Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-05-2014, 08:54 AM
 
Location: Somewhere in America
15,479 posts, read 15,643,377 times
Reputation: 28464

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Linda_d View Post
Maybe if state governments funded public universities and colleges at the same levels that they funded them in the 1960s and 1970s, then tuition wouldn't be so high, and there would be less need for student loans. When I attended a SUNY school in the late 1960s-1970s, the really low tuition only went to fund dormitories. The state provided 100% funding for its state colleges and universities. Since the CUNY system didn't have dorms, they had no tuition. Most other state universities/colleges had tuition that were pittances because they, too, got almost all their funding from tax dollars.
Wow! I had no idea that SUNY was once free! Sure wasn't in the 90's. And now the fees are more than tuition on many campuses since the state sets tuition and they can't change it. There's fees for EVERYTHING! Some campuses even charge you for printing on campus!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-05-2014, 08:57 AM
 
Location: Somewhere in America
15,479 posts, read 15,643,377 times
Reputation: 28464
Quote:
Originally Posted by KeraKera View Post
Your comment made me think of something. I think that there should be a 'locked in rate' for tuition. For example, if I attend a college and that year it's 12k for that entire year, that is what I should pay until I complete my degree.
There are a handful of schools that lock your tuition in for 4 years as long as you maintain you gpa and don't get kicked. None of them are cheap schools. Not sure that there are any cheap schools any since even state schools now cost you around $10K per year without living on campus.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2014, 09:32 AM
 
Location: Somewhere in America
15,479 posts, read 15,643,377 times
Reputation: 28464
Quote:
Originally Posted by smalltownblues View Post
Sure. And guess what? From that point forward, nobody will loan them any money because they know they'll just skip out on it. Everyone here thinks they're so clever and they can figure out clever ways to get things for free. You'll soon find out that the real world is more than capable of figuring out ways to deal with freeloaders.
Who said anyone was asking for anything to be free?


Quote:
Originally Posted by LordSquidworth View Post
College would cost a lot less if the debt was guaranteed and not able to be discharged in bankruptcy.
Student loans have NOT been dischargeable in bankruptcy for decades. Even in death most of them are still required to be paid.



Quote:
Originally Posted by kmb501 View Post
Another thing that really kind of upsets me is that colleges often spend their funds on things that are not related to education; new buildings, new recreational facilities, updated housing, new coaches, etc. Tour the average college campus, and chances are you will find most of the things you would expect to find in an upscale resort: swimming pools, tanning beds, saunas, gyms, fine dining, luxury housing, etc., all under the guise of the "college experience," while the high schools and junior colleges in the area are prepared to offer young people essential job skills training, trade school opportunities, and apprenticeships; I'm actually a bit jealous of my students.
Most colleges do not have fine dining, luxury housing, tanning beds, or saunas at least not around here. Maybe in Beverly Hills. New buildings are needed. Buildings don't last forever. And as student populations increase they need a place to have their classes.

Many schools that have swimming pools have them for phys ed classes which are a requirement, a degree program, and/or a sports program. They're not there to look pretty. Same for gyms.

Housing doesn't last forever either. I know dorms built in the 60's at a few colleges were condemned because they don't even come close to code today. One had sealed windows and the fire marshall almost had a nervous breakdown over that. that dorm was closed. The college had to build new to replace it.

Many of the things you list ARE directly related to college education especially if you live on campus. Colleges are also competing against each other to have the most intelligent and promising students they can find. So what if there's a Coca~Cola machine on every floor of the dorm. The college does not pay for that anyway.



Quote:
Originally Posted by mkpunk View Post
Did you not notice the eye-roll inferring I was sarcastic?
Save your sanity and just put him on ignore.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2014, 09:41 AM
 
Location: Florida
23,795 posts, read 13,286,221 times
Reputation: 19952
Quote:
Originally Posted by Linda_d View Post
Great idea!!! Insure that only the wealthy and the very bright can go to college and give all that extra money to corporations to off-shore more jobs or build more Walmarts, Bass Pros, and Burger Kings ... and then complain about welfare and people not willing to work for minimum wage at all those great new jobs.

//sarcasm off
You took the words right out of my mouth. Exactly what the US needs to dumb down further and be far less competitive globally. It reminds me of that ancient theory of "keeping them barefoot and pregnant."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2014, 11:57 AM
 
4,366 posts, read 4,585,727 times
Reputation: 2957
Quote:
Originally Posted by ss20ts View Post
Most colleges do not have fine dining, luxury housing, tanning beds, or saunas at least not around here. Maybe in Beverly Hills. New buildings are needed. Buildings don't last forever. And as student populations increase they need a place to have their classes.

Many schools that have swimming pools have them for phys ed classes which are a requirement, a degree program, and/or a sports program. They're not there to look pretty. Same for gyms.

Housing doesn't last forever either. I know dorms built in the 60's at a few colleges were condemned because they don't even come close to code today. One had sealed windows and the fire marshall almost had a nervous breakdown over that. that dorm was closed. The college had to build new to replace it.

Many of the things you list ARE directly related to college education especially if you live on campus. Colleges are also competing against each other to have the most intelligent and promising students they can find. So what if there's a Coca~Cola machine on every floor of the dorm. The college does not pay for that anyway.

Well, maybe it's just something they're doing with the colleges down here, but I feel like it does have something to do with the spike in tuition. We have several new buildings, restaurants, recreation centers, etc., on campus, while people talk about cutting the budget and doing away with certain classes and academic programs. When I started at this college a few years ago as an undergrad, we had almost none of that, and tuition was much lower. Now, you can go for a swim, order a pan-fried salmon, get a tan, and attend a football game all without leaving campus. Hey, it would be comfortable if it weren't shared with so many students, but unfortunately, living on campus with roommates now is about the price of living in a small off-campus apartment without roommates. Throw in the mandatory meal plans, and you are looking at spending a lot of money. I'm happy I live off campus now and am away from the drama and unnecessary spending, but that doesn't mean I still don't pay high tuition so that others can reap the benefits.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2014, 12:35 PM
 
1,136 posts, read 943,337 times
Reputation: 438
Quote:
Originally Posted by ss20ts View Post
I went to college about 20 years ago and without student loans, I would never have been able to attend neither would my siblings.
...and that would have been the end of the world? Because I think your parents did fine.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2014, 12:36 PM
 
1,136 posts, read 943,337 times
Reputation: 438
Quote:
Originally Posted by ss20ts View Post
Most colleges do not have fine dining, luxury housing, tanning beds, or saunas at least not around here. Maybe in Beverly Hills.
You should probably look into what you're saying before you start randomly writing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2014, 12:39 PM
 
1,136 posts, read 943,337 times
Reputation: 438
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enigma777 View Post
You took the words right out of my mouth. Exactly what the US needs to dumb down further and be far less competitive globally. It reminds me of that ancient theory of "keeping them barefoot and pregnant."
It's fascinating how 100% of liberals think that when people can't afford something the prices remain high. That's probably why, if you look at any government-institution, that's how it acts. If you have mass-transit in your city, you will routinely see that they say "due to declining ridership, we need to raise prices." That's what happens when liberals run things, so you sort of can't blame them for responding the way they do, because that's how they think you run a business.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2014, 12:45 PM
 
Location: CA
1,716 posts, read 2,503,638 times
Reputation: 1870
IMO, student loans = higher education subsidy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2014, 01:47 PM
 
Location: The Carolinas
2,511 posts, read 2,821,244 times
Reputation: 7982
I think "the government" (which is US, by the way. . . ) needs to get the hell out of a lot of things. Let the markets determine where money should go. What they need to do is start taxing consumption higher (sales taxes, etc.) and stop taxing income from savings. With more money in individuals' pockets (i.e. working students, parents of students, etc.) THEY can decide where the money should go.

STOP TAXING SAVINGS and START TAXING CONSUMPTION.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:32 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top