Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-23-2016, 06:34 PM
 
59 posts, read 169,967 times
Reputation: 60

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTOlover View Post
I love the understated looks and the fun of having a sleeper that can surprise many modern sports/muscle cars and they would be priced the same as a Fully loaded/well equipped Mazda 6..
How about NO

Let's see what google gives me

2016 Chevrolet SS

Curb weight: 3,975 lbs
MSRP: From $46,575
Horsepower: 415 hp
MPG: Up to 14 city / 22 highway

2016 Mazda 6

MSRP: From $21,495
Horsepower: 184 hp
Curb weight: 3,179 to 3,250 lbs
MPG: Up to 26 city / 38 highway

The I grand touring, which is the fully loaded version, is $30,195. The Chevrolet SS base manual and automatic are $46,575

Google NEVER lies. These cars are NOT in the same category. I can get a BMW M3 for the cost of that chevy SS, which is a still a chevy in the end.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-23-2016, 06:52 PM
 
Location: Vancouver, B.C., Canada
11,155 posts, read 29,319,643 times
Reputation: 5479
Quote:
Originally Posted by Miamismo View Post
How about NO

Let's see what google gives me

2016 Chevrolet SS

Curb weight: 3,975 lbs
MSRP: From $46,575
Horsepower: 415 hp
MPG: Up to 14 city / 22 highway

2016 Mazda 6

MSRP: From $21,495
Horsepower: 184 hp
Curb weight: 3,179 to 3,250 lbs
MPG: Up to 26 city / 38 highway

The I grand touring, which is the fully loaded version, is $30,195. The Chevrolet SS base manual and automatic are $46,575

Google NEVER lies. These cars are NOT in the same category. I can get a BMW M3 for the cost of that chevy SS, which is a still a chevy in the end.
the only option on the Chevy SS is an optional sunroof and the choice between 6-Speed manual and 8-speed automatic is free all Chevy SS sedans come Fully loaded their are no base versions and they comepte more with the E39 M5 and the new 2016 Camaro SS LT1 competes with the BMW M3/M4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D87tO7VUs2I
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2016, 06:52 PM
 
Location: Phoenix
30,370 posts, read 19,162,886 times
Reputation: 26262
Yep, the Mazda 6 is the best looking mid size family sedan and what I would but in that class.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2016, 06:57 PM
 
Location: Houston, TX
2,052 posts, read 5,873,209 times
Reputation: 1298
If I had to buy a family sedan right now, I would buy the Mazda 6 simply because it is available with a manual transmission. I could get a Touring model, Soul Red with manual for about $25K drive out. But I bought a Mustang GT instead.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2016, 07:00 PM
 
Location: NYC
20,550 posts, read 17,705,684 times
Reputation: 25616
Quote:
Originally Posted by GTOlover View Post
Disagree I find the 2016 Chevy SS to be the best bang for the buck fun family sleeper sedan

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YbLweooe3aM
$46k muscle car, what avg family buys SS for grocery shopping?

Best looking family car imo, Mazda 6, Ford Fusion, and Kia Optima.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2016, 07:05 PM
 
Location: Connecticut
1,292 posts, read 1,976,191 times
Reputation: 1502
Mazdas are ugly. I would never buy one. They look almost as hideous as Nissans.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2016, 07:06 PM
 
Location: Outskirts of Gray Court, and love it!
5,674 posts, read 5,882,381 times
Reputation: 5817
Butt ugly IMO. Might be a decent starter car for a family, but oce those kids get older, it is going to get tighter.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2016, 07:29 PM
 
Location: Montgomery County, PA
16,569 posts, read 15,274,757 times
Reputation: 14591
Not long ago my son was in the market for a midsize sedan. You know the choices; Camry, Accord, Altima, Mazda 6 and Sonata/Optima perhaps. He went with the Altima. What broke the tie was factory promotion. Mazda is very good looking but you had to pay pretty much list. The current Altima is a very nice looking car, much sportier than Camry or Accord. And don't let the CVT scare you away. There is nothing to it. I have driven the car and didn't notice anything out of the ordinary.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2016, 07:46 PM
 
Location: Vancouver, B.C., Canada
11,155 posts, read 29,319,643 times
Reputation: 5479
Quote:
Originally Posted by vision33r View Post
$46k muscle car, what avg family buys SS for grocery shopping?

Best looking family car imo, Mazda 6, Ford Fusion, and Kia Optima.
True most average families do not buy mid-size sedans but rather compact-mid-size SUV and full-size PU trucks seem to be the go too choice these days which is why mid-size sedans are struggling in terms of sales.

Listen I have nothing agianst the Mazda just that it looks nice but would be better if the offered AWD and a V6 option to compete better in the segment.

Since I see many Mazda 3's on the road but not very many newish Mazda 6's when compared to Honda Accord's, Toyota Camry's, Subaru Legacy's and the Ford Fusion's out there on the roads on a daily basis.

It is a beautiful looking car in a highly competitive segment that for some reason or other is not selling as well as the previous generation(s) they got the styling right buy are missing something I cannot put my finger on.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2016, 08:34 PM
 
17,304 posts, read 12,251,233 times
Reputation: 17261
Quote:
Originally Posted by Miamismo View Post
yet 99% of people with a Camry have the 4 cylinder version with CVT

The Mazda 6 still has a regular 6-speed automatic transmission.

CVT sucks ass.
All automatics do.

I loved my 2003 Mazda6s v6 with the 5 speed manual.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top