Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-06-2010, 11:46 PM
 
30,904 posts, read 36,998,853 times
Reputation: 34557

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by stars99 View Post
Isn't the IPhone $100/month for service? I don't know why anyone would want to pay that much for cell service unless they were financially secure.
Yeah, and you have to have AT&T for your provider, and their reception s*cks.

Honestly, I just don't get people (including my boyfriend, who also has an iphone) .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-06-2010, 11:55 PM
 
30,904 posts, read 36,998,853 times
Reputation: 34557
Quote:
Originally Posted by hilgi View Post
This tells the future, you spend less as you age. http://www.bls.gov/cex/2008/Standard/age.pdf

Plus for Gen-X they are in what should be their peak earning and spending years but they are either saddled with debt or they are the new frugal. Plus there are fewer of them. So when you have fewer people who spend less than the larger generation before them, you get a natural drop off in spending, add in debt, taxes and fear, things don't look good.
I wonder if the Boomers will really spend less as they age, though. To a certain extent, they will be forced to because their incomes will be lower (since earnings peak for most people in their 50s).

But I think they'll spend more in old age than previous generations before them. They popularized the idea that life couldn't be fun unless you spent everything you had. So I hardly expect them to suddenly give up that kind of thinking in old age.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2010, 12:02 AM
 
Location: South Jordan, Utah
8,182 posts, read 9,222,743 times
Reputation: 3632
Quote:
Originally Posted by mysticaltyger View Post
I wonder if the Boomers will really spend less as they age, though. To a certain extent, they will be forced to because their incomes will be lower (since earnings peak for most people in their 50s).

But I think they'll spend more in old age than previous generations before them. They popularized the idea that life couldn't be fun unless you spent everything you had. So I hardly expect them to suddenly give up that kind of thinking in old age.
Exactly, earnings peak, women are retiring at a fast rate now that the kids are leavng the house and they are worried about retirement.

The spending drop is not really noticeable on them, sure they buy cars every 5-7 years as opposed to 3. they buy less cloths then when they worked.

The noticeable part is when the kids leave, they don't need to buy all of the stuff that kids consume, they don't need as much new furniture as they id when there kids needed new beds as they age, etc.

Even if their overall spending drops 20%, that is a massive hit to the GDP.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2010, 12:11 AM
 
30,904 posts, read 36,998,853 times
Reputation: 34557
Quote:
Originally Posted by hilgi View Post
Exactly, earnings peak, women are retiring at a fast rate now that the kids are leavng the house and they are worried about retirement.

The spending drop is not really noticeable on them, sure they buy cars every 5-7 years as opposed to 3. they buy less cloths then when they worked.

The noticeable part is when the kids leave, they don't need to buy all of the stuff that kids consume, they don't need as much new furniture as they id when there kids needed new beds as they age, etc.

Even if their overall spending drops 20%, that is a massive hit to the GDP.
I do see your point. But in some ways, less consumption would help our economy. For instance, the trade deficit might drop...and the trade deficit has been a drag on GDP for a while.

Don't get me wrong, in general, I'm very worried about the state of the economy. I worry a lot about how we're going to pay for Medicare & Social Security and service the interest on all the existing government debt we've racked up.

But I don't know that the Boomers retiring is going to be the end of the world. Even before the recession, the average retirement age had started to creep up. I think that will continue, which will also help to prop up Boomer incomes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2010, 12:21 AM
 
Location: South Jordan, Utah
8,182 posts, read 9,222,743 times
Reputation: 3632
Quote:
Originally Posted by mysticaltyger View Post
I do see your point. But in some ways, less consumption would help our economy. For instance, the trade deficit might drop...and the trade deficit has been a drag on GDP for a while.

Don't get me wrong, in general, I'm very worried about the state of the economy. I worry a lot about how we're going to pay for Medicare & Social Security and service the interest on all the existing government debt we've racked up.

But I don't know that the Boomers retiring is going to be the end of the world. Even before the recession, the average retirement age had started to creep up. I think that will continue, which will also help to prop up Boomer incomes.
Fewer dollars being spent will hurt everyone, if a boomer buys one less Dell for their kids it only hurts overseas for a small amount of that purchase. If that money was spent in the US it would help GDP, otherwise it hurts GDP, tax revenue and end retail business who sell the products

It is not so much retiring that is the problem, it is reduced spending after their late 40's. (when kids start to leave home on average)

Look at the CES (Consumer Expenditure Survey) spending peaks in the late 40's and drops after that. Their income will go to savings and debt, not consumption.

Also, look at many duel income boomers turn into one income as the kids leave home.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2010, 01:37 AM
 
Location: San Francisco, CA
15,088 posts, read 13,464,605 times
Reputation: 14266
Quote:
Originally Posted by stars99 View Post
Lately, when I've been out to a restaurant, there are usually lots of other people there. And the new IPhone has set record sales. How can people afford these things if we're in a depression?

I wasn't that old during the recession in the early '80s, but I hear that the restaurants were dead during that time. What makes this different?
1. Not every single person in the nation is unemployed and bankrupt. The people buying the iPhones are arguably not the same people who are laid off for a year now.

2. Consumption is still significantly depressed from robust economic growth levels. Your perception based on looking around a local restaurant and reading about iPhone sales is pretty incomplete.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-10-2010, 11:07 PM
 
2,685 posts, read 6,051,641 times
Reputation: 952
90% of Americans are still employed and many of those are starting to feel better about things and spending a little more.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ambient View Post
1. Not every single person in the nation is unemployed and bankrupt. The people buying the iPhones are arguably not the same people who are laid off for a year now.

2. Consumption is still significantly depressed from robust economic growth levels. Your perception based on looking around a local restaurant and reading about iPhone sales is pretty incomplete.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-10-2010, 11:15 PM
 
Location: Texas
44,259 posts, read 64,416,945 times
Reputation: 73937
Quote:
Originally Posted by mysticaltyger View Post
Yeah, and you have to have AT&T for your provider, and their reception s*cks.

Honestly, I just don't get people (including my boyfriend, who also has an iphone) .
Their reception 'sucking' is based on what phone you have. I have always had outstanding reception and will be that one person who can get a signal when everyone else (with different phones and from all other providers) is looking around for one.

I guess I understand the iphone thing...but people sure have gotten annoying with them...they can't seem to put 'em down.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-12-2010, 08:10 PM
 
48,502 posts, read 96,924,900 times
Reputation: 18305
Quote:
Originally Posted by mysticaltyger View Post
I wonder if the Boomers will really spend less as they age, though. To a certain extent, they will be forced to because their incomes will be lower (since earnings peak for most people in their 50s).

But I think they'll spend more in old age than previous generations before them. They popularized the idea that life couldn't be fun unless you spent everything you had. So I hardly expect them to suddenly give up that kind of thinking in old age.
No becasue if that is so they will have less to spend. But a large number including myself will be fine but right now hunkering down in thsi unceertainty. Much of the consuming wew see will start to end once thsoe governamnt payments stop and we see interest rates climb to control inflation. That is when the real test will come. But I don't see that soon as things are flat and not chnaging really.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2010, 10:06 AM
 
Location: San Diego California
6,795 posts, read 7,296,130 times
Reputation: 5194
Quote:
Originally Posted by mysticaltyger View Post
I do see your point. But in some ways, less consumption would help our economy. For instance, the trade deficit might drop...and the trade deficit has been a drag on GDP for a while.

Don't get me wrong, in general, I'm very worried about the state of the economy. I worry a lot about how we're going to pay for Medicare & Social Security and service the interest on all the existing government debt we've racked up.

But I don't know that the Boomers retiring is going to be the end of the world. Even before the recession, the average retirement age had started to creep up. I think that will continue, which will also help to prop up Boomer incomes.
Boomer retirement will be a non event, because the majority simply cannot retire. Forty-one percent of workers ages 45 to 54 have less than $25,000 saved up for retirement. Many others refinanced their mortgages late in life and will not be mortgage free until their 70's or 80's. Most will opt to work longer to attempt to maximize Social Security benefits, but due to poor diet, alcohol, and obesity many will die before ever collecting a single check. The ones who do will put off by new laws that will ratchet up the age at which you can collect.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top