Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-11-2009, 12:48 AM
 
321 posts, read 720,456 times
Reputation: 132

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by JustCallMeTC View Post
Half those pics were taken from land.

Here are a few more from the "land"






Didn't I agree that Seattle had a gorgeous skyline? Seattle is one of my favorite cities, I just was noting how skylines look from the sea is not what residents live with... I still think Seattle is beautiful.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-11-2009, 10:23 PM
 
260 posts, read 757,410 times
Reputation: 202
Not so, many neighborhoods in Seattle have similar views. West Seattle, Queen Anne, First Hill, etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-11-2009, 11:30 PM
 
1,263 posts, read 4,008,520 times
Reputation: 642
NYC has the prettiest skyline. I don't care others say it is more powerful than pretty. It is the most powerful and the prettiest at the same time. It has so many angles and so many interesting buildings. Every time you look at it you find something more and they are all spectacular.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-11-2009, 11:33 PM
 
1,263 posts, read 4,008,520 times
Reputation: 642
Just find any skyscraper book, count the number of buildings listed that are in NYC and in Chicago. NYC has lots more *famous* and *textbook* buildings. Of course, people from Chicago never get that and always think they are the architectural leader.

Quote:
Originally Posted by wpmeads View Post
I don't know about that part in bold at least for architecture. Have you ever heard of Mies van der Rohe, Louis Sullivan, or the Chicago School?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-11-2009, 11:40 PM
 
3,969 posts, read 13,661,729 times
Reputation: 1576
The word "prettiest" makes Seattle and San Francisco the winners, no doubt. Their surroundings define "pretty". Both also are substantial when it comes to pure office/residential space, and that shouldn't be discounted.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-11-2009, 11:53 PM
 
Location: Houston
2,023 posts, read 4,185,767 times
Reputation: 467
Quote:
Originally Posted by fashionguy View Post
Just find any skyscraper book, count the number of buildings listed that are in NYC and in Chicago. NYC has lots more *famous* and *textbook* buildings. Of course, people from Chicago never get that and always think they are the architectural leader.
Lol! I don't know how many architectural history classes you've taken but I'm going to take a wild guess and say your talking out your a**. That wasn't true for my text book. They where about the same. Have YOU ever heard of Mies van der Rohe, Louis Sullivan, or the Chicago School? They are arguably the three MOST important and influential architects/design movements of the modern architecture era!!!!! All based out of Chicago. Google it. Chicago was just as important in the development of the skyscraper and modern architecture as New York especially in the 19th and 20th century. Chicago can hang with the best of them when it come to modern and even current architecture.

Oh and I'm form Houston BTW. I've never lived in Chicago. It's just what the city is known for.

Last edited by wpmeads; 11-12-2009 at 12:03 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-16-2009, 11:40 PM
 
27 posts, read 102,620 times
Reputation: 21
No need arguing over this people. It's all opinions, so grow up! We all like different things, so stop bashing people because they like something you don't like. You guys act like you're still in high school or something. Differences in taste are what make our world diverse and what make our cities unique.

That being said, in my OPINION, the prettiest skylines are (and remember this is prettiest, NOT biggest),
Pittsburgh http://www.vmi.pitt.edu/images-t/Pittsburgh.jpg
San Fransisco
Seattle
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-17-2009, 10:21 AM
 
5,802 posts, read 9,892,055 times
Reputation: 3051
Im sorry nothing touches the Burgh....I could look at this skyline from Mt Washington for hrs.


















http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a320/lennyj17/78967305-1.jpg (broken link)

http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a320/lennyj17/78980579-1.jpg (broken link)



http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a320/lennyj17/DSC07321-1.jpg (broken link)

http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a320/lennyj17/DSC07343-1.jpg (broken link)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-17-2009, 10:26 AM
 
Location: Atlanta, GA
927 posts, read 2,225,354 times
Reputation: 750
A skyline (if we're just talking buildings) IMO cannot be "pretty." Most builings look the same, some glass highrises of various diversity, some historical buildings.

On the other hand, a cityscape can be pretty since that will probably include whatever natural features surround the central business district.

That's why these threads are unfair. A city can have three paltry bulidings, but plop some water and mountains next to it and suddenly it has the best skyline in the country. I do not, however, consider water and mountains a skyline.

Ranting aside, my vote is San Francisco.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-18-2009, 11:23 AM
 
27 posts, read 102,620 times
Reputation: 21
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blackbeauty212 View Post
Im sorry nothing touches the Burgh....I could look at this skyline from Mt Washington for hrs.
Amen. Couldn't agree more. A skyline does not have to be massive to be beautiful. It's not just the perfectly constructed buildings that make Pittsburgh beautiful to me. It's the three rivers, the bridges, the hills surrounding the city, the triangle, the huge fountain at the end of the point... and so many other things that make it unlike any other city. My (hopefully) soon to be home<3

If you like huge skylines, the Burgh probably isn't for you.
Check out these pictures of beautiful Pittsburgh and it's "golden triangle."

http://photographs.mccumber.us/540/b...ttsburgh02.jpg

http://www.ronsaari.com/stockImages/...kPanoramic.jpg

http://headsweater.files.wordpress.c...gh_skyline.jpg

http://www.wikinfo.org/upload/8/8d/Pittsburgh_skyline_nighttime.jpg (broken link)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top