So when I was spec-ing out my bike, the assembler as selling points for some of the choices, is that they were popular with "randonneurs."
And I was like what's that. He gave me a quick download on what that meant, and then I got curious and learned more.
Here are some links on the details:
https://janheine.wordpress.com/2013/...randonneuring/
A beginners guide to randonneuring | Bicycle Times Magazine
And to sum up what makes a good "rando bike:"
- Comfortable for long rides in a range of conditions
- Fast enough to make the cut-off time
- Has lights for riding in the dark
- Protects you from water and road grime
- Has a way to carry the stuff you need for a brevet (aka the long distance ride) - maps, layers, snacks, drinks, repair equipment
These bike are typically equipped with wider tires, fenders, front rack, bag, lights and a semi-upright position.
Even though I have no interest in riding 300k, it seems downright practical to get a bike equipped for brevets. Your bike is comfy, works on lots of terrain and weather, let's you carry stuff and it has lights to ride at night.
Of course there are a whole host of randonneurs who also have very specific aesthetic preferences. I like those choices because they remind me of the classically formed 70s 10-speeds, old school racing bikes and 40s bikes.
So what do you think, is a rando bike the perfect all around bike for most uses?