Region West Adult/Community School in Tampa, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 55.

1701 NORTH BLVD
Tampa, FL 33607

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Ptec - St Petersburg School (19.0 miles):

98
Fishhawk Creek Elementary School (18.1 miles):

73
Nina Harris Ese Center School (17.6 miles):

60
Region West Adult/Community School:

55
Highland Lakes Elementary School (18.1 miles):

50
Chiaramonte Elementary School (5.8 miles):

40
Frost Elementary School (7.9 miles):

30
Hammond Elementary School (12.8 miles):

19
Region West Adult/Community School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Hillsborough County:

42
Tampa:

41
Region West Adult/Community:

55

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (813) 233-2400 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 29
School number: 5001
School type: Adult
District Name: HILLSBOROUGH
Grade range: ADULT
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (813) 233-2402
Principal: Eria Chester
The function/setting of the school: Adult Education
The main educational program offered at the school: Adult
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 11
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 59
Senate District: 18

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

66%
State average from 133 schools:

72%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

89%
State average from 133 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

94%
State average from 133 schools:

87%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

38%
State average from 133 schools:

52%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

60%
State average from 133 schools:

63%
Making Math Gains
Here:

81%
State average from 133 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

53%
State average from 133 schools:

59%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

82%
State average from 133 schools:

65%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

563
State average from 133 schools:

541
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 133 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: Pending

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: B

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

12%
State average from 133 schools:

52%
Minority Rate
Here:

21%
State average from 133 schools:

43%
Region: 3

Title I: NO


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 326 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 326 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 141
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

63%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 307
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 253

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 307
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 252
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 263 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 263 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 122
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

67%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 251
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 208

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 251
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 207
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 30 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 30 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 38 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 38 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 33
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 33
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 25
Number of Students Tested in Math: 25
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
REGION WEST ADULT/COMMUNITY:

65%
State average from 133 schools:

72%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

88%
State average from 133 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

88%
State average from 133 schools:

91%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

43%
State average from 133 schools:

51%
Making Reading Gains
REGION WEST ADULT/COMMUNITY:

61%
State average from 133 schools:

67%
Making Math Gains
Here:

86%
State average from 133 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

54%
State average from 133 schools:

65%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

75%
State average from 133 schools:

68%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

560
State average from 133 schools:

557
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 133 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: B

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

3%
State average from 132 schools:

48%
Minority Rate
Here:

16%
State average from 133 schools:

42%
Region: 3


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 290 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 289 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 120
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

63%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 261
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 215

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 260
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 213
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 247 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 246 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 100
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

65%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 223
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 180

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
REGION WEST ADULT/COMMUNITY:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 222
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 179
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16
Number of Students Tested in Math: 16
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 23
Number of Students Tested in Math: 23
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

57%
State average from 131 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

85%
State average from 131 schools:

72%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

86%
State average from 131 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

48%
State average from 131 schools:

48%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

58%
State average from 131 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
Here:

86%
State average from 131 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

39%
State average from 131 schools:

61%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

73%
State average from 131 schools:

69%
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 10

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
REGION WEST ADULT/COMMUNITY:

542
State average from 131 schools:

540
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 131 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: NO

Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Reading: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: B

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

5%
State average from 131 schools:

47%
Minority Rate
Here:

19%
State average from 131 schools:

44%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 314 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 314 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 157
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

54%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 284
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 246

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

83%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 284
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 246
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 247 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 247 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 123
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
REGION WEST ADULT/COMMUNITY:

55%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 221
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 191

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

86%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 221
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 191
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 25
Number of Students Tested in Math: 25
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 30 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 30 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 27
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 27
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1281
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
REGION WEST ADULT/COMMUNITY:

297
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

29%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

8%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

25%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

34%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

63%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

16
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1431
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

294
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

26%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

21%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

28%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

23%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

2%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

54%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

17
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1538
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

290
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

23%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

19%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

35%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

18%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

4%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

58%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
REGION WEST ADULT/COMMUNITY:

14
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

10
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
REGION WEST ADULT/COMMUNITY:

1
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2052
State average:

1922
Mean Scale Score 100-500
REGION WEST ADULT/COMMUNITY:

336
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
REGION WEST ADULT/COMMUNITY:

10%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

24%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

37%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

16%
State average:

12%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

12%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

66%
State average:

45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

13
State average:

11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2114
State average:

1938
Mean Scale Score 100-500
REGION WEST ADULT/COMMUNITY:

335
State average:

302
Percent Passing
Here:

77%
State average:

56%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

16%
State average:

35%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

28%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

24%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

10%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

22%
State average:

12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

56%
State average:

37%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

17
State average:

15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

8
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
REGION WEST ADULT/COMMUNITY:

295
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
REGION WEST ADULT/COMMUNITY:

26%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

38%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

33%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

3%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

36%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

8
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

8
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

309
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

20%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

44%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

33%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

4%
State average:

5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
REGION WEST ADULT/COMMUNITY:

36%
State average:

36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1414
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

325
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

17%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 2
REGION WEST ADULT/COMMUNITY:

10%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

32%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
REGION WEST ADULT/COMMUNITY:

27%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

14%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

73%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
REGION WEST ADULT/COMMUNITY:

5
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1455
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

300
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

26%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
REGION WEST ADULT/COMMUNITY:

21%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

30%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

19%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

5%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

54%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
REGION WEST ADULT/COMMUNITY:

1626
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

324
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

16%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

31%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

36%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

15%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

2%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

53%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
REGION WEST ADULT/COMMUNITY:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2029
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

333
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

6%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

14%
State average:

22%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

31%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

33%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

16%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

80%
State average:

61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2074
State average:

1995
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

345
State average:

326
Percent Passing
Here:

96%
State average:

80%
% in each Achievement Level 1
REGION WEST ADULT/COMMUNITY:

3%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

8%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

29%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

50%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 5
REGION WEST ADULT/COMMUNITY:

11%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

90%
State average:

69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

8
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1182
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

281
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1470
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
REGION WEST ADULT/COMMUNITY:

301
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 02%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 05
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 09
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 02

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1498
State average:

1656
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

283
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
REGION WEST ADULT/COMMUNITY:

2049
State average:

1907
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

335
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2078
State average:

1921
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

328
State average:

299
Percent Passing: 73%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

293
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 34%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

312
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1369
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
REGION WEST ADULT/COMMUNITY:

315
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1481
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

306
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1572
State average:

1675
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

313
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2024
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
REGION WEST ADULT/COMMUNITY:

332
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 87%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2065
State average:

1972
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

343
State average:

321
Percent Passing: 96%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 51%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 9
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 171
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Unscore - Combined: 3
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 47%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 78%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 135
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 30%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 11%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 87%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1240
State average:

1396
Mean Scale Score 100-500
REGION WEST ADULT/COMMUNITY:

290
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
REGION WEST ADULT/COMMUNITY:

1416
State average:

1582
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

291
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1499
State average:

1627
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

283
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
REGION WEST ADULT/COMMUNITY:

2006
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

327
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2068
State average:

1935
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

326
State average:

302
Percent Passing: 69%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 9

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

290
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 30%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

315
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1338
State average:

1461
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

308
State average:

335
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1415
State average:

1563
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

291
State average:

325
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1590
State average:

1668
Mean Scale Score 100-500
REGION WEST ADULT/COMMUNITY:

316
State average:

333
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1986
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

320
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2063
State average:

1984
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

343
State average:

323
Percent Passing: 93%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
REGION WEST ADULT/COMMUNITY:

177
State average:

103
Mean Scale Score
Here:

615
State average from 3241 schools:

633
Median NPR
Here:

45
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
REGION WEST ADULT/COMMUNITY:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

158
State average:

97
Mean Scale Score
REGION WEST ADULT/COMMUNITY:

632
State average from 3233 schools:

653
Median NPR
Here:

52
State average:

69
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
REGION WEST ADULT/COMMUNITY:

12
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

10
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
REGION WEST ADULT/COMMUNITY:

7
State average:

8
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

171
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
Here:

655
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
REGION WEST ADULT/COMMUNITY:

62
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

139
State average:

273
Mean Scale Score
Here:

706
State average from 2275 schools:

694
Median NPR
Here:

72
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

11
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

11
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
REGION WEST ADULT/COMMUNITY:

6
State average:

5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

168
State average:

237
Mean Scale Score
Here:

724
State average from 2096 schools:

709
Median NPR
Here:

80
State average:

65
Literary (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
REGION WEST ADULT/COMMUNITY:

15
State average:

14
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
REGION WEST ADULT/COMMUNITY:

16
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
REGION WEST ADULT/COMMUNITY:

11
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

8
State average:

8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 154
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

295
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 55%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 43%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 81%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 2

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 173
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

321
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 63%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 28%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 6%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 84%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Tampa, FL
  5. Region West Adult/Community School in Tampa, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.