Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Idaho > Boise area
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 07-31-2009, 04:33 PM
 
58 posts, read 167,688 times
Reputation: 44

Advertisements

All these residential subdivisions were built with with no strip malls in sight. This forces residents in those areas to travel a ways to the busy streets, like Eagle or Caldwell Blvd.,creating more traffic and congestion.
If the residential areas had services, people would not have to drive very far, (to the market), and traffic would be more spread throughout. Freeway, (I-84) construction is years behind other major centers, and the work crew is small for a major important project, that this area needs so bad, fast.

Last edited by Perkinst; 07-31-2009 at 04:53 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-31-2009, 04:47 PM
 
3,338 posts, read 6,906,790 times
Reputation: 2848
Oh but the Interstate is going to be so nice once the whole stretch from Micron to Nampa/Caldwell is completed. Finally there will be four lanes in each direction through the City as it should have been a decade ago. I am anxious for the Vista Interchange to be rebuilt which has already started. But a larger Interstate is not the answer to traffic woes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-31-2009, 05:24 PM
 
1,056 posts, read 2,684,193 times
Reputation: 842
Quote:
Originally Posted by Syringaloid View Post
But a larger Interstate is not the answer to traffic woes.
A million times yes! It's a bandaid at best.

Is it going to be 4 lanes, though? I heard just 3. Either way, I'd hope they put in carpool lanes and enforce them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-31-2009, 08:32 PM
 
Location: Emmett Idaho
993 posts, read 3,254,924 times
Reputation: 438
Don't forget the new hwy 16 extension so the Emmett traffic could move smoother too.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-01-2009, 05:49 AM
 
Location: North Carolina
1,310 posts, read 2,942,221 times
Reputation: 1514
Quote:
Originally Posted by Perkinst View Post
All these residential subdivisions were built with with no strip malls in sight. This forces residents in those areas to travel a ways to the busy streets, like Eagle or Caldwell Blvd.,creating more traffic and congestion.
If the residential areas had services, people would not have to drive very far, (to the market), and traffic would be more spread throughout. Freeway, (I-84) construction is years behind other major centers, and the work crew is small for a major important project, that this area needs so bad, fast.
No, if the infrastructure was there when the boom hit, the traffic issue would be less of a concern. Way too many 4 way stop signs at mid-major intersections (i.e. McMillan & Locust Grove).

By the way, Boise really doesn't have a bad traffic issue (well, maybe bad drivers). Experience LA or Chicago during rush hour to appreciate what you have here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-01-2009, 08:03 PM
 
1,056 posts, read 2,684,193 times
Reputation: 842
Quote:
Originally Posted by h2ohzrd View Post
By the way, Boise really doesn't have a bad traffic issue (well, maybe bad drivers). Experience LA or Chicago during rush hour to appreciate what you have here.
Apples to oranges.

It's a matter of perception. Of course traffic isn't at the level it is in most large cities, but at the same time, those cites are far bigger, more spread out, etc. The point is that traffic in Boise, for the size it is, is absolutely terrible. There is ONE connecting freeway. All other thoroughfares - Eagle Road, Fairview, State, Chinden, Vista, Broadway, 5 Mile, Franklin - are all two lane roads with numerous stop signs that are almost never in sync.

Add this to the points Perkinst brought up, and traffic in Boise is as frustrating as it is anywhere else.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-02-2009, 01:18 AM
 
Location: Boise
4,426 posts, read 5,922,746 times
Reputation: 1701
traffic in boise is a breeze...
The only issues with traffic is timing of signal lights needs to be looked into..
and the only backup on the freeway that happens is from the damn bottlneck at meridian road where 4 lanes gets crunched into 2 to go to nampa...
once that issue is fixed with the widening project.. it will be a breeze.. atleast for the next decade or so..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Idaho > Boise area

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top