Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-02-2009, 02:52 PM
 
Location: roaming gnome
12,384 posts, read 28,500,336 times
Reputation: 5879

Advertisements

Hrmm... To this day N.O. hood is the worst I've ever been in, I think it was called the Magnolias or something. I remember we went to the sugar bowl in 1994 and got off at a wrong exit...bad idea. Maybe it is not the worst, but it sure seems the scariest looking to me. It is worse than what I've seen in Oakland/Cleveland/Chicago/NYC
Birmingham, Montgomery and Memphis are also pretty sketchy notables that I find "scarier" even if the #'s aren't as bad.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-02-2009, 04:14 PM
 
Location: Chicago- Lawrence and Kedzie/Maywood
2,242 posts, read 6,238,462 times
Reputation: 741
Quote:
Originally Posted by jman650 View Post
Well that, and the fact that its true. Chicago shares that status through the media as well.
Nobody cares about Chicago.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-02-2009, 04:20 PM
 
5,969 posts, read 9,556,580 times
Reputation: 1614
Quote:
Originally Posted by Venom View Post
Nobody cares about Chicago.
I agree, the media has never highlighted Chicago's severe crime and gang problems as they have other cities like Los Angeles and others.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-02-2009, 04:39 PM
 
2,957 posts, read 6,471,986 times
Reputation: 1419
Quote:
Originally Posted by DailyJournalist View Post
I agree, the media has never highlighted Chicago's severe crime and gang problems as they have other cities like Los Angeles and others.
The media I've had access to has. Maybe not so much in the movies, but I've always thought of Chicago as being the co-capitol of gangs alongside LA. And crimewise its obviously worse overall. Even on the History Channel's Gangland they labeled Chicago a "gangster city." LA does get more sensationalized, and it does technically have slightly more gangs/members. But Chicago has always been right up there with it from my perspective, and I've never lived in either city.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-02-2009, 04:55 PM
 
14,256 posts, read 26,925,927 times
Reputation: 4565
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gtownoe View Post
The media.
I could've sworn it was because LA had the highest number of gang-related homicides in our nations history. I read it somewhere. I could be wrong.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-02-2009, 05:24 PM
 
Location: Earth
17,440 posts, read 28,593,729 times
Reputation: 7477
Quote:
Originally Posted by jman650 View Post
The media I've had access to has. Maybe not so much in the movies, but I've always thought of Chicago as being the co-capitol of gangs alongside LA. And crimewise its obviously worse overall. Even on the History Channel's Gangland they labeled Chicago a "gangster city." LA does get more sensationalized, and it does technically have slightly more gangs/members. But Chicago has always been right up there with it from my perspective, and I've never lived in either city.
Chicago doesn't have as MANY gangs but its gangs are quite large.

L.A. has MORE gangs but some of the gangs are very small and not that dangerous, the worst 10% of the gangs commit 80% of the gang related crimes. I don't think you'd find a gang of 15 people in Chicago like you do in L.A., the Chicago gangs are all really massive.

The number of total gang members is about the same due to many LA gang members having moved to the suburbs (although if you're talking SoCal as a whole it has by far and away the most gang members of any region in the US). This might've happened in Chicago also to some extent
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-02-2009, 05:49 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles, CA
287 posts, read 546,924 times
Reputation: 204
Quote:
Originally Posted by majoun View Post
Chicago doesn't have as MANY gangs but its gangs are quite large.

L.A. has MORE gangs but some of the gangs are very small and not that dangerous, the worst 10% of the gangs commit 80% of the gang related crimes. I don't think you'd find a gang of 15 people in Chicago like you do in L.A., the Chicago gangs are all really massive.

The number of total gang members is about the same due to many LA gang members having moved to the suburbs (although if you're talking SoCal as a whole it has by far and away the most gang members of any region in the US). This might've happened in Chicago also to some extent
The 18th Street gang has an estimated 100,000 members. Pretty huge gang if you ask me. MS 13 is a huge gang as well. They have members across the U.S. and they're considered to be one of the most dangerous gangs in the nation. LA was pretty bad in the 90s.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-02-2009, 05:50 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles, CA
287 posts, read 546,924 times
Reputation: 204
1991
Chicago - 3,092.5
LA - 2,525.8
Oakland - 2,495.8
NYC - 2,318.2
New Orleans - 2,190.3
Long Beach - 2,100.7

That's ridiculous how Long Beach and LA were among the most dangerous at that time considering how close they are. LA was definitely was war zone back in the 90s. Oakland was crazy too..wow. Still is pretty crazy today I must say.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-02-2009, 05:52 PM
 
Location: 30-40°N 90-100°W
13,809 posts, read 26,548,187 times
Reputation: 6790
I remember Chicago's "Gang Disciple Nation", or whatever it's called, being in the news in the 1990s because it ran a candidate in a Chicago election. (I guess they were called "Gangster Disciples")
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-02-2009, 07:11 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles County
47 posts, read 128,964 times
Reputation: 30
One of the reason L.A. is the "gang capital" is because here, the gang culture exists pretty much all over, not just in certain areas. While I don't really know too much about Chicago gang violence, I believe (I of course could be way wrong) that it really only exists on the South and West side of the city. In Los Angeles, from the Valley, to East L.A., to South L.A., and even a few parts of the Westside (recent article about gang injunction, arrests in Venice b/c of drugs), gangs exist. Obviously, some parts are much, much worse than others, and in other areas they're barely noticeable, but the culture and mindset still lingers throughout.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top