Oak Park School in Pinellas Park, Florida (FL) - Test Results, Rating, Ranking, Grades, Scores, Classes, Enrollment, Teachers, Students, and Report Card

City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 49.

8570 66TH ST N
Pinellas Park, FL 33781

Show street view No street view available for this location

Other nearby schools ratings:

St. Petersburg Collegiate High School (5.0 miles):	96
Palm Harbor Middle School (15.2 miles):	72
Palm Harbor University High School (16.3 miles):	58
Oak Park School:	49
Osceola High School (3.0 miles):	46
Madison Middle School (13.3 miles):	37
Lealman Intermediate School (4.2 miles):	27
Dixie M. Hollins High School (2.4 miles):	15

Oak Park School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:

Florida:	45
Pinellas County:	51
Pinellas Park:	40
Oak Park School:	49

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:

Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum

Phone: (727) 490-5600 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 52
School number: 2881
School type: Senior High
District Name: PINELLAS
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 12
Principal: Timothy Haley
The function/setting of the school: Alternative to Expulsion
The main educational program offered at the school: Alternative Education
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 10
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 51
Senate District: 13

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	91%
State average from 133 schools:	66%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	88%
State average from 133 schools:	72%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	86%
State average from 133 schools:	85%

Meeting High Standards in Science

OAK PARK SCHOOL:	79%
State average from 133 schools:	47%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	79%
State average from 133 schools:	61%

Making Math Gains

Here:	68%
State average from 132 schools:	69%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	76%
State average from 133 schools:	57%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	74%
State average from 133 schools:	66%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	641
State average from 133 schools:	522

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 132 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 119999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	19%
State average from 137 schools:	57%

Minority Rate

Here:	74%
State average from 137 schools:	53%

Region: 5

Title I: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 402 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 402 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 98
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	88%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 395
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 382

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	84%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 395
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 382
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 108 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 108 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 25

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	94%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 108
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 106

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	92%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 108
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 106
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 38 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 38 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 240 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 240 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 58
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	88%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 234
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 226

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	87%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 234
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 226
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 74 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 74 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	75%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 67
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 65

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	66%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 67
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 65
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 42 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 42 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 41
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 41
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	90%
State average from 141 schools:	64%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	89%
State average from 133 schools:	72%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	94%
State average from 139 schools:	85%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	72%
State average from 133 schools:	47%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	73%
State average from 133 schools:	65%

Making Math Gains

Here:	71%
State average from 136 schools:	68%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

OAK PARK SCHOOL:	67%
State average from 133 schools:	64%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	55%
State average from 133 schools:	67%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	611
State average from 133 schools:	540

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 134 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	15%
State average from 132 schools:	53%

Minority Rate

Here:	67%
State average from 139 schools:	52%

Region: 5

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 360 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 360 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 90
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	86%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 353
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 339

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	85%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 353
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 339
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 120 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 120 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 31
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	92%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 120
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 113

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	89%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 120
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 113
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 35 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 35 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 178 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 178 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 40
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	86%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 171
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 166

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	88%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 171
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 166
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 53 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 53 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 51
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 49
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 51
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 49
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 26
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 41 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 41 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 36
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 36
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	92%
State average from 124 schools:	66%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	90%
State average from 124 schools:	71%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

OAK PARK SCHOOL:	94%
State average from 125 schools:	84%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	62%
State average from 122 schools:	46%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	82%
State average from 122 schools:	63%

Making Math Gains

Here:	75%
State average from 122 schools:	71%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	83%
State average from 122 schools:	61%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	67%
State average from 122 schools:	70%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	645
State average from 122 schools:	535

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 124 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	14%
State average from 126 schools:	49%

Minority Rate

Here:	65%
State average from 125 schools:	52%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 217 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 212 (95%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	65%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 78
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	12%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 154
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 149

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	19%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 145
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 138
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 87 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 84 (93%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

OAK PARK SCHOOL:	59%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 32
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	14%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 59
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 55

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	29%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 56
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 50
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 102 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 100 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 39

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	11%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 74
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 73

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	12%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 69
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 68
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 22
Number of Students Tested in Math: 22
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 167 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 163 (95%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	65%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 62
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	13%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 117
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 113

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	18%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 109
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 103
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

OAK PARK SCHOOL:	15%
State average from 63 schools:	49%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	24%
State average from 63 schools:	55%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	74%
State average from 63 schools:	85%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	3%
State average from 63 schools:	37%

Making Reading Gains

OAK PARK SCHOOL:	35%
State average from 63 schools:	53%

Making Math Gains

Here:	55%
State average from 63 schools:	64%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	60%
State average from 63 schools:	55%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	74%
State average from 63 schools:	63%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns

Here:	340
State average from 63 schools:	461

Percent Tested

Here:	95%
State average from 63 schools:	97%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: P

Grade in 2006: P

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	68%
State average from 63 schools:	55%

Minority Rate

Here:	51%
State average from 63 schools:	55%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 294 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 294 (96%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	92%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 71
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	14%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 137
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	22%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 139
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 143 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 142 (95%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	95%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 38
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	20%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 71
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	32%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 75
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 111 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 112 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 23

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	7%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 46
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	7%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 44
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 26
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 202 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 203 (96%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	88%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 43
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	11%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 92
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	13%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 90
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 20
Number of Students Tested in Math: 20
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	12%
State average from 62 schools:	49%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	15%
State average from 62 schools:	55%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	43%
State average from 62 schools:	82%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	38%
State average from 62 schools:	57%

Making Math Gains

Here:	54%
State average from 62 schools:	66%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

OAK PARK SCHOOL:	64%
State average from 62 schools:	62%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns

Here:	226
State average from 62 schools:	371

Percent Tested

Here:	92%
State average from 62 schools:	97%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: P

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	64%
State average from 63 schools:	54%

Minority Rate

Here:	48%
State average from 63 schools:	53%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 350 (90%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 336 (87%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	68%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 74

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	12%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 145
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	15%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 141
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 182 (91%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 177 (89%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	64%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 36

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	13%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 76
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	25%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 75
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 121 (88%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 115 (85%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 29

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	8%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 48
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 49
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 30 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 27 (90%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 222 (88%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 214 (86%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	67%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 54

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	8%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 101
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	10%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 97
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 27 (84%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26 (81%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1613
State average:	1402

Mean Scale Score 100-500

OAK PARK SCHOOL:	352
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1

OAK PARK SCHOOL:	6%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	6%
State average:	11%

% in each Achievement Level 3

OAK PARK SCHOOL:	20%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	49%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	20%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	89%
State average:	74%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	20
State average:	17

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	5
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

OAK PARK SCHOOL:	1758
State average:	1604

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	350
State average:	324

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	5%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

OAK PARK SCHOOL:	5%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 3

OAK PARK SCHOOL:	29%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	41%
State average:	29%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	19%
State average:	11%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	90%
State average:	72%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	21
State average:	19

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

OAK PARK SCHOOL:	10
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	3
State average:	2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1785
State average:	1659

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	334
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	10%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	7%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 3

OAK PARK SCHOOL:	20%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	48%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	16%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	83%
State average:	70%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

OAK PARK SCHOOL:	4
State average:	3

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	17
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	11
State average:	10

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	2
State average:	2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1927
State average:	1716

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	350
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	3%
State average:	19%

% in each Achievement Level 2

OAK PARK SCHOOL:	6%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	32%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	41%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	17%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	90%
State average:	65%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	17
State average:	14

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

OAK PARK SCHOOL:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1971
State average:	1810

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	348
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	3%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	16%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	27%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	34%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	19%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	81%
State average:	65%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

OAK PARK SCHOOL:	19
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	344
State average:	321

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	11%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	16%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 3

OAK PARK SCHOOL:	43%
State average:	36%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	25%
State average:	11%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	6%
State average:	4%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	73%
State average:	51%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

Here:	10
State average:	9

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

Here:	10
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

Here:	10
State average:	9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1674
State average:	1481

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	381
State average:	339

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	5%
State average:	8%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	3%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	20%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	31%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	41%
State average:	16%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	92%
State average:	79%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	9
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	5
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	6
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1636
State average:	1585

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	341
State average:	330

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	4%
State average:	10%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	10%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	39%
State average:	36%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	32%
State average:	26%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	14%
State average:	11%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	86%
State average:	74%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

OAK PARK SCHOOL:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	5
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1770
State average:	1674

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	355
State average:	334

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	11%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	9%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	21%
State average:	27%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	40%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	19%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	80%
State average:	63%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	9
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

OAK PARK SCHOOL:	8
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1827
State average:	1696

Mean Scale Score 100-500

OAK PARK SCHOOL:	345
State average:	315

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	5%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	14%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	46%
State average:	29%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	17%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	17%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	81%
State average:	55%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	6
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	7
State average:	6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

OAK PARK SCHOOL:	1921
State average:	1786

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	339
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	11%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	13%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	23%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	34%
State average:	19%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	19%
State average:	7%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	76%
State average:	57%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	7
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	5
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	7
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	7
State average:	5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1512
State average:	1402

Mean Scale Score 100-500

OAK PARK SCHOOL:	335
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1677
State average:	1605

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	336
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 09%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1882
State average:	1656

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	352
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 24%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1909
State average:	1707

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	347
State average:	310

% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	352
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 10
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

OAK PARK SCHOOL:	1627
State average:	1476

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	371
State average:	338

% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 27%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 95%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1655
State average:	1578

Mean Scale Score 100-500

OAK PARK SCHOOL:	346
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1828
State average:	1675

Mean Scale Score 100-500

OAK PARK SCHOOL:	367
State average:	334

% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 9
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 9
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 9

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1836
State average:	1679

Mean Scale Score 100-500

OAK PARK SCHOOL:	348
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 22%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 90

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	4
State average from 27 schools:	59

Unscore - Combined: 1
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 48%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 88%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1470
State average:	1396

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	328
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1785
State average:	1582

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	354
State average:	320

% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 93%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 22
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

OAK PARK SCHOOL:	1824
State average:	1627

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	341
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 51%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 91%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1366
State average:	1696

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	249
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 74%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 16%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

OAK PARK SCHOOL:	1544
State average:	1775

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	267
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 22%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

OAK PARK SCHOOL:	1583
State average:	1857

Mean Scale Score 100-500

OAK PARK SCHOOL:	246
State average:	304

% in each Achievement Level 1: 68%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 2%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1670
State average:	1894

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	265
State average:	307

% in each Achievement Level 1: 68%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 12%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1589
State average:	1935

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	238
State average:	302

Percent Passing: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 85%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 6%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

OAK PARK SCHOOL:	330
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	220
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 79%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 2%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	212
State average:	302

% in each Achievement Level 1: 79%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 3
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 3
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1559
State average:	1461

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	356
State average:	335

% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1750
State average:	1563

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	367
State average:	325

% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 33%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1801
State average:	1668

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	361
State average:	333

% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 9
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 9

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1593
State average:	1801

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	257
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 63%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 17%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1686
State average:	1882

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	267
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 59%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 18%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1751
State average:	1915

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	251
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 15%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1799
State average:	1984

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	278
State average:	323

Percent Passing: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 55%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 8%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	96
State average:	103

Mean Scale Score

Here:	650
State average from 3241 schools:	633

Median NPR

OAK PARK SCHOOL:	75
State average:	61

Literary (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

OAK PARK SCHOOL:	16
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	103
State average:	97

Mean Scale Score

Here:	677
State average from 3233 schools:	653

Median NPR

Here:	85
State average:	69

Literary (max 18)

Here:	16
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

OAK PARK SCHOOL:	11
State average:	10

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	17
State average:	15

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	8

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	8
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	101
State average:	101

Mean Scale Score

Here:	691
State average from 3309 schools:	667

Median NPR

OAK PARK SCHOOL:	87
State average:	71

Literary (max 18)

OAK PARK SCHOOL:	15
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	11
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	16
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

OAK PARK SCHOOL:	10
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	18
State average:	190

Mean Scale Score

Here:	640
State average from 2604 schools:	671

Median NPR

OAK PARK SCHOOL:	33
State average:	63

Literary (max 18)

Here:	10
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	9
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	10
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	6
State average:	8

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	11
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	7
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	5
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	46
State average:	201

Mean Scale Score

OAK PARK SCHOOL:	648
State average from 2487 schools:	682

Median NPR

Here:	36
State average:	66

Literary (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

OAK PARK SCHOOL:	10
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	8
State average:	12

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	11
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	7
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

OAK PARK SCHOOL:	5
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	43
State average:	192

Mean Scale Score

Here:	647
State average from 2497 schools:	687

Median NPR

Here:	26
State average:	63

Literary (max 18)

OAK PARK SCHOOL:	10
State average:	12

Informational (max 18)

Here:	8
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	10
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	6
State average:	7

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	10
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

OAK PARK SCHOOL:	7
State average:	10

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	5
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	45
State average:	273

Mean Scale Score

Here:	649
State average from 2275 schools:	694

Median NPR

Here:	20
State average:	61

Literary (max 18)

Here:	8
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	7
State average:	11

Functional (max 18)

Here:	8
State average:	11

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	4
State average:	7

Interpretation (max 20)

OAK PARK SCHOOL:	9
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	5
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	3
State average:	5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	39
State average:	237

Mean Scale Score

Here:	674
State average from 2096 schools:	709

Median NPR

Here:	33
State average:	65

Literary (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

Here:	10
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	11
State average:	14

Initial Understanding (max 12)

OAK PARK SCHOOL:	7
State average:	8

Interpretation (max 20)

OAK PARK SCHOOL:	12
State average:	15

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	10

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	6
State average:	8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 104

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	337
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 54%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 83%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 9
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 13

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 43%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 90%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 52

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	211
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 77%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 2%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 7

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	3
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 54%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 45

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	223
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 62%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 4%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 7

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	3
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 33%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 22%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1413
State average from 878 schools:	1661

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	257
State average:	302

% in each Achievement Level 1: 54%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 14%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 83%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1400
State average:	1663

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

OAK PARK SCHOOL:	1433
State average:	1592

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: -33

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

OAK PARK SCHOOL:	1513
State average from 808 schools:	1746

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	261
State average:	305

% in each Achievement Level 1: 61%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 22%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 87%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1522
State average:	1743

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1517
State average:	1668

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 4

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1561
State average from 819 schools:	1810

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	242
State average:	294

% in each Achievement Level 1: 61%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 16%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 88%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

OAK PARK SCHOOL:	1578
State average:	1807

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1675
State average:	1738

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: -97

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1614
State average from 612 schools:	1849

Mean Scale Score 100-500

OAK PARK SCHOOL:	255
State average:	298

% in each Achievement Level 1: 72%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 6%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 9: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 86%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1597
State average:	1837

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1629
State average:	1779

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: -32

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1615
State average from 573 schools:	1879

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	242
State average:	291

Percent Passing: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 80%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 10%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 18: 9
Percent Matched to 2006: 76%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1599
State average:	1873

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

OAK PARK SCHOOL:	1711
State average:	1876

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: -112

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	220
State average:	290

% in each Achievement Level 1: 75%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 5%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 3
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	224
State average:	295

% in each Achievement Level 1: 75%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 13: 3
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 14: 5

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1405
State average from 873 schools:	1641

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	248
State average:	302

% in each Achievement Level 1: 65%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 21%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 82%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

OAK PARK SCHOOL:	1415
State average:	1645

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1478
State average:	1620

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: -63

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1569
State average from 804 schools:	1777

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	251
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1: 59%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 15%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 85%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1590
State average:	1774

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1502
State average:	1645

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 88

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

OAK PARK SCHOOL:	1706
State average from 815 schools:	1851

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	272
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 55%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 17%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 84%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1717
State average:	1845

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1642
State average:	1755

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 75

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1723
State average from 613 schools:	1884

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	243
State average:	290

% in each Achievement Level 1: 62%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 14%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 11: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 10: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 8: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 78%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1710
State average:	1869

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1694
State average:	1821

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 16

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

OAK PARK SCHOOL:	1806
State average from 581 schools:	1950

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	280
State average:	315

Percent Passing: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 18%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 10: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 14: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 14: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 11: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 76%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1818
State average:	1939

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1771
State average:	1901

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 47

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 31

Mean Scale Score

Here:	645
State average from 874 schools:	671

Median NPR: 39
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 9
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 12): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 12): 6
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 51

Mean Scale Score

Here:	626
State average from 796 schools:	675

Median NPR: 19
Literary (max 18): 10
Informational (max 18): 5
Functional (max 18): 7
Initial Understanding (max 12): 5
Interpretation (max 20): 9
Critical Analysis (max 12): 5
Strategies (max 10): 3

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 71

Mean Scale Score

OAK PARK SCHOOL:	656
State average from 810 schools:	685

Median NPR: 34
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 8
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 10): 6
Interpretation (max 20): 11
Critical Analysis (max 14): 8
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 64

Mean Scale Score

Here:	670
State average from 597 schools:	696

Median NPR: 39
Literary (max 18): 11
Informational (max 18): 9
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 10): 6
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 14): 8
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 37

Mean Scale Score

OAK PARK SCHOOL:	675
State average from 575 schools:	695

Median NPR: 33
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 8
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 10): 6
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 14): 9
Strategies (max 10): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 31

Mean Scale Score

OAK PARK SCHOOL:	629
State average from 874 schools:	669

Median NPR: 25
Number Sense (max 10): 4
Operations (max 12): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 2
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 52

Mean Scale Score

Here:	647
State average from 796 schools:	685

Median NPR: 35
Number Sense (max 9): 3
Operations (max 9): 4
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 3
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 72

Mean Scale Score

Here:	666
State average from 810 schools:	698

Median NPR: 39
Number Sense (max 9): 4
Operations (max 9): 4
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 3
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 62

Mean Scale Score

Here:	675
State average from 597 schools:	708

Median NPR: 38
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 4
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 37

Mean Scale Score

Here:	682
State average from 575 schools:	710

Median NPR: 27
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 4
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 72

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	238
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 63%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 10%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 7
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

OAK PARK SCHOOL:	3
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 38%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 72%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 47%

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 49

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	246
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 59%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 14%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 9 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	3
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 31%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 4%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 67%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 37%

City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DC	DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID
IL	IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	MD
ME	MI	MN	MO	MS	MT	NC
ND	NE	NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY
OH	OK	OR	PA	RI	SC	SD
TN	TX	UT	VA	VT	WA	WI
WV	WY

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID	IL
IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	ME	MI
MN	MO	MS	MT	NC	ND	NE
NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	SD	TN	TX
VA	VT	WA	WI	WV	WY

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID	IL
IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	ME	MI
MN	MO	MS	MT	NC	ND	NE
NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	SD	TN	TX
VA	VT	WA	WI	WV	WY

AL	AZ	CA	CO	CT	DE	FL
GA	HI	IA	ID	IL	IN	KS
LA	MA	MD	MI	MN	MO	NC
NE	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	TN	TX	UT
VA	WA	WI	WV

AL	CA	CO	DC	DE	FL	GA
IA	ID	IL	IN	KS	KY	LA
MD	ME	MI	MN	NC	NE	NH
NJ	NV	NY	OH	OK	OR	PA
SC	TN	TX	UT	VA	WA	WI