Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
With Lebron now getting bids for 1, 2 or 3 all time, I just wanted to reflect a little on how great Larry may have been.
With those numbers, how good would Larry have been in today's NBA? He could definitely shoot so wouldn't today's game with teams shooting 20+ 3s benefit a player like him? Do you think he would challenge Steph/Lebron/Durant for 2016 MVP?
Larry Bird is Lebron's closes comparison really in terms of all around ability. Bird was the better shooter. Lebron a better passer.
At age 31, Larry shot his highest career FG% and scored big highest PPG of his career. Hopefully Lebron's year 32 is better than Larry's (injured and only played 6 games).
After 31 years of age, Larry continued to be a force on the boards and dishing out assists, but his FG%, including 3 Pt FG% both dropped significantly.
With Lebron now getting bids for 1, 2 or 3 all time, I just wanted to reflect a little on how great Larry may have been.
With those numbers, how good would Larry have been in today's NBA? He could definitely shoot so wouldn't today's game with teams shooting 20+ 3s benefit a player like him? Do you think he would challenge Steph/Lebron/Durant for 2016 MVP?
Larrys numbers are better across the board. Thats why the debate lives on. Id take Larry.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.