Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 07-31-2018, 04:23 PM
 
Location: Studio City, CA 91604
3,049 posts, read 4,548,895 times
Reputation: 5961

Advertisements

This sounds like a great program!

It will be for people who work for small businesses or are self-employed and want the option of paying into a retirement plan, but don't want something that is risky or shifty, such as a Wall Street plan.

The CalSavers plan will allow people to save money and then withdraw when needed. It will be self-contained and not require taxpayer funds. It will also be independent of PERS and STRS.

I love the fact that I live in a state like California where things like this are taken into consideration and the state is proactively trying to address this need.

This program isn't supposed to come online until later this year. I would actively encourage people without a retirement plan to investigate this program and see what benefit it might provide you.

Quote:
Have a look:
https://www.treasurer.ca.gov/scib/

The most ambitious push to expand retirement security since the passage of Social Security in the 1930s became a reality on September 29, 2016 when Governor Jerry Brown signed Senate Bill 1234, championed by Senator Kevin de León. The California Secure Choice Retirement Savings Investment Board, chaired by State Treasurer John Chiang, is in the midst of developing and implementing the CalSavers Retirement Savings Program. The Board anticipates the Program will open with a pilot program in late-2018 and officially open for statewide enrollment in 2019.

Once implemented, the CalSavers program will ensure nearly all Californians have access to a workplace retirement savings plan. CalSavers offers employees a completely voluntary, low cost, portable retirement savings vehicle with professionally managed investments and oversight from a public, transparent board of directors.

CalSavers provides employers a way to offer their employees a retirement savings benefit without the administrative complexity, fees, or fiduciary liability of existing options for employers. Any employer with at least five employees that doesn’t already offer a workplace retirement savings vehicle will be required to either begin offering one via the private market or provide their employees access to CalSavers.

Last edited by kttam186290; 07-31-2018 at 04:31 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-31-2018, 04:59 PM
 
Location: az
13,767 posts, read 8,014,399 times
Reputation: 9418
In theory I like the idea. However, I but don`t trust CalSavers not to start raising fees after six years especially if the enrollment numbers aren't what they project.

One big question is fees. By law, participants must bear all costs including administration and fund fees. After six years of operation, fees would be capped at 1 percent of assets, but until then there would be no limit. The program is borrowing money from the general fund to get started, but participants must repay that loan.

In Oregon, fees are about 1 percent of assets, $104 per year on a $10,000 balance. In Illinois fees are capped at 0.75 percent. Those fees are much higher than average for large 401(k) plans, but lower than average for very small plans, according to BrightScope data.

CalSavers expects to have lower fees than Illinois, given the “vast size of our target market, approximately 7 million workers,” Selenski said.

https://www.sfchronicle.com/business...n-12739753.php
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-31-2018, 05:34 PM
 
18,172 posts, read 16,409,991 times
Reputation: 9328
Quote:
Originally Posted by john3232 View Post
In theory I like the idea. However, I but don`t trust CalSavers not to start raising fees after six years especially if the enrollment numbers aren't what they project.

One big question is fees. By law, participants must bear all costs including administration and fund fees. After six years of operation, fees would be capped at 1 percent of assets, but until then there would be no limit. The program is borrowing money from the general fund to get started, but participants must repay that loan.

In Oregon, fees are about 1 percent of assets, $104 per year on a $10,000 balance. In Illinois fees are capped at 0.75 percent. Those fees are much higher than average for large 401(k) plans, but lower than average for very small plans, according to BrightScope data.

CalSavers expects to have lower fees than Illinois, given the “vast size of our target market, approximately 7 million workers,” Selenski said.

https://www.sfchronicle.com/business...n-12739753.php
And what happens if it does not have enough funds when people start retiring?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-31-2018, 08:10 PM
 
Location: Laguna Niguel, Orange County CA
9,807 posts, read 11,149,143 times
Reputation: 7997
Quote:
Originally Posted by kttam186290 View Post
This sounds like a great program!

It will be for people who work for small businesses or are self-employed and want the option of paying into a retirement plan, but don't want something that is risky or shifty, such as a Wall Street plan.

The CalSavers plan will allow people to save money and then withdraw when needed. It will be self-contained and not require taxpayer funds. It will also be independent of PERS and STRS.

I love the fact that I live in a state like California where things like this are taken into consideration and the state is proactively trying to address this need.

This program isn't supposed to come online until later this year. I would actively encourage people without a retirement plan to investigate this program and see what benefit it might provide you.
Some kind of universal savings program is indeed a necessity for folks who don't have traditional retirement accounts. People simply must be forced to save. I am a super saver and investor. It becomes an obsession, I admit. As we get older, it becomes critical.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:00 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top