Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-04-2009, 11:14 AM
 
18,250 posts, read 16,944,262 times
Reputation: 7554

Advertisements

Quote:
The number of unemployed is approximately 15 million. Not trivial, but not 30 million either.
From noted Harvard law professor Elizabeth Warren:

Quote:
Today, one in five Americans is unemployed, underemployed or just plain out of work.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/elizab..._b_377829.html
Multiply 15 million by five and you get 75 million working-age Americans---out of a population of 315 million! Sounds a tad low, doesn't it?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-04-2009, 11:18 AM
 
Location: Marietta, GA
7,887 posts, read 17,204,546 times
Reputation: 3706
Quote:
Originally Posted by thrillobyte View Post
From noted Harvard law professor Elizabeth Warren
LOL...you buy what a professor at Harvard says, publishing in the Huffington Post, but ignore the official BLS numbers. That's rich.

Employment Situation Summary

"In November, both the number of unemployed persons, at 15.4 million, and the unemployment rate, at 10.0 percent, edged down."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2009, 11:29 AM
 
5,760 posts, read 11,555,173 times
Reputation: 4949
Quote:
Originally Posted by neil0311 View Post
LOL...you buy what a professor at Harvard says, publishing in the Huffington Post, but ignore the official BLS numbers. That's rich.

Employment Situation Summary

"In November, both the number of unemployed persons, at 15.4 million, and the unemployment rate, at 10.0 percent, edged down."

ummm, yeah?

Real Question -- How often and how long do you have to be lied to before you figure out you are dealing with liars?

In other news . . . . The Soviet Wheat Production numbers just keep growing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2009, 12:25 PM
 
12,022 posts, read 11,589,360 times
Reputation: 11136
Actually, the household figures were much better than the establishment survey. The number employed increased 227,000 from October, but that is still down 362,000 from September. It seems to be indicative of a lot of seasonal flux in hiring and layoffs. Usually, the household survey will lead the establishment survey.

Employment Situation Summary
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2009, 12:28 PM
 
12,022 posts, read 11,589,360 times
Reputation: 11136
Quote:
Originally Posted by neil0311 View Post
LOL...you buy what a professor at Harvard says, publishing in the Huffington Post, but ignore the official BLS numbers. That's rich.

Employment Situation Summary

"In November, both the number of unemployed persons, at 15.4 million, and the unemployment rate, at 10.0 percent, edged down."
That's entirely due to 291,000 being reclassified as NOT IN LABOR FORCE; i.e., unemployed and not looking for work last month. It means that they've given up temporarily.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2009, 12:32 PM
 
Location: I think my user name clarifies that.
8,292 posts, read 26,695,563 times
Reputation: 3925
^ It is this kind of numbers dance that pretty much makes all these kinds of articles useless and irrelevant. People distort, misrepresent, and outright lie in order to make numbers say what they want them to say.

You're right. The fact that 291,000 people quit looking for work does not mean that they are no longer unemployed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2009, 12:59 PM
 
3,459 posts, read 5,798,982 times
Reputation: 6677
U3 stats are misleading when we're talking about true unemployment because it ignores the people who were forced to accept part time hours.

A better measure of unemployment is U6, but even that is incomplete because it doesn't count unemployed contractors (1099 employees), fresh grads/teenagers who can't find jobs, undocumented workers, nor the people who were forced to dip into Social Security earlier than they would have liked.

If you took the time to count all these people up, it wouldn't surprise me a bit to see the true unemployment number hovering around 25%.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2009, 01:17 PM
 
Location: I think my user name clarifies that.
8,292 posts, read 26,695,563 times
Reputation: 3925
Quote:
Originally Posted by sterlinggirl View Post
U3 stats are misleading when we're talking about true unemployment because it ignores the people who were forced to accept part time hours.

A better measure of unemployment is U6, but even that is incomplete because it doesn't count unemployed contractors (1099 employees), fresh grads/teenagers who can't find jobs, undocumented workers, nor the people who were forced to dip into Social Security earlier than they would have liked.

If you took the time to count all these people up, it wouldn't surprise me a bit to see the true unemployment number hovering around 25%.
Right. That's another reason that all of these numbers are skewed and can be misrepresented, strictly for the sake of political gain.

We should probably be looking at a bigger picture, and trying to discern trends.

While I truly hope that the trend is toward less unemployment and an improving economy, I'm not sure that's actually the trend.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2009, 02:44 PM
 
18,250 posts, read 16,944,262 times
Reputation: 7554
Quote:
Originally Posted by neil0311 View Post
LOL...you buy what a professor at Harvard says, publishing in the Huffington Post, but ignore the official BLS numbers. That's rich.

Employment Situation Summary

"In November, both the number of unemployed persons, at 15.4 million, and the unemployment rate, at 10.0 percent, edged down."
Yeah, right! Like a well-respected law professor who heads the Congressional Oversight Panel, who's been fighting for the little guy for 10+years has less credibility than the federal government, who lies to us every chance it gets!!! You're just yanking our collective chain, neil. You don't believe government stats any more than you do the man in the moon so enough already!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2009, 03:07 PM
 
975 posts, read 1,756,353 times
Reputation: 524
Didn't a bunch of Harvard MBAs cause this mess?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top