Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Despite her claims of opposing government interference and waste, her family receives farm subsidy $$$ and she's made no effort to end that waste. A classic case of "SOCIALISM! is baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaad except when it benefits me"
Her father-in-law's corporation receives a farm subsidy. Should every shareholder of every corporation that ever received a government tax subsidy or payment be similarly accountable? If so that a lot of liberals caught in the hypocrisy loop. Anyone who has an invested pension or retirement fund.
Frankly, if you ever even owned a vehicle that ran on subsidized gas (ethanol or big oil) or produced by a manufacturer that took a bailout from the US government you are guilty of being a hypocrit with your post.
Vote away all the farm subsidies (along with food stamps) and you have no more reason to complain. I know one Kansas farmer feeds 128 people plus you. How many people do you feed?
Crazy person actually follows the law. Hey, I'm against drug laws doesn't mean I'm going out to shoot up. Look kiddies if this is all ya got, you are in one heck if a mess. This stuff versus 9.1% unemployment? I think you guys need to pick up your game.
Telling other people to break the law, when you are a lawyer as well as a member of Congress, may skirt breaking the law, but it's not exactly ethical. And yet that's exactly what she did when advising people not to complete the 2010 census.
All (D)'s and (R)'s aside: We really need to keep religious lunacy out of Washington.
Then the only candidate worth considering (unless you want to see Obama finish destroying this county, its currency, and its economy for a Dictatorship the likes of Chavez) is Ron Paul, plain and simple. The man cannot be bought or corrupted and adheres to our Constitution.
Then the only candidate worth considering (unless you want to see Obama finish destroying this county, its currency, and its economy for a Dictatorship the likes of Chavez) is Ron Paul, plain and simple. The man cannot be bought or corrupted and adheres to our Constitution.
I 10000% agree with this.
We need more him, and less of what we have and what we might have.
Telling other people to break the law, when you are a lawyer as well as a member of Congress, may skirt breaking the law, but it's not exactly ethical. And yet that's exactly what she did when advising people not to complete the 2010 census.
Well of course she did no such thing. She committed an act of civil disobedience, but of course she didn't encourage anyone to follow suit.
I think Bachmann believes that she has a religious and moral obligation to submit to her husband, no matter how much she disagrees with him. Living in the land of fundamentalists, I've known many women who share this belief. I'd like to hear from Bachmann where she draws the line and thinks her judgment supercedes her husband's. Because if she doesn't draw a line, then why is she running for President instead of her husband?
I think you're taking what you perceive she said and running with it, not caring to stop and think about what she actually said.
She said she submits to her husband in spiritual matters. So what? There can be only one leader, and it just so happens that God said the man has the role. Nobody is saying a man is superior, or that she submits to him in every area of life. Do you honestly think she calls him to ask how to vote in congress now?
I think you're taking what you perceive she said and running with it, not caring to stop and think about what she actually said.
She said she submits to her husband in spiritual matters. So what? There can be only one leader, and it just so happens that God said the man has the role. Nobody is saying a man is superior, or that she submits to him in every area of life. Do you honestly think she calls him to ask how to vote in congress now?
There you go throwing water on the liberal slam Bachman party. How dare you bring truth and common sense into the discussion.
Originally Posted by lifelongMOgal Predictable deflection from the thread topic
Quote:
Originally Posted by lifelongMOgal Is deflection all you have?
Quote:
Originally Posted by lifelongMOgal Nice deflection,
Quote:
Originally Posted by lifelongMOgal Care to actually address the thread topic ...or are you just doing the usual deflection and thread hijacking?
Quote:
Originally Posted by lifelongMOgal Deflection alert!
Quote:
Originally Posted by lifelongMOgal Awwwwwwww.........another topic deflection
Quote:
Originally Posted by lifelongMOgal Deflection perhaps?
Quote:
Originally Posted by lifelongMOgal Cute deflection
Quote:
Originally Posted by lifelongMOgal Nice deflection from the real subject at hand.
.
Wow...you've clearly been saving up for this for a while
Then the only candidate worth considering (unless you want to see Obama finish destroying this county, its currency, and its economy for a Dictatorship the likes of Chavez) is Ron Paul, plain and simple. The man cannot be bought or corrupted and adheres to our Constitution.
Voters are concerned about Ron Paul's age. Would he be a good veep?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
is baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaad except when it benefits me" 
