Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-22-2010, 08:56 PM
 
Location: Austin, TX/Chicago, IL/Houston, TX/Washington, DC
10,138 posts, read 16,060,443 times
Reputation: 4047

Advertisements

Can you name any cities that have lost significant population since the 1950 census in which many cities reached their ultimate population peak?

This thread is not here to discuss why they lost the population, (suburbs, westward expansion, invention of AC, War strategies, automobile, etc...) but only to talk specifically about the cities that have suffered a population loss since that time.

Name a city that has lost a lot of population since 1950, then list what it's highest population ever recorded was, and what it is currently, and if you ever think it'll rebound back. (your own personal perception- doesn't have to be backed up by stats)

I'll start. I nominate my city, Chicago, Illinois. At it's peak in 1950 it was America's 2nd largest city, with 3.6 million people and today it's hovering at the borderline of 2.8 million and 2.9 million. And yes, I think my city will make a come back, it's doing a lot of residential improvements in South Loop and such and going ways to attract more people to inner loop than suburbs now. In the distant future it will start growing again, but likelihood of it reaching what it was in 1950- probably not anytime in the next 70 years.

You turn.

Last edited by DANNYY; 06-22-2010 at 09:34 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-22-2010, 09:23 PM
 
4,574 posts, read 7,504,238 times
Reputation: 2613
Within nearly a 6 decade period from 1950, Detroit lost almost half of its residents. Its population in 1950 was 1,849,568, and in 2009 was 910,920.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-22-2010, 09:31 PM
 
Location: Dallas-Fort Worth Metroplex
3,260 posts, read 8,767,217 times
Reputation: 693
Philadelphia

1950: 2,071,605
Now: 1,547,901
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-22-2010, 09:34 PM
 
Location: ☀ ѕυnѕнιne ѕтaтe ☀
1,416 posts, read 3,213,451 times
Reputation: 253
Cincinatti - 503,998 - 1950 to Today - 333,336
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-22-2010, 09:35 PM
 
Location: Oak Park, IL
5,525 posts, read 13,958,585 times
Reputation: 3908
Aside from NYC (and maybe Indianapolis and Columbus) has any major city in the Northeast or Midwest gained population since 1950?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-22-2010, 09:35 PM
 
2,106 posts, read 6,634,412 times
Reputation: 963
Cleveland

1950: 914,000
2010: 433,000
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-22-2010, 09:37 PM
 
Location: Austin, TX/Chicago, IL/Houston, TX/Washington, DC
10,138 posts, read 16,060,443 times
Reputation: 4047
Quote:
Originally Posted by oakparkdude View Post
Aside from NYC (and maybe Indianapolis and Columbus) has any major city in the Northeast or Midwest gained population since 1950?
Philadelphia just did recently. Boston has also recently started too (last 30 years), and Washington DC as well. Baltimore seems to be picking up. Chicago is showing signs of that transition but hasn't this decade, it did last decade, and I feel it will next decade onwards.

But the truth is, none of them are anywhere close to their peak... sad to say.

Last edited by DANNYY; 06-22-2010 at 09:47 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-22-2010, 09:38 PM
 
Location: ☀ ѕυnѕнιne ѕтaтe ☀
1,416 posts, read 3,213,451 times
Reputation: 253
Quote:
Originally Posted by WeSoHood View Post
Cleveland

1950: 914,000
2010: 433,000
Damn forreal? Whats up with Ohio cities?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-22-2010, 09:40 PM
 
Location: Dallas-Fort Worth Metroplex
3,260 posts, read 8,767,217 times
Reputation: 693
Washington, DC

1950:802,178
Now:599,657
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-22-2010, 09:44 PM
 
Location: Dallas-Fort Worth Metroplex
3,260 posts, read 8,767,217 times
Reputation: 693
Baltimore

1950: 949,708
Now: 637,418
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:53 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top