Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I am not surprised. The other three candidates are *******s.
As a person that has only voted Republican and is right-center politically, it hurts me to say this, but the party itseld has nothing on Obama right now, which is why they are bringing up issues which haven't been important in decades.
The only way this party can regain massive support, mostly the independent vote which decides races, is to leave God in church and take on more libertarian beliefs.
This is different. That is people claiming that a single polling company that openly claims to be an ally of the Democrats will naturally favor Democrats.
There are Ron Paul supporters claiming that ALL of the polls and exit/Entrance Polls are deliberately skewed to hold back Ron Paul.
When you go that extreme, you really have to wonder.
I don't want to belabor it, but like I said I haven't seen what you have said stated. There is a bias, however and not considering that would be a mistake in my view. If you have researched in the past at polling issues you might find somethings. You might also look into the Big 6 and the NEP.
Then the big money connections through a variety of ways. I don't think the D and R game matters much. It is like Ventura put it they are the WWF. It's a show, there is little difference. Left and Right isn't what the real game is about.
Try to have an open mind maybe. I understand why you say what you do because people get conditioned. Just look at chimps and they can teach you alot about humanity.
Someone on here was claiming the conspiracy thing also, then in the same breathe claimed RP supporters weren't real, but were bots or something "spamming for our god".
I don't want to belabor it, but like I said I haven't seen what you have said stated. There is a bias, however and not considering that would be a mistake in my view. If you have researched in the past at polling issues you might find somethings. You might also look into the Big 6 and the NEP.
Then the big money connections through a variety of ways. I don't think the D and R game matters much. It is like Ventura put it they are the WWF. It's a show, there is little difference. Left and Right isn't what the real game is about.
Try to have an open mind maybe. I understand why you say what you do because people get conditioned. Just look at chimps and they can teach you alot about humanity.
Are you talking about the 1 person who uses the word "fudging"? That's everybody claiming a conspiracy against Paul? Sorry I don't agree w/ that.
I mean much supports there is a bias. There is much at stake and polls are used to directly match voting. Obviously this isn't a black and white 100% thing, but voter "fraud" is rampant and quite easy to pull off, especially when you have same grp in control and are using computers. Computers make manipulation and fraud quite easy. It's more like driving a bus, you don't need much steering when you have things in your control.
Now watch this video which was a live video broadcast from an Iowa radio station in which the people plainly state that the GOP blackmailed Iowans into not voting for Ron Paul by telling them that if they did, then Iowa might likely lose its place in the nomination process. And not only that, but they openly admit that the GOP leaders where "silently asking those district chaimen to start swaying some important concuss members over to the ""ANTI-PAUL" side" ... And what happened the next day? Out of nowhere Santorum surges into victory, though he was polling last in Iowa up until that very day.
And all the voter fraud evidence that we have had since then? This is the very definition of conspiracy as posted above and not so much against Ron Paul - though they openly admit to their being the "ANTI-Ron Paul" side - as against the democratic process and the American people.
People ignoring the facts only make it more obvious that they are disingenuous.
Lets define conspiracy ...
Now watch this video which was a live video broadcast from an Iowa radio station in which the people plainly state that the GOP blackmailed Iowans into not voting for Ron Paul by telling them that if they did, then Iowa might likely lose its place in the nomination process. And not only that, but they openly admit that the GOP leaders where "silently asking those district chaimen to start swaying some important concuss members over to the ""ANTI-PAUL" side" ... And what happened the next day? Out of nowhere Santorum surges into victory, though he was polling last in Iowa up until that very day.
And all the voter fraud evidence that we have had since then? This is the very definition of conspiracy as posted above and not so much against Ron Paul - though they openly admit to their being the "ANTI-Ron Paul" side - as against the democratic process and the American people.
This would suggest that those who were going to vote for Mr. Paul were spineless toads easily influenced by the GOP party leaders.
This is what I am trying to understand - it is clear, at least from this forum, that Mr. Paul's supporters are a very vocal bunch. If this sort of voter manipulation was going on, where are these people to trumpet how their candidate was robbed?
Where are their exit interviews? And, I'm not just talking Iowa, but, where are they from Maine, Florida, Nevada...?
Why do polls now consistently show Mr. Paul dead last for the most part?
Lots of pollsters are calling cell phones now so it's not like they are only talking to older people.
Seriously, inquiring minds really want to know: why such a discrepancy between then and now?
This would suggest that those who were going to vote for Mr. Paul were spineless toads easily influenced by the GOP party leaders.
This is what I am trying to understand - it is clear, at least from this forum, that Mr. Paul's supporters are a very vocal bunch. If this sort of voter manipulation was going on, where are these people to trumpet how their candidate was robbed?
Where are their exit interviews? And, I'm not just talking Iowa, but, where are they from Maine, Florida, Nevada...?
Why do polls now consistently show Mr. Paul dead last for the most part?
Lots of pollsters are calling cell phones now so it's not like they are only talking to older people.
Seriously, inquiring minds really want to know: why such a discrepancy between then and now?
You certainly suppose a lot without any facts. Not every person who is leaning towards Paul is as passionate about his presidency as others. It could have been anything from sweet heart deals, to threats, to out right bribery, to miscounting the actual votes themselves ... All of which happened in Iowa and in other states since ... And not only against Paul.
Still the video i posted above is all the evidence anyone needs to know the GOP party leaders are "anti Ron Paul", and will do anything they can collectively and conspiratorially to try and make sure he doesn't win the Nomination, and they have openly admitted as much, as have the MSM.
The fact that you continue to deny the facts is evidence of your own intellectual dishonesty, and the fact that you are in reality morally complicate in the fraud being perpetrated on the American people.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
