Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-24-2017, 12:41 AM
 
6,843 posts, read 10,975,458 times
Reputation: 8436

Advertisements

Total International Visitors, 2016
05. New York: 12.75 million international visitors
21. Los Angeles: 5.60 million international visitors
24. Miami: 5.24 million international visitors
29. Toronto: 4.52 million international visitors
33. San Francisco: 3.93 million international visitors
34. Vancouver: 3.90 million international visitors
43. Mexico City: 2.98 million international visitors
51. Montreal: 2.24 million international visitors
53. Washington D.C.: 2.18 million international visitors
55. Chicago: 2.08 million international visitors
60. Boston: 1.74 million international visitors
69. Houston: 1.50 million international visitors
83. Atlanta: 1.02 million international visitors
93. Dallas/Fort Worth: 0.78 million international visitors
99. Philadelphia: 0.72 million international visitors


Dollar amount spent by International Visitors, 2016 (valuations in $USD):
01. New York: $18.52 Billion
02. Miami: $8.15 Billion
03. Los Angeles: $8.10 Billion
04. San Francisco: $5.93 Billion
05. Chicago: $2.95 Billion
06. Washington D.C.: $2.54 Billion
07. Houston: $2.48 Billion
08. Mexico City: $2.27 Billion
09. Boston: $2.18 Billion
10. Toronto: $2.16 Billion
11. Vancouver: $2.12 Billion
12. Atlanta: $1.47 Billion
13. Dallas/Fort Worth: $1.13 Billion
14. Montreal: $1.08 Billion
15. Philadelphia: $1.05 Billion

Page 62 and 63 in the report:

https://newsroom.mastercard.com/wp-c...dex-Report.pdf

In case people were wondering, cities such as Cancun, Cabo San Lucas, Cozumel, Honolulu, Las Vegas, and Orlando were not included in this assessment. Had they been, it is presumed they would've been up pretty high for this.

For the American cities, they got their information from the United States' tourism bureau, a government agency that works with the trade department as well, so this is a rough sketch of the information the government has. These numbers for the United States cities do include Canada and Mexico, but only if those Canadian and Mexican visitors arrived via plane. Same for Canada and Mexico with regard to American visitors, counted for them only if they arrived via plane.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-24-2017, 01:49 AM
 
Location: La Jolla
4,226 posts, read 3,305,072 times
Reputation: 4143
Surprising the Los Angeles and Miami are so close, and Chicago ranking below Vancouver, DC, and Montreal confirms what a lot have been saying around here-that its not really an international city. It's barely beating Houston.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-24-2017, 05:44 AM
 
Location: MPLS/CHI
574 posts, read 690,166 times
Reputation: 427
Quote:
Originally Posted by Losfrisco View Post
Surprising the Los Angeles and Miami are so close, and Chicago ranking below Vancouver, DC, and Montreal confirms what a lot have been saying around here-that its not really an international city. It's barely beating Houston.
I don't the full economics involved in traveling over seas, but I would imagine it costs more and takes longer to get to Chicago than coastal cities. On the flip side, Chicago is more accesible to domestic travelers, which is why it probably crushes most non tourism cities (even NYC if you account for the size difference) in domestic visitors.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-24-2017, 06:35 AM
 
Location: Maryland
4,675 posts, read 7,411,912 times
Reputation: 5369
Quote:
Originally Posted by Losfrisco View Post
Surprising the Los Angeles and Miami are so close, and Chicago ranking below Vancouver, DC, and Montreal confirms what a lot have been saying around here-that its not really an international city. It's barely beating Houston.
On the other hand, Chicago has nearly as many international visitors as the nation's capital, which I consider pretty international in terms of drawing tourists.

I was surprised to see TO so high, but it looks like a bulk of their tourist numbers come from the U.S., according to the survey.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-24-2017, 06:44 AM
 
Location: OC
12,851 posts, read 9,587,241 times
Reputation: 10641
I'm surprised that Houston is as high as it is. Good for Houston. But these aren't strictly vacationers right? This could be folks in town for business.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-24-2017, 06:46 AM
 
Location: Maryland
4,675 posts, read 7,411,912 times
Reputation: 5369
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gaylord_Focker View Post
I'm surprised that Houston is as high as it is. Good for Houston. But these aren't strictly vacationers right? This could be folks in town for business.
Yeah, I think the report cited nearly 43% business travelers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-24-2017, 06:50 AM
 
Location: OC
12,851 posts, read 9,587,241 times
Reputation: 10641
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maintainschaos View Post
Yeah, I think the report cited nearly 43% business travelers.
And not to downplay it as it's a great city, but I'm guessing a lot of Vancouver's bucks are coming from Seattlites driving a couple of hours across the border.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-24-2017, 07:55 AM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,660 posts, read 67,564,755 times
Reputation: 21249
Yikes visitors to Toronto and Vancouver sure are cheap.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-24-2017, 08:16 AM
 
2,563 posts, read 3,631,319 times
Reputation: 3434
Quote:
Originally Posted by Losfrisco View Post
Surprising the Los Angeles and Miami are so close, and Chicago ranking below Vancouver, DC, and Montreal confirms what a lot have been saying around here-that its not really an international city. It's barely beating Houston.
Nice troll post there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-24-2017, 08:19 AM
 
Location: Texas
1,982 posts, read 2,092,961 times
Reputation: 2185
Philadelphia is slacking. I quite honestly expected DFW to be bottom of the list. With how CD say Boston is an international city, boosters say Philadelphia is at least on level with Boston, and people saying tourism is a major part of what makes an international and global city.

Toronto, Vancouve, and Montreal are pretty close to the US border and, aside from maybe Montreal, American population centers. Their visitor numbers may be inflated by that, which lowers spending per tourist.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:54 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top