Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 04-15-2011, 09:45 PM
 
322 posts, read 614,957 times
Reputation: 224

Advertisements

I notice that people who aren't from the south speak very poorly about southern cities and people. Please tell me why no one likes the south. We got major metropolitan areas, great food, and great vacation destinations. So why do people hate us so much?

 
Old 04-15-2011, 10:02 PM
 
38 posts, read 29,879 times
Reputation: 11
Ignorance, perception, history.
I like the south (the real south, not Maryland and DC).
But there are remnants of the old south everywhere though mostly.
Life is very slow in the south, whether its Atlanta, GA or Tupelo, MS.
 
Old 04-15-2011, 10:08 PM
 
322 posts, read 614,957 times
Reputation: 224
I'd hardly consider Atlanta to be slow. It may not be as fast as NY or LA but its deff not slow.
 
Old 04-15-2011, 10:12 PM
 
38 posts, read 29,879 times
Reputation: 11
Quote:
Originally Posted by lgonzalez12 View Post
I'd hardly consider Atlanta to be slow. It may not be as fast as NY or LA but its deff not slow.
I'm not saying that D.C., where I'm from is the fastest place in the country, but compared to Atlanta it is much faster. Atlanta is laid back and relaxing, thats what I like about it.
It may be the fastest city in the south, but compared to the BosWash corridor, Chicago, LA and SF it is slow.
 
Old 04-15-2011, 10:23 PM
 
Location: Austin, TX & Miami, FL
312 posts, read 437,339 times
Reputation: 171
Quote:
Originally Posted by DCmayor View Post
I'm not saying that D.C., where I'm from is the fastest place in the country, but compared to Atlanta it is much faster. Atlanta is laid back and relaxing, thats what I like about it.
It may be the fastest city in the south, but compared to the BosWash corridor, Chicago, LA and SF it is slow.
Los Angeles isn't a fast paced city, unless you include driving fast at rush hour.
 
Old 04-15-2011, 10:25 PM
 
684 posts, read 1,151,105 times
Reputation: 910
The proof is in the pudding...they are overwhelmingly red states.
 
Old 04-15-2011, 10:27 PM
 
38 posts, read 29,879 times
Reputation: 11
Quote:
Originally Posted by Social Network View Post
Los Angeles isn't a fast paced city, unless you include driving fast at rush hour.
I wouldn't exactly call it slow neither though.
Its fast enough so where things are always moving.
 
Old 04-15-2011, 10:27 PM
 
Location: Nantahala National Forest, NC
27,073 posts, read 11,863,660 times
Reputation: 30347
NC went blue last presidential election...






Quote:
Originally Posted by sky1949 View Post
The proof is in the pudding...they are overwhelmingly red states.
 
Old 04-15-2011, 10:30 PM
 
684 posts, read 1,151,105 times
Reputation: 910
Quote:
Originally Posted by greatblueheron View Post
NC went blue last presidential election...
Yes, but I said "overwhelmingly", not unanimously. Also, there is more toconsider thnjust the presidncy. Senate, house and gubs are also indicative.
 
Old 04-15-2011, 10:32 PM
 
Location: Austin, TX & Miami, FL
312 posts, read 437,339 times
Reputation: 171
Quote:
Originally Posted by DCmayor View Post
I wouldn't exactly call it slow neither though.
Its fast enough so where things are always moving.
It's not slow but I think Atlanta is faster than it for its size. For one, Downtown Los Angeles might have activity but look at its population, its 18 million it has no creditability of a metropolis of 18 million when it comes to speed. It should have 1.3 million people using its rail lines everyday and should easily be tops that of Chicago and Washington but its not. It should have the second most vibrant downtown, it has the population around it to make that happen but it doesn't.

It slows down at rush hour, you literally can get a sandwich and sit and wait in the car for 15 minutes before you move an inch on the worst days for commuting. Now I'm not hating on Los Angeles but the "laid back" and "easy going life" is what it's known for and from my trips there it delivers it whether it wants to or not. The fast paced and "move b*tch" sidewalk mentality doesn't exist in Los Angeles at all, its go at your own speed but don't be too late. Its why I like Los Angeles and would live there over anything in the Northeast with the exception of Washington but fast paced is something that it wont be until it gets its downtown jam packed, its rail lines clustered, its cars in garages and more street traffic!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:28 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top