Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-26-2018, 08:06 PM
 
Location: Niceville, FL
13,258 posts, read 22,826,007 times
Reputation: 16416

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by mustangman66 View Post
I remember my buddy in high school had a Ford Escort. That thing was only FWD and even without snow tires we just plowed through what seemed like everything and I cant remember a single time we ever went off the road or got stuck.
I grew up in the Lake Michigan lake effect snow zone, and my first car was one of those Ford Escorts. It was pretty much a soda can with a go kart engine inside. And then it had 'real car' brakes, and was awesome in 4" or less of snow, slush, ice, you have it. My theory was that econoboxes of that era were typically so lightweight that they didn't get bogged down in slush and also had significantly shorter wet/icy braking distance and better maneuverability than heavier cars and SUVs did.

Parents still live up there, and have a Buick Enclave and a Subaru Forrester, both with all-weather tires, in their garage.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-26-2018, 10:26 PM
 
Location: Not far from Fairbanks, AK
20,292 posts, read 37,167,593 times
Reputation: 16397
Quote:
Originally Posted by beachmouse View Post
I grew up in the Lake Michigan lake effect snow zone, and my first car was one of those Ford Escorts. It was pretty much a soda can with a go kart engine inside. And then it had 'real car' brakes, and was awesome in 4" or less of snow, slush, ice, you have it. My theory was that econoboxes of that era were typically so lightweight that they didn't get bogged down in slush and also had significantly shorter wet/icy braking distance and better maneuverability than heavier cars and SUVs did.

Parents still live up there, and have a Buick Enclave and a Subaru Forrester, both with all-weather tires, in their garage.
Well, I have no idea how some folks in this thread can't drive without a SUV in snow country. In the late '70's when it snowed a lot in Northern NY and Burlington, VT, I drove a RWD Pinto station wagon. During the winter I had snow tires without studs, and so most people I knew. In fact, in the '70s an AWD car was a rarity unless it was a European car such as some of the old Mercedes. These were RWD, and when one of the front tires would spin, the transfer case (if I well remember) would engage the front wheels.

Back then it used to snow quite a lot, even in NY city, but we drove RWD vehicles without any trouble. I have been living in the interior of Alaska where the roads get covered by ice for days or weeks at a time, and not all drivers use AWD vehicles. In fact, there is a combination of vehicles such as FWD, AWD SUVs, AWD cars, a bunch of trucks of all kinds. We have high schoolers driving FWD cars, while this old timer (me) drives a FWD Toyota that wears a set of Blizzack tires.

The driving conditions near Anchorage and vicinity are nothing compared to the ice conditions of the interior, and as I said above, we have all kinds of young and old drivers happily driving FWD cars on the ice roads...without any trouble. And yes, I can run circles on ice with my FWD car around any AWD vehicle that wears the wrong tires. There was a time, long ago, when FWD didn't incorporate stability/traction control, so one had to be very careful driving on ice. Nowadays one still have to be careful, but the traction systems incorporated on FWD cars are amazing compared to what old automobiles had.

The tires are the main link to traction, not the automobile. It's the tire that provides the grip on the road, not the vehicle. With the proper tires for road conditions, driver's experience is the second most important factor.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-27-2018, 04:19 AM
 
24,557 posts, read 18,235,988 times
Reputation: 40260
Quote:
Originally Posted by beachmouse View Post
I grew up in the Lake Michigan lake effect snow zone, and my first car was one of those Ford Escorts. It was pretty much a soda can with a go kart engine inside. And then it had 'real car' brakes, and was awesome in 4" or less of snow, slush, ice, you have it. My theory was that econoboxes of that era were typically so lightweight that they didn't get bogged down in slush and also had significantly shorter wet/icy braking distance and better maneuverability than heavier cars and SUVs did.

Parents still live up there, and have a Buick Enclave and a Subaru Forrester, both with all-weather tires, in their garage.
My life experience is that short wheelbase lightweight cars aren’t great on unplowed slop. They want to float up on it so you have the usual hydroplane issue. My VW GTIs with snow tires were really good snow cars but kind of white knuckle passing traffic in the unplowed left lane. On the flip side, the lighter weight made for much shorter braking distances and much better traction in corners. My long wheelbase and heavy SUV was the opposite. It was solid in the unplowed left lane but the sheer weight of the car made for poor braking and cornering. Very bad on black ice. I ran studded tires to compensate for that.

I run Nokians on my Outback. From the ski area parking lot to my driveway is a downhill left turn. The Outback is 500 lbs heavier than my old GTI and has the same tires. With the GTI, I had much better braking performance and I occasionally slide past my driveway in the Outback.

My point is that there is no one “best” snow car. An FWD car with snow tires is fine until it bottoms out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-27-2018, 04:46 AM
 
Location: Vermont
1,002 posts, read 916,718 times
Reputation: 2046
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeoffD View Post
My life experience is that short wheelbase lightweight cars aren’t great on unplowed slop. They want to float up on it so you have the usual hydroplane issue. My VW GTIs with snow tires were really good snow cars but kind of white knuckle passing traffic in the unplowed left lane. On the flip side, the lighter weight made for much shorter braking distances and much better traction in corners. My long wheelbase and heavy SUV was the opposite. It was solid in the unplowed left lane but the sheer weight of the car made for poor braking and cornering. Very bad on black ice. I ran studded tires to compensate for that.

I run Nokians on my Outback. From the ski area parking lot to my driveway is a downhill left turn. The Outback is 500 lbs heavier than my old GTI and has the same tires. With the GTI, I had much better braking performance and I occasionally slide past my driveway in the Outback.

My point is that there is no one “best” snow car. An FWD car with snow tires is fine until it bottoms out.
This very closely resembles my experience as well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-27-2018, 07:31 AM
 
Location: NY
9,131 posts, read 20,000,438 times
Reputation: 11707
Quote:
Originally Posted by beachmouse View Post
I grew up in the Lake Michigan lake effect snow zone, and my first car was one of those Ford Escorts. It was pretty much a soda can with a go kart engine inside. And then it had 'real car' brakes, and was awesome in 4" or less of snow, slush, ice, you have it. My theory was that econoboxes of that era were typically so lightweight that they didn't get bogged down in slush and also had significantly shorter wet/icy braking distance and better maneuverability than heavier cars and SUVs did.

Parents still live up there, and have a Buick Enclave and a Subaru Forrester, both with all-weather tires, in their garage.
I had a FWD 1991 Ford Probe that was a tank in the snow.


Tires back then had taller side walls and were skinnier overall than on modern cars. They were able to bite down into the snow better compared to modern cars tires which are more apt to ride on top of the snow back.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-27-2018, 08:16 AM
 
Location: MN
6,541 posts, read 7,121,664 times
Reputation: 5819
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coldjensens View Post
Maybe because all seasons are not better than summer tires in snow and ice
Are you kidding? High end summer tires become solid blocks below 40 degrees giving you nearly zero traction. They come standard on high hp cars for a reason. Continental DWS all seasons handle all conditions well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-27-2018, 08:25 AM
 
Location: Southern Colorado
3,680 posts, read 2,963,150 times
Reputation: 4809
My own experience has been that front wheel drive is far better than rear wheel drive. Importance of tires is obvious.

Ground clearance should rarely be a issue on main roads.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-27-2018, 08:40 AM
 
Location: Juneau, AK + Puna, HI
10,547 posts, read 7,739,679 times
Reputation: 16044
Couldn't go wrong with a Subaru sporting 4 snow tires, and it's a setup that won't break the bank.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-27-2018, 10:18 AM
 
5,132 posts, read 4,482,437 times
Reputation: 9955
Jeep (any of them)
Toyota 4Runner
Toyota Highlander
Toyota Land Cruiser
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-27-2018, 11:24 AM
 
2,415 posts, read 4,244,442 times
Reputation: 3791
Quote:
Originally Posted by augiedogie View Post
It looks like the northern states will have an especially long cold winter. I'd appreciate any suggestions for a vehicle in cold and snowy weather. Also, we will be moving to a very rural area of Northern Wisconsin, so this vehicle will not be a short trip/city vehicle. No worries about traffic jambs, parking, etc.
Chevy Tahoe, hands down. Mine went almost 300,000 miles on and off road, and through water, completely submerged in the Florida swamps, twice. That's a long story though, one best told over beers.

SS
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top