Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-26-2012, 05:48 AM
 
Location: Charlotte
12,642 posts, read 15,597,739 times
Reputation: 1680

Advertisements

Seeking Taxes, Romney went after Business - NYTimes
Quote:
Much of the business community in Massachusetts was puzzled. Mitt Romney, a Republican with high-caliber corporate credentials, had run for governor pledging to sweep aside barriers to business and act as the state’s “top salesman.”

But just a few months after Mr. Romney took office in 2003, what he delivered seemed anything but friendly to the C.E.O. crowd: a bill to financial firms for what they saw as $110 million in new corporate taxes — and a promise of more to come.

“How could he do this to businesses as a business guy?” Joe Casey, then a top executive at a Massachusetts bank, Seacoast Financial, recalled asking colleagues whose companies had to pay up.

Mr. Norquist regards the changes as tax hikes.

“They changed the laws and the rules to significantly raise taxes,” he said. “That is a tax increase.”
Would Romney go against his pledge and raise taxes on US Corporations?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-26-2012, 06:38 AM
 
Location: Hoboken
19,890 posts, read 18,750,872 times
Reputation: 3146
Quote:
Originally Posted by walidm View Post
Seeking Taxes, Romney went after Business - NYTimes

Would Romney go against his pledge and raise taxes on US Corporations?

The left should be tickled, isn't that what you want? Sheesh, can't make lefties happy.

What an unreasonable guy. From your link.

"An examination of the period reveals a more complicated picture. It shows a governor who sometimes put the need to find new revenues ahead of the conservative argument that tax increases almost by definition kill jobs; a shrewd financial manager who aides said was guided by a strong sense of rectitude, not just pragmatism; and a political aspirant willing to buck the orthodoxies of his own party — at least, state lawmakers said,"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-26-2012, 06:48 AM
 
25,021 posts, read 27,930,716 times
Reputation: 11790
Quote:
Originally Posted by shorebaby View Post
The left should be tickled, isn't that what you want? Sheesh, can't make lefties happy.

What an unreasonable guy. From your link.

"An examination of the period reveals a more complicated picture. It shows a governor who sometimes put the need to find new revenues ahead of the conservative argument that tax increases almost by definition kill jobs; a shrewd financial manager who aides said was guided by a strong sense of rectitude, not just pragmatism; and a political aspirant willing to buck the orthodoxies of his own party — at least, state lawmakers said,"
He's making the point that Romney is the Republican version of Obama when it comes to campaign promises and going 180° on them after being elected
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-26-2012, 06:51 AM
 
Location: Hoboken
19,890 posts, read 18,750,872 times
Reputation: 3146
Quote:
Originally Posted by theunbrainwashed View Post
He's making the point that Romney is the Republican version of Obama when it comes to campaign promises and going 180° on them after being elected
He would be wrong. Romney did the exact same thing Reagan did. Reagan closed loopholes. I hate to break it to you, Ron Paul will never be President.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-26-2012, 06:52 AM
 
Location: Charlotte
12,642 posts, read 15,597,739 times
Reputation: 1680
Quote:
For the next three years, the Romney administration relentlessly scoured the tax code for more loopholes, extracting hundreds of millions of corporate dollars to help close budget gaps in a state with a struggling economy.

It was only after Mr. Romney was gearing up in 2005 for a possible White House bid that he backed away from some of his most assertive tax enforcement proposals amid intensifying complaints from local companies and conservative antitax groups in Washington.
hmm...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-26-2012, 06:55 AM
 
Location: Hoboken
19,890 posts, read 18,750,872 times
Reputation: 3146
Quote:
Originally Posted by walidm View Post
hmm...

I still don't get lefties, they can't take yes for an answer. Shrug.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-26-2012, 07:18 AM
 
Location: pensacola,florida
3,202 posts, read 4,433,628 times
Reputation: 1671
Yes i'm sure corporations have more to fear from Romneys tax policies then Obamas.....yeah...ok
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-26-2012, 07:44 AM
 
Location: Charlotte
12,642 posts, read 15,597,739 times
Reputation: 1680
Lightbulb hmm...

Quote:
Originally Posted by imbobbbb View Post
Yes i'm sure corporations have more to fear from Romneys tax policies then Obamas.....yeah...ok
The economists and business leaders don't seem to agree with your opinion.

Quote:
“Changing the rules and being more aggressive with loopholes sent a message to larger companies,” said Michael P. Hogan, the former chief executive of MassDevelopment, a state-financed group that worked closely with the Romney administration to market the state to companies. “It was a little bit of a step back.”

The impact of closing the loopholes, which produced a relatively small fraction of state revenues, is an open question. “It cost us jobs,” said David G. Tuerck, an economist at Suffolk University in Boston
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-26-2012, 07:46 AM
 
Location: Hoboken
19,890 posts, read 18,750,872 times
Reputation: 3146
Quote:
Originally Posted by walidm View Post
The economists and business leaders don't seem to agree with your opinion.

Well of course you are once again wrong. The quotes you provided in no way compared Obama and Romney tax policy.

Obama is a failure who has cost millions of jobs and added trillions to the debt.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-26-2012, 08:02 AM
 
Location: Greater Washington, DC
1,347 posts, read 1,088,316 times
Reputation: 235
He did it by closing loopholes, the same thing he has said he would do at the federal level... If you don't like it, that's fine, but it certainly doesn't point to any Romney hypocrisy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top