Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-01-2011, 09:36 PM
 
Location: Cumberland County, NJ
8,632 posts, read 13,000,665 times
Reputation: 5766

Advertisements

Los Angeles
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-01-2011, 11:09 PM
 
Location: 30-40°N 90-100°W
13,809 posts, read 26,558,648 times
Reputation: 6790
The following look possible, going by the US Census, but before 2005 I only have population numbers by decade so maybe there were declines in an individual year that were recouped by decade's end. I tried to limit to ones with relatively high growth each decade to avoid that.

Albuquerque, New Mexico
Anchorage, Alaska
Austin, Texas
Bakersfield, California
Charlotte, North Carolina
Fresno, California
Greensboro, North Carolina
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Phoenix, Arizona
San Antonio, Texas

I'm not sure of those in California, took out Riverside even, and maybe others have more detailed stats for some I named by my own quick research.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-02-2011, 12:23 PM
 
Location: Avondale and Tempe, Arizona
2,852 posts, read 4,502,741 times
Reputation: 2562
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thomas R. View Post
The following look possible, going by the US Census, but before 2005 I only have population numbers by decade so maybe there were declines in an individual year that were recouped by decade's end. I tried to limit to ones with relatively high growth each decade to avoid that.

Albuquerque, New Mexico
Anchorage, Alaska
Austin, Texas
Bakersfield, California
Charlotte, North Carolina
Fresno, California
Greensboro, North Carolina
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Phoenix, Arizona
San Antonio, Texas

I'm not sure of those in California, took out Riverside even, and maybe others have more detailed stats for some I named by my own quick research.
It's interesting to note Phoenix is the largest city in the nation that has never recorded a population decline.

Even the recent recession and the housing crunch didn't affect growth, people are still moving there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-02-2011, 12:32 PM
 
Location: Glendale, CA
1,299 posts, read 2,540,341 times
Reputation: 1395
Quote:
Originally Posted by Java Jolt View Post
It's interesting to note Phoenix is the largest city in the nation that has never recorded a population decline.

Even the recent recession and the housing crunch didn't affect growth, people are still moving there.
Per census numbers I believe Los Angeles is the largest city never to have recorded a population decline.

Largest cities in the United States by population by decade - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-02-2011, 12:35 PM
 
Location: Up on the moon laughing down on you
18,495 posts, read 32,953,051 times
Reputation: 7752
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbcmh81 View Post
Official count. Estimates are way off.
If you are going by official census counts then Houston never lost.
It did lose based on estimates in the 80's but by the time the census came around the numbers from 1980 to 1990 was positive
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-02-2011, 12:37 PM
 
Location: Up on the moon laughing down on you
18,495 posts, read 32,953,051 times
Reputation: 7752
Quote:
Originally Posted by Java Jolt View Post
It's interesting to note Phoenix is the largest city in the nation that has never recorded a population decline.

Even the recent recession and the housing crunch didn't affect growth, people are still moving there.
LA and Houston are both larger than Phoenix and neither have recorded a decline based on census official numbers
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-02-2011, 12:39 PM
 
Location: Up on the moon laughing down on you
18,495 posts, read 32,953,051 times
Reputation: 7752
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thomas R. View Post
The following look possible, going by the US Census, but before 2005 I only have population numbers by decade so maybe there were declines in an individual year that were recouped by decade's end. I tried to limit to ones with relatively high growth each decade to avoid that.

Albuquerque, New Mexico
Anchorage, Alaska
Austin, Texas
Bakersfield, California
Charlotte, North Carolina
Fresno, California
Greensboro, North Carolina
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Phoenix, Arizona
San Antonio, Texas

I'm not sure of those in California, took out Riverside even, and maybe others have more detailed stats for some I named by my own quick research.
San Antonio had Declines in the mid 1800's when it was still a small town and under constant threat from mexico
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-05-2011, 04:49 PM
 
Location: You Already Know: San Diego!
377 posts, read 1,082,541 times
Reputation: 125
All of the top ten cities had (including estimates from 2000-2010). Los Angeles has, even San Diego had during the 1880's. Personally, I don't know.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-05-2011, 04:53 PM
 
Location: San Antonio, TX
2,089 posts, read 3,907,034 times
Reputation: 2695
All the larger cities in Texas for sure. In the Austin metro, we had a population of around 350 thousand in 1975, now 1 million and 350 thousand!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-05-2011, 05:44 PM
 
9,961 posts, read 17,524,172 times
Reputation: 9193
Las Vegas had a population of 25 people in 1900, about 24,000 in 1950 and over 580,000 by the 2010 census... It might possibly suffer a decline in population in the near future, but it didn't at any other time in its history from what I can see.

San Diego(8th largest city in the US) also doesn't have a recorded population decline by census figures for any decade, although I don't know if the city ever lost population for a given year. Same with San Jose.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top