Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-08-2013, 02:02 PM
 
Location: Vegas
1,782 posts, read 2,139,330 times
Reputation: 1789

Advertisements

Wow! A real boost to the economy without government spending. Think Obumbler and his Greenie buddies will allow it? Maybe everyday Americans will fight back and put people in office who will help the economy.


Read more @ Fuel Fix » Study: Atlantic drilling could give economy $23.5B boost
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-08-2013, 03:49 PM
 
Location: MD's Eastern Shore
3,703 posts, read 4,852,685 times
Reputation: 6385
Bring it on. Personally, I wouldn't mind seeing it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-08-2013, 04:25 PM
 
Location: Cold Springs, NV
4,625 posts, read 12,296,810 times
Reputation: 5233
I wonder what the business owners along the gulf coast feel about this? Maybe ask some of the people in Valdez Alaska too? I just make this comment for balance, and clearly the OP's original post does not approach the subject matter with any objectivity. We could just appoint the ceo of Exxon Mobile to head up the epa and solve all our problems.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-08-2013, 05:03 PM
 
Location: Vallejo
21,882 posts, read 25,154,836 times
Reputation: 19084
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrWillys View Post
I wonder what the business owners along the gulf coast feel about this? Maybe ask some of the people in Valdez Alaska too? I just make this comment for balance, and clearly the OP's original post does not approach the subject matter with any objectivity. We could just appoint the ceo of Exxon Mobile to head up the epa and solve all our problems.
Most of them are usually pro-drilling. The exception is tourism and fishing. Oil rigs are kind of ugly and don't help tourism. Fishing doesn't care about the local economy since they're wholesale operations that ship across the US. California is full of greenies, but it's full of even more people who live where the oil is actually being extracted who are very pro oil.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-09-2013, 12:30 AM
 
Location: MD's Eastern Shore
3,703 posts, read 4,852,685 times
Reputation: 6385
The oil rigs would be so far offshore here that they would have no negative affect on tourism. As far as fishing, they only help as the platforms would become fish attractants, so tourism would actually improve.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-10-2013, 04:21 PM
 
17,874 posts, read 15,952,870 times
Reputation: 11660
If this were to happen, what are the tell tale signs this will go down, and how far in advance will everyone including ordinary citizens know? Or is this just going to go down behind closed doors, and only the politicians, and oil companies, banks, and friends will be able to profit off of this?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-10-2013, 05:56 PM
 
30,896 posts, read 36,965,098 times
Reputation: 34526
Quote:
Originally Posted by sargentodiaz View Post
Wow! A real boost to the economy without government spending. Think Obumbler and his Greenie buddies will allow it? Maybe everyday Americans will fight back and put people in office who will help the economy.


Read more @ Fuel Fix » Study: Atlantic drilling could give economy $23.5B boost
I'm not necessarily knocking the idea of drilling in the Atlantic...but 23B is pretty small potatoes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-10-2013, 06:21 PM
 
Location: TX
795 posts, read 1,391,724 times
Reputation: 786
$23B per year. Not small potatoes.

Would be interesting to see which of the energy companies will start sniffing around. Odds are this is a large project only economical for the oil majors.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-10-2013, 07:01 PM
 
Location: Corona the I.E.
10,137 posts, read 17,484,012 times
Reputation: 9140
First and foremost, we need better safety procedures and redundancies. I am leery of any offshore after BP, because they had a single point of failure. At the time that occurred, they did a comparison of offshore rigs off of Denmark/Norway and those companies used redundant safety valves. Talk to me about that and I support offshore drilling.

No please don't start with BS that this would double prices at the pump by adding a second safety valve. And yes I am willing to pay an extra .10-.20 cents for additional safety procedures.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-10-2013, 09:49 PM
 
Location: Atlantis
3,016 posts, read 3,911,025 times
Reputation: 8867
$23 billion?

Hardly enough start up capital to finance the next war.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:20 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top