Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: I live east of the Mississippi river and my favorite West Coast city is
Seattle 13 20.00%
Portland 2 3.08%
San Francisco 14 21.54%
Los Angeles 23 35.38%
San Diego 10 15.38%
Other 3 4.62%
Voters: 65. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-01-2013, 02:31 AM
 
Location: Austin, TX
654 posts, read 1,910,150 times
Reputation: 911

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigCityDreamer View Post
Smallish east coast cities? Haha, that's funny. LA is just extremely sprawled. The east coast has 45 million+ people in an area just the size of southern California.
And yet, the Los Angeles urban area has a higher population density than NYC's urban area.

List of United States urban areas - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-01-2013, 07:00 AM
 
Location: Crooklyn, New York
32,101 posts, read 34,720,210 times
Reputation: 15093
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marat View Post
And yet, the Los Angeles urban area has a higher population density than NYC's urban area.

List of United States urban areas - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
And that matters because...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-01-2013, 09:21 AM
 
Location: Pasadena, CA
10,078 posts, read 15,858,119 times
Reputation: 4049
Quote:
Originally Posted by BajanYankee View Post
And that matters because...
I think it is more in response to this:

Quote:
The east coast has 45 million+ people in an area just the size of southern California.
Which might technically be true but anyone with a general knowledge of the layout of Southern California will know it is misleading.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-01-2013, 09:28 AM
 
Location: East Coast of the United States
27,564 posts, read 28,665,617 times
Reputation: 25154
Quote:
Originally Posted by munchitup View Post
Which might technically be true but anyone with a general knowledge of the layout of Southern California will know it is misleading.
What's misleading about that statement? It doesn't take anything away from the growth of southern California, which has been impressive. But the east coast still has a much larger population in the same area. So what?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-01-2013, 09:41 AM
 
Location: Pasadena, CA
10,078 posts, read 15,858,119 times
Reputation: 4049
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigCityDreamer View Post
What's misleading about that statement? It doesn't take anything away from the growth of southern California, which has been impressive. But the east coast still has a much larger population in the same area. So what?
What is misleading is that in order for your statement to be correct, you would have to be using the CSA, which includes all of San Bernardino and Riverside Counties and as discussed ad-naseum on this forum, are something like 80% completely empty desert. So yes it is a true statement but it is not like Southern California sprawls to the Nevada border, or comes even close to it. Victorville is the most proximate LA-area city (term used very loosely) to the Nevada border - at 129 miles away.

If you look at the satellite map, you can see the developed area of Southern California hugs the coast and is hemmed in by mountain ranges: http://goo.gl/maps/eIdcn
Here is an image of the truly developed parts of Southern California: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:SoCal_megaregion.png Much less than the 52k square miles typically attributed to it.

And either way, what matters is you took my statement completely the wrong way and assumed it as an insult to East Coast cities. Which is ridiculous because one of the small-city-limits cities is my third favorite city in the country.

Last edited by munchitup; 03-01-2013 at 10:01 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-01-2013, 10:03 AM
 
Location: Philadelphia, PA
8,700 posts, read 14,698,612 times
Reputation: 3668
Los Anhelas for me
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-01-2013, 12:00 PM
 
Location: Austin, TX
654 posts, read 1,910,150 times
Reputation: 911
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marat View Post
And yet, the Los Angeles urban area has a higher population density than NYC's urban area.

List of United States urban areas - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Did you see the statement I quoted? It would explain it for you. Someone said how Los Angeles was incredibly sprawled. This shows otherwise. Unless you want to count cities in the northeast as even more sprawled.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-01-2013, 12:06 PM
 
Location: NY
778 posts, read 998,436 times
Reputation: 422
SF, because its the one thats most like an East Coast city.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-01-2013, 02:41 PM
 
Location: East Coast of the United States
27,564 posts, read 28,665,617 times
Reputation: 25154
Quote:
Originally Posted by munchitup View Post
What is misleading is that in order for your statement to be correct, you would have to be using the CSA, which includes all of San Bernardino and Riverside Counties and as discussed ad-naseum on this forum, are something like 80% completely empty desert. So yes it is a true statement but it is not like Southern California sprawls to the Nevada border, or comes even close to it. Victorville is the most proximate LA-area city (term used very loosely) to the Nevada border - at 129 miles away.

If you look at the satellite map, you can see the developed area of Southern California hugs the coast and is hemmed in by mountain ranges: Google Maps
Here is an image of the truly developed parts of Southern California: File:SoCal megaregion.png - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Much less than the 52k square miles typically attributed to it.

And either way, what matters is you took my statement completely the wrong way and assumed it as an insult to East Coast cities. Which is ridiculous because one of the small-city-limits cities is my third favorite city in the country.
Okay, I'm still not getting your point. So maybe, let's just forget it. lol.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-01-2013, 06:40 PM
 
Location: Shaw.
2,226 posts, read 3,856,695 times
Reputation: 846
Quote:
Originally Posted by LINative View Post
Btw, because of 'homers" voting, you should have made this vote public. On the Northeast cities thread, I noticed a few people from the Northeast were voting for their home cities (one city in particular) even though the OP specifically said only for people outside the Northeast to vote.
Yes, I'm aware:

Quote:
Originally Posted by pgm123 View Post
I didn't mean to make this a secret poll, btw. It's supposed to parallel the other thread. Is a mod able to change that, or is it too late?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top