Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-25-2013, 06:55 AM
 
1,924 posts, read 2,373,854 times
Reputation: 1274

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by icicles View Post
keep in mind I am an austrian believer.
Who would have guessed?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-25-2013, 07:03 AM
 
651 posts, read 862,848 times
Reputation: 320
Quote:
Originally Posted by oaktonite View Post
Who would have guessed?

Well, it's right from a logical point.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2013, 07:04 AM
 
Location: Someplace Wonderful
5,177 posts, read 4,791,004 times
Reputation: 2587
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigJon3475 View Post
Except that the "manipulators" are reactionary. They simply try to undue the harm Americans and their politicians do to themselves. Americans could have chosen the real path the espoused for 100 years and actually went through S. America "nation building" but instead they used the Monroe Doctrine to economically enslave states for their own benefit without regard for their slave's well being. Had America had forethought they would have realized that if they had a rurally built nations and their infrastructure those nations would have needs for things like washers, dryers, ranges, refrigerators, plumbing along with all the other creature comforts Americans have. But since they decided it was better to steal the wealth of nations (snickers) and leave them, after 100 years of king-like rule, impoverished and in most cases without even a basic sanitation system and running water those states had no option but to watch Americans get richer on their backs and hope some day there really would be a Shining City on the Hill that they could emulate. As we know now, that SCOAH is BRIC and they're reaping all the benefits Americans were too short sighted to plan for.
I cant decide if my lack of understanding is because I am dense, or because my nerve pain is frying my brain, or is what you are saying is gibberish.

The goldbugs act as if the world was perfect when everyone was on the gold standard. Even the most cursory glance as history says otherwise. There was no central bank in the US from 1830 something til 1913. During that time there were booms and busts, same as there have been since the establishment of the Fed in 1913.

The smart guys who manipulate money are not just in government. The big banks have some pretty smart boys working to do the same. Someone will have to spend a lot of time explaining to me how returning to the so called gold "standard" would change any of that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2013, 07:11 AM
 
9,639 posts, read 6,017,180 times
Reputation: 8567
Quote:
Originally Posted by chuckmann View Post
The smart guys who manipulate money are not just in government. The big banks have some pretty smart boys working to do the same. Someone will have to spend a lot of time explaining to me how returning to the so called gold "standard" would change any of that.
It wouldn't.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2013, 07:56 AM
 
Location: TX
795 posts, read 1,391,576 times
Reputation: 786
Quote:
Originally Posted by icicles View Post
wow.

Where in the world are you getting that deflation of prices of products is a bad thing???

I mean hell, I am hurting real bad buying cheaper computers every year. What a tragedy. Or what about deflating products of hard drives, plastic surgery, etc. Deflation of prices are a GOOD thing.

Deflation of prices happens when you have sound economic policy. we had the LOWEST UNEMPLOYMENT RATE IN THE HISTORY OF EVERY SINGLE COUNTRY THAT HISTORY HAS BEEN RECORDED WITH THIS SYSTEM.

Ok, now prove me wrong.

Keep in mind that money supply deflaton is different than price deflation.
Meanwhile on the unmentioned producer-side, margins nosedive and millions of businesses fail. The few surviving employed earn a fraction of their former wages. Tax revenue dries up, so more gov't layoffs. The trade deficit worsens from inability to export, so cash leaves the country rapidly while the real value of debt rises and we die a slow, agonizing death.

Boy I am really glad you are not in charge.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2013, 08:03 AM
 
1,924 posts, read 2,373,854 times
Reputation: 1274
Quote:
Originally Posted by icicles View Post
Well, it's right from a logical point.
LOL! The entire "Austrian School" is a pile of heterodox manufactured nonsense. It exists only as part of a disinformation complex that serves only to provide a mouthpiece and propaganda outlet for the ultra-rightwing corporatists who paid to construct it.

Meanwhile, this is not a cash-and-carry world. Credit is the lifeblood of every modern economy and underlies all economic activity. Deflation amplifies the costs of credit, thereby draining away demand which diminishes production, jobs, and incomes. It also causes people to delay as much spending as they can, further eroding demand, etc. With deflation, producers spend more on production than they can recoup from selling the inventory they have produced. Profits, incomes, and economic activity accordingly dwindle further. Businesses try to reduce labor costs by firing people. That's even more reduction in demand. Governments can't borrow, so they have to raise taxes in order to maintain essential public services. Guess what that causes. Deflation is where downard economic spirals come from. Austrians are apparently blinded to the plainly obvious here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2013, 08:10 AM
 
1,924 posts, read 2,373,854 times
Reputation: 1274
Quote:
Originally Posted by chuckmann View Post
There was no central bank in the US from 1830 something til 1913. During that time there were booms and busts, same as there have been since the establishment of the Fed in 1913.
Central banking didn't actually get its feet on the ground in this country until after WWII. The overall effects of central banking have been that we experience fewer recessions, and that they are milder and of shorter duration. Of course, if you manage to put idiots in office, all bets are off.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2013, 11:26 AM
 
Location: Paranoid State
13,044 posts, read 13,865,519 times
Reputation: 15839
Quote:
Originally Posted by icicles View Post
all I see are monumentally stupid people in this thread who have no idea what they are talking about.


during the 1800's we had a gold standard. it limits and constrains the money supply. Prices during this period all went down substationally. That is how free markets work. they actually puch prices down in relation to a slow growth of money.


Governments and banks love inflation because they steal wealth from the system with an unbacked currency. They steal because they print money which steals value from the existing money in the system. it empoverishes the people who hold dollars and they steal the buying power from the currency.

The poor and middle class thrived under the gold standard, fiat money enriches bankers and government and coporations.

Anyway, like the romans did, you can dilute gold/ fake it/etc on a gold standard. the country could hold fake gold and claim it as real. or just dilute the coinage like they do today and everywhere.

Ultimately your money system is only as legit as the honesty of the men running the country or who control the currency.
I understand what you are saying, but I suggest you read Milton Friedman & Anna Schwartz's seminal book A Monetary History of the United States

Inflation is a tax in that it alters the proportion of wealth/cash held by the private sector and the public sector by diluting the portion held by the private sector.

In the past there have been several criticisms of this approach because (a) it is a stealth tax and (b) Congress didn't have to vote for it. I don't agree with the "stealth tax" view, because people have rational expectations and factor expected deflation into account in their economic planning.

The argument that Congress didn't have to vote for it is a stronger one - but it is moot at this point in time.

Your general point that fiat money can enable an unscrupulous government to monetize its debt is valid. And suffering caused by hyperinflation is real -- see for example Hyperinflation - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia .

In the US system, the Federal Reserve is thankfully insulated from direct control by politicians. This is a major reason the US Dollar has been the reserve currency of the world.

Last edited by SportyandMisty; 07-25-2013 at 11:45 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2013, 11:29 AM
 
Location: Paranoid State
13,044 posts, read 13,865,519 times
Reputation: 15839
Quote:
Originally Posted by oaktonite View Post
Central banking didn't actually get its feet on the ground in this country until after WWII. The overall effects of central banking have been that we experience fewer recessions, and that they are milder and of shorter duration. Of course, if you manage to put idiots in office, all bets are off.
Not quite true. The Federal Reserve certainly made the Great Depression worse than it otherwise would have been. See for example Great Depression - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

If only the Fed knew then what we know now, the Great Depression wouldn't have been catastrophic.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2013, 11:55 AM
 
9,639 posts, read 6,017,180 times
Reputation: 8567
Quote:
Originally Posted by SportyandMisty View Post
Not quite true. The Federal Reserve certainly made the Great Depression worse than it otherwise would have been. See for example Great Depression - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

If only the Fed knew then what we know now, the Great Depression wouldn't have been catastrophic.
Actually, its sorta exactly what he said.

Quote:
In this view, the Federal Reserve, by not acting, allowed the money supply as measured by the M2 to shrink by one-third from 1929–1933
Kinda hard to make a foot print not doing anything.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top