Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-19-2012, 10:47 AM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
20,054 posts, read 18,282,893 times
Reputation: 3826

Advertisements

Apparently, 3 polls have Gingrich ahead of Romney. Guess Romney's ex-advisor was right that Romney won't win SC.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-19-2012, 10:57 AM
 
Location: Tampa Florida
22,229 posts, read 17,855,263 times
Reputation: 4585
Perry may support the Grinch, but Perry backers seem to be moving to Romney. I suspect this is just one of many. This is too bad, it would be fun to watch Obama make a bumbling idiot of Newt in debates.

Key Perry supporter will back Romney – CNN Political Ticker - CNN.com Blogs
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2012, 10:59 AM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
20,054 posts, read 18,282,893 times
Reputation: 3826
Quote:
Originally Posted by florida.bob View Post
Perry may support the Grinch, but Perry backers seem to be moving to Romney. I suspect this is just one of many. This is too bad, it would be fun to watch Obama make a bumbling idiot of Newt in debates.

Key Perry supporter will back Romney – CNN Political Ticker - CNN.com Blogs
There are many many bad things about Newt, but there is no reality (current or alternate) where Obama can win a debate against Newt.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2012, 11:10 AM
 
Location: Chicago Area
12,687 posts, read 6,734,867 times
Reputation: 6594
Quote:
Originally Posted by summers73 View Post
Apparently, 3 polls have Gingrich ahead of Romney. Guess Romney's ex-advisor was right that Romney won't win SC.
Speaking from a completely neutral point of view, Mitt Romney is a very different candidate from past candidates. Everyone else needs the South to win the nomination. Mitt doesn't and any pathway to the nomination for him concedes that he probably loses most of the South. In order to be a real threat to Mitt, Gingrich has to beat him in Florida and Nevada.

Nevada is a total role reversal when it comes to one of Newt's biggest advantages: Religion. Mormons are the single most dominant religion in Nevada and you can bet they don't appreciate Evangelicals demonizing their religion in their efforts to destroy Romney purely on a religious basis.

Gingrich also doesn't have a strong foothold in the North, but Romney should do very well there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2012, 11:15 AM
 
Location: Tampa Florida
22,229 posts, read 17,855,263 times
Reputation: 4585
Quote:
Originally Posted by summers73 View Post
There are many many bad things about Newt, but there is no reality (current or alternate) where Obama can win a debate against Newt.
Unlikely we will ever find out. By the way, just because Newt says he is a great debater, doesn't make him one. Newt's debate technique is simply, if he has no answer or valid argument, he just deflects condescendingly and implies the opponent is too dumb to understand the subject. I use the same technique quite often.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2012, 11:23 AM
 
9,879 posts, read 8,018,970 times
Reputation: 2521
Quote:
Originally Posted by tmsterp View Post
I loved his responses to the overt race-bating by the moderators. I didn't think of Newt's characterization of Obama as a food stamp president as having anything to do with race. Only liberals seem to see that. That's usually how it is really. Conservatives will make racially benign comment about helping those who are poor and the liberals are the ones to make it racist.
I thought the "food stamp" applause/exchange was of the lowest
common denominator I have seen at any debate.
Stand up and applaud that - I don't think so....


Newt Gingrich to Juan Williams: Americans Want Paychecks, Not Foodstamps - YouTube

Yes, hunger is universal - no color need be attached, but the
most disturbing is that Newt brings up "food stamps" with such callous disregard.


White Poverty Statistics in the U.S. - YouTube

I wonder how many of these people will be opening up "doughnut shops"....Newt - what an ass.

Last edited by pollyrobin; 01-19-2012 at 11:31 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2012, 11:34 AM
 
Location: Texas
38,859 posts, read 25,538,911 times
Reputation: 24780
Quote:
Originally Posted by summers73 View Post
Good deal.

Newt needs to siphon away some of Romney's momentum. This will allow Paul enough opportunity to catch up and overtake Mittens.

Honestly, I'd like to see Dr Paul as the GOP nominee. It would make for an election with a distinct choice. And some really good debates. Sadly, I don't think there's much chance that the GOP would ever nominate Paul.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2012, 11:36 AM
 
Location: SC
9,101 posts, read 16,457,116 times
Reputation: 3620
Quote:
Originally Posted by Randomstudent View Post
It is a narrow lead within the MoE, but this and Santorum's belated victory in Iowa shatters the myth of Romney inevitability in the GOP primary.

Poll: Gingrich takes the lead in South Carolina | The Augusta Chronicle
What all the articles and polls leave out is that Gingrich and Santorum, not being on the ballots in three big states are UNELECTABLE. This point needs to be DRIVEN through peoples thick skulls again and again!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2012, 11:45 AM
 
Location: Northern CA
12,770 posts, read 11,564,791 times
Reputation: 4262
Quote:
Originally Posted by emilybh View Post
What all the articles and polls leave out is that Gingrich and Santorum, not being on the ballots in three big states are UNELECTABLE. This point needs to be DRIVEN through peoples thick skulls again and again!
You're right, I forgot about that. And if more states demand eligibility proof like Georgia, perhaps Obama won't be on the ballot either! Let the good times roll.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2012, 12:20 PM
 
791 posts, read 460,709 times
Reputation: 141
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sco View Post
It is amazing that the overt racism that Newt displayed during the most recent debate is working out so well for him in SC. It tells you a lot about the voters of SC and the south in general.
Your generalizations only hold water in your own mind...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:14 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top