Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-24-2008, 05:21 AM
 
1,955 posts, read 5,269,651 times
Reputation: 1124

Advertisements

I'm just curious how those who claim the cartel controls the market will explain this. OPEC can influence prices, but only the demand side can really determine them.

OPEC cuts production, oil sinks - Oct. 24, 2008
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-24-2008, 07:59 AM
 
Location: Los Angeles Area
3,306 posts, read 4,158,930 times
Reputation: 592
Cartels never work, and this case you have a classic game. If most are complying with the cut and you don't you make out.

Some OPEC member need expensive oil where as others are more conservative and can deal with selling oil at $40/barrel just fine.

How many months to you give Hugo if oil goes below $50/barrel?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2008, 08:13 AM
 
5,760 posts, read 11,555,173 times
Reputation: 4949
Quote:
Originally Posted by Humanoid View Post
Cartels never work, and this case you have a classic game. If most are complying with the cut and you don't you make out.

Some OPEC member need expensive oil where as others are more conservative and can deal with selling oil at $40/barrel just fine.

How many months to you give Hugo if oil goes below $50/barrel?
I would give Chavez more a life span at that price than most of the Canada Tar Sands and much of Texas.

Chavez survives playing to the bottom end. He can still do that with less money.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2008, 09:06 AM
 
48,502 posts, read 96,918,474 times
Reputation: 18305
Chavez was already hurting and this will hurt him further.He really is not very popular in his country. But he will cheat just as so many others did in the oil embargo.I still can't believe that people think Texas produces so much oil ;we peaked in the 1960's.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2008, 09:14 AM
 
1,955 posts, read 5,269,651 times
Reputation: 1124
Quote:
Originally Posted by Philip T View Post
I would give Chavez more a life span at that price than most of the Canada Tar Sands and much of Texas.

Chavez survives playing to the bottom end. He can still do that with less money.
Chavez is not popular, and he's not Robert Mugabe. Once the lower oil price trickles down to the common man through reduced state benefits and job losses, Chavez will find himself in serious trouble. He's made what was once a reasonably diversified economy far too dependent on oil.

I agree that the Canadian tar sands will hurt, although consolidation in that sector will probably bring production costs down enough to keep it going - just to minimize losses on investment.

Some of the people that will really hurt are the hundreds of everyday types who found oil on their land across America, invested in expensive drilling equipment, and expected to be able to pay it off and make a modest profit. That was when oil was $130+.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2008, 09:28 AM
 
Location: state of enlightenment
2,403 posts, read 5,244,224 times
Reputation: 2500
Anybody see Peak Oil lately?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2008, 09:39 AM
 
5,760 posts, read 11,555,173 times
Reputation: 4949
Quote:
Originally Posted by texdav View Post
Chavez was already hurting and this will hurt him further.He really is not very popular in his country. But he will cheat just as so many others did in the oil embargo.I still can't believe that people think Texas produces so much oil ;we peaked in the 1960's.
So who is less popular in their own Country, now? Bush or Chavez?

Out of the mindless politicks and back to energy -- Sure the rough stats are now Texas is producing (actually pulling from the ground) about 1/3 of the 1970 peak of 1MM barrels, annual. About the same as the 1930s, presently. Almost makes a perfect bell curve and a Super example of Peak Oil.

Difference now is it takes over 3 x as many wells just to get the 1930's level as it did then. Along with a lot more tricks. Lots more dollars and technology involved. Means a LOT more well (nyuk, nyuk) paying jobs and money now. At least for now. Part of why Texas is about the last standing job and real estate market in the US.

Oil goes down, and all the present Texas model goes buh, bye. Same with Natural Gas drilling, pipelines and processing across North Texas in the Barnett Shale. Buh, bye.

If this keeps on the current path, Texas will be running about even with, and straight into the hole with Michigan. Been there (and here) and done this game on both ends in the mid 80's.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2008, 09:49 AM
 
78,502 posts, read 60,702,401 times
Reputation: 49828
Where did all the "Oil will be $200 a barrel and we will be rioting and resorting to cannabalism" posts go?

Chavez is very popular in his country by giving handouts to the poor. But his actions long term damage will eventually render the country an even bigger craphole which will be blamed upon someone else as Chavez will (does) have complete control. Think Fidel the 2nd.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2008, 10:37 AM
 
5,760 posts, read 11,555,173 times
Reputation: 4949
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mathguy View Post
Where did all the "Oil will be $200 a barrel and we will be rioting and resorting to cannabalism" posts go?
This rodeo is still in the early rounds, Mathguy.

As the price drops so do the valid supplies.

When you do estimates of what is available and in reserves, it is factored with "at what cost." As noted above, it costs more and more to bring Texas oil up, with less and less coming out.

Jumping into the big picture, at a world wide scale -- Means there may some trillions of barrels left at say $500 a barrel. But maybe only a trillion at say $50 a barrel. Under that, and even less. Those are just sample numbers. No one really knows the exact model and curves until we live them.

This is why you can always tell you are dealing with a bs'er when they start talking about "X or Y years supply." This is a economically recoverable factor involved that matters more than how much goo is left in the ground.

At each build up and collapse the cycles get closer and the peak prices get higher. Do you recall "underdamped" systems from any systems or controls math classes?

The whole Peak Oil model included that if demand dropped faster the the production dropped the prices could stay low all the way down the backside of the Production Bell Curve.

Presently the prices are coming down from demand dropping rather than additional supply or production. While that in itself could be a good thing, in this case it may not.

Sad part demand is dropping not because of better economics or renewable replacements but because the world economy is collapsing even faster.

Keeps going and you may still see that (metaphorically only, hopefully) cannibal, yet.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2008, 10:49 AM
 
48,502 posts, read 96,918,474 times
Reputation: 18305
Chavez's weakness is that he has put so much of his oil money into subdising his popularity;not in investment like the Saudi's for example. But then we will gain alot more from lower oil orices because we are nolonger a big producer really. We peak in production here in Texas in the 60's as did the natio0n as evidenced by our evr increasing oil imports. Much of the new oil here is in the deep gulf of mexico and that is very expensive to produce.Not all oil is same cost to recover nad then ot are oil is eqaul in value. Many take alot more energy and investment in eqauipment to produce a refined product that is sold.Many opeople dont' even realise that we have few refineries that can use the sour crude oil the saudi's produce. We are a huge importer of Canadian oil and other sweet crudes. The oil refinerers are not crazy and are in fact mostly spending money to refine the oil that is from safer ;more stable poil suppliers than those from risky areas.As far as the american consumer we shpuld be thankful that the world consumtion especailly in like China which was buying oil companies just for their oil contratcs has allowed; otherwise gasoline and all crude products would be much higher. Only when aolternatives become competive in energy produed with oil will the world really strt getting off oil to much extent.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:24 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top