Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Sports > Baseball
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-10-2013, 10:59 PM
 
Location: Houston
26,979 posts, read 15,886,908 times
Reputation: 11259

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by jacktravern View Post
One former Hall of Very Good pitcher said, in todays game, you have to work harder to get the 7,8, and 9th guys out. Prior to the 1990's, the SS, 2B, and C positions historically offered a lot of weak hitting that didnt require much effoert to get them out. I swear in the 80's every shortstop seemed liked they were hitting 220 with 5 hrs

Yes, they have to throw more pitches per inning now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-12-2013, 09:57 PM
 
Location: Florida
251 posts, read 436,911 times
Reputation: 259
Modern day pitchers are stronger than ever. Modern day little league all-stars throw harder than pro ballplayers from 100 years ago.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2013, 07:52 AM
 
Location: ABQ
3,771 posts, read 7,093,442 times
Reputation: 4893
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kestrel88 View Post
Modern day pitchers are stronger than ever. Modern day little league all-stars throw harder than pro ballplayers from 100 years ago.
Tell that to Walter Johnson or Smokey Joe Wood.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2013, 08:40 AM
 
Location: Arizona
8,271 posts, read 8,652,996 times
Reputation: 27675
I don't think there is one answer to the question.

Pitchers throw harder than before. I know there are exceptions.

Pitchers are not started off in a 4 man rotation so they never had to through that many innings. I am sure some could but we will never know.

I don't seem to remember the many variations in the strike zone as some umpires have today. If there were I don't remember it. A strict stike zone would cut the pitch count.

The DH.

Better relief pitchers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2013, 08:52 AM
 
Location: Sioux Falls, SD area
4,860 posts, read 6,926,010 times
Reputation: 10175
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kestrel88 View Post
Modern day pitchers are stronger than ever. Modern day little league all-stars throw harder than pro ballplayers from 100 years ago.
On what expertise do you make this statement.

I've been involved in college and amateur ball and managed youth baseball through amateur adult leagues my whole life. When it comes to just velocity, I would even lean towards pitchers years ago being able on average to throw harder than today. You're going to have an very occasional 12 year old throwing in the upper 80's, but that has more to do with the kid maturing early. Don't discount the early beard and deepening voice.

The best little league player I coached was an unhittable superstar who pitched like a catcher throwing from behind his ear (despite my best efforts) and quit baseball by the time he was 14. He couldn't bear the facts that all his teammates were caught up to him. He also had an ego the size of Texas from all his early success which got trashed by the time he hit high school in all sports.

Modern day pitchers ARE better than years ago due to coaching and year around practice. It ain't all about velocity. It's about technique.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2013, 08:58 AM
 
Location: Sioux Falls, SD area
4,860 posts, read 6,926,010 times
Reputation: 10175
Quote:
Originally Posted by thinkalot View Post
I don't think there is one answer to the question.

Pitchers throw harder than before. I know there are exceptions.

Pitchers are not started off in a 4 man rotation so they never had to through that many innings. I am sure some could but we will never know.

I don't seem to remember the many variations in the strike zone as some umpires have today. If there were I don't remember it. A strict stike zone would cut the pitch count.

The DH.

Better relief pitchers.
Over the years, the strike zone keeps getting reinvented. I actually wish they would call it as it's defined. In recent years I've noticed that major league umps have gotten into the habit of calling it where it hits the glove instead of where the pitch is when it crosses the plate. This isn't so much on high calls, but happens all the time on calls on the outside corner.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2013, 08:32 PM
 
Location: Florida
251 posts, read 436,911 times
Reputation: 259
Quote:
Originally Posted by Parti Rhinocéros View Post
Tell that to Walter Johnson or Smokey Joe Wood.

Johnson flirted with 90mph and was considered a freak of nature within the game. The other 99% of pitchers were throwing in the 60-70mph range. Unlimited pitch counts, little rest between starts, and 50 appearances per season does not equal hard thrower. There's only one way a pitcher could consistently work 100 more innings per season than modern day HOF pitchers. Only a fool would say it's because they were stronger back then. Clearly those feats were accomplished by throwing a fraction as hard.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2013, 09:34 PM
 
Location: Sioux Falls, SD area
4,860 posts, read 6,926,010 times
Reputation: 10175
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kestrel88 View Post
Johnson flirted with 90mph and was considered a freak of nature within the game. The other 99% of pitchers were throwing in the 60-70mph range. Unlimited pitch counts, little rest between starts, and 50 appearances per season does not equal hard thrower. There's only one way a pitcher could consistently work 100 more innings per season than modern day HOF pitchers. Only a fool would say it's because they were stronger back then. Clearly those feats were accomplished by throwing a fraction as hard.
Walter Johnson was back in the stone age of baseball when everything you did was self taught. What I'm comparing with is what I know. This being baseball from the 60's, 70's, 80's, 90's, and into the 21st century.

You can call me what you want. I doubt very much that you've experienced baseball in depth through this period as much as i have. Incidentally, during all my playing years, I was a catcher.

As far as the pitchers in the early 20th century, I'll guarantee you they threw faster than 60 to 70 mph. My god, I never caught junker who couldn't throw their fastball at least that hard. Do you really think these raw-boned tough as nails guys from back in those days couldn't throw harder than that?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-14-2013, 09:22 AM
 
Location: ABQ
3,771 posts, read 7,093,442 times
Reputation: 4893
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kestrel88 View Post
Johnson flirted with 90mph and was considered a freak of nature within the game. The other 99% of pitchers were throwing in the 60-70mph range. Unlimited pitch counts, little rest between starts, and 50 appearances per season does not equal hard thrower. There's only one way a pitcher could consistently work 100 more innings per season than modern day HOF pitchers. Only a fool would say it's because they were stronger back then. Clearly those feats were accomplished by throwing a fraction as hard.
You make good points, but where do you get 90mph from? Both Johnson and Wood are thought to be one of the top 10-20 hardest throwing pitchers of all time - not just of their era. Even today, you've got guys like Ben Sheets that have topped 100 on the gun. This isn't some sort of unique, special trait.

I don't even play baseball and I'm not that active and I threw 78mph on the gun without warming up last week when I was in Memphis, TN (and I'm a pretty smallish guy). I think people generally overestimate the strength needed to throw a fastball with any sort of velocity. With any sort of practice and strength building, it'd be absolutely possible for people like you and me to get somewhere in the vicinity of 75-85mph and special, more athletically-inclined folks to get over 90mph without having to be professional baseball players.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-14-2013, 04:01 PM
 
Location: southwestern USA
1,823 posts, read 2,127,177 times
Reputation: 2440
I just think the reason modern day pitchers dont throw as many innings or complete games is the way the game is managed.

This has become a game of speciiization and micromanaging. Generally most teams use the 100-110 pitch mark as the limit for a pitcher. Also its developed now that every team has it assigned bullpen roles---set up men and closers. Watching a game unfold, you know who is getting ready in the seventh, eight, and ninth innings.

I liked the era of complete games and greatly admired the stamina of Juan Marichal, Don Drysdale, Warren Spahn, and Bob Gibson. Times and eras change and with our reliance on stats and assigned roles the day of the complete games is vanishing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Sports > Baseball

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top