiness. Each test in English language arts/literacy (ELA) and mathematics is comprised of two parts: (1) a computer-adaptive test and (2) a performance task, administered within a selected testing window available at 66 percent of the instructional year for grades three through eight, and grade eleven.
The summative assessments are aligned with the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) for ELA and mathematics. The tests capitalize on the strengths of computer adaptive testing efficient and precise measurement across the full range of achievement and timely turnaround of results.
ELA Standard Met and Above
- All33%
- Males32%
- Females35%
- Hispanic30%
ELA students tested: 426
ELA students with scores: 426
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 33% |
State: | 49% |
Standard Not Met:
42.3%Standard Nearly Met:
24.6%Standard Met:
21.8%Standard Exceeded:
11.3%All Grades:
3rd Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2386.1, Students tested: 146, Standard Not Met: 41.1%, Nearly Met: 32.9%, Met: 15.1%, Exceeded: 11.0%)4th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2410.8, Students tested: 142, Standard Not Met: 59.1%, Nearly Met: 15.5%, Met: 15.5%, Exceeded: 9.9%)5th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2491.6, Students tested: 138, Standard Not Met: 26.1%, Nearly Met: 25.4%, Met: 35.5%, Exceeded: 13.0%)Noble Avenue Elementary School - ELA Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
Math Standard Met and Above
- All35%
- Males40%
- Females29%
- Hispanic33%
Math students tested: 433
Math students with scores: 433
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 35% |
State: | 38% |
Standard Not Met:
30.9%Standard Nearly Met:
34.4%Standard Met:
21.0%Standard Exceeded:
13.6%All Grades:
3rd Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2415.8, Students tested: 147, Standard Not Met: 32.6%, Nearly Met: 31.3%, Met: 22.4%, Exceeded: 13.6%)4th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2430.0, Students tested: 146, Standard Not Met: 37.7%, Nearly Met: 39.0%, Met: 16.4%, Exceeded: 6.8%)5th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2511.5, Students tested: 140, Standard Not Met: 22.1%, Nearly Met: 32.9%, Met: 24.3%, Exceeded: 20.7%)Noble Avenue Elementary School - Math Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
ELA Standard Met and Above
- All35%
- Males35%
- Females36%
- Hispanic35%
ELA students tested: 420
ELA students with scores: 420
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 35% |
California: | 48% |
Standard Not Met:
39.0%Standard Nearly Met:
26.0%Standard Met:
24.0%Standard Exceeded:
11.0%All Grades:
3rd Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2388.3, Students tested: 143, Standard Not Met: 43.0%, Nearly Met: 27.0%, Met: 18.0%, Exceeded: 12.0%)4th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2430.1, Students tested: 135, Standard Not Met: 41.0%, Nearly Met: 30.0%, Met: 19.0%, Exceeded: 10.0%)5th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2479.9, Students tested: 142, Standard Not Met: 31.0%, Nearly Met: 21.0%, Met: 36.0%, Exceeded: 12.0%)Noble Avenue Elementary School - ELA Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
Math Standard Met and Above
- All33%
- Males37%
- Females28%
- Hispanic31%
Math students tested: 427
Math students with scores: 427
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 33% |
State: | 37% |
Standard Not Met:
30.0%Standard Nearly Met:
38.0%Standard Met:
19.0%Standard Exceeded:
13.0%All Grades:
3rd Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2410.3, Students tested: 147, Standard Not Met: 39.0%, Nearly Met: 22.0%, Met: 25.0%, Exceeded: 14.0%)4th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2452.6, Students tested: 137, Standard Not Met: 20.0%, Nearly Met: 55.0%, Met: 18.0%, Exceeded: 7.0%)5th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2494.9, Students tested: 143, Standard Not Met: 29.0%, Nearly Met: 38.0%, Met: 14.0%, Exceeded: 20.0%)Noble Avenue Elementary School - Math Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
ELA Standard Met and Above
- All30%
- Males24%
- Females36%
- Hispanic29%
ELA students tested: 406
ELA students with scores: 406
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 30% |
California: | 44% |
Standard Not Met:
43.0%Standard Nearly Met:
27.0%Standard Met:
22.0%Standard Exceeded:
8.0%All Grades:
3rd Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2402.2, Students tested: 130, Standard Not Met: 29.0%, Nearly Met: 37.0%, Met: 26.0%, Exceeded: 8.0%)4th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2406.5, Students tested: 147, Standard Not Met: 54.0%, Nearly Met: 25.0%, Met: 16.0%, Exceeded: 4.0%)5th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2470.5, Students tested: 129, Standard Not Met: 43.0%, Nearly Met: 19.0%, Met: 26.0%, Exceeded: 12.0%)Noble Avenue Elementary School - ELA Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
Math Standard Met and Above
- All30%
- Males34%
- Females27%
- Hispanic31%
Math students tested: 411
Math students with scores: 411
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 30% |
State: | 34% |
Standard Not Met:
35.0%Standard Nearly Met:
35.0%Standard Met:
20.0%Standard Exceeded:
10.0%All Grades:
3rd Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2408.0, Students tested: 133, Standard Not Met: 32.0%, Nearly Met: 38.0%, Met: 26.0%, Exceeded: 5.0%)4th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2442.9, Students tested: 147, Standard Not Met: 30.0%, Nearly Met: 44.0%, Met: 20.0%, Exceeded: 7.0%)5th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2480.4, Students tested: 131, Standard Not Met: 43.0%, Nearly Met: 24.0%, Met: 15.0%, Exceeded: 18.0%)Noble Avenue Elementary School - Math Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
Paper-based CAASPP:
(State average from 9,784 schools)
California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) System includes paper-based tests:
California Standards Tests (CSTs) - The CSTs for science in grades five, eight, and ten are administered only to students in California public schools. All questions are multiple-choice. These tests were developed specifically to assess students' knowledge of the California content standards in science.
CST Science students tested: 135
CST Science students with scores: 135
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 47% |
State: | 54% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
8.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
10.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
35.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
30.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
18.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.5th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 352.3, Students tested: 135, Far Below Basic: 8.0%, Below Basic: 10.0%, Basic: 35.0%, Proficient: 30.0%, Advanced: 18.0%) CST Science students tested: 131
CST Science students with scores: 131
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 47% |
California: | 56% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
11.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
15.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
27.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
29.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
18.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.5th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 348.4, Students tested: 131, Far Below Basic: 11.0%, Below Basic: 15.0%, Basic: 27.0%, Proficient: 29.0%, Advanced: 18.0%)11.0%
15.0%
27.0%
29.0%
18.0%
CST Science students tested: 134
CST Science students with scores: 134
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 60% |
California: | 60% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
9.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
7.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
24.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
41.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
19.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.5th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 359.9, Students tested: 134, Far Below Basic: 9.0%, Below Basic: 7.0%, Basic: 24.0%, Proficient: 41.0%, Advanced: 19.0%) The Physical Fitness Test:
The Physical Fitness Test (PFT) for students in California schools is the FITNESSGRAM. The main goal of the test is to help students in starting life-long habits of regular physical activity.
Aerobic Capacity:5th grade:
(Students tested: 139, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 75.5%, Needs Improvement: 20.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 4.4%)
Body Composition:5th grade:
(Students tested: 139, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 48.2%, Needs Improvement: 18.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 33.8%)
Abdominal Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 139, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 72.7%, Needs Improvement: 27.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 139, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 78.4%, Needs Improvement: 21.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 139, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 45.3%, Needs Improvement: 54.7%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:5th grade:
(Students tested: 139, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 69.8%, Needs Improvement: 30.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:5th grade:
(Students tested: 141, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 61.7%, Needs Improvement: 28.4%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 9.9%)
Body Composition:5th grade:
(Students tested: 141, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 46.1%, Needs Improvement: 20.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 33.3%)
Abdominal Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 141, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 70.9%, Needs Improvement: 29.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 141, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 67.4%, Needs Improvement: 32.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 141, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 42.6%, Needs Improvement: 57.4%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:5th grade:
(Students tested: 141, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 67.4%, Needs Improvement: 32.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:5th grade:
(Students tested: 127, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 52.0%, Needs Improvement: 34.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 13.4%)
Body Composition:5th grade:
(Students tested: 127, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 45.7%, Needs Improvement: 18.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 36.2%)
Abdominal Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 127, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 44.1%, Needs Improvement: 55.9%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 127, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 86.6%, Needs Improvement: 13.4%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 127, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 20.5%, Needs Improvement: 79.5%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:5th grade:
(Students tested: 127, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 69.3%, Needs Improvement: 30.7%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:5th grade:
(Students tested: 135, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 65.2%, Needs Improvement: 25.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 9.6%)
Body Composition:5th grade:
(Students tested: 135, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 45.2%, Needs Improvement: 23.7%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 31.1%)
Abdominal Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 135, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 68.1%, Needs Improvement: 31.9%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 135, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 75.6%, Needs Improvement: 24.4%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 135, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 53.3%, Needs Improvement: 46.7%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:5th grade:
(Students tested: 135, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 71.1%, Needs Improvement: 28.9%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:5th grade:
(Students tested: 149, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 63.8%, Needs Improvement: 23.5%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 12.7%)
Body Composition:5th grade:
(Students tested: 149, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 45.6%, Needs Improvement: 8.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 46.3%)
Abdominal Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 149, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 81.9%, Needs Improvement: 18.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 149, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 85.9%, Needs Improvement: 14.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 149, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 43.6%, Needs Improvement: 56.4%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:5th grade:
(Students tested: 149, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 72.5%, Needs Improvement: 27.5%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:5th grade:
(Students tested: 210, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 51.9%, Needs Improvement: 35.7%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 12.4%)
Body Composition:5th grade:
(Students tested: 210, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 35.2%, Needs Improvement: 13.8%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 51.0%)
Abdominal Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 210, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 43.3%, Needs Improvement: 56.7%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 210, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 61.9%, Needs Improvement: 38.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 210, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 25.2%, Needs Improvement: 74.8%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:5th grade:
(Students tested: 210, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 64.3%, Needs Improvement: 35.7%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
California English Language Development Test:
(State average from 9,932 schools)
Students in kindergarten through grade twelve whose home language is not English are required by law to take an English skills test. In California, the test is called the California English Language Development Test (CELDT).
Noble Avenue Elementary School - students who met CELDT criterion (all grades)
All Grades:Student Count: 494
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 121
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 24.0% |
State: | 34.0% |
Kindergarten:Student Count: 121
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 17
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 14.0% |
California: | 13.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 376.6 |
State: | 364.6 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 269.6 |
California: | 276.6 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 397.2 |
State: | 375.9 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 282.6 |
California: | 286.0 |
Grade 1:Student Count: 95
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 35
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 37.0% |
State: | 44.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 437.3 |
California: | 439.9 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 362.4 |
California: | 383.8 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 457.1 |
State: | 446.4 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 384.2 |
State: | 386.5 |
Grade 2:Student Count: 74
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 15
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 20.0% |
California: | 27.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 472.5 |
State: | 477.2 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 426.8 |
California: | 440.5 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 489.9 |
California: | 483.0 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 449.9 |
California: | 456.4 |
Grade 3:Student Count: 68
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 3
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 4.0% |
State: | 26.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 463.9 |
State: | 475.9 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 434.8 |
State: | 459.6 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 501.3 |
State: | 491.7 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 460.6 |
State: | 478.6 |
Grade 4:Student Count: 70
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 14
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 20.0% |
California: | 37.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 476.9 |
California: | 509.2 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 468.1 |
California: | 490.7 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 512.8 |
State: | 515.2 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 480.5 |
State: | 502.2 |
Grade 5:Student Count: 66
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 37
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 56.0% |
California: | 48.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 530.0 |
California: | 533.7 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 521.9 |
California: | 514.0 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 598.5 |
California: | 530.0 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 510.8 |
State: | 519.1 |
All Grades:Student Count: 517
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 145
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 28.0% |
State: | 34.0% |
Kindergarten:Student Count: 137
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 27
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 20.0% |
California: | 13.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 390.9 |
State: | 365.6 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 288.0 |
State: | 279.1 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 400.6 |
California: | 374.5 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 298.6 |
State: | 285.8 |
Grade 1:Student Count: 75
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 36
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 48.0% |
California: | 42.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 460.7 |
California: | 437.6 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 384.3 |
California: | 382.2 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 469.0 |
State: | 443.4 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 390.7 |
California: | 383.8 |
Grade 2:Student Count: 89
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 22
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 25.0% |
State: | 27.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 478.6 |
California: | 478.1 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 441.6 |
California: | 441.7 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 516.1 |
State: | 482.4 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 466.5 |
State: | 458.7 |
Grade 3:Student Count: 90
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 15
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 17.0% |
California: | 26.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 456.0 |
California: | 475.5 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 438.4 |
State: | 461.0 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 493.5 |
State: | 493.6 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 461.9 |
California: | 479.8 |
Grade 4:Student Count: 64
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 18
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 28.0% |
California: | 37.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 507.8 |
State: | 511.0 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 490.9 |
California: | 494.0 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 517.1 |
State: | 515.3 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 498.5 |
California: | 504.8 |
Grade 5:Student Count: 62
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 27
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 44.0% |
State: | 47.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 524.6 |
State: | 533.6 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 503.3 |
California: | 515.8 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 541.9 |
State: | 527.6 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 496.8 |
State: | 519.3 |
All Grades:Student Count: 508
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 182
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 36.0% |
State: | 34.0% |
Kindergarten:Student Count: 109
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 37
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 34.0% |
State: | 12.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 428.8 |
California: | 362.1 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 312.5 |
California: | 277.6 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 441.3 |
California: | 373.6 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 325.2 |
State: | 289.5 |
Grade 1:Student Count: 84
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 46
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 55.0% |
State: | 40.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 453.2 |
California: | 434.3 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 395.4 |
California: | 380.8 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 467.6 |
State: | 443.0 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 398.1 |
State: | 386.6 |
Grade 2:Student Count: 113
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 32
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 28.0% |
California: | 27.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 478.6 |
California: | 477.2 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 439.6 |
State: | 442.5 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 498.2 |
California: | 483.0 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 455.4 |
California: | 459.9 |
Grade 3:Student Count: 88
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 32
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 36.0% |
State: | 28.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 490.2 |
State: | 478.6 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 479.2 |
California: | 464.9 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 521.6 |
State: | 494.6 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 495.8 |
State: | 486.2 |
Grade 4:Student Count: 65
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 17
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 26.0% |
State: | 36.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 491.8 |
State: | 509.3 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 475.6 |
State: | 494.0 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 489.0 |
State: | 515.0 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 493.2 |
California: | 505.6 |
Grade 5:Student Count: 49
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 18
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 37.0% |
California: | 50.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 529.2 |
California: | 535.5 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 510.2 |
California: | 519.9 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 556.6 |
California: | 532.4 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 517.7 |
State: | 523.7 |
All Grades:Student Count: 519
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 173
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 33.0% |
State: | 34.0% |
Kindergarten:Student Count: 121
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 16
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 13.0% |
California: | 11.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 386.1 |
California: | 358.1 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 279.3 |
State: | 275.6 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 398.7 |
California: | 365.3 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 286.2 |
State: | 285.3 |
Grade 1:Student Count: 114
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 56
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 49.0% |
California: | 37.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 458.6 |
California: | 432.0 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 371.3 |
State: | 380.2 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 455.2 |
California: | 438.9 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 392.8 |
California: | 383.8 |
Grade 2:Student Count: 101
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 44
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 44.0% |
California: | 27.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 500.8 |
California: | 476.7 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 465.6 |
California: | 444.5 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 530.0 |
California: | 481.5 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 484.8 |
State: | 461.7 |
Grade 3:Student Count: 80
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 22
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 28.0% |
California: | 29.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 461.7 |
State: | 478.7 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 467.4 |
State: | 470.0 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 508.2 |
State: | 494.2 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 487.6 |
State: | 487.2 |
Grade 4:Student Count: 57
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 11
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 19.0% |
California: | 38.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 503.7 |
California: | 512.5 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 479.7 |
California: | 499.4 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 513.1 |
California: | 514.5 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 504.6 |
California: | 509.1 |
Grade 5:Student Count: 46
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 24
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 52.0% |
State: | 49.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 537.0 |
California: | 534.2 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 509.8 |
State: | 521.2 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 551.6 |
State: | 531.7 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 516.7 |
State: | 525.0 |
All Grades:Student Count: 551
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 196
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 36.0% |
State: | 34.0% |
Kindergarten:Student Count: 134
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 10
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 7.0% |
State: | 9.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 367.5 |
State: | 359.3 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 302.5 |
California: | 301.7 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 364.8 |
California: | 351.7 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 355.9 |
State: | 347.9 |
Grade 1:Student Count: 115
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 65
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 57.0% |
State: | 35.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 453.7 |
California: | 428.8 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 428.7 |
California: | 393.5 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 462.5 |
California: | 429.9 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 422.1 |
State: | 405.0 |
Grade 2:Student Count: 110
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 45
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 41.0% |
California: | 28.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 510.3 |
State: | 483.4 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 455.7 |
California: | 444.5 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 508.3 |
State: | 477.5 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 490.1 |
State: | 468.9 |
Grade 3:Student Count: 71
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 15
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 21.0% |
California: | 30.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 457.0 |
California: | 482.8 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 478.6 |
California: | 482.4 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 486.4 |
State: | 483.2 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 488.7 |
California: | 496.8 |
Grade 4:Student Count: 58
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 24
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 41.0% |
State: | 35.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 548.3 |
California: | 511.2 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 504.4 |
California: | 506.4 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 521.9 |
California: | 501.3 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 517.1 |
State: | 514.3 |
Grade 5:Student Count: 63
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 37
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 59.0% |
State: | 48.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 545.7 |
State: | 537.3 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 536.9 |
California: | 528.1 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 551.6 |
California: | 517.0 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 539.1 |
California: | 531.8 |
All Grades:Student Count: 768
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 241
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 31.0% |
California: | 35.0% |
Kindergarten:Student Count: 188
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 13
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 7.0% |
State: | 9.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 384.0 |
State: | 358.9 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 308.0 |
State: | 299.9 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 398.6 |
California: | 357.6 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 368.1 |
State: | 350.9 |
Grade 1:Student Count: 159
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 86
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 54.0% |
California: | 35.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 454.3 |
State: | 428.7 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 400.6 |
California: | 391.1 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 461.9 |
California: | 434.3 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 404.9 |
California: | 405.5 |
Grade 2:Student Count: 128
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 29
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 23.0% |
California: | 25.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 479.6 |
State: | 478.6 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 449.0 |
California: | 442.5 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 482.2 |
State: | 478.1 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 471.9 |
State: | 465.8 |
Grade 3:Student Count: 99
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 23
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 23.0% |
State: | 32.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 486.5 |
California: | 493.6 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 483.7 |
California: | 482.5 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 503.8 |
California: | 486.4 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 493.5 |
California: | 494.3 |
Grade 4:Student Count: 102
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 46
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 45.0% |
State: | 39.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 533.8 |
California: | 522.7 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 513.2 |
California: | 510.8 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 510.7 |
State: | 505.9 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 516.2 |
State: | 512.8 |
Grade 5:Student Count: 92
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 44
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 48.0% |
State: | 50.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 545.3 |
California: | 544.3 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 522.8 |
State: | 531.9 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 522.6 |
State: | 519.3 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 519.6 |
State: | 527.0 |
All Grades:Student Count: 774
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 163
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 21.0% |
State: | 31.0% |
Kindergarten:Student Count: 178
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 14
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 8.0% |
California: | 8.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 371.2 |
California: | 348.7 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 311.1 |
State: | 294.0 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 388.3 |
California: | 345.3 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 359.1 |
State: | 337.4 |
Grade 1:Student Count: 140
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 31
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 22.0% |
State: | 32.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 412.8 |
State: | 423.8 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 404.4 |
California: | 389.5 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 441.7 |
California: | 431.8 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 409.9 |
California: | 402.3 |
Grade 2:Student Count: 137
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 44
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 32.0% |
State: | 24.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 483.1 |
California: | 466.1 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 454.7 |
California: | 440.6 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 507.0 |
State: | 484.0 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 471.0 |
California: | 452.2 |
Grade 3:Student Count: 119
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 15
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 13.0% |
California: | 25.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 428.2 |
State: | 468.8 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 461.9 |
California: | 471.7 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 490.6 |
State: | 486.4 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 480.1 |
California: | 484.8 |
Grade 4:Student Count: 121
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 36
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 30.0% |
California: | 33.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 495.1 |
State: | 504.0 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 497.0 |
State: | 503.1 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 523.5 |
California: | 505.0 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 499.4 |
State: | 506.6 |
Grade 5:Student Count: 79
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 23
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 29.0% |
State: | 44.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 510.8 |
State: | 528.2 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 517.4 |
State: | 526.9 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 527.6 |
State: | 517.8 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 508.4 |
California: | 524.0 |
Accountability
Adequate Yearly Progress:
(State average from 9,846 schools)
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) - Accountability system mandated by federal No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Statistics are based on test results of the Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR) Program, the California High School Exit Examination (CAHSEE), and the California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA).
Noble Avenue Elementary School - Adequate Yearly Progress status
ELA Participation RateNoble Avenue Elementary School: | 99.0% |
State: | 96.3% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black80
- White100
- Multirace100
- SED99
- LEP99
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 388 out of 389 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 6 out of 6 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 8 out of 8 enrolled)
- Black: 80% (tested 4 out of 5 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 10 out of 10 enrolled)
- Two or More Races: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 99% (tested 392 out of 394 enrolled)
- English Learners: 99% (tested 338 out of 341 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 55 out of 55 enrolled)
Math Participation RateHere: | 99.0% |
California: | 96.1% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black80
- White100
- Multirace100
- SED99
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 393 out of 394 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 6 out of 6 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 8 out of 8 enrolled)
- Black: 80% (tested 4 out of 5 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 10 out of 10 enrolled)
- Two or More Races: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 99% (tested 395 out of 397 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 344 out of 345 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 55 out of 55 enrolled)
Met all AYP Criteria: Yes
Number of AYP criteria met: 9
Number of AYP criteria possible: 9
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)Attendance rate (calculated by using number of days attended and enrolled) : 98
Met Attendance rate Target: Yes
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
ELA Participation RateSchool: | 99.0% |
California: | 95.2% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic99
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White84
- Multirace100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 99% (tested 371 out of 373 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 10 out of 10 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 7 out of 7 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 4 out of 4 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 7 out of 7 enrolled)
- White: 84% (tested 5 out of 6 enrolled)
- Two or More Races: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 382 out of 383 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 293 out of 294 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 48 out of 48 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveNoble Avenue Elementary School: | 29.6% |
State: | 42.6% |
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic28
- SED29
- LEP22
- With Disabilities4
- Hispanic: 28% (100 out of 352 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 29% (105 out of 364 valid scores)
- English Learners: 22% (61 out of 283 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 4% (2 out of 45 valid scores)
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- Multirace100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 376 out of 377 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 10 out of 10 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 7 out of 7 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 4 out of 4 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 7 out of 7 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 6 out of 6 enrolled)
- Two or More Races: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 384 out of 385 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 296 out of 297 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 48 out of 48 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or AboveNoble Avenue Elementary School: | 30.8% |
California: | 33.3% |
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic31
- SED31
- LEP25
- With Disabilities9
- Hispanic: 31% (108 out of 353 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 31% (113 out of 365 valid scores)
- English Learners: 25% (72 out of 283 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 9% (4 out of 45 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 9
Number of AYP criteria possible: 17
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: No
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 89.2%
ELA Participation RateNoble Avenue Elementary School: | 100.0% |
State: | 98.2% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- Multirace100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 526 out of 526 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 18 out of 18 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 17 out of 17 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 8 out of 8 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 6 out of 6 enrolled)
- Two or More Races: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 493 out of 493 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 412 out of 412 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 66 out of 66 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or Above
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic49
- Asian71
- Filipino82
- SED49
- LEP47
- With Disabilities30
- Hispanic: 49% (243 out of 498 valid scores)
- Asian: 71% (12 out of 17 valid scores)
- Filipino: 82% (14 out of 17 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 49% (233 out of 477 valid scores)
- English Learners: 47% (185 out of 396 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 30% (18 out of 61 valid scores)
Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: No
Math Percent Proficient Target: 89.5%
Math Participation RateHere: | 100.0% |
California: | 98.2% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- Multirace100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 526 out of 526 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 18 out of 18 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 17 out of 17 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 8 out of 8 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 6 out of 6 enrolled)
- Two or More Races: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 493 out of 493 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 412 out of 412 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 66 out of 66 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or Above
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic67
- Asian88
- Filipino88
- SED67
- LEP67
- With Disabilities57
- Hispanic: 67% (335 out of 498 valid scores)
- Asian: 88% (15 out of 17 valid scores)
- Filipino: 88% (15 out of 17 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 67% (319 out of 477 valid scores)
- English Learners: 67% (265 out of 396 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 57% (35 out of 61 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 12
Number of AYP criteria possible: 17
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 78.4%
ELA Participation RateSchool: | 100.0% |
California: | 98.3% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino97
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities99
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 670 out of 670 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 22 out of 22 enrolled)
- Filipino: 97% (tested 25 out of 26 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 11 out of 11 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 7 out of 7 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 739 out of 740 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 560 out of 561 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 88 out of 89 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or Above
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic49
- Asian79
- Filipino92
- SED51
- LEP45
- With Disabilities36
- Hispanic: 49% (302 out of 621 valid scores)
- Asian: 79% (15 out of 19 valid scores)
- Filipino: 92% (22 out of 24 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 51% (349 out of 683 valid scores)
- English Learners: 45% (238 out of 530 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 36% (29 out of 80 valid scores)
Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: No
Math Percent Proficient Target: 79%
Math Participation RateSchool: | 100.0% |
California: | 98.1% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 670 out of 670 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 22 out of 22 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 26 out of 26 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 11 out of 11 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 7 out of 7 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 740 out of 740 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 561 out of 561 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 89 out of 89 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or AboveNoble Avenue Elementary School: | 68.7% |
California: | 59.9% |
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic67
- Asian95
- Filipino92
- SED69
- LEP67
- With Disabilities51
- Hispanic: 67% (418 out of 621 valid scores)
- Asian: 95% (18 out of 19 valid scores)
- Filipino: 92% (23 out of 25 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 69% (470 out of 684 valid scores)
- English Learners: 67% (356 out of 531 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 51% (41 out of 81 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: Yes
Number of AYP criteria met: 17
Number of AYP criteria possible: 17
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: Yes
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 67.6%
ELA Participation RateNoble Avenue Elementary School: | 100.0% |
State: | 98.2% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 701 out of 701 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 16 out of 16 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 24 out of 24 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 19 out of 19 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 6 out of 6 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 770 out of 770 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 595 out of 595 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 87 out of 87 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveHere: | 45.6% |
California: | 55.9% |
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic44
- Asian57
- Filipino83
- Black42
- SED46
- LEP41
- With Disabilities22
- Hispanic: 44% (290 out of 664 valid scores)
- Asian: 57% (8 out of 14 valid scores)
- Filipino: 83% (20 out of 24 valid scores)
- Black: 42% (5 out of 12 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 46% (330 out of 724 valid scores)
- English Learners: 41% (236 out of 570 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 22% (18 out of 82 valid scores)
Math met overall: Yes
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
Math Percent Proficient Target: 68.5%
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black95
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities99
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 701 out of 701 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 16 out of 16 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 24 out of 24 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Black: 95% (tested 18 out of 19 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 6 out of 6 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 769 out of 770 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 595 out of 595 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 86 out of 87 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or AboveNoble Avenue Elementary School: | 70.3% |
State: | 59.3% |
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic70
- Asian71
- Filipino96
- Black42
- SED70
- LEP68
- With Disabilities63
- Hispanic: 70% (463 out of 664 valid scores)
- Asian: 71% (10 out of 14 valid scores)
- Filipino: 96% (23 out of 24 valid scores)
- Black: 42% (5 out of 12 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 70% (509 out of 724 valid scores)
- English Learners: 68% (390 out of 570 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 63% (52 out of 82 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 14
Number of AYP criteria possible: 17
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: No
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 56.8%
ELA Participation RateNoble Avenue Elementary School: | 99.0% |
State: | 98.2% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic99
- American Indian100
- Asian89
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black95
- White100
- Multirace100
- SED99
- LEP99
- With Disabilities94
- Hispanic: 99% (tested 744 out of 753 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- Asian: 89% (tested 8 out of 9 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 25 out of 25 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Black: 95% (tested 18 out of 19 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 5 out of 5 enrolled)
- Two or More Races: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 99% (tested 806 out of 817 enrolled)
- English Learners: 99% (tested 618 out of 625 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 94% (tested 82 out of 88 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveSchool: | 40.3% |
California: | 53.7% |
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic38
- Filipino80
- Black62
- SED40
- LEP35
- With Disabilities30
- Hispanic: 38% (261 out of 689 valid scores)
- Filipino: 80% (20 out of 25 valid scores)
- Black: 62% (8 out of 13 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 40% (299 out of 742 valid scores)
- English Learners: 35% (205 out of 580 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 30% (23 out of 76 valid scores)
Math met overall: Yes
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
Math Percent Proficient Target: 58%
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- Multirace100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities99
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 750 out of 753 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 9 out of 9 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 25 out of 25 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 19 out of 19 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 5 out of 5 enrolled)
- Two or More Races: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 814 out of 817 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 624 out of 625 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 87 out of 88 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or AboveHere: | 52.3% |
California: | 57.1% |
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic51
- Filipino88
- Black31
- SED52
- LEP50
- With Disabilities49
- Hispanic: 51% (354 out of 696 valid scores)
- Filipino: 88% (22 out of 25 valid scores)
- Black: 31% (4 out of 13 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 52% (392 out of 750 valid scores)
- English Learners: 50% (290 out of 586 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 49% (39 out of 80 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 10
Number of AYP criteria possible: 17
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: No
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 46%
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 765 out of 765 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 18 out of 18 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 23 out of 23 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 12 out of 12 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 5 out of 5 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 783 out of 783 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 645 out of 645 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 94 out of 94 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveSchool: | 36.2% |
California: | 52.4% |
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic35
- Asian53
- Filipino67
- SED35
- LEP31
- With Disabilities9
- Hispanic: 35% (238 out of 688 valid scores)
- Asian: 53% (9 out of 17 valid scores)
- Filipino: 67% (14 out of 21 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 35% (247 out of 710 valid scores)
- English Learners: 31% (187 out of 600 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 9% (7 out of 79 valid scores)
Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
Math Percent Proficient Target: 47.5%
Math Participation RateNoble Avenue Elementary School: | 100.0% |
California: | 98.2% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 765 out of 765 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 18 out of 18 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 23 out of 23 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 12 out of 12 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 5 out of 5 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 783 out of 783 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 645 out of 645 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 94 out of 94 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or AboveHere: | 47.0% |
California: | 55.6% |
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic45
- Asian65
- Filipino81
- SED46
- LEP44
- With Disabilities13
- Hispanic: 45% (312 out of 688 valid scores)
- Asian: 65% (11 out of 17 valid scores)
- Filipino: 81% (17 out of 21 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 46% (324 out of 710 valid scores)
- English Learners: 44% (261 out of 600 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 13% (10 out of 79 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 16
Number of AYP criteria possible: 17
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 35.2%
ELA Participation RateNoble Avenue Elementary School: | 100.0% |
California: | 98.1% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 704 out of 704 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 15 out of 15 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 33 out of 33 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 14 out of 14 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 6 out of 6 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 740 out of 740 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 568 out of 568 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 89 out of 89 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveSchool: | 35.6% |
California: | 48.6% |
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic34
- Asian64
- Filipino56
- Black27
- SED35
- LEP30
- With Disabilities6
- Hispanic: 34% (206 out of 603 valid scores)
- Asian: 64% (7 out of 11 valid scores)
- Filipino: 56% (15 out of 27 valid scores)
- Black: 27% (3 out of 11 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 35% (224 out of 633 valid scores)
- English Learners: 30% (149 out of 497 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 6% (5 out of 80 valid scores)
Math met overall: Yes
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
Math Percent Proficient Target: 37%
Math Participation RateNoble Avenue Elementary School: | 100.0% |
State: | 98.0% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 704 out of 704 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 15 out of 15 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 33 out of 33 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 14 out of 14 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 6 out of 6 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 740 out of 740 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 568 out of 568 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 89 out of 89 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or Above
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic48
- Asian82
- Filipino82
- Black36
- SED49
- LEP44
- With Disabilities11
- Hispanic: 48% (287 out of 603 valid scores)
- Asian: 82% (9 out of 11 valid scores)
- Filipino: 82% (22 out of 27 valid scores)
- Black: 36% (4 out of 11 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 49% (308 out of 633 valid scores)
- English Learners: 44% (220 out of 497 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 11% (9 out of 80 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: Yes
Number of AYP criteria met: 17
Number of AYP criteria possible: 17
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: Yes
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 24.4%
ELA Participation RateHere: | 100.0% |
California: | 97.8% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 743 out of 744 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 15 out of 15 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 31 out of 31 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 18 out of 18 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 5 out of 5 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 773 out of 774 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 617 out of 617 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 102 out of 102 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveNoble Avenue Elementary School: | 29.8% |
California: | 46.4% |
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic28
- Asian50
- Filipino53
- Black21
- SED29
- LEP25
- With Disabilities7
- Hispanic: 28% (186 out of 656 valid scores)
- Asian: 50% (6 out of 12 valid scores)
- Filipino: 53% (16 out of 30 valid scores)
- Black: 21% (3 out of 14 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 29% (199 out of 689 valid scores)
- English Learners: 25% (143 out of 573 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 7% (6 out of 90 valid scores)
Math met overall: Yes
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
Math Percent Proficient Target: 26.5%
Math Participation RateNoble Avenue Elementary School: | 100.0% |
State: | 97.9% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 744 out of 744 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 15 out of 15 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 31 out of 31 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 18 out of 18 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 5 out of 5 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 774 out of 774 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 617 out of 617 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 102 out of 102 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or Above
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic39
- Asian58
- Filipino73
- Black14
- SED40
- LEP38
- With Disabilities14
- Hispanic: 39% (258 out of 656 valid scores)
- Asian: 58% (7 out of 12 valid scores)
- Filipino: 73% (22 out of 30 valid scores)
- Black: 14% (2 out of 14 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 40% (273 out of 689 valid scores)
- English Learners: 38% (215 out of 573 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 14% (13 out of 90 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 16
Number of AYP criteria possible: 17
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 24.4%
ELA Participation RateHere: | 100.0% |
California: | 97.3% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 839 out of 839 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 13 out of 13 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 38 out of 38 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 18 out of 18 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 5 out of 5 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 874 out of 874 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 715 out of 715 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 99 out of 99 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or Above
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic25
- Filipino50
- Black25
- SED26
- LEP22
- With Disabilities6
- Hispanic: 25% (182 out of 727 valid scores)
- Filipino: 50% (16 out of 32 valid scores)
- Black: 25% (3 out of 12 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 26% (195 out of 757 valid scores)
- English Learners: 22% (145 out of 652 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 6% (5 out of 89 valid scores)
Math met overall: Yes
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
Math Percent Proficient Target: 26.5%
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 838 out of 839 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 13 out of 13 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 38 out of 38 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 18 out of 18 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 5 out of 5 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 873 out of 874 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 715 out of 715 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 99 out of 99 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or AboveNoble Avenue Elementary School: | 38.1% |
California: | 49.9% |
Math Proficient or Above
- Filipino63
- Black33
- SED37
- LEP34
- With Disabilities9
- Filipino: 63% (20 out of 32 valid scores)
- Black: 33% (4 out of 12 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 37% (280 out of 756 valid scores)
- English Learners: 34% (224 out of 652 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 9% (8 out of 89 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 15
Number of AYP criteria possible: 19
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: No
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 24.4%
ELA Participation RateSchool: | 100.0% |
California: | 99.3% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities99
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 1,115 out of 1,117 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 9 out of 9 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 40 out of 40 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 17 out of 17 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 12 out of 12 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,194 out of 1,196 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 974 out of 976 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 106 out of 107 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveNoble Avenue Elementary School: | 21.5% |
California: | 44.5% |
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic20
- Filipino60
- SED22
- LEP17
- With Disabilities3
- Hispanic: 20% (201 out of 1,006 valid scores)
- Filipino: 60% (18 out of 30 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 22% (228 out of 1,062 valid scores)
- English Learners: 17% (156 out of 910 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 3% (3 out of 90 valid scores)
Math met overall: Yes
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
Math Percent Proficient Target: 26.5%
Math Participation RateNoble Avenue Elementary School: | 100.0% |
California: | 99.2% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities99
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 1,114 out of 1,117 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 9 out of 9 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 40 out of 40 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 17 out of 17 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 12 out of 12 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,193 out of 1,196 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 974 out of 976 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 106 out of 107 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or Above
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic32
- Filipino63
- SED33
- LEP31
- With Disabilities12
- Hispanic: 32% (323 out of 1,005 valid scores)
- Filipino: 63% (19 out of 30 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 33% (352 out of 1,061 valid scores)
- English Learners: 31% (286 out of 910 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 12% (11 out of 90 valid scores)
Health & Safety
Harassment & Bullying:
(State average from 2,337 schools)
An allegation is a claim or assertion that someone has done something wrong or illegal, typically made without proof.
Harassment or bullying on the basis of sex includes sexual harassment or bullying and gender-based harassment or bullying. Sexual harassment or bullying is unwelcome conduct of a sexual nature, such as unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal, nonverbal, or physical conduct of a sexual nature. Gender-based harassment or bullying is nonsexual intimidation or abusive behavior toward a student based on the student's actual or perceived sex, including harassment based on gender identity, gender expression, and nonconformity with gender stereotypes. Harassing conduct may take many forms, including verbal acts and name-calling, as well as non-verbal behavior, such as graphic and written statements, or conduct that is physically threatening, harmful or humiliating. The conduct can be carried out by school employees, other students, and non-employee third parties. Both male and female students can be victims of harassment or bullying on the basis of sex, and the harasser or bully and the victim can be of the same sex. Bullying on the basis of sex constitutes sexual harassment.
Allegations of harassment or bullying on the basis of sex: 1
Allegations of harassment or bullying on the basis of sex per 1,000 studentsNoble Avenue Elementary School: | 1.1 |
State: | 6.8 |
Students reported as harassed or bullied on the basis of sex: 2 (all female)
Chronic Student Absenteeismt:
(State average from 8,737 schools)
A chronically absent student is a student who is absent 15 or more school days during the school year. A student is absent if he or she is not physically on school grounds and is not participating in instruction or instruction - related activities at an approved off-grounds location for at least half the school day. Each day that a student is absent for 50 percent or more of the school day should be counted. Any day that a student is absent for less than 50 percent of the school day should not be counted. The number of absences is based on the total number of school days absent. Chronically absent students include students who are absent for any reason(e.g., illness, suspension, the need to care for a family member), regardless of whether absences are excused or unexcused.
Chronic Student Absenteeism
- Hispanic52
- Asian4
- Native Hawaiian2
- Black4
- White4
- LEP25
- IDEA16
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 66 (male: 37, female: 29)
- Hispanic: 52 (male: 29, female: 23)
- Asian: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 2 (all male)
- Black: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 25 (male: 17, female: 8)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 16 (male: 11, female: 5)
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 studentsSchool: | 74.1 |
California: | 172.7 |
Chronic Student Absenteeism
- Hispanic37
- Native Hawaiian2
- Multirace2
- LEP22
- IDEA5
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 41 (male: 28, female: 13)
- Hispanic: 37 (male: 26, female: 11)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 2 (all female)
- Two or More Races: 2 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 22 (male: 14, female: 8)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 5 (all male)
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 studentsNoble Avenue Elementary School: | 46.0 |
California: | 178.2 |
Restraint and Seclusion:
(State average from 741 schools)
Physical restraint refers to a personal restriction that immobilizes or reduces the ability of a student to move his or her torso, arms, legs, or head freely. The term physical restraint does not include a physical escort. Physical escort means a temporary touching or holding of the hand, wrist, arm, shoulder or back for the purpose of inducing a student who is acting out to walk to a safe location.
Total Number of students with disabilities (IDEA) subjected to physical restraint: 2 (all male)
Students with disabilities (IDEA) subjected to physical restraint per 1,000 students
Suspensions:
(State average from 1,406 schools)
Out-of-school suspension - For students with disabilities served under IDEA : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his/her regular school for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes to another setting (e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include both removals in which no individualized family service plan(IFSP) or individualized education plan(IEP) services are provided because the removal is 10 days or less as well as removals in which the child continues to receive services according to his/her IFSP or IEP.
- For students without disabilities and students with disabilities served solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his / her regular school for at least half a day(but less than the remainder of the school year) for disciplinary purposes to another setting(e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include removals in which no educational services are provided, and removals in which educational services are provided(e.g., school-provided at home instruction or tutoring).
In-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his or her regular classroom(s) for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes, but remains under the direct supervision of school personnel. Direct supervision means school personnel are physically in the same location as students under their supervision. School days missed due to out-of-school suspension: 5 (all male)
- Hispanic: 1
- Black: 2
- White: 2
Instances of out-of-school suspension (Students without disabilities): 4
Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Students without disabilities)Noble Avenue Elementary School: | 4.5 |
California: | 84.8 |
Students without disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 6 (all male)
- Hispanic: 2
- Black: 2
- White: 2
Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 2 (all male)
Students without disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 2 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2
Students with disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 2 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2
Students with disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 2 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2
Comments
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic: