City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is
51.
Other nearby schools ratings:
Palm Cove Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:| Florida: | 45 |
| Broward County: | 47 |
| Pembroke Pines: | 62 |
| Palm Cove Elementary School: | 51 |
Discuss this school with others on our active
Florida forum
Phone: (754) 323-6800 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 6
School number: 3311
School type: Elementary
District Name: BROWARD
Grade range: KINDERGARTEN TO GRADE 5
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (754) 323-6840
Principal: Dorothy Cain
School in Need of Improvement (SINI) Status: Title 1 school not in need of improvement
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 17
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 105
Senate District: 31
2009-2010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading| PALM COVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 78% |
| State average from 734 schools: | 73% |
Meeting High Standards in Math| Here: | 78% |
| State average from 734 schools: | 77% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing| Here: | 92% |
| State average from 734 schools: | 85% |
Meeting High Standards in Science| PALM COVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 50% |
| State average from 733 schools: | 53% |
Making Reading Gains | Here: | 70% |
| State average from 734 schools: | 64% |
Making Math Gains| PALM COVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 70% |
| State average from 733 schools: | 67% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading | Here: | 57% |
| State average from 734 schools: | 58% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math| Here: | 60% |
| State average from 734 schools: | 66% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)| Here: | 555 |
| State average from 734 schools: | 543 |
Percent Tested| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 733 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES
Grade in 2010: A
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 119999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate| Here: | 68% |
| State average from 734 schools: | 57% |
Minority Rate| Here: | 92% |
| State average from 735 schools: | 46% |
Region: 5
Title I: YES
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 479 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 478 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 153
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| PALM COVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 74% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 407
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 76% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 407
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 33 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 33 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 247 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 246 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 75
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 70% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 217
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 68% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 217
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 161 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 161 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient| Here: | 89% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 78% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 131
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 82% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 131
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 322 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 321 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient| Here: | 94% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 73% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 266
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 72% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 266
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 63 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 62 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 24
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 38
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 38
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 34 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 34 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2008-2009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading| Here: | 72% |
| State average from 735 schools: | 74% |
Meeting High Standards in Math| Here: | 79% |
| State average from 734 schools: | 76% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing| PALM COVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 91% |
| State average from 734 schools: | 88% |
Meeting High Standards in Science| Here: | 52% |
| State average from 734 schools: | 51% |
Making Reading Gains | Here: | 71% |
| State average from 734 schools: | 67% |
Making Math Gains| PALM COVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 73% |
| State average from 735 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading | Here: | 73% |
| State average from 735 schools: | 65% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math| PALM COVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 74% |
| State average from 734 schools: | 67% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)| PALM COVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 585 |
| State average from 734 schools: | 557 |
Percent Tested| PALM COVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 100% |
| State average from 734 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate| Here: | 62% |
| State average from 734 schools: | 53% |
Minority Rate| PALM COVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 91% |
| State average from 734 schools: | 45% |
Region: 3
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 464 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 464 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 144
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 70% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 403
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 78% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 403
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 45 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 45 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 38
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 38
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 223 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 223 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 77
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 65% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 192
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 73% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 192
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 153 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 153 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 42
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 72% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 136
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 81% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 136
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 278 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 278 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 82
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 63% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 229
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 73% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 229
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 59 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 59 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 45
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 45
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 39 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 39 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
2007-2008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading| Here: | 73% |
| State average from 711 schools: | 73% |
Meeting High Standards in Math| Here: | 76% |
| State average from 711 schools: | 75% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing| Here: | 93% |
| State average from 711 schools: | 82% |
Meeting High Standards in Science| PALM COVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 42% |
| State average from 711 schools: | 47% |
Making Reading Gains | Here: | 66% |
| State average from 711 schools: | 65% |
Making Math Gains| Here: | 65% |
| State average from 711 schools: | 70% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading | Here: | 56% |
| State average from 711 schools: | 62% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math| Here: | 59% |
| State average from 711 schools: | 69% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)| Here: | 530 |
| State average from 711 schools: | 544 |
Percent Tested| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 711 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate| Here: | 57% |
| State average from 711 schools: | 50% |
Minority Rate| PALM COVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 91% |
| State average from 711 schools: | 44% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 501 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 501 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 138
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 69% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 450
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| PALM COVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 73% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 451
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 49 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 49 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 43
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 43
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 230 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 230 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 59
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 63% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 214
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 64% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 214
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 162 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 162 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 43
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 69% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 140
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 75% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 141
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 294 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 294 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 79
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 64% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 256
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 65% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 257
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 85 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 85 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 58% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 76
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 68% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 77
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 56 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 56 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 46
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 47
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
2006-2007 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading| Here: | 73% |
| State average from 652 schools: | 75% |
Meeting High Standards in Math| Here: | 76% |
| State average from 652 schools: | 73% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing| Here: | 91% |
| State average from 652 schools: | 83% |
Meeting High Standards in Science| Here: | 29% |
| State average from 650 schools: | 46% |
Making Reading Gains| Here: | 65% |
| State average from 652 schools: | 72% |
Making Reading Gains - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Included
Making Math Gains| PALM COVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 64% |
| State average from 652 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading| Here: | 59% |
| State average from 652 schools: | 67% |
% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Included
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math| Here: | 69% |
| State average from 652 schools: | 69% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns| PALM COVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 526 |
| State average from 652 schools: | 553 |
Percent Tested| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 652 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate| Here: | 52% |
| State average from 655 schools: | 53% |
Minority Rate| Here: | 89% |
| State average from 655 schools: | 55% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 531 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 531 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient| Here: | 98% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 68% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 72% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 55 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 55 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 239 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 239 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient| Here: | 97% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 62% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 65% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 181 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 181 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient| Here: | 98% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 70% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 75% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 283 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 283 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient| Here: | 96% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 62% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 67% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 88 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 88 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 59% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 65% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 55 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 55 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
2005-2006 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading| Here: | 74% |
| State average from 643 schools: | 75% |
Meeting High Standards in Math| Here: | 77% |
| State average from 643 schools: | 71% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing| Here: | 92% |
| State average from 643 schools: | 81% |
Making Reading Gains| Here: | 63% |
| State average from 643 schools: | 63% |
Making Math Gains| Here: | 79% |
| State average from 643 schools: | 69% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading| Here: | 55% |
| State average from 643 schools: | 61% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns| Here: | 440 |
| State average from 643 schools: | 420 |
Percent Tested| PALM COVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 99% |
| State average from 643 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate| Here: | 44% |
| State average from 644 schools: | 54% |
Minority Rate| Here: | 88% |
| State average from 644 schools: | 54% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 583 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 578 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient| Here: | 96% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient| Here: | 70% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient| Here: | 74% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 67 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 67 (99%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient| PALM COVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 71% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient| Here: | 73% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 241 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 237 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient| Here: | 95% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient| Here: | 65% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient| PALM COVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 67% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 218 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 217 (100%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient| Here: | 98% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient| Here: | 72% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient| Here: | 79% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 30 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 30 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient| Here: | 83% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient| Here: | 87% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 246 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 243 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient| Here: | 94% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient| Here: | 65% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient| Here: | 67% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 127 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 127 (100%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient| PALM COVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 97% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient| Here: | 65% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient| Here: | 74% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 61 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 61 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 20
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient| PALM COVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 43% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient| Here: | 46% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
2004-2005 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading| PALM COVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 71% |
| State average from 631 schools: | 74% |
Meeting High Standards in Math| Here: | 73% |
| State average from 631 schools: | 69% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing| PALM COVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 93% |
| State average from 631 schools: | 80% |
Making Reading Gains| Here: | 68% |
| State average from 631 schools: | 66% |
Making Math Gains| Here: | 75% |
| State average from 631 schools: | 69% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading| Here: | 66% |
| State average from 631 schools: | 60% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns| PALM COVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 446 |
| State average from 631 schools: | 417 |
Percent Tested| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 631 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate| Here: | 46% |
| State average from 631 schools: | 54% |
Minority Rate| Here: | 85% |
| State average from 631 schools: | 52% |
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| PALM COVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 1382 |
| State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 313 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1| Here: | 17% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 41% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 31% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 76% |
| State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17| PALM COVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 17 |
| State average: | 17 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1559 |
| State average: | 1604 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 316 |
| State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 1| Here: | 15% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 13% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 39% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 25% |
| State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 5| PALM COVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 7% |
| State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 72% |
| State average: | 72% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1603 |
| State average: | 1659 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 302 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1| Here: | 14% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 21% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 35% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 24% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 65% |
| State average: | 70% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 311 |
| State average: | 321 |
% in each Achievement Level 1| Here: | 18% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 39% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 35% |
| State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| PALM COVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 42% |
| State average: | 51% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12| PALM COVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1488 |
| State average: | 1481 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 341 |
| State average: | 339 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 15% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 31% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 31% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 5| Here: | 17% |
| State average: | 16% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 79% |
| State average: | 79% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1596 |
| State average: | 1585 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 332 |
| State average: | 330 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 19% |
| State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| PALM COVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 31% |
| State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 32% |
| State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 5| Here: | 10% |
| State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 73% |
| State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8| PALM COVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7| PALM COVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| PALM COVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 1689 |
| State average: | 1674 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 337 |
| State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1| Here: | 13% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 24% |
| State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 26% |
| State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 30% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 63% |
| State average: | 63% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12| PALM COVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 8 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7| PALM COVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| PALM COVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 1323 |
| State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 304 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1584 |
| State average: | 1605 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 320 |
| State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 03%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 05
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1654 |
| State average: | 1656 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 311 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 319 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1474 |
| State average: | 1476 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 338 |
| State average: | 338 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1635 |
| State average: | 1578 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 341 |
| State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1721 |
| State average: | 1675 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 344 |
| State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 152
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined| Here: | 4 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Unscore - Combined: 1
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 51%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 89%
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1329 |
| State average: | 1396 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 305 |
| State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1601 |
| State average: | 1582 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 323 |
| State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1606 |
| State average: | 1627 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 302 |
| State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 313 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 40%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1470 |
| State average: | 1461 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| PALM COVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 337 |
| State average: | 335 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1610 |
| State average: | 1563 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| PALM COVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 335 |
| State average: | 325 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1667 |
| State average: | 1668 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 333 |
| State average: | 333 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students| Here: | 167 |
| State average: | 103 |
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 628 |
| State average from 3241 schools: | 633 |
Functional (max 18)| PALM COVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 12 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students| PALM COVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 152 |
| State average: | 97 |
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 655 |
| State average from 3233 schools: | 653 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)| PALM COVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 9 |
| State average: | 8 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students| Here: | 180 |
| State average: | 101 |
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 663 |
| State average from 3309 schools: | 667 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 151
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined| Here: | 326 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 74%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 40%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 91%
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1347 |
| State average: | 1342 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 308 |
| State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000| Here: | 1557 |
| State average from 1875 schools: | 1542 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 315 |
| State average: | 313 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 82%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007| Here: | 1564 |
| State average: | 1546 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006| Here: | 1358 |
| State average: | 1397 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 206
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000| Here: | 1595 |
| State average from 1873 schools: | 1629 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 300 |
| State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 83%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007| PALM COVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 1626 |
| State average: | 1632 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006| Here: | 1568 |
| State average: | 1532 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 58
2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 292 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 25%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1439 |
| State average: | 1413 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 330 |
| State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000| Here: | 1602 |
| State average from 1874 schools: | 1525 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 334 |
| State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 83%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007| Here: | 1619 |
| State average: | 1528 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006| Here: | 1455 |
| State average: | 1414 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 163
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000| Here: | 1677 |
| State average from 1872 schools: | 1647 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 335 |
| State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 83%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007| Here: | 1697 |
| State average: | 1649 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006| Here: | 1624 |
| State average: | 1519 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 73
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 170
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 636 |
| State average from 1891 schools: | 633 |
Median NPR: 63
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 179
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 642 |
| State average from 1874 schools: | 642 |
Median NPR: 61
Literary (max 18): 11
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 177
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 664 |
| State average from 1870 schools: | 667 |
Median NPR: 70
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 170
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 637 |
| State average from 1891 schools: | 632 |
Median NPR: 72
Number Sense (max 14): 11
Operations (max 11): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 177
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 657 |
| State average from 1874 schools: | 652 |
Median NPR: 79
Number Sense (max 12): 10
Operations (max 12): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 177
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 659 |
| State average from 1870 schools: | 663 |
Median NPR: 71
Number Sense (max 12): 9
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 181
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined| Here: | 315 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 64%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 12
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 32%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 88%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 72%
- All Cities
- Florida forum
- Florida
- Pembroke Pines, FL
- Palm Cove Elementary School in Pembroke Pines, Florida (FL)
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic: