Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Which city is more iconic/visually recognizable?
Chicago 29 36.71%
San Francisco 50 63.29%
Voters: 79. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 09-23-2014, 08:52 AM
 
2,829 posts, read 3,172,404 times
Reputation: 2266

Advertisements

SF vs Chicago. Let the storm begin...


 
Old 09-23-2014, 08:53 AM
 
Location: Crooklyn, New York
32,087 posts, read 34,686,093 times
Reputation: 15078
Quote:
Originally Posted by cheese plate View Post
It is quite recognizable because it's along a distinct Lake Michigan beach backdrop, and it is because it had the tallest scrapers for a good chunk of years, some of them very recognizable. I agree that the topography of San Fran stands out, as well. No one who's been to either city would have trouble recognizing pictures of either's skylines.
But people who haven't been to San Francisco recognize this.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...Highlands3.jpg

People everywhere in the world will recognize that.
 
Old 09-23-2014, 08:55 AM
 
Location: Milwaukee
3,453 posts, read 4,527,042 times
Reputation: 2987
Quote:
Originally Posted by BajanYankee View Post
But people who haven't been to San Francisco recognize this.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...Highlands3.jpg

People everywhere in the world will recognize that.
Sure - again, GG is the most recognizable singular feature between the two cities, but outside of GG Chicago is more more recognizable. Because of this, it's a close comparison.
 
Old 09-23-2014, 08:57 AM
 
2,829 posts, read 3,172,404 times
Reputation: 2266
Quote:
Originally Posted by BajanYankee View Post
But people who haven't been to San Francisco recognize this.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...Highlands3.jpg

People everywhere in the world will recognize that.
Looks just like Portland with a big bridge.
 
Old 09-23-2014, 09:17 AM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
18,980 posts, read 32,634,523 times
Reputation: 13630
Quote:
Originally Posted by cheese plate View Post
Sure - again, GG is the most recognizable singular feature between the two cities, but outside of GG Chicago is more more recognizable. Because of this, it's a close comparison.
What exactly about Chicago is more recognizable?
 
Old 09-23-2014, 09:44 AM
 
Location: Phoenix metro
20,004 posts, read 77,363,453 times
Reputation: 10371
I think if you removed the Golden Gate Bridge, SF would be hard to ID, specifically if youre talking solely about the skyline. Id give the slight edge to Chicago on this one, as the skyline is unique. This was a tough one!
 
Old 09-23-2014, 09:56 AM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,653 posts, read 67,487,099 times
Reputation: 21229
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve-o View Post
I think if you removed the Golden Gate Bridge, SF would be hard to ID, specifically if youre talking solely about the skyline. Id give the slight edge to Chicago on this one, as the skyline is unique. This was a tough one!
Not really.

San Francisco's steep hills, sweeping vistas and residential architecture collectively are far more iconic than Chicago. Chinatown, Cable Cars, Colorful Victorians, the Bay itself-and the Golden Gate Bridge and skyline, hell, even the fog) all combine to put out an extremely vivid and easily recognizable image of SF that is world famous.
 
Old 09-23-2014, 10:20 AM
 
Location: LoS ScAnDaLoUs KiLLa CaLI
1,227 posts, read 1,592,735 times
Reputation: 1195
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve-o View Post
I think if you removed the Golden Gate Bridge, SF would be hard to ID, specifically if youre talking solely about the skyline. Id give the slight edge to Chicago on this one, as the skyline is unique. This was a tough one!
Did you know that if you removed a genius' ability to read and write, they'd be an idiot?
 
Old 09-23-2014, 10:36 AM
 
Location: Crooklyn, New York
32,087 posts, read 34,686,093 times
Reputation: 15078
Quote:
Originally Posted by cheese plate View Post
Sure - again, GG is the most recognizable singular feature between the two cities, but outside of GG Chicago is more more recognizable. Because of this, it's a close comparison.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve-o View Post
I think if you removed the Golden Gate Bridge, SF would be hard to ID, specifically if youre talking solely about the skyline. Id give the slight edge to Chicago on this one, as the skyline is unique. This was a tough one!
There is no "outside of GG" or "if you removed the Golden Gate Bridge." Once you have to start resorting to "if you removed..." statements, then you've already lost.

SF vs Chicago, in terms of recognizability, is not a close comparison. The Golden Gate Bridge plays a big role in that. But so do cable cars, Alcatraz, and the views of the city. If you see a postcard with a cable car going up a hill, most people are going to think "San Francisco." And when you go there, there are tons of tourists waiting in line for the chance to ride one of them. A first visit to SF isn't really complete until you've done that, imo.

As already mentioned upthread, SF's landmarks are more famous. And the streetscape of the Loop is not that different from NYC. The El gives the Loop some identity, but I don't think the average person living in Denmark could distinguish Chicago from Philadelphia if you showed them a picture with the El running over a downtown street.
 
Old 09-23-2014, 10:41 AM
 
Location: Milwaukee
3,453 posts, read 4,527,042 times
Reputation: 2987
Quote:
Originally Posted by BajanYankee View Post
There is no "outside of GG" or "if you removed the Golden Gate Bridge." Once you have to start resorting to "if you removed..." statements, then you've already lost.
OK, then Chicago. Which is what I voted for. The bone I am throwing to San Fran is having a singular feature that is likely best known worldwide, but overall it's going to be Chicago.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top