Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Georgia > Augusta area
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-15-2012, 03:21 AM
 
37,882 posts, read 41,956,856 times
Reputation: 27279

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by nortonguy View Post
The research center, NCI cancer center, top 50 in the US for NIH funds, $100 million cancer center, $5 million towards the existing cancer center is more in line with research than being a college city.
I think you're just unfamiliar with the type of research that goes on at a typical research university; this is right in line with that. Therefore, it will put Augusta more in the ranks of Columbia, Knoxville, Winston-Salem, Baton Rogue, Lexington, etc. It won't be enough to propel Augusta into the league of Raleigh-Durham; again, that region has three research universities (Duke, UNC, NC State) among the nation's most notable, along with a handful of smaller institutions (NC Central, Shaw, Meredith, St. Augustine, etc.). GRU is just one institution and won't come anywhere close to matching that and it's delusional to think otherwise.

Quote:
I seriously doubt the smaller cities in NC/SC were considered, because one of Starbucks plants is located right outside of Columbia.
It also has plants in Minden, NV (a town of 3,000) and York, PA (a town of 44,000) so it's very conceivable that smaller towns in the Carolinas were considered. I contend that they had to, if quality of life was such a deciding factor. More than likely it wouldn't have been if other similarly-sized cities were considered, since they all offer a lot of the same sorts of amenities, more or less.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-15-2012, 03:55 AM
 
196 posts, read 231,598 times
Reputation: 58
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mutiny77 View Post

It also has plants in Minden, NV (a town of 3,000) and York, PA (a town of 44,000) so it's very conceivable that smaller towns in the Carolinas were considered. I contend that they had to, if quality of life was such a deciding factor. More than likely it wouldn't have been if other similarly-sized cities were considered, since they all offer a lot of the same sorts of amenities, more or less.
Pretty sure I read somewhere the smaller towns in the Carolinas were considered and that Augusta was chosen just based on symbology.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-15-2012, 11:37 AM
 
Location: Augusta, GA ''The fastest rising city in the southeast''
7,508 posts, read 15,101,643 times
Reputation: 955
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mutiny77 View Post
I think you're just unfamiliar with the type of research that goes on at a typical research university; this is right in line with that. Therefore, it will put Augusta more in the ranks of Columbia, Knoxville, Winston-Salem, Baton Rogue, Lexington, etc. It won't be enough to propel Augusta into the league of Raleigh-Durham; again, that region has three research universities (Duke, UNC, NC State) among the nation's most notable, along with a handful of smaller institutions (NC Central, Shaw, Meredith, St. Augustine, etc.). GRU is just one institution and won't come anywhere close to matching that and it's delusional to think otherwise.
I don't expect Augusta to reach the level of Raleigh-Durham anytime soon. I'm saying pound for pound Augusta will become a similar city in this industry.

I don't think you're presently giving Augusta enough credit. Augusta is just starting on it's brand new university from scratch(GHSU/ASU), and those are major universities already. Gov Deal wants Augusta to enter the top 50, and become the second NCI cancer center in the state. Columbia, Knoxville, Lexington, and Baton Rogue don't have NCI cancer centers. The Markey cancer center in Lexington is applying to become one, but it's not at the moment. Being ranked in the top 50, and having the NCI cancer center equals millions in additional NIH funds.

How would the developments put Augusta more in the ranks with those cities? Augusta is already currently receiving more NIH than all of them except for Wake Forest, UK, and LSU.

2012 NIH funds

Wake Forest: $92 million
Kentucy: $83 million
LSU: $52 million
GHSU: $46 million
U of Tennessee: $38 million
University of South Carolina: $31 million

NIH Awards by Location and Organization - NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools (RePORT)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-15-2012, 05:59 PM
 
37,882 posts, read 41,956,856 times
Reputation: 27279
Quote:
Originally Posted by nortonguy View Post
I don't expect Augusta to reach the level of Raleigh-Durham anytime soon. I'm saying pound for pound Augusta will become a similar city in this industry.

I don't think you're presently giving Augusta enough credit. Augusta is just starting on it's brand new university from scratch(GHSU/ASU), and those are major universities already. Gov Deal wants Augusta to enter the top 50, and become the second NCI cancer center in the state. Columbia, Knoxville, Lexington, and Baton Rogue don't have NCI cancer centers. The Markey cancer center in Lexington is applying to become one, but it's not at the moment. Being ranked in the top 50, and having the NCI cancer center equals millions in additional NIH funds.

How would the developments put Augusta more in the ranks with those cities? Augusta is already currently receiving more NIH than all of them except for Wake Forest, UK, and LSU.

2012 NIH funds

Wake Forest: $92 million
Kentucy: $83 million
LSU: $52 million
GHSU: $46 million
U of Tennessee: $38 million
University of South Carolina: $31 million

NIH Awards by Location and Organization - NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools (RePORT)
You're restricting this to just medical research; I'm talking about research period, across a variety of fields. Medical research will just so happen to be GRU's niche, but other institutions have their research niches also. Looking at total research funding, it's clear that GRU still has ground to make up to reach the level of Wake Forest, UK, LSU, UT, USC, etc:

GHSU: $99 million
USC: $226 million
LSU: $152 million
UK: $337 million
UT: $188 million
MUSC: $234 million
Wake Forest: $234 million for Wake Forest Baptist alone

The gap between GHSU/GRU and those schools is already large, but it's conceivable that it could significantly close the gap, even if not entirely. But just Duke by itself had research expenditures pushing $1 billion for 2010 ($983 million); throw in the $759 million at UNC and the $380 million for NC State, and it's clear that putting Augusta in the same sentence as Raleigh/Durham in terms of research is one huge stretch. Maybe it can compete in an aspect here or there, but overall? It's time to put that whole notion to rest.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-15-2012, 07:02 PM
 
Location: Augusta, GA ''The fastest rising city in the southeast''
7,508 posts, read 15,101,643 times
Reputation: 955
I'm focusing on medical, because Augusta/Raleigh are mostly based on this. The NIH funds is where the money is located in terms of research dollars.

There's a big difference in terms of funding when it comes to metros with NCI cancer centers, and top 50 medical schools. I mean $45 million(almost half) of the total funding at GHSU is related to the NIH. The majority of funding at Emory(Georgia's only NCI cancer center at the moment), is because of NIH funds.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-15-2012, 07:25 PM
 
37,882 posts, read 41,956,856 times
Reputation: 27279
Quote:
Originally Posted by nortonguy View Post
I'm focusing on medical, because Augusta/Raleigh are mostly based on this. The NIH funds is where the money is located in terms of research dollars.

There's a big difference in terms of funding when it comes to metros with NCI cancer centers, and top 50 medical schools. I mean $45 million(almost half) of the total funding at GHSU is related to the NIH. The majority of funding at Emory(Georgia's only NCI cancer center at the moment), is because of NIH funds.
It's true that NIH is the source of a large share of research dollars, but it's obvious that it's not the only source. Otherwise, GHSU would already rank above those other institutions for total research funding based on the fact that it receives more NIH funding, but that's not the case at all.

Even in terms of medical, the research funding gap between anything GRU could realistically achieve and what the Triangle already gets is just way too large for any sort of realistic comparison between the two, present or future. I'd stick with comparisons to Winston-Salem, Charleston, Lexington, etc. as far as potential economic impact related to medical research funding. As I stated, at most it would make Augusta more of a typical midsized college city, not another Triangle.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-17-2012, 01:05 PM
 
472 posts, read 809,660 times
Reputation: 136
Starbucks's acquisition of Atlanta based Teavana should definitely do some good for our state. Maybe even make us a lot healthier!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-18-2012, 03:10 AM
 
196 posts, read 231,598 times
Reputation: 58
Quote:
Originally Posted by dichloromethane View Post
Starbucks's acquisition of Atlanta based Teavana should definitely do some good for our state. Maybe even make us a lot healthier!

Hopefully that is the case. GA is so full of unhealthy people.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-05-2012, 11:28 PM
 
2,217 posts, read 3,388,028 times
Reputation: 254
The mayor was on 96.3 kiss this morning he said it should more announcements on more jobs coming to the Industrial Park location in 2013. He said he can't give any names as of now but should hear about aleast two more businesses coming by Starbucks.

the Inside Story on 96.3,Mayor Deke Copenhaver said that isn't actually the case.

"Wayne Guilfoyle is Asian-American, Mary Davis is a female ... so all this five and five,it's really not that anymore," he said,making this the most diverse commission in recent memory.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-05-2012, 11:49 PM
 
Location: Augusta, GA ''The fastest rising city in the southeast''
7,508 posts, read 15,101,643 times
Reputation: 955
Thanks amlovingit for posting the excellent news. I'm thinking Georgia Power and the other company being a wood pellet processing facility. Starbucks is located in the Corporate Park not to be confused with the new Augusta Regional Industrial Park.. A few people new to Augusta reading the forum might not know the difference.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Georgia > Augusta area
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:16 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top