Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Current Events
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 03-16-2014, 07:35 PM
 
Location: where you sip the tea of the breasts of the spinsters of Utica
8,297 posts, read 14,164,711 times
Reputation: 8105

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by iNviNciBL3 View Post
If they did that they would brag about it...."Yay!! everyone look what we did! we destroyed the threat! we destroyed those evil terrorist dreams!!"
I think they'd be worried about negative world opinion for them having shot down an unarmed plane with lots of innocents aboard.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-16-2014, 08:02 PM
 
837 posts, read 2,083,166 times
Reputation: 441
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mack Knife View Post
Confusing pirates with terrorists.

Pirates do care about getting caught, their motivations are greed and dead people can't spend money.

Terrorists however, are often ready to die and some prefer that to living.

Have yet to hear about pirates that could care less about getting caught. Getting caught and not caring about getting caught are very different things.
The issue I have with the pirates and/or terrorists theory is that a faction would have claimed responsibility for this incident. There aren't even strong rumors about what terrorist organization could be behind this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-16-2014, 08:09 PM
 
Location: M I N N E S O T A
14,773 posts, read 21,500,362 times
Reputation: 9263
Quote:
Originally Posted by Comp625 View Post
The issue I have with the pirates and/or terrorists theory is that a faction would have claimed responsibility for this incident. There aren't even strong rumors about what terrorist organization could be behind this.
When they don't claim responsibility its usually because they are about to carry out another attack... or this guy is just a lone wolf like the guys from Boston bombing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-16-2014, 08:15 PM
 
Location: where you sip the tea of the breasts of the spinsters of Utica
8,297 posts, read 14,164,711 times
Reputation: 8105
Quote:
Originally Posted by Comp625 View Post
The issue I have with the pirates and/or terrorists theory is that a faction would have claimed responsibility for this incident. There aren't even strong rumors about what terrorist organization could be behind this.
Intelligent pirates wouldn't claim responsibility. They don't want there to be clues about where to be found.

However it does seem to be one or both pilots, whom I don't think would be pirates ...... they'd have to leave their communities and get cosmetic surgery to hide.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-16-2014, 08:26 PM
 
Location: near bears but at least no snakes
26,654 posts, read 28,682,916 times
Reputation: 50525
Quote:
Originally Posted by Woof View Post
I think they'd be worried about negative world opinion for them having shot down an unarmed plane with lots of innocents aboard.
But if some country shot them down by mistake they'd be found out sooner or later. It would make more sense for them to come forward now instead of making it worse by making everyone in the world sit and wonder. Then, when it finally did come out, they're really be hated. If they admitted it now, at least there would be a chance of being forgiven for making a mistake.

I do think one of the pilots is the most likely, although I still don't see any huge motive for doing such a thing. Even if his wife and kids had left him (someone said that was the case with the captain) that's not a good enough reason to bring an entire planeload of people down. Everyone said he loved people and was a good person. In a way I still lean towards some sort of pre-planned hijacking but I guess that's not the case. No motive there either.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-16-2014, 10:01 PM
 
Location: The beautiful Garden State
2,734 posts, read 4,150,932 times
Reputation: 3671
Quote:
Originally Posted by Auntie77 View Post
Anwar Ibrahim is not some religious fringe zealot. He is a moderate lawyer and people who support him are not extremists.

NO. This is not the lunatic fringe you are looking for.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Auntie77 View Post
Anwar Ibrahim is a religious moderate who opposed Mahatir Muhammed for president. Immediately to the election years ago, he was jailed on a sodomy charge, then he appealed. He won the appeal. Very recently his appeal was overturned and he was flung into jail again.

No. Anwar Ibrahim is not some religious zealot with loony followers.
Apparently Ibrahim is a supporter of a more democratic society:

Pilot Zaharie Ahmad Shah supported Anwar Ibrahim. Was he a terrorist?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-17-2014, 01:25 AM
 
Location: where you sip the tea of the breasts of the spinsters of Utica
8,297 posts, read 14,164,711 times
Reputation: 8105
Malaysia Airlines MH370: investigators examine “9/11-style plot.”
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-17-2014, 05:17 AM
 
43,663 posts, read 44,393,687 times
Reputation: 20559
Background checks of passengers on Malaysian Airlines Flight MH370 have drawn a blank, but not every country whose nationals were on board has responded to requests for information, police chief Khalid Abu Bakar told a news conference on Sunday.

Police hunt for motive as search for jet goes on | Top News
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-17-2014, 06:56 AM
 
Location: Virginia
18,717 posts, read 31,086,150 times
Reputation: 42988
Quote:
Originally Posted by in_newengland View Post
In a way I still lean towards some sort of pre-planned hijacking but I guess that's not the case. No motive there either.
The motive would be to bury something (or someone) that was on the plane in a deep part of the sea, where it would never be found.

Suicide seems to be the popular motive right now, but I have a hard time believing it. Why continue flying for so long and go to the effort to turn tracking devices off if all it was about was a suicide? You can crash a plane and kill yourself just about anywhere, if that's all you wanted to do.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-17-2014, 06:59 AM
 
16,431 posts, read 22,198,807 times
Reputation: 9623
Quote:
Originally Posted by Caladium View Post
The motive would be to bury something (or someone) that was on the plane in a deep part of the sea, where it would never be found.

.
Maybe the motive was to seize something or someone on the plane and it landed at a secured location.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Current Events

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top