Richard L. Sanders School in Pinellas Park, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 0.

5025 76TH AVE N
Pinellas Park, FL 33781

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Disston Gifted Center School (5.6 miles):

98
Project Craft School (20.0 miles):

74
Davidsen Middle School (16.0 miles):

59
Oak Park School (1.7 miles):

49
Egypt Lake Elementary School (17.0 miles):

38
Jefferson High School (13.7 miles):

30
Melrose Elementary School (6.4 miles):

18
Richard L. Sanders School:

0
Dixie Hollins Adult Education Center School (2.1 miles):

0
Richard L. Sanders School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Pinellas County:

51
Pinellas Park:

40
Richard L. Sanders School:

0

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:



Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (727) 547-7728 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 52
School number: 3231
School type: Combination Elementary and Secondary
District Name: PINELLAS
Grade range: KINDERGARTEN TO GRADE 12
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (727) 545-6413
Principal: Mildred Y Reed
The main educational program offered at the school: Special Education
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 10
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 53
Senate District: 16
School Web Address: http://it.pinellas.k12.fl.us/schools/sanders

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 79 (91%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 79 (91%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

60%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

23%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 44

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

14%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 49
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 44
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 20
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 47 (90%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 47 (90%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

13%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

12%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 33
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 74 (90%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 74 (90%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

23%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 40

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

16%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 40
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 79 (91%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 79 (91%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

23%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 44

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

14%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 49
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 44
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 77 (90%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 76 (89%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

26%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 27
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

24%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 59
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 52

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

16%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 57
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 48
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 25
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 44 (89%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 44 (89%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

19%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

16%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 31
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 68 (90%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 67 (90%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 26

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

25%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 47

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

16%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 50
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 44
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 77 (90%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 76 (90%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 27

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

24%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 59
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 52

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

16%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 57
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 48
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 104 (92%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 104 (92%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

36%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 33
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

16%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 79
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 73

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

18%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 80
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 69
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 32 (89%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 32 (89%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 55 (93%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 55 (93%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

7%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 40

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

10%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 38
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 93 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 93 (95%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 28

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

15%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 71
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 66

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

15%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 71
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 62
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 104 (93%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 104 (93%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 33

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

16%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 79
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 73

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

18%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 80
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 69
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 126 (92%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 122 (90%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

20%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 83
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

17%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 77
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 52 (93%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 52 (91%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

23%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 31
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 65 (92%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 62 (92%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

16%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

17%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 42
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 109 (92%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 105 (89%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

19%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 73
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

15%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 65
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 126 (92%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 122 (90%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

20%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 83
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

17%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 77
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 120 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 118 (92%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 40
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

26%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 86
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

23%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 92
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 47 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 42 (87%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 13

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

15%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 33
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

18%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 33
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 63 (93%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 66 (97%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 25

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

33%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 45
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

25%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 51
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 107 (93%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 106 (92%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 36

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

27%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 75
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

23%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 81
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 120 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 118 (92%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
RICHARD L. SANDERS SCHOOL:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 40

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

26%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 86
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

23%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 92
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

925
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

181
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

80%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

20%
State average:

15%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

2
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

6
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

1
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1154
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

211
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

69%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

23%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

8%
State average:

31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

8%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

2
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

8
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

1
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1534
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

265
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

42%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

42%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

17%
State average:

33%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

17%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
RICHARD L. SANDERS SCHOOL:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

12
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1107
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

214
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

80%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

10%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

10%
State average:

27%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
RICHARD L. SANDERS SCHOOL:

10%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

3
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

2
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

2
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

2
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1153
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

189
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

92%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
RICHARD L. SANDERS SCHOOL:

8%
State average:

20%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
RICHARD L. SANDERS SCHOOL:

2
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

1
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

2
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1476
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
RICHARD L. SANDERS SCHOOL:

228
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

69%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

31%
State average:

20%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

2
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
RICHARD L. SANDERS SCHOOL:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1707
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

238
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
RICHARD L. SANDERS SCHOOL:

55%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
RICHARD L. SANDERS SCHOOL:

36%
State average:

22%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

9%
State average:

31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

9%
State average:

61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

1
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

2
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1639
State average:

1995
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

239
State average:

326
Percent Passing
Here:

10%
State average:

80%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

80%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

20%
State average:

18%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

2
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

1
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

1
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

3
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

1
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1207
State average:

1656
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

231
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 64%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 27%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1259
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

230
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 73%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 27%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1513
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

261
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 54%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 31%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1449
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

218
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 79%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 7%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
RICHARD L. SANDERS SCHOOL:

211
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 90%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1033
State average:

1675
Mean Scale Score 100-500
RICHARD L. SANDERS SCHOOL:

198
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1: 91%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1276
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

218
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 70%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1500
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

234
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 71%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 21%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1573
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

239
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 83%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 8%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 16
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

2
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 50%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 6%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 6%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

900
State average:

1396
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

234
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 75%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 25%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

918
State average:

1582
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

206
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1: 73%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 18%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
RICHARD L. SANDERS SCHOOL:

1457
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
RICHARD L. SANDERS SCHOOL:

266
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 23%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1356
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
RICHARD L. SANDERS SCHOOL:

231
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 75%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 6%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1417
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

212
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 80%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1449
State average:

1935
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

212
State average:

302
Percent Passing: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 82%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 9%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1029
State average:

1461
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

241
State average:

335
% in each Achievement Level 1: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 25%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1182
State average:

1563
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

237
State average:

325
% in each Achievement Level 1: 64%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 18%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
RICHARD L. SANDERS SCHOOL:

1480
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

265
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 67%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 17%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1422
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

215
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 94%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1621
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

251
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 80%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 20%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1653
State average:

1984
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

242
State average:

323
Percent Passing: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 67%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 8%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

12
State average:

103
Mean Scale Score
Here:

562
State average from 3241 schools:

633
Median NPR
Here:

9
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

5
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

6
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

6
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
RICHARD L. SANDERS SCHOOL:

4
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

7
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

3
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
RICHARD L. SANDERS SCHOOL:

3
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

10
State average:

97
Mean Scale Score
Here:

592
State average from 3233 schools:

653
Median NPR
Here:

19
State average:

69
Literary (max 18)
Here:

8
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

7
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

8
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

5
State average:

10
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

9
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

5
State average:

8
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

4
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

6
State average:

101

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

13
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
Here:

631
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
Here:

27
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
RICHARD L. SANDERS SCHOOL:

6
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

10
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

5
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

12
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
Here:

624
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
RICHARD L. SANDERS SCHOOL:

18
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

8
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
RICHARD L. SANDERS SCHOOL:

7
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

9
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

5
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
RICHARD L. SANDERS SCHOOL:

4
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

10
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
RICHARD L. SANDERS SCHOOL:

639
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
RICHARD L. SANDERS SCHOOL:

20
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
Here:

7
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
RICHARD L. SANDERS SCHOOL:

9
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

5
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

9
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

5
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

8
State average:

273

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
RICHARD L. SANDERS SCHOOL:

11
State average:

237
Mean Scale Score
RICHARD L. SANDERS SCHOOL:

642
State average from 2096 schools:

709
Median NPR
Here:

14
State average:

65
Literary (max 18)
RICHARD L. SANDERS SCHOOL:

9
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

6
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
RICHARD L. SANDERS SCHOOL:

9
State average:

14
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

5
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

9
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

4
State average:

8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 9

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 11
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

190
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 73%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 27%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 6
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 9%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 45%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 14
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

193
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 64%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 7%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 6
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

2
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 21%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

713
State average:

1342
Mean Scale Score 100-500
RICHARD L. SANDERS SCHOOL:

203
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 85%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 15%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

785
State average from 1875 schools:

1542
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

184
State average:

313
% in each Achievement Level 1: 90%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 1
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 1
Percent Matched to 2006: 50%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

947
State average:

1546
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

949
State average:

1397
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: -2

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
RICHARD L. SANDERS SCHOOL:

1217
State average from 1873 schools:

1629
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

233
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 64%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 21%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 1
Percent Matched to 2006: 86%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1234
State average:

1632
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1106
State average:

1532
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 129

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1277
State average from 878 schools:

1661
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

233
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 69%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 15%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 65%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1362
State average:

1663
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1143
State average:

1592
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 219

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1262
State average from 819 schools:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

179
State average:

294
% in each Achievement Level 1: 88%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 6
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 76%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1301
State average:

1807
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1368
State average:

1738
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: -68

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1524
State average from 612 schools:

1849
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

239
State average:

298
% in each Achievement Level 1: 86%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 9%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 6
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 9: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 64%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1593
State average:

1837
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1498
State average:

1779
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 95

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

240
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 86%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

974
State average:

1413
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

229
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1: 62%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 8%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1041
State average from 1874 schools:

1525
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

205
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 80%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 30%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
RICHARD L. SANDERS SCHOOL:

1291
State average:

1528
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1305
State average:

1414
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: -14

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1288
State average from 1872 schools:

1647
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

252
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 57%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 50%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1221
State average:

1649
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1210
State average:

1519
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 11

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1237
State average from 873 schools:

1641
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

208
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 79%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 4%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 67%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1283
State average:

1645
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1165
State average:

1620
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 118

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1371
State average from 815 schools:

1851
Mean Scale Score 100-500
RICHARD L. SANDERS SCHOOL:

187
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 89%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 6%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 67%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1348
State average:

1845
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1377
State average:

1755
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: -28

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1608
State average from 613 schools:

1884
Mean Scale Score 100-500
RICHARD L. SANDERS SCHOOL:

209
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 71%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 11: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 10: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 8: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 67%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1621
State average:

1869
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1574
State average:

1821
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 47

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 10
Mean Scale Score
Here:

555
State average from 1891 schools:

633
Median NPR: 6
Literary (max 18): 5
Informational (max 18): 5
Functional (max 18): 5
Initial Understanding (max 12): 4
Interpretation (max 20): 6
Critical Analysis (max 12): 3
Strategies (max 10): 3

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 10
Mean Scale Score
Here:

583
State average from 1874 schools:

642
Median NPR: 14
Literary (max 18): 7
Informational (max 18): 6
Functional (max 18): 5
Initial Understanding (max 12): 4
Interpretation (max 20): 8
Critical Analysis (max 12): 4
Strategies (max 10): 3

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 14
Mean Scale Score
Here:

613
State average from 1870 schools:

667
Median NPR: 23
Literary (max 18): 10
Informational (max 18): 6
Functional (max 18): 8
Initial Understanding (max 12): 5
Interpretation (max 20): 10
Critical Analysis (max 12): 5
Strategies (max 10): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 23
Mean Scale Score
RICHARD L. SANDERS SCHOOL:

621
State average from 874 schools:

671
Median NPR: 19
Literary (max 18): 9
Informational (max 18): 7
Functional (max 18): 8
Initial Understanding (max 12): 6
Interpretation (max 20): 9
Critical Analysis (max 12): 5
Strategies (max 10): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 14
Mean Scale Score
RICHARD L. SANDERS SCHOOL:

622
State average from 810 schools:

685
Median NPR: 11
Literary (max 18): 7
Informational (max 18): 6
Functional (max 18): 7
Initial Understanding (max 10): 4
Interpretation (max 20): 7
Critical Analysis (max 14): 5
Strategies (max 10): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 14
Mean Scale Score
Here:

653
State average from 597 schools:

696
Median NPR: 24
Literary (max 18): 9
Informational (max 18): 7
Functional (max 18): 9
Initial Understanding (max 10): 5
Interpretation (max 20): 10
Critical Analysis (max 14): 6
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 13
Mean Scale Score
Here:

561
State average from 1891 schools:

632
Median NPR: 12
Number Sense (max 14): 6
Operations (max 11): 4
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 2
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 3
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 3

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 10
Mean Scale Score
Here:

593
State average from 1874 schools:

652
Median NPR: 28
Number Sense (max 12): 6
Operations (max 12): 4
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 3
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 12
Mean Scale Score
Here:

620
State average from 1870 schools:

663
Median NPR: 34
Number Sense (max 12): 7
Operations (max 12): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 2
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 3
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 22
Mean Scale Score
Here:

622
State average from 874 schools:

669
Median NPR: 19
Number Sense (max 10): 3
Operations (max 12): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 2
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 3
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 15
Mean Scale Score
RICHARD L. SANDERS SCHOOL:

651
State average from 810 schools:

698
Median NPR: 22
Number Sense (max 9): 3
Operations (max 9): 3
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 3
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 3
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 14
Mean Scale Score
Here:

668
State average from 597 schools:

708
Median NPR: 31
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 4
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 3
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 6
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 16
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

159
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 94%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 6%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 2
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 7
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
RICHARD L. SANDERS SCHOOL:

2
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 31%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 6%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 19%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 6%

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 9
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2021 Advameg, Inc.