Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-17-2011, 12:57 PM
 
3,189 posts, read 4,983,145 times
Reputation: 1032

Advertisements

Nameless Republican Ties Obama in 2012 Election Preferences

Young voters less supportive of his re-election than of his election in 2008

February 16, 2011

PRINCETON, NJ -- U.S. registered voters are evenly split about whether they would back President Barack Obama for re-election in 2012 (45%) or "the Republican Party's candidate" (45%).

Obama: 45%

Republican: 45%

Other: 4%

No Opinion: 6%

Read More: Nameless Republican Ties Obama in 2012 Election Preferences
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-17-2011, 12:59 PM
 
Location: Long Island (chief in S Farmingdale)
22,190 posts, read 19,466,581 times
Reputation: 5305
As other polls have shown, no name/ Generic Republican does better than named ones.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2011, 01:03 PM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
20,892 posts, read 16,080,363 times
Reputation: 3954
Since any generic nameless Republican has higher positives and lower negatives than any named specific Republican, it's funny to see you post this as if it was good news for Republicans.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2011, 01:07 PM
 
10,854 posts, read 9,303,308 times
Reputation: 3122
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smash255 View Post
As other polls have shown, no name/ Generic Republican does better than named ones.
Too bad they can run one in the election. They'd probably be better off than the current slate of candidates.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2011, 01:08 PM
 
3,189 posts, read 4,983,145 times
Reputation: 1032
Quote:
Originally Posted by HistorianDude View Post
Since any generic nameless Republican has higher positives and lower negatives than any named specific Republican, it's funny to see you post this as if it was good news for Republicans.

I only recall posting the RESULTS without any bias in who it was good news for.

Did you read that someplace else?

I also don't see the positives/negatives of anyone listed at my link?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2011, 01:10 PM
 
Location: Long Island (chief in S Farmingdale)
22,190 posts, read 19,466,581 times
Reputation: 5305
Quote:
Originally Posted by KoobleKar View Post
I only recall posting the RESULTS without any bias in who it was good news for.

Did you read that someplace else?

I also don't see the positives/negatives of anyone listed at my link?
Polls of either side generally show Generic candidates doing better than named ones. Its basically polling 101.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2011, 01:12 PM
 
6,129 posts, read 6,812,053 times
Reputation: 10821
I get why professional campaign managers would need this information, but we all know how much can change between now and when the real voting starts. So to me these polls means nothing really. Its all about what the parties do with the information.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2011, 01:18 PM
 
Location: Marlborough, MA
871 posts, read 3,018,814 times
Reputation: 958
No-name Republican, iconic Republican, makes no difference. I will stake all I own on the fact that Barack will win it again in 2012. Check back with me then.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2011, 01:22 PM
 
3,189 posts, read 4,983,145 times
Reputation: 1032
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smash255 View Post
Polls of either side generally show Generic candidates doing better than named ones. Its basically polling 101.
You can make what you want of it.

I provided nothing but the results and I didn't write the headline.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2011, 01:24 PM
 
3,189 posts, read 4,983,145 times
Reputation: 1032
Quote:
Originally Posted by eloyfan View Post
I will stake all I own on the fact that Barack will win it again in 2012. Check back with me then.

That's nice...thanks for sharing.

But those words might be more prophetic than you realize. You just might actually be staking everything you own, or once owned on that vote.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:42 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top