Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-16-2011, 09:07 PM
 
Location: Gone
25,231 posts, read 16,959,589 times
Reputation: 5932

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by godofthunder9010 View Post
Well it entirely depends. Their right to choose what?

I'm all for the right to choose what outfit they want to wear and what shoes they want to go with it. I support the right of women date or marry whoever they want to, go to school or not go to school and to go to work or not go to work.

I firmly believe that it is a woman's God-given right to choose to go the the beach. It would be unethical to take away a woman's right to decide whether to shave her legs, wax or just leave em natural. And if women in this nation want to go to Burger King and pays her $4 for a Whopper then she damn well better get a Whopper!!

I'm all for women's choice on the vast majority of issues.
But, you are against her right to chose wether or not to have a baby. Gatta Ya, understood.
Reminder: as a man it is not Your choice to make, you can never walk in her shoes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-16-2011, 09:22 PM
 
Location: Free From The Oppressive State
30,293 posts, read 23,777,638 times
Reputation: 38758
Quote:
Originally Posted by Casper in Dallas View Post
But, you are against her right to chose wether or not to have a baby. Gatta Ya, understood.
Reminder: as a man it is not Your choice to make, you can never walk in her shoes.
She made that choice when she had sex.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-16-2011, 09:32 PM
 
Location: Chicago Area
12,687 posts, read 6,746,317 times
Reputation: 6594
Quote:
Originally Posted by Casper in Dallas View Post
But, you are against her right to chose wether or not to have a baby. Gatta Ya, understood.
Reminder: as a man it is not Your choice to make, you can never walk in her shoes.
A woman does not have a right to take her newborn baby, roast him and eat him. That would be an insane level of inhuman behavior. And above all else, she is ending a life that is not her own. Nobody has the right to do that.

Do I have a right to call the police if I see a woman doing that?

Apparently not. I'm not a woman, I'll never be a mother, therefore I'll never really understand. Far be it from me to disagree with her choice to cook and eat her baby. Only other women have the right to disagree with her.

Did I mention that I respect a woman's right to shut up and go make me a sandwich?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-16-2011, 09:36 PM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,690,714 times
Reputation: 18521
Sounds like he wishes to destroy the Progressive dream!


Those are the 10 reasons I'm voting for the guy.

Individual liberty. No more PC crap, or clumping us into groups, to pick who is going to get the bounty of the pillaging.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-16-2011, 09:44 PM
 
Location: Gone
25,231 posts, read 16,959,589 times
Reputation: 5932
Quote:
Originally Posted by Three Wolves In Snow View Post
She made that choice when she had sex.
Nope, but your statement says you have a narrow POV on the subject, and are either ignoring all the facts or don't care about them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-16-2011, 09:46 PM
 
Location: Gone
25,231 posts, read 16,959,589 times
Reputation: 5932
Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
Sounds like he wishes to destroy the Progressive dream!


Those are the 10 reasons I'm voting for the guy.

Individual liberty. No more PC crap, or clumping us into groups, to pick who is going to get the bounty of the pillaging.
Yesw, we already know you are against PC. The DNC thanks you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-16-2011, 09:46 PM
 
2,643 posts, read 2,446,439 times
Reputation: 1928
Ron Paul is looney tunes. I agree with some of his statements but this guy would destroy America and send us back to the 1700s.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-16-2011, 09:47 PM
 
Location: Gone
25,231 posts, read 16,959,589 times
Reputation: 5932
Quote:
Originally Posted by godofthunder9010 View Post
A woman does not have a right to take her newborn baby, roast him and eat him. That would be an insane level of inhuman behavior. And above all else, she is ending a life that is not her own. Nobody has the right to do that.

Do I have a right to call the police if I see a woman doing that?

Apparently not. I'm not a woman, I'll never be a mother, therefore I'll never really understand. Far be it from me to disagree with her choice to cook and eat her baby. Only other women have the right to disagree with her.

Did I mention that I respect a woman's right to shut up and go make me a sandwich?
Thanks for clarifying your position
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-16-2011, 09:56 PM
 
Location: Chicago Area
12,687 posts, read 6,746,317 times
Reputation: 6594
Quote:
Originally Posted by Casper in Dallas View Post
Thanks for clarifying your position
Hey, we gotta stand up for that mother's rights! That baby surely would have turned out to be an unwanted burden on her, poor thing. We can't have that now can we? Babies are awfully inconvenient things. What gives them the right to ruin everything in their mother's life?

Glad you agree with me on all of this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-16-2011, 10:31 PM
 
674 posts, read 1,056,930 times
Reputation: 480
My favorite part of attacking Ron Paul is all of the...

"BUT HE WANTS TO ELIMINATE THIS ENTIRE GOVERNMENT AGENCY" - ...yes, in favor of a less bureaucratic system that would better cater to the people. I assure you Ron Paul does not just want to eliminate social security so that all of his golf buddies can go broke and be homeless.

and

"BUT HE WANTS TO REPEAL THIS PIECE OF LEGISLATION" ...yes, that would be replaced with more effective legislation that would most likely be void of loopholes and enforceable.

Those were 10 reasons not to read that blog ever again. That's what that pile of bong sh** was.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:37 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top