Quote:
Originally Posted by andywire
America is the best house in the worst neighborhood. China's growth was unsustainable. Europe can't grow, and is making our immigration problems look insignificant. If you are referring to the latest dip/correction that we have seen in equities, why do you care so much about the freak show on Wallstreet? They certainly don't need any more of our help, or the help from the Fed.
|
Unless we're talking interstellar travel, America is the best house in the only neighborhood.
China has seen significant wage inflation. In my little high tech universe, we went from paying software engineers in Shanghai $30K a decade ago to $80K now. As the country has become more affluent, they're less competitive. I work for a Korean company now. They just started offshoring to a new R&D center in Vietnam.
Europe has very well documented problems. The northern part has a rapidly aging and contracting population. Countries like France where government spending is more than 50% of GDP have a big problem maintaining the status quo in their social democracy. France's anti-immigrant vitriol blows away anything coming out of the mouth of Donald Trump.
I don't see that the United States has much in the way of an immigration problem. Immigration prevented us from having the Japan/Europe shrinking/aging population catastrophe. Unlike our permanent underclass that is about 50% African-American descendants of slavery, our current wave of immigrants is mostly tracking to the usual melting pot 'Murican Dream. Look at the demographics of the freshman class at Harvard or MIT or Stanford or UC Berkeley. It's just about 50% Asian and most are first or 2nd generation. Those immigrants are going to drive our economy in the 21st century. For the most part, the Hispanic wave is also making good progress marching towards the middle class. I'd prefer to see an immigration bias towards smart, healthy, young people but what we have now isn't so awful.
I'm 100% bought in to the long term impact of automation and globalization. The rich have the capital that buys the automation and the corporations they own as stockholders shift labor to the low cost parts of the world. If you think the rich will continue to get richer due to the leverage of capital invested in automation on labor costs (and the impact on bottom line profits), I see nothing but a bright long-term future for all the US-listed multinationals. Because of accounting slight of hand where US corporations push anything they can away from the 36% United States federal corporate income tax, the market cap to GDP ratio looks frightening. It's now about 130% instead of the more historic 90-ish percent. The PE ratio is also quite high but I think that is factoring in the continued increase in profit from automation and globalization. If you just look at historic market cap to GDP and PE ratio charts, it looks like we're in a bubble and due for a nasty correction. I'm more optimistic than that but still concerned that more Europe and Asia catastrophes will continue to make the US stock market unstable. I'm in the market for the long term with my portfolio so I'm less worried. I manage my mother's financial affairs and I'm spending her brokerage account to pay for her assisted living. I'm much more conservative with that account.