Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
It really boggles my mind how Gingrich became the anti-Romney choice. They accuse Romney of flip-flopping and liberal positions and then they come up with Newt who is a flip-flopper and closet liberal, plus adulterer and one who cheated the taxpayer (Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac), amongst other things. If Romney is bad, Newt is 10x worse.
Gingrich and Romney should debate each other directly. Face to face to face to face.
They might but it's not going to be on Newt's terms which is what he is demanding. He wants to dictate the moderator, the venue, the format...not going to happen that way.
Gingrich and Romney should debate each other directly. Face to face to face to face.
What would that prove? Who is the better debater? Look at their history to see what kind of an executive they would be. Look at what they've done, not at the song they are singing to you now.
What would that prove? Who is the better debater? Look at their history to see what kind of an executive they would be. Look at what they've done, not at the song they are singing to you now.
You seem to miss the point. Two people, four faces.... come on, at least a snicker.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
