Oak Park School in Sarasota, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 0.

7285 PROCTOR RD
Sarasota, FL 34241

Show street view No street view available for this location

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:



Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (941) 361-6428 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 58
School number: 293
School type: Combination Elementary and Secondary
District Name: SARASOTA
Grade range: KINDERGARTEN TO GRADE 12
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (941) 361-6430
Principal: Ronald Dipillo
The main educational program offered at the school: Special Education
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 13
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 67
Senate District: 23
School Web Address: www.sarasotacountyschools.net/oakpark

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 185 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 185 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

43%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 70
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

40%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 177
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 158

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

33%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 178
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 160
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 103 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 103 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

33%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 42
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

40%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 99
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 86

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 99
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 87
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 52 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 52 (95%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

29%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 45

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

16%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 49
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 46
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 131 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 131 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 50
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

37%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 126
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 114

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

29%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 127
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 115
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 185 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 185 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

43%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 70
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

40%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 177
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 158

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

33%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 178
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 160
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 204 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 204 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

38%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 77
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

36%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 183
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 161

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

27%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 183
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 164
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 119 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 119 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

35%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 49
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

40%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 105
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 92

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

30%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 106
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 96
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 53 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 52 (96%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

25%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 42

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

21%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 41
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 20
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 146 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 146 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

41%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 56
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

34%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 129
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 114

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

27%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 128
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 114
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 204 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 204 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

38%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 77
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

36%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 183
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 161

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

27%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 183
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 164
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 209 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 209 (95%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

58%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 64
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 184
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 109

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 187
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 108
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 133 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 133 (94%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

59%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 46
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 122
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 68

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 125
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 67
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 52 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 52 (96%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

40%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 31

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

37%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 31
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16
Number of Students Tested in Math: 16
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 131 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 131 (94%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 36
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

41%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 112
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 73

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 112
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 72
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 209 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 209 (95%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

58%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 64
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 184
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 109

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 187
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 108
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1094
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

211
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

77%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

8%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

8%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

8%
State average:

28%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
OAK PARK SCHOOL:

15%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

1
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
OAK PARK SCHOOL:

8
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
OAK PARK SCHOOL:

1
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1842
State average:

1922
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

297
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

36%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

36%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

21%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

7%
State average:

12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

29%
State average:

45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

10
State average:

11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

6
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

202
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
OAK PARK SCHOOL:

85%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

8%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

8%
State average:

36%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

8%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

5
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

4
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

5
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

4
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1150
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

223
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

85%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

15%
State average:

23%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

3
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

2
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

2
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

2
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1796
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

264
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

64%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

7%
State average:

22%
% in each Achievement Level 3
OAK PARK SCHOOL:

14%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

14%
State average:

21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

29%
State average:

61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
OAK PARK SCHOOL:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

2
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

801
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

218
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 75%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 8%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1238
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

261
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 20%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 03
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 06
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 02

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1597
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

277
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 25%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
OAK PARK SCHOOL:

1723
State average:

1907
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

275
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 64%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 9%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1423
State average:

1921
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

207
State average:

299
Percent Passing: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 88%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 6%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

875
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

208
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 83%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 8%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1313
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

267
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 20%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1528
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

241
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 75%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 17%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1742
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
OAK PARK SCHOOL:

248
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 18%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
OAK PARK SCHOOL:

1676
State average:

1972
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

248
State average:

321
Percent Passing: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 81%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 6%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 1
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 17
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

3
State average from 27 schools:

59
Unscore - Combined: 6
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 12%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 24%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

926
State average:

1396
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

238
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 58%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 17%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1322
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

241
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 30%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1661
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
OAK PARK SCHOOL:

264
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 55%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 18%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1664
State average:

1935
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

252
State average:

302
Percent Passing: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 67%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 20%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1011
State average:

1461
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

237
State average:

335
% in each Achievement Level 1: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 17%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1339
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

232
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 80%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 10%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1714
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
OAK PARK SCHOOL:

240
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 64%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 18%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1831
State average:

1984
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

286
State average:

323
Percent Passing: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 54%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 23%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

12
State average:

103
Mean Scale Score
Here:

572
State average from 3241 schools:

633
Median NPR
Here:

13
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

7
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

7
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
OAK PARK SCHOOL:

7
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

5
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

8
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

4
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
OAK PARK SCHOOL:

4
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

7
State average:

97

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

7
State average:

101

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

10
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
Here:

622
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
OAK PARK SCHOOL:

20
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

7
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

5
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

9
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

5
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
OAK PARK SCHOOL:

5
State average:

201

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

5
State average:

192

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

20
State average:

273
Mean Scale Score
Here:

644
State average from 2275 schools:

694
Median NPR
Here:

17
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

8
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

6
State average:

11
Functional (max 18)
Here:

7
State average:

11
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

4
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

9
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

5
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

3
State average:

5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
OAK PARK SCHOOL:

13
State average:

237
Mean Scale Score
Here:

683
State average from 2096 schools:

709
Median NPR
Here:

39
State average:

65
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

14
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
OAK PARK SCHOOL:

8
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 15
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

199
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 80%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 13%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 13%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 7
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

2
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 13%


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2021 Advameg, Inc.