Pre-K Early Intervention Prog School in Largo, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 94.

301 4TH ST SW
Largo, FL 33770

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Ptec - St Petersburg School (12.6 miles):

98
Pre-K Early Intervention Prog School:

94
Oakhurst Elementary School (3.8 miles):

78
Shore Acres Elementary School (12.5 miles):

65
Mildred Helms Elementary School (0.3 miles):

55
Curlew Creek Elementary School (10.6 miles):

45
South Ward Elementary School (3.1 miles):

36
James B. Sanderlin Elementary School (13.8 miles):

26
Pre-K Early Intervention Prog School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Pinellas County:

51
Largo:

46
Pre-K Early Intervention Prog:

94

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:



Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (727) 588-6092 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 52
School number: 7101
School type: Elementary
District Name: PINELLAS
Principal: Donna Rippley
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 10
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 54
Senate District: 13

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

77%
State average from 33 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

91%
State average from 33 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

98%
State average from 33 schools:

86%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

63%
State average from 33 schools:

46%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

70%
State average from 33 schools:

63%
Making Math Gains
Here:

81%
State average from 33 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

54%
State average from 33 schools:

60%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

76%
State average from 33 schools:

69%
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 10

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
PRE-K EARLY INTERVENTION PROG:

620
State average from 33 schools:

528
Percent Tested
PRE-K EARLY INTERVENTION PROG:

100%
State average from 33 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: Pending

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 119999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

44%
State average from 33 schools:

64%
Minority Rate
PRE-K EARLY INTERVENTION PROG:

80%
State average from 33 schools:

54%
Region: 5

Title I: NO


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1587 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1587 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 777
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

76%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1582
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1544

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
PRE-K EARLY INTERVENTION PROG:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1585
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1546
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 308 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 308 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 158
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 306
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 297
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 307
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 298
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 276 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 276 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 154
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 274
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 266

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

79%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 276
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 268
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 912 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 912 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 424
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

76%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 911
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 890

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
PRE-K EARLY INTERVENTION PROG:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 911
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 889
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 71 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 71 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 29
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 71
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 71
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 71
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 71
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 674 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 674 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 320
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

65%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 673
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 663

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 674
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 664
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 22
Number of Students Tested in Math: 22
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 60 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 60 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 59
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 57
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 59
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 57
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

75%
State average from 33 schools:

63%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

92%
State average from 33 schools:

69%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

99%
State average from 33 schools:

90%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

64%
State average from 33 schools:

44%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

68%
State average from 33 schools:

63%
Making Math Gains
Here:

81%
State average from 33 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
PRE-K EARLY INTERVENTION PROG:

52%
State average from 33 schools:

61%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

80%
State average from 33 schools:

66%
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 10

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

621
State average from 33 schools:

526
Percent Tested
PRE-K EARLY INTERVENTION PROG:

100%
State average from 33 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
PRE-K EARLY INTERVENTION PROG:

36%
State average from 33 schools:

61%
Minority Rate
Here:

80%
State average from 33 schools:

53%
Region: 5


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1531 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1529 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 743
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1525
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1484

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1524
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1487
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 319 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 319 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 150
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 317
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 309

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
PRE-K EARLY INTERVENTION PROG:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 318
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 310
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 292 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 292 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 140
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 291
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 283

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 291
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 285
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 792 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 790 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 389
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 790
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 768

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 787
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 767
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 52 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 52 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 27
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 51
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 49
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 50
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 547 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 545 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 272
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 545
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 539

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 541
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 537
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 26
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 65 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 65 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

78%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 41
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 62
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 59
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 63
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 60
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

75%
State average from 33 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Math
PRE-K EARLY INTERVENTION PROG:

92%
State average from 33 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

97%
State average from 33 schools:

86%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

62%
State average from 33 schools:

45%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

74%
State average from 33 schools:

62%
Making Math Gains
Here:

83%
State average from 33 schools:

72%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
PRE-K EARLY INTERVENTION PROG:

57%
State average from 33 schools:

61%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

85%
State average from 33 schools:

73%
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 10

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

635
State average from 33 schools:

535
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 33 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

34%
State average from 33 schools:

58%
Minority Rate
Here:

79%
State average from 33 schools:

54%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1550 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1551 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 779
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1545
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1510

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1549
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1514
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 323 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 323 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 163
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

83%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 323
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 315
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 323
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 315
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 269 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 270 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 121
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

63%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 267
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 262

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

83%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 269
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 264
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 819 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 819 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 421
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 817
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 797

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 818
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 798
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 50 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 50 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 24
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 49
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 48
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 50
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 49
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 524 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 524 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 246
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 522
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 514

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
PRE-K EARLY INTERVENTION PROG:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 523
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 515
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 27
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 83 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 83 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 38
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 82
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 72
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 82
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 72
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2133
State average:

1922
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

351
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

4%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

19%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

33%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

24%
State average:

12%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

20%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

77%
State average:

45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
PRE-K EARLY INTERVENTION PROG:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
PRE-K EARLY INTERVENTION PROG:

14
State average:

11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

8
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2234
State average:

1938
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

357
State average:

302
Percent Passing
Here:

89%
State average:

56%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

7%
State average:

35%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

18%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

23%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

15%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

36%
State average:

12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

75%
State average:

37%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

18
State average:

15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

9
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

336
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

10%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

28%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

47%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

13%
State average:

5%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

62%
State average:

36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

11
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
PRE-K EARLY INTERVENTION PROG:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

8
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
PRE-K EARLY INTERVENTION PROG:

8
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2068
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

345
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

3%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

9%
State average:

22%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

25%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

37%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

27%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

88%
State average:

61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
PRE-K EARLY INTERVENTION PROG:

8
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

8
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2117
State average:

1995
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

356
State average:

326
Percent Passing
PRE-K EARLY INTERVENTION PROG:

97%
State average:

80%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

1%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
PRE-K EARLY INTERVENTION PROG:

7%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

18%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

51%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

23%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

92%
State average:

69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

9
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

7
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

9
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

11
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

7
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2131
State average:

1907
Mean Scale Score 100-500
PRE-K EARLY INTERVENTION PROG:

350
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2195
State average:

1921
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

350
State average:

299
Percent Passing: 87%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 9

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

338
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2075
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

347
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 29%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 90%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 9
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
PRE-K EARLY INTERVENTION PROG:

2106
State average:

1972
Mean Scale Score 100-500
PRE-K EARLY INTERVENTION PROG:

353
State average:

321
Percent Passing: 97%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 51%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 92%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 10
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 732
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

5
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 28%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 13%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 7%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 98%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2133
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

351
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2195
State average:

1935
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

350
State average:

302
Percent Passing: 85%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 32%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 10

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
PRE-K EARLY INTERVENTION PROG:

338
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2064
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

343
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 24%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 90%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2103
State average:

1984
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

352
State average:

323
Percent Passing: 96%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 92%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 9
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

758
State average:

273
Mean Scale Score
Here:

729
State average from 2275 schools:

694
Median NPR
Here:

88
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

16
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
PRE-K EARLY INTERVENTION PROG:

14
State average:

11
Functional (max 18)
PRE-K EARLY INTERVENTION PROG:

14
State average:

11
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

17
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

12
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
PRE-K EARLY INTERVENTION PROG:

769
State average:

237
Mean Scale Score
Here:

746
State average from 2096 schools:

709
Median NPR
Here:

91
State average:

65
Literary (max 18)
Here:

16
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

16
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

16
State average:

14
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

18
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

12
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

9
State average:

8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 772
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

361
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 25%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 86%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 9
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 12
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
PRE-K EARLY INTERVENTION PROG:

5
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 15%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 10%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 97%


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2021 Advameg, Inc.