Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 05-25-2016, 04:28 AM
 
Location: Silicon Valley
7,651 posts, read 4,606,610 times
Reputation: 12713

Advertisements

Millionaires chalk success up to hard work and family values

by Jackie Wattles @jackiewattles May 24, 2016: 6:10 PM ET



How to be a millionaire.
Most high net worth Americans say they worked their way up from a lower class.

That's according to a report released by U.S. Trust on Monday, based on a survey that asked 684 adults in the U.S. with $3 million or more of "investible assets" hundreds of questions.

About 77% of those surveyed said they grew up in the middle class or lower, including 19% who say they were poor. And they credit their success to three somewhat surprising factors: Hard work, ambition and family upbringing. Respondents even went so far as to say that these influences were much more important than "connections" or "innate talent."
"The points seem to be so traditional in nature," said Chris Heilmann, the chief fiduciary executive at U.S. Trust, Bank of America's private wealth management firm. "It's [about] deeply held family values rather than an inheritance or existing wealth,"


The survey was also a shout-out to strict parents. About 80% of respondents said their parents were firm disciplinarians. They also named "academic achievement," "financial discipline" and "work participation" as the family values that were most emphasized in their homes.
"It indicates the American Dream seems to be alive and well," Heilmann said.
Considering that some people might doubt that, Heilmann said that the results were "refreshing, encouraging and a bit surprising."
CNNMoney (New York) First published May 23, 2016: 7:42 PM ET

 
Old 05-25-2016, 06:56 AM
 
11,411 posts, read 7,812,838 times
Reputation: 21923
Yes to all of this!


"They also named "academic achievement," "financial discipline" and "work participation" as the family values that were most emphasized in their homes."
 
Old 05-25-2016, 09:45 AM
 
Location: NYC
20,550 posts, read 17,718,910 times
Reputation: 25616
When I was growing up, I never lived in a house and moved from one apt to another. Both parents worked 10-12hrs to get us into college, I worked my butt off in college while most of my college buds partied. I moved out of my parent's house shortly after college at 24yrs old and now have my own home and let's say I make enough that my wife doesn't have to work. I put my money to work, I also invest and spend towards my job as an IT consultant. Today I pretty much dictate where I want to work unlike many in the forums that are sending out resumes. I only polish my resume whenever I'm asked to provide one.

I agree that most people that are well to do even those that are privileged has to have an understanding of financial discipline or investment ways.

Most guys that are self-made millionaires are usually self-taught and never received some high end education. You really need to think outside the box in order to get ahead of the competition.
 
Old 05-25-2016, 10:06 AM
 
6,326 posts, read 6,595,089 times
Reputation: 7457
So, I guess we can make some arithmetic estimates of "working hard". A millionaire works 20 times as hard as a 50k grunt, a billionaire is 20,000 times as hard working. You are not laughing yet? I dont really know why people use this oxymoron rationalization. A society/economy is a parasitic coercive pyramid extracting labor and resources from many to reward few with disproportioned share of the collective output. You can use whatever rationale, from "hard work" to the will of the Universe, to justify why some should fleece 200,000 times more than the others, but sad truth is that free, independent people would never allow 20,000 ratios of "hard work" to happen. It is not about you or hard work, it is all about "the coercive system" that allows parasitic relationships of 200,000 kind.
 
Old 05-25-2016, 10:23 AM
 
Location: Washington, DC
4,320 posts, read 5,140,801 times
Reputation: 8277
So? And? Everytime I hear this it is used to justify keeping tax rates low for the wealthy. It's a losing proposition that just burdens the middle-class. History has proven trickle-down as complete BS many times.

And it also obscures all the people who have gone from lower to middle-class due to hard work or from middle to upper-middle. There are hard-working people in every class. You are not getting me to lick the a$$ of the wealthy because they are the highest priority of the GOP and Donald Trump. BTW, I'm not far from wealthy myself but refuse to be... selfish.
 
Old 05-25-2016, 10:25 AM
 
Location: Starting a walkabout
2,691 posts, read 1,668,957 times
Reputation: 3135
Quote:
Originally Posted by RememberMee View Post
So, I guess we can make some arithmetic estimates of "working hard". A millionaire works 20 times as hard as a 50k grunt, a billionaire is 20,000 times as hard working. You are not laughing yet? I dont really know why people use this oxymoron rationalization. A society/economy is a parasitic coercive pyramid extracting labor and resources from many to reward few with disproportioned share of the collective output. You can use whatever rationale, from "hard work" to the will of the Universe, to justify why some should fleece 200,000 times more than the others, but sad truth is that free, independent people would never allow 20,000 ratios of "hard work" to happen. It is not about you or hard work, it is all about "the coercive system" that allows parasitic relationships of 200,000 kind.
Working hard does not mean just physical labor. It is also making good use of mental resources.

You seem to have a cynical and disgruntled attitude. Thankfully others have a more positive attitude and can rise to the top.
 
Old 05-25-2016, 10:26 AM
 
18,549 posts, read 15,596,590 times
Reputation: 16235
Quote:
Originally Posted by RememberMee View Post
So, I guess we can make some arithmetic estimates of "working hard". A millionaire works 20 times as hard as a 50k grunt, a billionaire is 20,000 times as hard working. You are not laughing yet? I dont really know why people use this oxymoron rationalization. A society/economy is a parasitic coercive pyramid extracting labor and resources from many to reward few with disproportioned share of the collective output. You can use whatever rationale, from "hard work" to the will of the Universe, to justify why some should fleece 200,000 times more than the others, but sad truth is that free, independent people would never allow 20,000 ratios of "hard work" to happen. It is not about you or hard work, it is all about "the coercive system" that allows parasitic relationships of 200,000 kind.
Best counter-argument ever!!!
 
Old 05-25-2016, 10:31 AM
 
Location: NY/LA
4,663 posts, read 4,552,412 times
Reputation: 4140
Quote:
Originally Posted by vision33r View Post
Most guys that are self-made millionaires are usually self-taught and never received some high end education.
Do you have a link to these stats? I'd be interested in seeing them.
 
Old 05-25-2016, 10:34 AM
 
Location: NY/LA
4,663 posts, read 4,552,412 times
Reputation: 4140
Quote:
Originally Posted by RememberMee View Post
So, I guess we can make some arithmetic estimates of "working hard". A millionaire works 20 times as hard as a 50k grunt, a billionaire is 20,000 times as hard working.
Are you comparing net worth to income?
 
Old 05-25-2016, 10:39 AM
 
6,326 posts, read 6,595,089 times
Reputation: 7457
Quote:
Originally Posted by kamban View Post
Working hard does not mean just physical labor. It is also making good use of mental resources.

You seem to have a cynical and disgruntled attitude. Thankfully others have a more positive attitude and can rise to the top.
No, it is all about genetics, the will of Gods, eugenics, or whatever else. Still, how does that refute what I said? One could be 20,000 times more smart, genetically superior, whatever, but unless you in a fleecing spot forget about 20,000 reward ratio.

I wonder about your upside down definitions of "positive attitude". I do realize that the pyramid is alive and well not because of the "evil" people who fleece the rest of us right NOW, it is alive and well because average people hope that one of these days they will occupy fleecing spots to exchange 1 unit of their efforts and time for 200,000 units of efforts and time of others. That's what you call "positive attitude", and I call that slave attitude.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:14 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top