Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-13-2007, 01:41 PM
 
Location: Mesa, Az
21,144 posts, read 42,138,196 times
Reputation: 3861

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fleet View Post

I've been spoiled by the low-end torque the American engines make so I will only buy American cars. I also prefer the '60s/early '70s styling and overall reliability of American cars.

I'm not really planning to buy more cars, but next on my list would be:

1969 Dodge Coronet R/T 440-Magnum.
1969 Cadillac Fleetwood Seventy-Five Limousine.
The Old School Detroit Three cars; were by and large, pretty decent 1979 on down...........till the advent of decent fuel injection (1986 Ford and ca. 1988 Chevy TBI) whereupon they became good again

The feedback carburetors were junk------then God they only hung around in large numbers between 1980-85.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-13-2007, 02:32 PM
 
Location: Northridge/Porter Ranch, Calif.
24,511 posts, read 33,317,235 times
Reputation: 7623
Quote:
Originally Posted by ArizonaBear View Post
The Old School Detroit Three cars; were by and large, pretty decent 1979 on down...........till the advent of decent fuel injection (1986 Ford and ca. 1988 Chevy TBI) whereupon they became good again

The feedback carburetors were junk------then God they only hung around in large numbers between 1980-85.
Yeah, I agree. I really prefer 1971 and older. All of that extra anti-smog junk which was added more and more from 1972 and on really hurt performance and fuel mileage.

That's one reason I may eventually buy a '69 limo in place of my current '76. I like the '76 a lot, but the '69 has a more solid feel to it, much more horsepower and nice touches inside like real wood on the dash and door panels.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-13-2007, 02:34 PM
 
Location: Northridge/Porter Ranch, Calif.
24,511 posts, read 33,317,235 times
Reputation: 7623
Quote:
Originally Posted by miu View Post
I HATE automatic transmissions.
Why?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-13-2007, 02:36 PM
 
491 posts, read 1,434,005 times
Reputation: 84
the two best cars i have ever had were my last two...

both manual (I WILL NEVER BUY AN AUTOMATIC FOR MYSELF)

2003 mazda protege, i loved it, it was a great car. someone hit me and totalled it and i never thought i would find something i liked so much, ended up getting the hatchback version of the toyota yaris. it may be even better
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-13-2007, 02:37 PM
 
491 posts, read 1,434,005 times
Reputation: 84
Quote:
Originally Posted by miu View Post

I HATE automatic transmissions.
me too...

not only do i like driving them much better, but most of the people i know can't drive them and therefore dont ask to drive my car
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-13-2007, 06:29 PM
 
Location: Mesa, Az
21,144 posts, read 42,138,196 times
Reputation: 3861
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fleet View Post
Yeah, I agree. I really prefer 1971 and older. All of that extra anti-smog junk which was added more and more from 1972 and on really hurt performance and fuel mileage.

That's one reason I may eventually buy a '69 limo in place of my current '76. I like the '76 a lot, but the '69 has a more solid feel to it, much more horsepower and nice touches inside like real wood on the dash and door panels.
Your 1976 can be 'tweaked' to run better.

Toss on a set of early Cadillac heads from a ca.1973 down 472; install a high flow catalytic converter (your muffler/resonator will keep the exhaust quiet) as well as richening up the Q-jet and dialing in more ignition timing/advance.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-13-2007, 06:43 PM
 
Location: Northridge/Porter Ranch, Calif.
24,511 posts, read 33,317,235 times
Reputation: 7623
Quote:
Originally Posted by ArizonaBear View Post
Your 1976 can be 'tweaked' to run better.

Toss on a set of early Cadillac heads from a ca.1973 down 472; install a high flow catalytic converter (your muffler/resonator will keep the exhaust quiet) as well as richening up the Q-jet and dialing in more ignition timing/advance.
That can be done, but I still like the 1969 better. For instance, it doesn't have those plastic rear fillers on the back fenders and it has the 120 mph speedometer (the '76s had a 100 mph speedo).
Also, the compression ratio on the '69 is a healthy 10.5:1 and only 8.5:1 on the '76.

Actually, I can't really do anything to my '76 because it is still required to go through those silly smog checks every other year and no way will it pass if I do things like richen up the carb and advance the ignition. It barely passes the way it's tuned now... yet another reason I may buy a '69 instead and won't have to go through those irritating smog checks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-13-2007, 06:45 PM
NCN
 
Location: NC/SC Border Patrol
21,663 posts, read 25,634,295 times
Reputation: 24375
We have a little 1996 Buick Century with more than 167,000 miles on it that has protected us through two wrecks, gets great gas mileage and still doesn't look too bad. It is my errand car now and when I have a choice between it and our LeSabre, I choose the Century.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-13-2007, 09:46 PM
 
3,326 posts, read 8,862,813 times
Reputation: 2035
1994 Honda Civic
Had it for almost 8 years. It did not tear up unless I tore it up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-14-2007, 04:02 AM
 
Location: Chicago
38,707 posts, read 103,201,963 times
Reputation: 29983
I just bought myself a 1996 Nissan Maxima 5MT yesterday. It doesn't have the sport-suspension package so I'm a little disappointed in the handling. Too much body roll, though admittedly once it's done rolling it settles in nicely and handles adequately & predictably. But boy, what an engine. The 190HP engine gives the 240+ HP engine in my SHO a very solid run for its money.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:11 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top